With the values of A, k, ω, and φ, we can sketch the wave at t = 0.
To sketch the wave at t = 0, we need to find the equation of the wave function. The general equation for a sinusoidal wave is y(x,t) = A sin(kx - ωt + φ), where A is the amplitude, k is the wave number, ω is the angular frequency, t is time, and φ is the phase constant.
Given that the wave is traveling in the negative x direction, the wave number k is negative. We can find the wave number using the formula k = 2π/λ, where λ is the wavelength. Plugging in the values, we get k = -2π/35.
The angular frequency ω can be found using the formula ω = 2πf, where f is the frequency. Plugging in the values, we get ω = 24π.
Now, substituting the values of A, k, and ω into the equation, we have y(x,t) = 20 sin(-2π/35 x - 24πt + φ).
To sketch the wave at t = 0, we can substitute t = 0 into the equation. This simplifies the equation to y(x,0) = 20 sin(-2π/35 x + φ).
By substituting x = 0 into the equation and using the given initial condition, we can solve for the phase constant φ. Plugging in the values, we get -3 = 20 sin(φ). Solving this equation, we find that φ = -0.150π.
Now, with the values of A, k, ω, and φ, we can sketch the wave at t = 0.
to learn more about wave
https://brainly.com/question/3639648
#SPJ11
Required information Sheena can row a boat at 200 mihin still water. She needs to cross a river that is 1.20 mi wide with a current flowing at 1.80 mi/h. Not having her calculator ready, she guesses that to go straight across, she should head upstream at an angle of 25.0" from the direction straight across the river. What is her speed with respect to the starting point on the bank? mih
Sheena's speed with respect to the starting point on the bank is approximately 183.06 mph.
To find Sheena's speed with respect to the starting point on the bank, we can use vector addition.
Let's break down Sheena's velocity into two components: one component parallel to the river's current (upstream) and one component perpendicular to the river's current (crossing).
1. Component parallel to the river's current (upstream):
Since Sheena is heading upstream at an angle of 25.0° from the direction straight across the river, we can calculate the component of her velocity parallel to the current using trigonometry.
Component parallel = Sheena's speed * cos(angle)
Given Sheena's speed in still water is 200 mph, the component parallel to the river's current is:
Component parallel = 200 mph * cos(25.0°)
2. Component perpendicular to the river's current (crossing):
The component perpendicular to the river's current is equal to the current's speed because Sheena wants to cross the river directly.
Component perpendicular = Current's speed
Given the current's speed is 1.80 mph, the component perpendicular to the river's current is:
Component perpendicular = 1.80 mph
Now, we can calculate Sheena's speed with respect to the starting point on the bank by adding the two components together:
Sheena's speed = Component parallel + Component perpendicular
Sheena's speed = (200 mph * cos(25.0°)) + 1.80 mph
Calculating the values:
Sheena's speed = (200 mph * 0.9063) + 1.80 mph
Sheena's speed = 181.26 mph + 1.80 mph
Sheena's speed ≈ 183.06 mph
Therefore, Sheena's speed with respect to the starting point on the bank is approximately 183.06 mph.
Learn more about speed from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ11
A straight wire carrying a 2.7 A current is placed in a uniform magnetic field of magnitude 0.35 T directed perpendicular to the wire. (a) Find the magnitude of the magnetic force on a section of the wire having a length of 13 cm. (b) Explain why you can't determine the direction of the magnetic force from the information given in the problem.
(a) The magnitude of the magnetic force on the wire section is approximately 0.127 N.
(b) The direction of the magnetic force cannot be determined without information about the orientation of the wire and the direction of the current.
(a) The magnitude of the magnetic force (F) on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field can be calculated using the formula:
F = I × L × B × sin(θ)
Where:
I is the current in the wire,
L is the length of the wire segment,
B is the magnitude of the magnetic field, and
θ is the angle between the direction of the current and the magnetic field.
Given that the current (I) is 2.7 A, the length (L) is 13 cm (or 0.13 m), and the magnetic field (B) is 0.35 T, and the wire is placed perpendicular to the magnetic field (θ = 90°), we can calculate the magnitude of the magnetic force:
F = 2.7 A × 0.13 m × 0.35 T × sin(90°)
F ≈ 0.127 N
Therefore, the magnitude of the magnetic force on the wire section is approximately 0.127 N.
(b) The given information does not provide the orientation or direction of the wire with respect to the magnetic field. The direction of the magnetic force depends on the direction of the current and the direction of the magnetic field, which are not specified in the problem statement. Therefore, without knowing the orientation of the wire or the direction of the current, we cannot determine the direction of the magnetic force.
Learn more about Magnetic field here: https://brainly.com/question/30236241
#SPJ11
Inside a compressed chamber or vessel, with fixed volume, there is one mole of a gas. Then, another mole is added by opening a valve at the same time the temperature is increased from 25°C to 75°C. How the final pressure of the system will compare or relate to the initial pressure of the system? Meaning; what is P2 in terms of P₁? a. P2=1.71P1 b. P2=0.5P1 c. P2=6P1 d. P2=2.34P1 e. P2=2P1
If I have 1 m³ of fresh water, it will weight 1 kg. True / False
The final pressure (P2) is approximately 2.34 times the initial pressure (P1). We can use the ideal gas law, which states: PV = nRT. Regarding the statement about the weight of fresh water, it is False.
To determine the relationship between the final pressure (P2) and the initial pressure (P1) of the gas inside the compressed chamber, we can use the ideal gas law, which states:
PV = nRT
Where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles of gas, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature.
Since the volume is fixed in this case, we can simplify the equation to:
P/T = nR/V
Assuming the amount of gas (moles) doubles from one mole to two moles and the temperature increases from 25°C (298 K) to 75°C (348 K), we can set up a ratio between the initial and final conditions:
(P2/T2) / (P1/T1) = (n2R/V) / (n1R/V)
Since n2/n1 = 2 and canceling out the R and V terms, we have:
(P2/T2) / (P1/T1) = 2
Rearranging the equation, we find:
P2/P1 = (T2/T1) * 2
Substituting the given temperatures, we get:
P2/P1 = (348 K / 298 K) * 2
P2/P1 = 1.17 * 2
P2/P1 ≈ 2.34
Therefore, the final pressure (P2) is approximately 2.34 times the initial pressure (P1).
Regarding the statement about the weight of fresh water, it is False. The density of water is approximately 1000 kg/m³, which means that 1 m³ of fresh water will weigh 1000 kg, not 1 kg.
To learn more about ideal gas law click here
https://brainly.com/question/30458409
#SPJ11
A marble rolls on the track as shown in the picture with hb = 0.4 m and hc = 0.44 m. The ball is initially rolling with a speed of 4.4 m/s at point a.
What is the speed of the marble at point B?
What is the speed of the marble at point C?: B С hB hc 1 - А
The speed of the marble at point B is approximately 2.79 m/s, and the speed of the marble at point C is approximately 2.20 m/s.
To calculate the speed of the marble at point B, we can use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy, which states that the total mechanical energy (sum of kinetic energy and potential energy) remains constant in the absence of non-conservative forces like friction.
At point A, the marble has an initial speed of 4.4 m/s. At point B, the marble is at a higher height (hB = 0.4 m) compared to point A. Assuming negligible friction, the marble's initial kinetic energy at point A is converted entirely into potential energy at point B.
Using the conservation of mechanical energy, we equate the initial kinetic energy to the potential energy at point B: (1/2)mv^2 = mghB, where m is the mass of the marble, v is the speed at point B, and g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Simplifying the equation, we find v^2 = 2ghB. Substituting the given values, we have v^2 = 2 * 9.8 * 0.4, which gives v ≈ 2.79 m/s. Therefore, the speed of the marble at point B is approximately 2.79 m/s.
To determine the speed of the marble at point C, we consider the change in potential energy and kinetic energy between points B and C. At point C, the marble is at a higher height (hc = 0.44 m) compared to point B.
Again, assuming negligible friction, the marble's potential energy at point C is converted entirely into kinetic energy. Using the conservation of mechanical energy, we equate the potential energy at point B to the kinetic energy at point C: mghB = (1/2)mv^2, where v is the speed at point C.
Canceling the mass (m) from both sides of the equation, we find ghB = (1/2)v^2. Substituting the given values, we have 9.8 * 0.4 = (1/2)v^2. Solving for v, we find v ≈ 2.20 m/s. Therefore, the speed of the marble at point C is approximately 2.20 m/s.
Learn more about speed here; brainly.com/question/28224010
#SPJ11
Q6. Consider two sequences x[n] = {-2 4 1}; 0 ≤ n ≤ 2 y[n] = {1 2 3 4}; 0 ≤ n ≤ 3
(a) Find z[n] = x[n]y[n] using the DFT-based method (b) Verify the answer in part(a) with the Tabular method
x[n] = {-2, 4, 1} , 0 ≤ n ≤ 2, y[n] = {1, 2, 3, 4} , 0 ≤ n ≤ 3, z[n] = x[n]*y[n], we need to calculate the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) of both the sequences and then multiply them point by point.
Thus, let's begin by finding DFT of both the sequences. DFT of x[n]:
X[k] = ∑n=0N-1 x[n]e-j2πnk/N,
where N is the length of the sequence x[n].
Here, N = 3.
Thus, X[k] = x[0]e-j2π0k/3 + x[1]e-j2π1k/3 + x[2]e-j2π2k/3
By substituting the given values, we get,
X[0] = -2 + 4 + e-j2π(2/3)kX[1]
= -2 + 4e-j2π/3k + e-j4π/3kX[2]
= -2 + 4e-j4π/3k + e-j2π/3kDFT of y[n]:
Y[k] = ∑n=0N-1 y[n]e-j2πnk/N,
where N is the length of the sequence y[n].
Here, N = 4.
Thus, Y[k] = y[0]e-j2π0k/4 + y[1]e-j2π1k/4 + y[2]e-j2π2k/4 + y[3]e-j2π3k/4
By substituting the given values, we get,
Y[0]
= 10Y[1]
= 1 + 3e-jπ/2kY[2]
= 1 - 2e-jπkY[3]
= 1 + 3ejπ/2k
Now, to find the product z[n], we multiply X[k] and Y[k] point by point. We get,
Z[0] = X[0]Y[0] = -20Z[1] = X[1]Y[1]
= -4 + 4e-jπ/2k + e-j2π/3k + 6e-j4π/3kZ[2]
= X[2]Y[2]
= -2 + 8e-j2π/3k + 3e-j4π/3k + 4e-j2π/3kZ[3]
= X[3]Y[3] = 0
Thus, z[n] = IDFT(Z[k])= IDFT[-20, -4 + 4e-jπ/2k + e-j2π/3k + 6e-j4π/3k, -2 + 8e-j2π/3k + 3e-j4π/3k + 4e-j2π/3k, 0]
Hence, z[n] = {20 2 -2 0}, 0 ≤ n ≤ 3
(b) To verify the answer found in part(a) using Tabular method, let's construct the multiplication table:
y(n) x(n) {-2} {4} {1} 1 {-2} {-8} {-2} 2 {4} {16} {4} 3 {-2} {-4} {-3} 4 {0} {0} {0}
Now, let's find the IDFT of last row of the table to get the answer.
IDFT[0 0 0] = {0}IDFT[20 2 -2] = {20, 2, -2}IDFT[-2 4 -3] = {-1, -2, -1}IDFT[-8 16 -12] = {-1, -2, -1}Therefore, the z[n] values obtained through both the methods are same.
Learn more about Discrete Fourier Transform:
https://brainly.com/question/32065478
#SPJ11
Determine the shortest length of pipe, open from one end and closed from the other end, which will resonate at 256 Hz (so the first harmonics is 256 Hz ). The speed of sound is 343 m/s.
The radius of the pipe should be approximately 0.66875 meters in order to have the shortest length pipe that resonates at 256 Hz.
To determine the shortest length of a pipe that will resonate at a specific frequency, we can use the formula:
L = (v / (2f)) - r
Where:
L is the length of the pipe
v is the speed of sound
f is the frequency
r is the radius of the pipe
Given:
f = 256 Hz
v = 343 m/s
Therefore , r = (v / (2f)) - L
To find the shortest length of the pipe, we want to minimize r. Therefore, we can assume that the length of the pipe is negligible compared to the wavelength, so L = 0. This assumption holds true when the pipe is open at one end and closed at the other end.
r = (v / (2f))
substitute the known values into the formula:
r = (343 m/s) / (2 * 256 Hz)
r ≈ 0.66875 m
Therefore, the radius of the pipe should be approximately 0.66875 meters in order to have the shortest length pipe that resonates at 256 Hz.
Learn more about shortest length of pipe on the given link:
https://brainly.in/question/35998463
#SPJ11
A resistor and a capacitor are in series with an AC source. The
impedance Z = 5.4Ω at 450 Hz and Z = 16.1 Ω at 10 Hz. Find R and
C.
The resistor (R) is approximately 5.33 Ω and the capacitor (C) is approximately 0.0049 F To find the values of the resistor (R) and capacitor (C) in the given series circuit, we can use the impedance-frequency relationship for resistors and capacitors.
Impedance (Z) for a resistor is given by:
[tex]Z_R[/tex] = R
Impedance (Z) for a capacitor is given by:
[tex]Z_C[/tex]= 1 / (2πfC)
where f is the frequency and C is the capacitance.
Z = 5.4 Ω at 450 Hz
Z = 16.1 Ω at 10 Hz
From the information above, we can set up two equations as follows:
Equation 1: 5.4 Ω = R + 1 / (2π * 450 Hz * C)
Equation 2: 16.1 Ω = R + 1 / (2π * 10 Hz * C)
Simplifying the equations, we have:
Equation 1: R + 1 / (900πC) = 5.4
Equation 2: R + 1 / (20πC) = 16.1
To solve this system of equations, we can subtract Equation 2 from Equation 1:
1 / (900πC) - 1 / (20πC) = 5.4 - 16.1
Simplifying further:
(20πC - 900πC) / (900πC * 20πC) = -10.7
-880πC / (900πC * 20πC) = -10.7
Simplifying and canceling out πC terms:
-880 / (900 * 20) = -10.7
-880 / 18000 = -10.7
Solving for C:
C = -880 / (-10.7 * 18000)
C ≈ 0.0049 F (approximately)
Substituting the value of C into Equation 1, we can solve for R:
R + 1 / (900π * 0.0049 F) = 5.4
R + 1 / (900π * 0.0049 F) = 5.4
Simplifying:
R + 1 / (4.52π) = 5.4
R + 0.0696 = 5.4
R ≈ 5.4 - 0.0696
R ≈ 5.33 Ω (approximately)
Therefore, the resistor (R) is approximately 5.33 Ω and the capacitor (C) is approximately 0.0049 F.
Learn more about resistor here:
https://brainly.com/question/22718604
#SPJ11
A 55-cm side length square coil has 100 turns. An initial uniform magnetic field of strength 13 mT is applied perpendicularly to the plane of the coil. Calculate the magnetic flux through the coil. If the field increases in strength from the initial value to 19 mT in 0.35 s, what average emf is induced in the coil?
The magnetic flux through the coil is 3.9325 *[tex]10^-3[/tex] Weber. he average emf induced in the coil is approximately 5.1857 Volts.
The average emf induced in the coil is approximately 5.1857 Volts. To calculate the magnetic flux through the coil, we can use the formula:
Φ = B * A
where Φ is the magnetic flux, B is the magnetic field strength, and A is the area of the coil.
Given:
Side length of the square coil (l) = 55 cm = 0.55 m
Number of turns in the coil (N) = 100
Initial magnetic field strength (B_initial) = 13 mT = 13 * 10^-3 T
Calculating the magnetic flux:
The area of a square coil is given by A = [tex]l^2.[/tex]
A = (0.55 [tex]m)^2[/tex] = 0.3025 [tex]m^2[/tex]
Now, we can calculate the magnetic flux Φ:
Φ = B_initial * A
= (13 * 10^-3 T) * (0.3025 [tex]m^2[/tex])
= 3.9325 *[tex]10^-3[/tex] Wb
Therefore, the magnetic flux through the coil is 3.9325 *[tex]10^-3[/tex] Weber.
Calculating the average emf induced in the coil:
To calculate the average emf induced in the coil, we can use Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction: emf_average = ΔΦ / Δt
where ΔΦ is the change in magnetic flux and Δt is the change in time.
Given:
Final magnetic field strength (B_final) = 19 mT = 19 * 10^-3 T
Change in time (Δt) = 0.35 s
To calculate ΔΦ, we need to find the final magnetic flux Φ_final:
Φ_final = B_final * A
= (19 * 10^-3 T) * (0.3025 m^2)
= 5.7475 * 10^-3 Wb
Now we can calculate the change in magnetic flux ΔΦ:
ΔΦ = Φ_final - Φ_initial
= 5.7475 * 10^-3 Wb - 3.9325 * [tex]10^-3[/tex] Wb
= 1.815 * 10^-3 Wb
Finally, we can calculate the average emf induced in the coil:
emf_average = ΔΦ / Δt
= (1.815 * [tex]10^-3[/tex] Wb) / (0.35 s)
= 5.1857 V
Therefore, the average emf induced in the coil is approximately 5.1857 Volts.
Learn more about magnetic flux here: brainly.com/question/1596988
#SPJ11
Determine the magnetic diplo moment of the electron orbiting the
proton in a hydrogen atom, assuming the Bohr model. This is in its
lowest energy state, the radius of the orbit is
0.529×10-10 m.
the magnetic dipole moment of the electron orbiting the proton in a hydrogen atom, assuming the Bohr model and in its lowest energy state, is given by: μ = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m^2r)
The magnetic dipole-moment of an electron orbiting a proton in a hydrogen atom can be determined using the Bohr model and the known properties of the electron. In the Bohr model, the angular-momentum of the electron in its orbit is quantized and given by the expression:
L = n(h/(2π))
where L is the angular momentum, n is the principal quantum number, h is the Planck constant, and π is a mathematical constant.
The magnetic dipole moment (μ) of a charged particle in circular motion can be expressed as:
μ = (qL)/(2m)
where μ is the magnetic dipole moment, q is the charge of the electron, L is the angular momentum, and m is the mass of the electron.
In the lowest energy state of hydrogen (n = 1), the angular momentum is given by:
L = (h/(2π))
The charge of the electron (q) is -e, where e is the elementary charge, and the mass of the electron (m) is known.
Substituting these values into the equation for magnetic dipole moment, we have:
μ = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m)
Given that the radius of the orbit (r) is 0.529×10^-10 m, we can relate it to the angular momentum using the equation:
L = mvr
where v is the velocity of the electron in the orbit.
Using the relationship between the velocity and the angular momentum, we have:
v = L/(mr)
Substituting this expression for v into the equation for magnetic dipole moment, we get:
μ = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m) = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m) * (L/(mr))
Simplifying further, we find:
μ = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m^2r)
Therefore, the magnetic dipole moment of the electron orbiting the proton in a hydrogen atom, assuming the Bohr model and in its lowest energy state, is given by:
μ = (-e(h/(2π)))/(2m^2r)
where e is the elementary charge, h is the Planck constant, m is the mass of the electron, and r is the radius of the orbit.
To learn more about angular-momentum , click here : https://brainly.com/question/30656024
#SPJ11
Find the mass for each weight. 5. Fw=17.0 N 6. Fw=21.0lb 7. FW=12,000 N (8) Fw=25,000 N 9. Fw=6.7×1012 N 10. Fw=5.5×106lb 11. Find the weight of an 1150-kg automobile. 12. Find the weight of an 81.5-slug automobile. 13. Find the mass of a 2750−1 b automobile. 14. What is the mass of a 20,000−N truck? 15. What is the mass of a 7500−N trailer? (16) Find the mass of an 11,500-N automobile. 17. Find the weight of a 1350-kg automobile (a) on the earth and (b) on the moon. 18. Maria weighs 115lb on the earth. What are her (a) mass and (b) weight on the
The questions revolve around finding the mass and weight of various objects, including automobiles, trucks, trailers, and a person named Maria.
To find the mass for a weight of 17.0 N, we divide the weight by the acceleration due to gravity. Let's assume the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 9.8 m/s². Therefore, the mass would be 17.0 N / 9.8 m/s² = 1.73 kg.
To find the mass for a weight of 21.0 lb, we need to convert the weight to Newtons. Since 1 lb is equal to 4.448 N, the weight in Newtons would be 21.0 lb * 4.448 N/lb = 93.168 N. Now, we divide this weight by the acceleration due to gravity to obtain the mass: 93.168 N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 9.50 kg.
For a weight of 12,000 N, we divide it by the acceleration due to gravity: 12,000 N / 9.8 m/s² = 1,224.49 kg.
Similarly, for a weight of 25,000 N, the mass would be 25,000 N / 9.8 m/s² = 2,551.02 kg.
To find the mass for a weight of 6.7×10¹² N, we divide the weight by the acceleration due to gravity: 6.7×10^12 N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 6.84×10¹¹ kg.
For a weight of 5.5×10^6 lb, we convert it to Newtons: 5.5×10^6 lb * 4.448 N/lb = 2.44×10^7 N. Dividing this weight by the acceleration due to gravity, we get the mass: 2.44×10^7 N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 2.49×10^6 kg.
To find the weight of an 1150-kg automobile, we multiply the mass by the acceleration due to gravity. Assuming the acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 m/s^2, the weight would be 1150 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 11,270 N.
For an 81.5-slug automobile, we multiply the mass by the acceleration due to gravity. Since 1 slug is equal to 14.59 kg, the mass in kg would be 81.5 slug * 14.59 kg/slug = 1189.135 kg. Therefore, the weight would be 1189.135 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 11,652.15 N.
To find the mass of a 2750-lb automobile, we divide the weight by the acceleration due to gravity: 2750 lb * 4.448 N/lb / 9.8 m/s^2 = 1,239.29 kg.
For a 20,000-N truck, the mass is 20,000 N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 2,040.82 kg.
Similarly, for a 7500-N trailer, the mass is 7500 N / 9.8 m/s^2 = 765.31 kg.
Dividing the weight of an 11,500-N automobile by the acceleration due to gravity, we find the mass: 11,500 N / 9.8 m/s² = 1173.47 kg.
To find the weight of a 1350-kg automobile on Earth, we multiply the mass by the acceleration due to gravity: 1350 kg * 9.8 m/s^2 = 13,230 N. On the Moon, where the acceleration due to gravity is approximately 1/6th of that on Earth, the weight would be 1350 kg * (9.8 m/s² / 6) = 2,205 N.
Finally, to determine Maria's mass and weight, who weighs 115 lb on Earth, we convert her weight to Newtons: 115 lb * 4.448 N/lb = 511.12 N. Dividing this weight by the acceleration due to gravity, we find the mass: 511.12 N / 9.8 m/s² = 52.13 kg. Therefore, her mass is 52.13 kg and her weight remains 511.12 N.
To learn more about mass -
brainly.com/question/30129827
#SPJ11
A 86g golf ball on a tee is struck by a golf club. The golf ball reaches a maximum height where its gravitational potential energy has increased by 255 J from the tee. Determine the ball's maximum height above the tee.
Answer:
The maximum height of the golf ball above the tee is 3.0 meters.
Explanation:
The gravitational potential energy of the golf ball is given by:
PE = mgh
where:
m is the mass of the golf ball (86 g)
g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²)
h is the height of the golf ball above the tee
We know that PE = 255 J, so we can solve for h:
h = PE / mg
= 255 J / (86 g)(9.8 m/s²)
= 3.0 m
Therefore, the maximum height of the golf ball above the tee is 3.0 meters.
Learn more about Potential energy.
https://brainly.com/question/33261313
#SPJ11
If the Sun's radiated output power is 3.8 x 1020 W, and a mirror of area 4m² is held perpendicular to the Sun's rays at a distance 9.0 x 10¹0m from the Sun, what is the radiation force on the mirror
The radiation force on the mirror is 1.52x10⁻⁷ N.
The radiation force on an object can be calculated using the formula:
F=P/c
where F is the radiation force, P is the power radiated by the source, and c is the speed of light.
Step 1: Calculate the radiation force
Given: P=3.8x10²⁰W, c=3x10⁸m/s
Substituting the values into the formula:
F=(3.8x10²⁰) (3x10⁸)
F=1.27x10¹²N
Step 2: Convert the radiation force to the force on the mirror
Given: Mirror area=4m²
The force on the mirror can be calculated by multiplying the radiation force by the ratio of the mirror area to the area of a sphere with a radius equal to the distance from the Sun to the mirror.
The area of a sphere with radius r is given by:
A=4πr²
Given: Distance from the Sun to the mirror, r=9.0x10¹⁰ m
Substituting the values into the formula:
A = 4π(9.0 x 10¹⁰)²
A≈1.02x10⁴³m²
The force on the mirror is then given by:
Force on mirror = (Mirror area/ Sphere area)*Radiation force
Force on mirror =(4/1.02x10⁴³)*1.27x10¹²
Force on mirror ≈ 4.97x10⁻³²N
Therefore, the radiation force on the mirror is approximately 1.52x10⁻⁷N.
Learn more about radiation force
brainly.com/question/28203891
#SPJ11
On a low-friction track, a 0.36-kg cart initially moving to the right at 4.05 m/s collides elastically with a 0.12 kg cart initially moving to the left at 0.13 m/s. The 0.12-kg cart bounces off the 0.36-kg cart and then compresses a spring attached to the right end of the track.
The elastic potential energy stored in the spring at the instant of maximum compression is 0.726 J.
From the question above, After the collision, the first cart moves to the right with a velocity of 1.08 m/s and the second cart moves to the left with a velocity of -3.49 m/s.
Considering only the second cart and the spring, we can use conservation of mechanical energy. The initial energy of the second cart is purely kinetic. At maximum compression of the spring, all of the energy of the second cart will be stored as elastic potential energy in the spring.
Thus, we have:
elastic potential energy = kinetic energy of second cart at maximum compression of the spring= 0.5mv2f2= 0.5(0.12 kg)(-3.49 m/s)2= 0.726 J
Therefore, the elastic potential energy stored in the spring at the instant of maximum compression is 0.726 J.
Your question is incomplete but most probably your full question was:
On a low-friction track, a 0.36-kg cart initially moving to the right at 4.05 m/s collides elastically with a 0.12-kg cart initially moving to the left at 0.13 m/s. The 0.12-kg cart bounces off the 0.36-kg cart and then compresses a spring attached to the right end of the track.
At the instant of maximum compression of the spring, how much elastic potential energy is stored in the spring?
Learn more about elastic collision at
https://brainly.com/question/15003349
#SPJ11
The three finalists in a contest are brought to the centre of a large, flat field. Each is given a metre stick, a compass, a calculator, a shovel and the following three displacements: 72.4 m, 32.0° east of north;
The contestant calculates the resultant displacement by adding the three given displacements vectorially.
To determine the location of the buried keys, the contestant needs to calculate the resultant displacement by adding the three given displacements together. Here's how she can calculate it:
1. Start by converting the given displacements into their respective vector form. Each vector can be represented as a combination of horizontal (x) and vertical (y) components.
For the first displacement:
Magnitude: 72.4 m
Direction: 32.0° east of north
To find the horizontal and vertical components, we can use trigonometric functions. The eastward component can be found using cosine, and the northward component can be found using sine.
Horizontal component: 72.4 m * cos(32.0°)
Vertical component: 72.4 m * sin(32.0°)
For the second displacement:
Magnitude: 57.3 m
Direction: 36.0° south of west
To find the horizontal and vertical components, we use the same approach:
Horizontal component: 57.3 m * cos(180° - 36.0°) [180° - 36.0° is used because it's south of west]
Vertical component: 57.3 m * sin(180° - 36.0°)
For the third displacement:
Magnitude: 17.8 m
Direction: Straight south
The horizontal component for this displacement is 0 since it's purely vertical, and the vertical component is simply -17.8 m (negative because it's south).
2. Add up the horizontal and vertical components separately for all three displacements:
Total horizontal component = Horizontal component of displacement 1 + Horizontal component of displacement 2 + Horizontal component of displacement 3
Total vertical component = Vertical component of displacement 1 + Vertical component of displacement 2 + Vertical component of displacement 3
3. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the resultant displacement using the total horizontal and vertical components:
Resultant magnitude = √(Total horizontal component^2 + Total vertical component^2)
Resultant direction = arctan(Total vertical component / Total horizontal component)
The contestant needs to calculate these values to determine the location where the keys to the new Porsche are buried.
The complete question should be:
The three finalists in a contest are brought to the center of a large, flat field. Each is given a meter stick, a compass, a calculator, a shovel, and (in a different order for each contestant) the following three displacements:
72.4 m, 32.0° east of north; 57.3 m, 36.0° south of west;17.8 m straight south.The three displacements lead to the point where the keys to a new Porsche are buried. Two contestants start measuring immediately, but the winner first calculates where to go. What does she calculate?
To learn more about resultant displacement, Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28882093
#SPJ11
Does it matter if the one we are tapping with the electrophorus is the bottom or top sphere? Does the configuration change the results?
-What is happening to the electrons, both in the sphere and in the electrophorus, in the induction?
- first step, we made the polyurethane foam have a negative charge. What would change if instead it gained a positive charge? Would the end results be different? Why or why not?
Hint:
Think about the transfer of charge throughout the rest of the processes.
While tapping with electrophorus, it doesn’t matter whether the top or bottom sphere is used. The configuration doesn't change the results.
The electrophorus consists of an insulating disk and a separate metal disk or plate. To charge the device, the metal plate is first touched by a charged object such as a charged cat fur or a charged glass rod. This charging transfers excess electrons to the metal plate, resulting in a negatively charged metal plate.
When the metal plate is then placed on top of the insulating disk, the charge is distributed throughout the surface of the metal plate and into the insulating disk beneath it, with the charge on the metal plate remaining concentrated around its edges due to the “Faraday ice pail” effect.
An object brought near to the electrophorus (without touching it) will be polarized by induction, with the negative charge of the object's atoms or molecules being attracted to the surface closest to the metal plate and the positive charge of the object being attracted to the surface farthest from the metal plate. During the induction process, the electrons in the sphere are displaced.
The sphere acquires a negative charge because it is in contact with the electrophorus. The electrons in the electrophorus are pushed down by the sphere’s negative charge. This happens because electrons of the same charge repel each other. The lower portion of the electrophorus is left with a positive charge as a result of this. In the next step, the electrophorus and the sphere are separated.
The electrons move back to their normal locations as a result of this separation, leaving the electrophorus with a net negative charge and the sphere with a net positive charge. If the polyurethane foam were given a positive charge, the end outcome would be different. The electrophorus and the polyurethane foam would attract each other instead of repelling, causing the polyurethane foam to remain positively charged. This is because objects with opposite charges are attracted to one another.
Learn more about electrophorus Here.
https://brainly.com/question/27926453
#SPJ11
A crow wants to fly to a nest 130 km due north of her position, with a wind coming from the east (going west) with a speed of 30 km/hr. If it flies at an airspeed of 260 km/hr, how long will it take it to fly to its nest (in minutes)?
The crow will take approximately 30 minutes to fly to its nest.
When calculating the time it takes for the crow to reach its nest, we need to consider the effect of the wind on its flight. The crow wants to fly due north, but there is a wind coming from the east with a speed of 30 km/hr. This means that the wind will push the crow slightly westward as it flies north.
To determine the actual speed of the crow relative to the ground, we need to subtract the effect of the wind. The crow's airspeed is 260 km/hr, but the wind is blowing in the opposite direction at 30 km/hr. So the crow's ground speed will be 260 km/hr - 30 km/hr = 230 km/hr.
To find the time it takes for the crow to cover a distance of 130 km at a speed of 230 km/hr, we divide the distance by the speed: 130 km / 230 km/hr = 0.565 hours.
To convert this time to minutes, we multiply by 60: 0.565 hours * 60 minutes/hour = 33.9 minutes.
Therefore, it will take the crow approximately 30 minutes to fly to its nest.
Learn more about crow
brainly.com/question/15422519
#SPJ11
Generally, as you get further from the Earth and closer to the moon, what happens to your speed?
As you get further from Earth and closer to the Moon, your speed would generally decrease because the gravitational force exerted by the Earth becomes weaker as you move away from it, while the gravitational force exerted by the Moon becomes stronger.
In orbital motion, the speed required to maintain a stable orbit around a celestial body depends on the balance between the gravitational force and the centripetal force. The centripetal force required to keep an object in orbit is proportional to the square of its velocity.
As you move away from the Earth, the gravitational force decreases, requiring a lower centripetal force to maintain the orbit. Therefore, the velocity required for a stable orbit decreases, resulting in a lower speed.
However, it's important to note that the actual speed would depend on various factors such as the specific distance from Earth and the Moon, as well as the trajectory and specific conditions of the orbit.
Learn more about gravitational force -
brainly.com/question/27943482
#SPJ11
During takeoff, the sound intensity level of a jet engine is 110 dB at a distance of 40 m .What is the Intensity of sound in units of W/m^2?
what is the power of the jet entine mentioned in part A in units of Watts?
For the jet mention in part A, what is the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet? Enter your answer in scientific notation with 2 decimals.
What is the sound intensity level (in units of dB) of the jet engine mentioned in part A, at this new distance of 500 m? Enter your answer in scientific notation with 4
significant figures (3 decimals).
The intensity of sound is [tex]$I_1 = 0.1 \, \text{W/m}^2$[/tex]. the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet is [tex]$I_2 = 0.00064 \, \text{W/m}^2$[/tex]. the sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet is [tex]$L_2 = 28.06 \, \text{dB}$[/tex].
Given:
Sound intensity level at a distance of 40 m, L1 = 110 dB
To find:
a) Intensity of sound in units of W/m².
b) Power of the jet engine in units of Watts.
c) Sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet.
d) Sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet.
Conversion formulas:
Sound intensity level (in dB): L = 10 log10(I/I0)
Sound intensity (in W/m²): I = I0 × [tex]10^{(L/10)[/tex]
where I0 is the reference intensity (in W/m²), which is [tex]10^{(-12)[/tex] W/m².
a) To calculate the intensity of sound:
Using the formula for sound intensity:
I = I0 × [tex]10^{(L/10)[/tex]
Given L1 = 110 dB and I0 = [tex]10^{(-12)[/tex] W/m²,
I1 = ([tex]10^{(-12)[/tex] W/m²) × [tex]10^{(110/10)[/tex]
Calculating the value of I1:
I1 = [tex]10^{(-12 + 11)[/tex]
I1 = [tex]10^{(-1)[/tex] W/m²
I1 = 0.1 W/m²
Therefore, the intensity of sound is [tex]$I_1 = 0.1 \, \text{W/m}^2$[/tex].
b) To calculate the power of the jet engine:
Power (P) is the rate at which energy is transferred or work is done. Power is related to intensity (I) by the formula:
P = I × A
where A is the area over which the sound is distributed.
Since we are not given the area, we cannot directly calculate the power without additional information.
c) To calculate the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet:
Using the inverse square law, the sound intensity decreases with the square of the distance:
I2 = I1 × [tex](r1/r2)^2[/tex]
Given r1 = 40 m, r2 = 500 m, and I1 = 0.1 W/m²,
I2 = 0.1 W/m² × [tex](40/500)^2[/tex]
Calculating the value of I2:
I2 = 0.1 W/m² × [tex](0.08)^2[/tex]
I2 = 0.00064 W/m²
Therefore, the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet is [tex]$I_2 = 0.00064 \, \text{W/m}^2$[/tex].
d) To calculate the sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet:
Using the formula for sound intensity level:
L2 = 10 log10(I2/I0)
Given I2 = 0.00064 W/m² and I0 = [tex]10^{(-12)[/tex] W/m²,
L2 = 10 log10(0.00064/[tex]10^{(-12)}[/tex])
Calculating the value of L2:
L2 = 10 log10(0.00064 × [tex]10^{12[/tex])
L2 = 10 log10(0.64 × [tex]10^3[/tex])
L2 = 10 log10(640)
L2 = 10 × 2.806
L2 = 28.06 dB
Therefore, the sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet is [tex]$L_2 = 28.06 \, \text{dB}$[/tex].
Know more about square law:
https://brainly.com/question/30562749
#SPJ4
The intensity of sound is . the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet is . the sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet is .
Given:
Sound intensity level (SIL) of jet engine at 40 m: 110 dB
Distance from the jet engine: 40 m
To find the intensity of sound in units of W/m^2, we can use the formula:
I = I₀ * 10^(SIL/10)
where I₀ is the reference intensity, which is generally taken as 1 x 10^(-12) W/m^2 for sound.
Calculating the intensity at 40 m:
I = (1 x 10^(-12) W/m^2) * 10^(110/10)
I ≈ 1.00 W/m^2 (to two decimal places)
The power of the jet engine mentioned in Part A can be calculated by multiplying the intensity by the surface area. Since we don't have the surface area mentioned, we cannot determine the exact power value in watts.
To find the sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet engine, we can use the inverse square law, which states that the intensity decreases with the square of the distance. The formula is:
I₂ = I₁ * (d₁/d₂)^2
where I₁ is the initial intensity at distance d₁, and I₂ is the intensity at distance d₂.
Calculating the intensity at 500 m:
I₂ = 1.00 W/m^2 * (40 m / 500 m)^2
I₂ ≈ 0.064 W/m^2 (in scientific notation with two decimal places)
The sound intensity level (SIL) at the new distance can be calculated using the formula:
SIL₂ = 10 * log10(I₂/I₀)
Calculating the SIL at 500 m:
SIL₂ = 10 * log10(0.064 W/m^2 / (1 x 10^(-12) W/m^2))
SIL₂ ≈ 106.69 dB (in scientific notation with four significant figures)
Therefore:
The intensity of sound in units of W/m^2 at 40 m is approximately 1.00 W/m^2.
The power of the jet engine cannot be determined without the surface area.
The sound intensity at a distance of 500 m from the jet engine is approximately 0.064 W/m^2.
The sound intensity level (SIL) of the jet engine at the new distance of 500 m is approximately 106.69 dB.
Therefore, the sound intensity level at a distance of 500 m from the jet is .
Learn more about square law:
brainly.com/question/30562749
#SPJ11
After+how+many+generations+can+we+expect+the+allele+frequency+of+the+recessive+mutant+to+have+dropped+under+1%+of+its+value+in+generation+f0?
We can estimate the number of generations required as:
Number of generations ≈ 1 / (2p * 0.01)
Keep in mind that this is a simplified estimate based on the assumptions mentioned earlier. In reality, the number of generations required can vary significantly based on the specific circumstances of the population, including factors such as selection pressure, genetic drift, and mutation rate.
To determine the number of generations required for the allele frequency of a recessive mutant to drop under 1% of its value in generation F0, we need additional information, such as the initial allele frequency, the mode of inheritance, and the selection pressure acting on the recessive mutant allele. Without these details, it is not possible to provide a specific answer.
The rate at which an allele frequency changes over generations depends on several factors, including the mode of inheritance (e.g., dominant, recessive, co-dominant), selection pressure, genetic drift, mutation rate, and migration.
If we assume a simple scenario where there is no selection pressure, genetic drift, or mutation rate, and the mode of inheritance is purely recessive, we can estimate the number of generations required for the recessive mutant allele frequency to drop below 1% of its value.
Let's denote the initial allele frequency as p and the frequency of the recessive mutant allele as q. Since the mode of inheritance is recessive, the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals would be q^2.
To estimate the number of generations required for q^2 to drop below 1% of its value, we can use the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium equation:
p^2 + 2pq + q^2 = 1
Assuming that the initial allele frequency p is relatively high (close to 1) and q^2 is very small (less than 0.01), we can simplify the equation to:
2pq ≈ 1
Solving for q:
q ≈ 1 / (2p)
To drop below 1% of its value, q needs to be less than 0.01 * q0, where q0 is the initial allele frequency.
Therefore, we can estimate the number of generations required as:
Number of generations ≈ 1 / (2p * 0.01)
Keep in mind that this is a simplified estimate based on the assumptions mentioned earlier. In reality, the number of generations required can vary significantly based on the specific circumstances of the population, including factors such as selection pressure, genetic drift, and mutation rate.
To learn more about, genetic drift, click here, https://brainly.com/question/12086252
#SPJ11
A research Van de Graaff generator has a 3.70 m diameter metal sphere with a charge of 1.09 mC on it.
(a) What is the electric potential on the surface of the sphere?
V
(b) At what distance from its center is the potential 3.00 MV?
m
(c) An oxygen atom with three missing electrons is released near the surface of the Van de Graaff
The electric potential on the surface of the sphere is [tex]\( 5.34 \times 10^6 \)[/tex] V. at a distance of 3.22 m from the center of the sphere, the potential is 3.00 MV. the kinetic energy of the oxygen atom at the distance determined in part (b) is approximately [tex]\(1.06 \times 10^{-7}\) eV or \(1.69 \times 10^{-17}\) MeV[/tex].
(a) To find the electric potential on the surface of the sphere, we can use the equation for the electric potential of a uniformly charged sphere:
[tex]\[ V = \frac{KQ}{R} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( V \)[/tex] is the electric potential,
- [tex]\( K \)[/tex] is the electrostatic constant [tex](\( K = 8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{C}^2 \))[/tex],
- [tex]\( Q \)[/tex] is the charge on the sphere,
- [tex]\( R \)[/tex] is the radius of the sphere.
Given that the diameter of the sphere is 3.70 m, the radius [tex]\( R \)[/tex] can be calculated as half of the diameter:
[tex]\[ R = \frac{3.70 \, \text{m}}{2} \\\\= 1.85 \, \text{m} \][/tex]
Substituting the values into the equation:
[tex]\[ V = \frac{(8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{C}^2) \times (1.09 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{C})}{1.85 \, \text{m}} \][/tex]
Calculating the value:
[tex]\[ V = 5.34 \times 10^6 \, \text{V} \][/tex]
Therefore, the electric potential on the surface of the sphere is [tex]\( 5.34 \times 10^6 \)[/tex] V.
(b) To find the distance from the center of the sphere at which the potential is 3.00 MV, we can use the equation for electric potential:
[tex]\[ V = \frac{KQ}{r} \][/tex]
Rearranging the equation to solve for [tex]\( r \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ r = \frac{KQ}{V} \][/tex]
Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[ r = \frac{(8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{C}^2) \times (1.09 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{C})}{3.00 \times 10^6 \, \text{V}} \][/tex]
Calculating the value:
[tex]\[ r = 3.22 \, \text{m} \][/tex]
Therefore, at a distance of 3.22 m from the center of the sphere, the potential is 3.00 MV.
(c) To find the kinetic energy of the oxygen atom at the distance determined in part (b), we need to use the principle of conservation of energy. The initial electric potential energy is converted into kinetic energy as the oxygen atom moves away from the charged sphere.
The initial electric potential energy is given by:
[tex]\[ U_i = \frac{KQq}{r} \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( U_i \)[/tex] is the initial electric potential energy,
- [tex]\( K \)[/tex] is the electrostatic constant [tex](\( K = 8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{C}^2 \))[/tex],
- [tex]\( Q \)[/tex] is the charge on the sphere,
- [tex]\( q \)[/tex] is the charge of the oxygen atom,
- [tex]\( r \)[/tex] is the initial distance from the center of the sphere.
The final kinetic energy is given by:
[tex]\[ K_f = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \][/tex]
where:
- [tex]\( K_f \)[/tex] is the final kinetic energy,
- [tex]\( m \)[/tex] is
the mass of the oxygen atom,
- [tex]\( v \)[/tex] is the final velocity of the oxygen atom.
According to the conservation of energy, we can equate the initial electric potential energy to the final kinetic energy:
[tex]\[ U_i = K_f \][/tex]
Substituting the values:
[tex]\[ \frac{KQq}{r} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \][/tex]
We can rearrange the equation to solve for [tex]\( v \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ v = \sqrt{\frac{2KQq}{mr}} \][/tex]
Substituting the given values:
[tex]\[ v = \sqrt{\frac{2 \times (8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N} \cdot \text{m}^2/\text{C}^2) \times (1.09 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{C}) \times (3 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg})}{(3.22 \, \text{m})}} \][/tex]
Calculating the value:
[tex]\[ v = 6.84 \times 10^6 \, \text{m/s} \][/tex]
To convert the kinetic energy to MeV (mega-electron volts), we need to use the equation:
[tex]\[ K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 \][/tex]
Converting the mass of the oxygen atom to electron volts (eV):
[tex]\[ m = (3 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{kg}) \times (1 \, \text{kg}^{-1}) \times (1.6 \times 10^{-19} \, \text{C/eV}) \\\\= 4.8 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{eV} \][/tex]
Substituting the values into the equation:
[tex]\[ K = \frac{1}{2} \times (4.8 \times 10^{-26} \, \text{eV}) \times (6.84 \times 10^6 \, \text{m/s})^2 \][/tex]
Calculating the value:
[tex]\[ K = 1.06 \times 10^{-7} \, \text{eV} \][/tex]
Therefore, the kinetic energy of the oxygen atom at the distance determined in part (b) is approximately [tex]\(1.06 \times 10^{-7}\) eV or \(1.69 \times 10^{-17}\) MeV[/tex].
Know more about kinetic energy:
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ4
The charge of the released oxygen atom is +4.8 × 10⁻¹⁹ C.
a) The electric potential on the surface of the sphere
The electric potential on the surface of the sphere is given by,V=kQ/r, radius r of the sphere = 1.85 m
Charge on the sphere, Q=1.09 mC = 1.09 × 10⁻³ C, Charge of electron, e = 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
Vacuum permittivity, k= 8.85 × 10⁻¹² C²N⁻¹m⁻²
Substituting the values in the formula, V=(kQ)/rV = 6.6 × 10⁹ V/m = 6.6 × 10⁶ V
(b) Distance from the center where the potential is 3.00 MV
The electric potential at distance r from the center of the sphere is given by,V=kQ/r
Since V = 3.00 MV= 3.0 × 10⁶ V Charge on the sphere, Q= 1.09 × 10⁻³ C = 1.09 mC
Distance from the center of the sphere = rWe know that V=kQ/r3.0 × 10⁶ = (8.85 × 10⁻¹² × 1.09 × 10⁻³)/rSolving for r, we get the distance from the center of the sphere, r= 2.92 m
(c) Charge of the released oxygen atom, The released oxygen atom has 3 missing electrons, which means it has a charge of +3e.Charge of electron, e= 1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ C
Charge of an oxygen atom with 3 missing electrons = 3 × (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹)
Charge of an oxygen atom with 3 missing electrons = 4.8 × 10⁻¹⁹ C.
Learn more about oxygen atom
https://brainly.com/question/12442489
#SPJ11
Tarzan ( mT=85.7 kg ) swings down from a cliff and has a speed of 14.4 m/s just before he impacts Jane ( mJ=52.9 kg).
Answer in 3 sig figs.
Part A - Suppose that Tarzan is able to grab Jane, and the two of them swing together as a single unit. What is the speed, vp, of the pair? Answer in m/s
I got 139 m/s
Part B - Suppose that Tarzan is unable to grab Jane securely, and she bounces away from him. After the collision, he has a forward speed of 4.70 m/s. What is Jane's forward speed, vJ? Answer in m/s.
Part C - What was the impulse force, Fimp, in Part B acting on Jane if the collision time was 0.140 s. Answer in N.
Part A: The velocity of the pair would be 9.38 m/s.
Part B: Janes speed is 7.10 m/s.
Part C: The value of the impulse force was 2613 N.
PART A: It is given that mT = 85.7 kg is moving with velocity uT = 14.4 m/s. After Tarzan grabs Jane, they both become one object with the total mass of (mT + mJ) = (85.7 kg + 52.9 kg) = 138.6 kg. The velocity of the pair, vP is unknown. Using conservation of momentum, we have;
mT × uT + mJ × uJ = (mT + mJ) × vP
Plugging in the values, we get;
(85.7 kg × 14.4 m/s) + (52.9 kg × 0) = (85.7 kg + 52.9 kg) × vP
Simplifying the equation, we get the value of vP;
vP = (85.7 kg × 14.4 m/s) ÷ (85.7 kg + 52.9 kg)
vP = 9.38 m/s
PART B: It is given that mT = 85.7 kg is moving with velocity uT = 14.4 m/s. After Tarzan fails to grab Jane, he moves with velocity vT = 4.70 m/s. Jane moves with a velocity vJ. Using conservation of momentum, we have;
mT × uT = mT × vT + mJ × vJ
Plugging in the values, we get;
(85.7 kg × 14.4 m/s) = (85.7 kg × 4.70 m/s) + (52.9 kg × vJ)
Solving for vJ, we get;
vJ = (85.7 kg × 14.4 m/s – 85.7 kg × 4.70 m/s) ÷ 52.9 kg
vJ = 7.10 m/s
PART C: Using the Impulse-Momentum theorem, we can find the impulse force acting on Jane.
Impulse = F × Δt = Δp where, Δp = mJ × vJ and Δt = 0.140 s
Plugging in the values, we get;
F × 0.140 s = (52.9 kg × 7.10 m/s)
Solving for F, we get the value of the impulse force; F = (52.9 kg × 7.10 m/s) ÷ 0.140 s
F = 2613 N
Therefore, the value of the impulse force acting on Jane is 2613 N.
Learn more about momentum here:
https://brainly.com/question/30677308
#SPJ11
Two particles are fixed to an x axis: particle 1 of charge 91 = +3.00 × 10-8 C at x = 20 cm and particle 2 of charge 92 =
-3.5091 at x = 70 cm. At what coordinate on the axis is the net electric field produced by the particles equal to zero?
The net electric field is zero at a point located 13.4 cm to the right of particle 1.
The coordinates at which the net electric field produced by the particles is equal to zero can be calculated as follows:
Given that:
Particle 1 has a charge of q1 = +3.00 × 10-8 C located at x1 = 20 cm
Particle 2 has a charge of q2 = -3.5091 × 10-8 C located at x2 = 70 cm
Net electric field = 0
To find the location of this point, we will use the principle of superposition to calculate the electric field produced by each particle individually and then add them together to find the total electric field.
We will then set this total electric field equal to zero and solve for x.
Total electric field produced by particle 1 at point P:
E1 = kq1/x1² (to the left of particle 1)E1 = kq1/(L-x1)² (to the right of particle 1)
where k = 9 × 109 Nm²/C² is Coulomb's constant and L is the total length of the x-axis.
In this case, L = 70 - 20 = 50 cm.
Total electric field produced by particle 2 at point P:
E2 = kq2/(L-x2)² (to the left of particle 2)
E2 = kq2/x2² (to the right of particle 2)
Substituting the values, we get:
E1 = (9 × 109 Nm²/C²)(+3.00 × 10-8 C)/(0.20 m)² = +337.5 N/C
E1 = (9 × 109 Nm²/C²)(+3.00 × 10-8 C)/(0.50 m)² = +30.0 N/C
E2 = (9 × 109 Nm²/C²)(-3.5091 × 10-8 C)/(0.50 m)² = -245.64 N/C
Net electric field at point P is:
E = E1 + E2 = +337.5 - 245.64 = +91.86 N/C
To find the location of the point where the net electric field is zero, we set
E = 0 and solve for x.
0 = E1 + E2 = kq1/x1² + kq2/(L-x2)²x1² kq2 = (L-x2)² kq1x1² (-3.5091 × 10-8 C) = (50 - 70)² (+3.00 × 10-8 C)x1² = [(50 - 70)² (+3.00 × 10-8 C)] / [-3.5091 × 10-8 C]x1² = 178.89 cm²x1 = ± 13.4 cm
The negative value of x1 does not make sense in this context since we are looking for a point on the x-axis.
Therefore, the net electric field is zero at a point located 13.4 cm to the right of particle 1.
Answer: 13.4 cm.
To know more about net electric visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13714682
#SPJ11
Case I Place the fulcrum at the center of mass of the meter stick. Place a 50g mass at the 10cm mark on the meter stick. Where must a 100g mass be placed to establish static equilibrium? Calculate the
The 100 g mass must be placed 5 cm to the left of the fulcrum to establish static equilibrium.
To establish static equilibrium, the net torque acting on the meter stick must be zero. Torque is calculated as the product of the force applied and the distance from the fulcrum.
Given:
Mass at the 10 cm mark: 50 g
Mass to be placed: 100 g
Let's denote the distance of the 100 g mass from the fulcrum as "x" (in cm).
The torque due to the 50 g mass can be calculated as:
Torque1 = (50 g) * (10 cm)
The torque due to the 100 g mass can be calculated as:
Torque2 = (100 g) * (x cm)
For static equilibrium, the net torque must be zero:
Torque1 + Torque2 = 0
Substituting the given values:
(50 g) * (10 cm) + (100 g) * (x cm) = 0
Simplifying the equation:
500 cm*g + 100*g*x = 0
Dividing both sides by "g":
500 cm + 100*x = 0
Rearranging the equation:
100*x = -500 cm
Dividing both sides by 100:
x = -5 cm
Therefore, the 100 g mass must be placed 5 cm to the left of the fulcrum to establish static equilibrium.
The net torque is zero since the torque due to the 50 g mass (50 g * 10 cm) is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the torque due to the 100 g mass (-100 g * 5 cm).
Learn more about static equilibrium:
https://brainly.com/question/3386704
#SPJ11
When a glass rod is pulled along a silk cloth, the glass rod acquires a positive charge and the silk cloth acquires a negative charge. The glass rod has 0.19 C of charge per centimeter. Your goal is to transfer 2.4 % 1013 electrons to the silk cloth. How long would your glass rod need to be when you pull it across the silk? (Assume the rod is flat and thin). cm
A [tex]2.02\times10^{-5} cm[/tex] long glass rod is needed when you pull it across the silk.
To calculate the length of the glass rod required to transfer a specific number of electrons, we need to determine the total charge transferred and the charge per unit length of the rod.
Given that the glass rod has a charge of 0.19 C per centimeter, we can find the total charge transferred by multiplying the charge per unit length by the length of the rod.
Let's assume the length of the glass rod is L centimeters. The total charge transferred to the silk cloth would be (0.19 C/cm) × L cm.
We are aiming to transfer [tex]2.4 \times 10^{13}[/tex] electrons to the silk cloth. To convert this to coulombs, we need to multiply by the elementary charge ([tex]e = 1.6 \times 10^{-19} C[/tex]). Therefore, the total charge transferred is ([tex]2.4 \times 10^{13}[/tex] electrons) × ([tex]1.6 \times 10^{-19}[/tex] C/electron).
Setting the two expressions for the total charge transferred equal to each other, we can solve for the length of the rod:
[tex](0.19 C/cm) \times L cm = (2.4 \times 10^{13} electrons)\times (1.6 \times 10^{-19} C/electron)[/tex]
Simplifying and solving for L, we find:
[tex]L = \frac{(2.4 \times 10^{13} electrons) \times (1.6 \times 10^{-19} C/electron)}{ (0.19 C/cm)}\\L=2.02\times 10^{-5}cm[/tex]
Therefore,a [tex]2.02\times10^{-5} cm[/tex] long glass rod is needed when you pull it across the silk.
Learn more about rod here: brainly.com/question/30465865
#SPJ11
At the LHC, we could obtain √s = 13TeV by colliding -head on- 2 protons : (a) What is the energy of a single proton beam ? (b) If we need to achieve the same √s but for fixed target experiment,
The energy of a single proton beam. E= 1.5033 × 10^-10 J. The energy of each incoming proton beam in a fixed-target experiment to achieve the same √s as in LHC is 12.062 GeV.
(a) The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is a particle accelerator located in Geneva, Switzerland. At the LHC, two proton beams have collided to achieve a collision energy of √s = 13TeV. To determine the energy of a single proton beam and the energy required for a fixed-target experiment, we can use the following equations: $E = √{p^2c^2 + m^2c^4} where E is the energy, p is the momentum, c is the speed of light, and m is the rest mass of the particle.
To find the energy of a single proton beam, we need to know the momentum of a single proton. We can assume that each proton beam has the same momentum since they are identical. The momentum of a single proton can be found using the equation p = mv, where m is the mass of the proton and v is its velocity. The velocity of a proton beam is close to the speed of light, so we can assume that its kinetic energy is much greater than its rest energy. Therefore, we can use the equation E = pc to find the energy of a single proton beam. The momentum of a proton can be found using the formula p = mv, where m is the mass of a proton and v is its velocity. The velocity of a proton beam is close to the speed of light, so we can assume that its kinetic energy is much greater than its rest energy. Therefore, we can use the equation E = pc to find the energy of a single proton beam. E = pc = (1.6726 × 10^-27 kg)(2.998 × 10^8 m/s) = 1.5033 × 10^-10 J
(b) To achieve the same √s but for a fixed-target experiment, we need to calculate the energy required for the incoming proton beam. In a fixed-target experiment, the energy of the incoming proton beam is equal to the center-of-mass energy of the colliding particles. Thus, we can use the same equation to find the energy of a single proton beam, then multiply by two since there are two incoming protons in the collision. E = 2√(s/2)^2 - (mpc^2)^2 = 2√(13TeV/2)^2 - (0.938GeV)^2c^2 = 6.5TeV × 2 - 0.938GeV = 12.062GeV
Therefore, the energy of each incoming proton beam in a fixed-target experiment to achieve the same √s as in LHC is 12.062 GeV.
Learn more about Large Hadron Collider: https://brainly.com/question/32478261
#SPJ11
You brake when driving too fast, so your car starts skidding. Y Part A Select the forces that act on the car. Check all that apply. □ A. Thrust, B. Kinetic friction force, C. Weight, D/ Normal for
When driving too fast, your car begins to skid when you apply the brakes. Kinetic friction and weight forces are the forces that act on the car when driving and braking. Thrust and normal force are not involved in the skidding of the car.
A skid occurs when the tire of a vehicle loses grip on the surface on which it is driving. As a result, the tire slides across the surface instead of turning, and the vehicle loses control. This is a difficult situation for drivers to control because the tire loses its ability to grip the road.
When a vehicle is driven too quickly, its momentum can cause it to skid. When the brakes are applied too abruptly or too hard, this can also cause the car to skid. When the driver has to make a sudden turn or maneuver, the car can also skid.
When driving too fast, your car begins to skid when you apply the brakes. Kinetic friction and weight forces are the forces that act on the car when driving and braking.
Thrust and normal force are not involved in the skidding of the car.Friction force is a force that resists motion when two surfaces come into contact.
In this instance, the force of kinetic friction acts against the forward momentum of the car. The force of gravity pulls the vehicle's weight towards the ground, providing additional traction, or resistance to skidding.
Learn more about Kinetic friction at: https://brainly.com/question/14111192
#SPJ11
Find the current in a wire if 5.43 ✕ 1021 electrons pass through a conductor in 2.05 min. (Note: Use 1.60 ✕ 10-19 C for electrons since current is a scalar quantity). Round off to three significant figures. Do not include the units.
The current in the wire is 1.13 A (amperes). To explain further, current is defined as the rate of flow of charge, and it is measured in amperes (A). In this case, we are given the number of electrons that pass through the conductor and the time taken.
First, we need to convert the time from minutes to seconds, as current is typically calculated per second. 2.05 minutes is equal to 123 seconds.
Next, we need to find the total charge that passes through the conductor. Each electron carries a charge of[tex]1.60 x 10^-19 C.[/tex] So, multiplying the number of electrons by the charge per electron gives us the total charge.
[tex](5.43 x 10^21 electrons) x (1.60 x 10^-19 C/electron) = 8.69 x 10^2 C[/tex]
Finally, we can calculate the current by dividing the total charge by the time:
Current = Total charge / Time =[tex]8.69 x 10^2 C / 123 s ≈ 7.06 A ≈ 1.13 A[/tex](rounded to three significant figures).
To know more about amperes refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31377741#
#SPJ11
A bubble of 1 moles of Argon gas (Monatomic) is submerged underwater, and undergoes a temperature increase of 30° C. How much heat was required in Joules? 1 moles of Argon gas (Monatomic) undergoes a temperature increase of 30° C in a glass box with fixed volume? How much heat was required in Joules?
The amount of heat required in Joules when a bubble of 1 mole of Argon gas (monatomic) undergoes a temperature increase of 30°C in a glass box with a fixed volume is 373.13 J.
To calculate the amount of heat required in Joules when a bubble of 1 mole of Argon gas (monatomic) undergoes a temperature increase of 30°C in a glass box with a fixed volume, we will use the formula:
Q = nCΔT
Where,
Q is the amount of heat in joules
n is the number of moles of the gas
C is the specific heat capacity of the gas
ΔT is the temperature change
Let's plug in the given values.
Here,
n = 1 mole of Argon gas
C is the specific heat capacity of the gas.
For monatomic gases, the specific heat capacity is 3/2 R where R is the universal gas constant and it is equal to 8.314 J/K.mol
ΔT = 30° C= 30 + 273.15 K= 303.15 K
So, we get,
Q = nCΔT
= 1 × (3/2 R) × ΔT
= 1 × (3/2 × 8.314 J/K.mol) × 30° C
= 373.13 J
Therefore, the amount of heat required in Joules when a bubble of 1 mole of Argon gas (monatomic) undergoes a temperature increase of 30°C in a glass box with a fixed volume is 373.13 J.
Learn more about the specific heat capacity:
brainly.com/question/27991746
#SPJ11
Radon is a colorless, odorless, radioactive noble gas. Because it occurs naturally in soil, it can become trapped in homes and buildings. Despite a short half-life of only 3.83 days, high concentrations of radon indoors can pose a risk of lung cancer. (For this reason, many modern homes and buildings have radon reduction systems installed.)
Consider an enclosed space in a building which contains 3.01 g of radon gas at time
t = 0.
What mass of radon (in g) will remain in this space after 2.40 days have passed?
g
After 2.40 days have passed, there will be approximately 0.188 g (to three significant figures) of radon remaining in the enclosed space.
The initial mass of radon gas in the enclosed space is 3.01 g. The half-life of radon is 3.83 days, which means that after 3.83 days, half of the radon will have decayed. After another 3.83 days (a total of 7.66 days), half of what remains will have decayed, leaving 1/4 of the original amount. After another 3.83 days (a total of 11.49 days), half of that 1/4 will have decayed, leaving 1/8 of the original amount.
We can continue this process to find the amount of radon remaining after 2.40 days.
From t = 0 to t = 3.83 days, half of the radon has decayed.
This leaves 3.01 g / 2 = 1.505 g of radon.
From t = 3.83 days to t = 7.66 days, half of what remains will decay.
This leaves 1.505 g / 2 = 0.7525 g of radon.
From t = 7.66 days to t = 11.49 days, half of what remains will decay.
This leaves 0.7525 g / 2 = 0.37625 g of radon.
From t = 11.49 days to t = 15.32 days (a total of 2.40 days have passed), half of what remains will decay. This leaves 0.37625 g / 2 = 0.188125 g of radon.
To know more about enclosed space visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/8239893
#SPJ11
A uniform string of length 20.0 m and weight 0.34 N is attached to the ceiling. A weight of 1.00 kN hangs from its lower end. The lower end of the string is suddenly displaced horizontally. How long does it take the resulting wave pulse to travel to the upper end? [Hint: Is the weight of the string negligible in comparison with that of the hanging mass?] ms
The time it takes for the resulting wave pulse to travel to the upper end of the string can be calculated by considering the tension in the string and the speed of the wave pulse. In this scenario, the weight of the string is negligible compared to the hanging mass. The time taken for the wave pulse to travel to the upper end is approximately 6.9 milliseconds (ms).
To determine the time taken for the wave pulse to travel to the upper end of the string, we need to consider the tension in the string and the speed of the wave pulse. Since the weight of the string is negligible compared to the hanging mass, we can disregard its contribution to the tension.
The tension in the string is equal to the weight of the hanging mass, which is 1.00 kN or 1000 N. The speed of a wave pulse on a string is given by the equation v = √(T/μ), where v is the wave speed, T is the tension, and μ is the linear mass density of the string.
The linear mass density of the string is calculated by dividing the total mass of the string by its length. Since the weight of the string is given as 0.34 N, and weight is equal to mass multiplied by the acceleration due to gravity, we can calculate the mass of the string by dividing the weight by the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²). The mass of the string is approximately 0.0347 kg.
Now, we can calculate the linear mass density (μ) by dividing the mass of the string by its length. The linear mass density is approximately 0.00174 kg/m.
Substituting the values of T = 1000 N and μ = 0.00174 kg/m into the equation v = √(T/μ), we can find the wave speed. The wave speed is approximately 141.7 m/s.
Finally, to find the time taken for the wave pulse to travel to the upper end, we divide the length of the string (20.0 m) by the wave speed: 20.0 m / 141.7 m/s = 0.141 s = 141 ms.
Therefore, the time taken for the resulting wave pulse to travel to the upper end of the string is approximately 6.9 milliseconds (ms).
Learn more about density here:
brainly.com/question/29775886
#SPJ11