Answer:
Explanation:
The sentence was "It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union." Hope this helps.
The inference is that the sentence in this excerpt from Susan B. Anthony's "On Women's Right to Vote" that reveals the purpose of the speech is that "It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting".
What is an inference?
An inference is the conclusion deduced from the information. After being tried and fined for casting an "illegal" vote in the presidential elections of 1872, Susan B. Anthony gave this speech to prove that, according to the preamble of the Federal Constitution women had the same right to vote as men.
She explained that the Constitution says "we, the people" which includes not only America's man, but also its women. Therefore, her casting a ballot was not only not illegal, but it was a right that no state should have the power to deny.
Learn more about inference on:
brainly.com/question/25280941
#SPJ2
Answer 2
Friends and fellow citizens: I stand before you tonight under indictment for the alleged crime of having voted at the last presidential election, without having a lawful right to vote. It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state to deny.
The preamble of the Federal Constitution says:
"We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people - women as well as men. And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republican government - the ballot.
For any state to make sex a qualification that must ever result in the disfranchisement of one entire half of the people, is to pass a bill of attainder, or, an ex post facto law, and is therefore a violation of the supreme law of the land. By it the blessings of liberty are forever withheld from women and their female posterity.
To them this government has no just powers derived from the consent of the governed. To them this government is not a democracy. It is not a republic. It is an odious aristocracy; a hateful oligarchy of sex; the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe; an oligarchy of wealth, where the rich govern the poor. An oligarchy of learning, where the educated govern the ignorant, or even an oligarchy of race, where the Saxon rules the African, might be endured; but this oligarchy of sex, which makes father, brothers, husband, sons, the oligarchs over the mother and sisters, the wife and daughters, of every household - which ordains all men sovereigns, all women subjects, carries dissension, discord, and rebellion into every home of the nation.
Webster, Worcester, and Bouvier all define a citizen to be a person in the United States, entitled to vote and hold office.
The only question left to be settled now is: Are women persons? And I hardly believe any of our opponents will have the hardihood to say they are not. Being persons, then, women are citizens; and no state has a right to make any law, or to enforce any old law, that shall abridge their privileges or immunities. Hence, every discrimination against women in the constitutions and laws of the several states is today null and void, precisely as is every one
Read the excerpt from The Republic by Plato.
Both the community of property and the community of
families, as I am saying, tend to make them more truly
guardians; they will not tear the city in pieces by
differing about "mine" and "not mine;" each man
dragging any acquisition which he has made into a
separate house of his own, where he has a separate
wife and children and private pleasures and pains; but
all will be affected as far as may be by the same
pleasures and pains because they are all of one
opinion about what is near and dear to them, and
therefore they all tend towards a common end.
How does the use of abductive reasoning help build
the argument?
O It shows how people are expected to act when
protecting their community.
O It emphasizes how people can work together to
enjoy communal resources.
O It demonstrates the importance of people having
private homes of their own.
It draws attention to the general structure of a
successful and stable family.
The use of abductive reasoning in it emphasizes how people can work together to enjoy communal resources, as it highlights the benefits of removing individual ownership and fostering unity within the community. Here option B is the correct answer.
The use of abductive reasoning in the excerpt from The Republic by Plato can be observed in the way it supports the argument for the community of property and the community of families. Abductive reasoning involves drawing plausible inferences or explanations based on available evidence or observations.
In this case, the passage presents the idea that the community of property and the community of families make the guardians of the city more united and cohesive. By removing the concept of individual ownership and separate households, the community members are not torn apart by disputes over possessions, spouses, and children.
Instead, they are encouraged to share a common understanding and opinion about what is important to them. This shared perspective leads them to work together towards a common end, fostering unity and stability within the community.
The passage highlights how the absence of individual ownership and private households encourages community members to share and enjoy communal resources, promoting a sense of cooperation and collective well-being. Therefore option B is the correct answer.
To learn more about abductive reasoning
https://brainly.com/question/31670168
#SPJ8
Read the excerpt from The Republic by Plato. Both the community of property and the community of families, as I am saying, tend to make them more truly guardians; they will not tear the city in pieces by differing about "mine" and "not mine;" each man dragging any acquisition which he has made into a separate house of his own, where he has a separate wife and children and private pleasures and pains; but all will be affected as far as may be by the same pleasures and pains because they are all of one opinion about what is near and dear to them, and therefore they all tend towards a common end. How does the use of abductive reasoning help build the argument?
A- It shows how people are expected to act when protecting their community.
B - It emphasizes how people can work together to enjoy communal resources.
C - It demonstrates the importance of people having private homes of their own.
D - It draws attention to the general structure of a successful and stable family.
6. What elements of a story should be included in a plot summary?
Brainlist!! Help!! Brecken's car beeps loudly until he turns off the headlights. This is an example of:
positive reinforcement
negative reinforcement
extinction
punishment
Answer:
This is an example of positive reinforcement. Positive reinforcement is a type of operant conditioning where a behavior is rewarded in order to increase the likelihood that it will be repeated. In this case, Brecken's car beeping until the headlights are turned off is a form of positive reinforcement as the noise signals him to take desired action, i.e. to turn off the headlights, to make it stop. The beeping is rewarding as it stops the sound when the desired behavior is exhibited.
Explanation:
Why need people a social distance
Social distancing is necessary to reduce the spread of COVID-19, protect vulnerable populations, prevent overwhelmed health care systems, and avoid another wave of infections.
Social distancing is the practice of keeping a certain distance from others outside of your household to limit the spread of infectious diseases. It has become necessary in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, as the virus spreads mainly through respiratory droplets from infected individuals. Social distancing has proven to be an effective way to reduce the transmission of the virus. Here are a few reasons why people need to practice social distancing:
To reduce the spread of COVID-19: Social distancing is a way to slow down or stop the spread of a virus. By staying at least 6 feet away from others, we can limit the transmission of respiratory droplets from one person to another.
To protect the vulnerable: Social distancing can help protect people who are at high risk for severe illness from COVID-19, such as the elderly and those with underlying health conditions.
To prevent overwhelmed health care systems: Social distancing can help prevent hospitals and health care systems from becoming overwhelmed with patients. By slowing the spread of the virus, we can ensure that everyone who needs medical attention can receive it.
To avoid another wave of infections: Social distancing can help prevent another wave of infections from occurring. By slowing the spread of the virus, we can prevent a surge in cases that could overwhelm health care systems and lead to more deaths.
For more such questions on infections, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/14083398
#SPJ8
how do i summarize or paraphrase this statment? "Angelina Jolie has traveled worldwide, assisting refugees and raising money to fight global poverty. The Jolie-Pitt Foundation, which focuses on fighting against extreme poverty in rural areas, was founded as a means of helping humanitarian efforts by raising millions of dollars in support."
Angelina Jolie, a renowned actress and humanitarian, has dedicated her time and resources to making a global impact. She has extensively traveled across the world, lending a helping hand to refugees and actively working to combat global poverty.
Recognizing the urgent need to address extreme poverty in rural areas, Jolie co-founded the Jolie-Pitt Foundation. The foundation serves as a platform to support various humanitarian initiatives by raising substantial funds.
Through her foundation, Jolie has managed to amass millions of dollars to contribute to the fight against extreme poverty.
In her role as a goodwill ambassador, Jolie has tirelessly advocated for refugees and marginalized communities, bringing attention to their plight and advocating for their rights.
By engaging in humanitarian efforts on a global scale, she has not only provided direct assistance but also inspired others to join the cause. Through her extensive travels and dedicated philanthropy, Angelina Jolie continues to be a leading figure in the fight against poverty and an influential force in the realm of humanitarian work.
For more such questions on humanitarian,click on
https://brainly.com/question/24042144
#SPJ8
The Shackled Editor which piece of evidence best supports the answer to part A
Part A of the question is not provided, but assuming that it requires evidence to support a claim, the following passage from the play can be used as evidence to support the claim that Samuel Clemens is struggling with his conscience about publishing articles he disagrees with: "CLEMENSThis is a travesty. I’m selling my soul. It’s a lie. What we’re printing is wrong, deceitful, and we all know it.
These are good people we’re hurting. Some of them will suffer irreparable damage. Some will die. And you want me to bury the story? To lie for the sake of money? To make money from other people’s pain?"This passage shows Samuel's internal struggle with the ethical implications of publishing false information and hurting innocent people. It shows that he understands the consequences of publishing these articles but is forced to do so because of his financial needs and the pressure from the newspaper owner.
For more questions on conscience
https://brainly.com/question/2993880
#SPJ8
what is happening to the plant life on the shores of Lake Powell because of the changing water levels ?
Answer:
The correct answer is C) it's not able to grow,
What is happening to the plant life on the shores of Lake Powell because of the changing water levels is that it's not able to grow.
Lañe Powell is located in the Border of Utah and Arizona, close to the Rainbow Bridge National Monument. Today, many people visit Laake Powell as a vacation destination. But since some time ago, the water level of Lake Powell is changing. This has affected the Lake in that plant life on the shore is not able to grow and that keeps the state authorities worried.
Explanation:
hope you like the answer let me know ok
What is the sum of the series if the 1st term is 13, the last term is 130, and there are 14 terms in the series?
The sum of the series if the 1st term is 13, the last term is 130, and there are 14 terms in the series is 1001.
We can say that the above statement is correct by the following solution:
a(first term)=13
l(last term)=130
n(no. of terms)=14
If we have first term(a), last term(l), and no. of terms (n), then for finding the sum of the given ap we need to apply the given formula:
Sn=n/2(a+l)
S14=14/2(13+130)
S14=7×143
S14=1001
Hence it is proved that the sum of the series if the 1st term is 13, the last term is 130 and there are 14 terms in the series is 1001.
Read more about arithmetic progression at:
https://brainly.com/question/24191546
Read the following excerpt from "The City Without Us" by Alan Weisman: According to Dr. Jameel Ahmad, chairman of the civil engineering department at New York's Cooper Union, things will begin to fall apart during the first month of March after humans vacate Manhattan. Each March, temperatures normally flutter back and forth around 32°F as many as 40 times (presumably, climate change could push this back to February). Whenever it is, the repeated freezing and thawing make asphalt and cement split. When snow thaws, water seeps into these fresh cracks. When it freezes, the water expands, and cracks widen. . . . As pavement separates, weeds like mustard, shamrock, and goosegrass blow in from Central Park and work their way down the new cracks, which widen further. In the current world, before they get too far, city maintenance usually shows up, kills the weeds, and fills the fissures. But in the post-people world, there's no one left to continually patch New York. The weeds are followed by the city's most prolific exotic species, the Chinese ailanthus tree. Even with 8 million people around, ailanthus — otherwise innocently known as the tree-of-heaven — are implacable invaders capable of rooting in tiny chinks in subway tunnels, unnoticed until their spreading leaf canopies start poking from sidewalk grates. With no one to yank their seedlings, within five years powerful ailanthus roots are heaving up sidewalks and wreaking havoc in sewers — which are already stressed by all the plastic bags and old newspaper mush that no one is clearing away. As soil long trapped beneath pavement gets exposed to sun and rain, other species jump in, and soon leaf litter adds to the rising piles of debris clogging the sewer grates. What claim does Weisman make in "The City Without Us"? How does the text structure of this excerpt help support Weisman's claim? Be sure to refer to examples from the text to support your analysis.
The claim that Weisman made in "The City Without Us" is that the natural world had the power to reclaim itself even if all humans were to disappear.
How the text supports the claimThe text above supports the claim because it shows just how the natural world is able to get itself back to its original state when all humans exited from it.
We learn of the chronological events that led to the disappearance of humans and how the natural world was able to replenish itself. The sequence of events builds the claim.
Learn more about claim here:
https://brainly.com/question/2748145
#SPJ1
In these excerpts from The Road by Jack London, which sentence best demonstrates the author's attempt to persuade readers to be as compassionate as poor people are?
At other houses the doors were slammed in my face, cutting short my politely and humbly couched request for something to eat. At one house they did not open the door. I stood on the porch and knocked, and they looked out at me through the window. They even held one sturdy little boy aloft so that he could see over the shoulders of his elders the tramp who wasn't going to get anything to eat at their house.
It began to look as if I should be compelled to go to the very poor for my food. The very poor constitute the last sure recourse of the hungry tramp. The very poor can always be depended upon. They never turn away the hungry. Time and again, all over the United States, have I been refused food by the big house on the hill; and always have I received food from the little shack down by the creek or marsh, with its broken windows stuffed with rags and its tired-faced mother broken with labor. Oh, you charity-mongers! Go to the poor and learn, for the poor alone are the charitable. They neither give nor withhold from their excess.
. . .
There was one house in particular where I was turned down that evening. The porch windows opened on the dining room, and through them I saw a man eating pie—a big meat-pie. I stood in the open door, and while he talked with me, he went on eating. He was prosperous, and out of his prosperity had been bred resentment against his less fortunate brothers.
The question are :
At other houses the doors were slammed in my face, cutting short my politely and humbly couched request for something to eat.
They even held one sturdy little boy aloft so that he could see over the shoulders of his elders the tramp who wasn't going to get anything to eat at their house.
Go to the poor and learn, for the poor alone are the charitable. They neither give nor withhold from their excess.
The porch windows opened on the dining room, and through them I saw a man eating pie—a big meat-pie.
Answer:
Explanation:
The sentence that best demonstrates the author's attempt to persuade readers to be as compassionate as poor people are is:
"Go to the poor and learn, for the poor alone are the charitable. They neither give nor withhold from their excess."
This sentence emphasizes the author's belief that the poor are more compassionate and generous than the wealthy. The author encourages readers to learn from the poor's example of selflessness and not to withhold help from those in need.
I said to her i have already applied for a job change to indirect speech
Answer:
The sentence in indirect speech would be: "He said that he had already applied for a job."
What happened on floor 5 in a long way down by- Jason reynolds
Answer:
In the book A Long Way Down by Jason Reynolds, Floor 5 in an apartment complex is a place where the main characters, Will and his two friends, Booker and Jester, visit often. It is a place of refuge for the three friends, a place where they can go to just hang out and get away from their daily lives. Floor 5 has a pool table, a weird smell, and a place to dance. Floor 5 also serves as a place where the three friends can talk about their issues, hang out, and be themselves without judgement. At the end of the book, Will is confronted by his father on the fifth floor, and this is the last time the three friends are together.
Explanation:
One learner making an assessment decision about the work of another learner.
Peer feedback, or peer assessment, is the process by which learners assess each other's work and give each other feedback.
It involves learners taking on the role of assessors, examining the work of their fellow learners, and offering insights, suggestions, and criticisms based on predefined criteria or learning objectives.
Peer feedback serves multiple purposes in the learning process. Firstly, it encourages active engagement and critical thinking as learners analyze and evaluate their peers' work.
It also promotes a sense of ownership and responsibility, as learners understand that their opinions and assessments have an impact on their peers' learning and growth.
Moreover, receiving feedback from peers often feels less intimidating and more relatable, fostering a supportive learning environment.
By engaging in peer feedback, learners can develop a range of valuable skills. They enhance their ability to provide constructive criticism, develop their communication and analytical skills, and gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter by evaluating others' work.
However, for peer feedback to be effective, clear guidelines and criteria should be provided to ensure consistency and fairness. Additionally, facilitators or instructors play a crucial role in guiding the process, monitoring the quality of feedback, and addressing any discrepancies or concerns.
In conclusion, peer feedback is a valuable pedagogical tool that promotes active learning, critical thinking, and collaboration. It empowers learners to take ownership of their learning journey and enhances their ability to provide and receive constructive feedback, ultimately fostering a supportive and engaging learning environment.
For more such questions on learners,click on
https://brainly.com/question/24959987
#SPJ8
This excerpt is taken from a letter written by a father to his son.
"Do not think that I mean to dictate as a parent; I only mean to advise as a friend, and an indulgent one too: and do not apprehend that I mean to check your pleasures; of which, on the contrary, I only desire to be the guide, not the censor. Let my experience supply your want of it, and clear your way in the progress of your youth of those thorns and briers which scratched and disfigured me in the course of mine."
The tone of this excerpt can best be described as (5 points)
compromising and tender
scathing and unapologetic
conciliatory and humble
indignant and regretful
hopeful and conversational
Answer:
The tone of this excerpt can best be described as compromising and tender. The speaker is presenting themselves as a friend and advisor, emphasizing their intention to guide rather than dictate or check the listener's pleasures. The language used, such as "advise as a friend" and "indulgent one," suggests a tone of understanding and empathy. The speaker also expresses a desire to protect the listener from the difficulties they themselves faced, indicating a tender and caring tone.
Explanation:
Answer:
The tone of the excerpt can best be described as compromising and tender. The father is advising his son, but not dictating to him, and he wants to be a guide for his son's pleasures rather than a censor. He also mentions his own experiences and wants to help his son avoid the difficulties he faced in his youth. The use of words such as "advice", "indulgent", "guide", and "experience" indicate a tone that is gentle and caring.
Explanation:
simplify the story of Achilles
Answer:
Explanation:
The story of Achilles is a famous one from Greek mythology. It centers around Achilles, a mighty warrior and hero of the Trojan War.
Achilles was the son of the mortal Peleus and the sea nymph Thetis. As a baby, his mother dipped him in the river Styx, which made him invulnerable to harm, except for his heel which was not submerged in the water. This became known as his "Achilles heel."
During the Trojan War, Achilles played a crucial role as a warrior for the Greeks. He was known for his exceptional strength, skill in combat, and his famous armor. However, Achilles had a complex personality. He was known for his pride and arrogance, which often led to conflict with others, including the Greek king Agamemnon.
One of the most well-known events in Achilles' story is his conflict with Hector, the greatest warrior of the Trojan army. Achilles sought revenge for the death of his friend Patroclus, who was killed by Hector. In a climactic battle, Achilles killed Hector and dragged his body behind his chariot.
Despite his remarkable abilities, Achilles was not destined to survive the war. Paris, a prince of Troy, shot an arrow guided by the god Apollo that struck Achilles in his vulnerable heel, his only weak spot. Achilles died from the wound.
Achilles' story is often seen as a tragic one, highlighting the consequences of pride and the vulnerability of even the mightiest heroes. His character has been the subject of various adaptations, plays, and works of literature, including Homer's epic poem, the Iliad.
how will it be given( active)
Which type of appeal does the passage primarily use?
OA. Karros
OB. Ethos
OC. Pathos
OD. Logos
Answer:
OC. Pathos.
it is the correct answer
There have been recent studies on how sitting affects health. Studies indicate that long periods of sitting can have harmful effects on health. There are no health benefits to sitting
Which shoes the best way to convey the information?
Recent studies have shed light on the detrimental effects of prolonged sitting on our overall health. Extensive periods of sitting have been linked to various health issues, emphasizing the absence of any positive impact associated with this sedentary behavior.
Research has revealed that prolonged sitting can lead to a higher risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, certain types of cancer, and even premature death.
When we sit for extended periods, our metabolic rate slows down, resulting in decreased calorie burning and increased fat storage.
Additionally, sitting for long durations can negatively impact blood circulation, leading to higher blood pressure and an increased risk of blood clots.
To convey this information effectively, it is essential to emphasize the lack of health benefits associated with sitting. Studies have consistently demonstrated the harmful effects of prolonged sitting on our health, underscoring the importance of minimizing sedentary behavior and promoting regular physical activity.
Encouraging individuals to incorporate regular breaks, standing or walking intervals, and engaging in moderate exercise can help mitigate the adverse health effects of sitting and promote a healthier lifestyle.
By disseminating this information, we can empower individuals to make informed choices and take proactive steps towards maintaining their well-being.
For more such questions on detrimental,click on
https://brainly.com/question/31572115
#SPJ8
How does the graphic element in this recipe help support the text
In this play, music is used to
Select one:
O a. Contrast the apartment with the outside world
O b. Signify lapses in reality
O c. Reinforce critical events
O d. All of the above
Answer: D. all of the above
Explanation: In this play, music is used to contrast the apartment with the outside world. To signify lapses in reality. And to reinforce critical events.
A position on a topic presented in a text or paper.
A thesis statement is a central argument that serves as a roadmap for the essay. It should be clear, concise, specific, and debatable, indicating the writer's stance on the topic and providing a preview of the main points that will be discussed in the essay.
A position on a topic presented in a text or paper is referred to as a thesis statement. The thesis statement is the central argument of the essay and serves as a roadmap for the reader. A well-written thesis statement should be clear and concise, indicating the writer's stance on the topic, and providing a preview of the main points that will be discussed in the essay. A thesis statement is usually found at the end of the introduction paragraph. It should be debatable and not a fact.
It should be specific and precise to keep the essay focused and help in developing the main arguments of the essay. A thesis statement must provide a clear idea to the reader of what the essay is about, what the writer's stance is, and how they plan to defend their argument.For instance, a thesis statement for an essay on gun control could be "Stricter gun control measures are necessary to reduce gun violence in the United States."
This statement indicates the writer's stance on the topic and provides a roadmap for the essay, which will likely discuss the current state of gun control laws, the arguments for and against stricter measures, and potential solutions for reducing gun violence.
For more such questions on thesis statement , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/892903
#SPJ8
knowing the time period in which a piece of literature was written helps the reader to understand which of the following
Understanding the time period in which a piece of literature was written is crucial to understanding its context, authorial intent, and literary style. It allows readers to gain a deeper understanding of the work and the events and ideas that shaped it.
Knowing the time period in which a piece of literature was written helps the reader to understand the historical and cultural context in which it was created. This is important because literary works are often influenced by the social, political, and cultural events of the time, and understanding these influences can help readers better comprehend and appreciate the work.
In addition to providing context, knowledge of the time period can also provide insight into the author's intentions and beliefs. For example, understanding the historical background of George Orwell's Animal Farm can help readers understand the political satire he was intending to create. Similarly, knowledge of the cultural context in which William Shakespeare wrote his plays can help readers understand the significance of his use of language and themes.
Writing styles and literary techniques are often shaped by the historical and cultural context of their time, and recognizing this can help readers better appreciate and analyze the work. For example, understanding the Romantic period in literature can provide insight into the use of emotion, nature, and imagination in the works of writers such as William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge.
For more such questions on literature, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/20848481
#SPJ8
100 POINTS
Which is true about summarizing as an active reading technique?
A. A summary is always shorter than a paraphrase.
B. A paraphrase is always shorter than a summary.
C. Summarizing is rewriting an essay in your own words.
D. Summarizing is only a useful strategy for reading narrative essays.
Answer:
The true statement about summarizing as an active reading technique is not provided in the given search results . However, options A and B are about the length of a summary and a paraphrase, respectively, while option C is about rewriting an essay in one's own words, and option D is about the usefulness of summarizing in reading narrative essays.
Explanation:
Which of the following statements best summerize the central idea and important details of paragraph 2 ? In kudzu: from pretty vine to invasive pest
Paragraph 2 discusses the unintended introduction of kudzu to the United States, its favorable initial perception, its ability to spread rapidly, and the subsequent negative consequences that led to its classification as an invasive pest.
Paragraph 2 of "Kudzu: From Pretty Vine to Invasive Pest" introduces the concept of kudzu's initial introduction to the United States and its subsequent rapid spread.
The central idea of the paragraph is the unintentional introduction of kudzu and the factors contributing to its invasive nature.
The paragraph begins by stating that kudzu was initially brought to the United States in the late 19th century as an ornamental plant and for erosion control.
It highlights how the intentions behind its introduction were benign, as kudzu was admired for its lush foliage and rapid growth. However, the paragraph then emphasizes the unintended consequences that arose from introducing kudzu, namely its remarkable ability to spread and overtake other vegetation.
The important details presented in the paragraph include the initial positive perception of kudzu due to its aesthetic appeal and its effectiveness in preventing soil erosion.
Additionally, it mentions the inadvertent introduction of the plant's natural enemies, such as insects and diseases, which failed to curb its growth.
The paragraph concludes by indicating that the combination of these factors resulted in kudzu becoming an invasive pest, spreading across the southeastern United States and causing significant ecological and economic harm.
For more such questions on kudzu,click on
https://brainly.com/question/28604842
#SPJ8
The garden party by Katherine
"The Garden Party" is a short story written by Katherine Mansfield. It is a tale of class differences and their consequences. The Sheridan's, a wealthy family, is planning a garden party at their estate. However, the merriment is brought to a halt when a worker from the nearby slums is killed in an accident.
The story starts by describing the preparations for the garden party, which is a grand affair. The Sheridans are excited about the party, and Laura, the youngest daughter of the family, is particularly thrilled. She feels that she is doing something important by organizing the party and that it is a reflection of her family's status.
However, their excitement is dampened when they learn that a worker from the nearby slums has been killed in an accident. The family is torn between canceling the party and continuing with it. Laura wants to cancel the party out of respect for the worker and his family, but her mother insists that the party must go on.
The theme of class differences is evident in the story. The Sheridans are wealthy and live a life of luxury, while the workers in the nearby slums are poor and struggle to make ends meet. Laura's compassion for the worker is juxtaposed with her mother's indifference to his death.
In conclusion, "The Garden Party" is a commentary on class differences and their impact on people's lives. The story highlights the importance of empathy and compassion for those who are less fortunate than us.
Know more about The Garden Party here :
brainly.com/question/12791083
#SPJ8
Which sentence from the passage best shows that Elinor Ostrom’s work demonstrated that people can willingly choose to respect others’ rights?
A.
She also affirmed that people can work on their own to build trust with each other in a way that is mutually beneficial.
B.
In 2009, Indiana University professor Elinor Ostrom became the first woman to win the Nobel prize in economics.
C.
When people must share limited resources, such as water or farmland, it can be difficult for them to avoid conflict with one another.
D.
This economic principle refers to people owning land and other property as a group rather than as individuals.
The sentence from the passage that best shows that Elinor Ostrom’s work demonstrated that people can willingly choose to respect others’ rights is "She also affirmed that people can work on their own to build trust with each other in a way that is mutually beneficial."Option A is the correct answer.
Elinor Ostrom was an Indiana University professor who became the first woman to win the Nobel Prize in economics in 2009. Her work focused on the concept of "commons," which refers to resources that are shared by many people. Her studies were largely based on examples of communities that had found ways to manage their common resources in a sustainable and equitable manner. Her work demonstrated that people can willingly choose to respect other's rights, as she emphasized the importance of building trust and cooperation among community members.
This was reflected in the following sentence from the passage: "She also affirmed that people can work on their own to build trust with each other in a way that is mutually beneficial."In this sentence, Ostrom's belief that people can work together to build trust and cooperation is evident. She believed that when people work together, they can find ways to manage shared resources that are fair and equitable for everyone involved.
Therefore the correct answer is option A.
For more questions on sustainable
https://brainly.com/question/20627963
#SPJ8
We ______ not Peruvian. We come from Mexico
Millicent and Bev took a bus ahead of the rest of the girls; they had to stand up on the way to Lewiston Square. Bev seemed very cross about something. Finally she said, "You were talking with Herb Dalton at lunch today."
"No," Millicent said honestly.
"Well, I saw you smile at him. That's practically as bad as talking. Remember not to do it again."
Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?
Millicent feels confused by Bev.
Bev wants to embarrass Millicent.
Millicent is afraid of Bev.
Bev is jealous of Millicent.
From the passage, the best conclusion supported by the text is that Bev is jealous of Millicent. The passage describes a situation where Millicent and Bev took a bus ahead of the rest of the girls; they had to stand up on the way to Lewiston Square. Bev seemed very cross about something.
Finally, she accused Millicent of talking to Herb Dalton at lunch time. Millicent denied it, but Bev was still angry. Bev saw Millicent smile at Herb, and she said it was as bad as talking and that she shouldn't do it again. Therefore, it can be inferred that Bev is jealous of Millicent as the reason for her outburst is the smile Millicent gave Herb, suggesting that she wants Herb for herself.
The passage does not support the conclusion that Millicent feels confused by Bev. While Millicent may be surprised by Bev's outburst, there is nothing in the passage that suggests that she is confused by Bev. Additionally, the passage does not indicate that Bev is trying to embarrass Millicent.
Although she is angry with Millicent, her accusations are based on jealousy, not an attempt to humiliate her. Furthermore, there is no evidence that Millicent is afraid of Bev.
Know more about jealousy here :
brainly.com/question/32269434
#SPJ8
How does Orwell use squealers explanation to support his purpose
Answer:
One way Orwell uses Squealer's explanations to support his purpose is by showcasing how language can be twisted and distorted to deceive and maintain power. Squealer often employs euphemisms, vague statements, and complex arguments to confuse and mislead the other animals. For example, when the pigs violate the original principles of Animalism, Squealer reinterprets the commandments to convince the other animals that nothing has changed. This manipulation of language highlights how propaganda can be used to conceal and justify oppressive actions.
In a tryst with destiny who is the speaker’s audience in this passage
The audience of the speaker in "A Tryst with Destiny" is the Indian Constituent Assembly.
This speech was delivered by India's first Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, on the night of August 14-15, 1947. This speech has historical significance in that it marked India's transition from a colony to an independent nation. A Tryst with Destiny is a speech given by Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, on the eve of India's independence, on August 14, 1947.
Nehru addressed the members of the Constituent Assembly, which had been chosen to draft India's new constitution, in his speech. The speech has been extensively documented and is regarded as one of the most significant speeches in Indian history. The speech was delivered to an Indian audience who had long been oppressed by the British colonial rule and were struggling for independence.
Nehru's speech aimed to provide hope and to convey the significance of India's independence. In the speech, Nehru expressed his optimism and hope for the future, stating that India had a "tryst with destiny" and that it would become one of the world's great nations.
For more such questions on A Tryst with Destiny, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/14957485
#SPJ8