Please help me with this question!

Answer:

(C) 0.5

Step-by-step explanation:

side with length 3 will now be 1.5

side with length 4 will now be 2

side with length 5 will now be 2.5

this will make the new triangle appear to be smaller than the original

Answer:

it's B

Step-by-step explanation:

by analyzing it I figured it was 100% B

Answer:

C. a dilation by a scale factor of 3 and then a 180 degrees rotation about the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

G is the same point transformed as E and H is the same as point F.

Since G is now (-9,0) that was multiplied 3 times from (3,0) before it was rotated. Which would show that the answer is probably C or D.

Next, the answer looks as though it has been rotated around D or the origin by 180 degrees but we don't know that quite yet.

So check if you dilated triangle DEF by a factor of 3 then translated it down 6 units point E would now be (9,-6).

Then translate it to the left 6 units. (3, -6). That's not the same as triangle DGH.

So the answer is C.

Hope this helps! If it does brainliest would be appreciated.

Step-by-step explanation:

y = ax +b

2 = 0a+ b => b = 2

4 = -2a + b

4 = -2a +2

2a = 2-4

2a = -2

a = -1

so, y = -x + 2

Answer:

.79

Step-by-step explanation:

79/100 or .79 m

Answer:

option c (82) is the answer

Answer:

-9

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct answer is B).

The single solution is [tex]log_\frac{1}{2} \frac{w^{4}u^{2} }{v^{3} }[/tex].

The exponent to which the base of the logarithm should be raised in order to obtain the number N is the logarithm of any number N, if interpreted as an exponential form. Numerous astronomical and scientific calculations involving large numbers can benefit from its use. As an inverse of the exponential function, logarithmic functions are closely related to exponential functions.

Given Equation

[tex]4log_\frac{1}{2} w + (2log_\frac{1}{2} u - 3log_\frac{1}{2} v)[/tex]

[tex]mlog_an = log_an^{m}[/tex]

equation is

[tex]log_\frac{1}{2} w^4 + (log_\frac{1}{2} u^2 - log_\frac{1}{2} v^3)[/tex]

and [tex]log_an - log_am = log_a\frac{n}{m}[/tex]

and [tex]log_an + log_am = log_amn[/tex]

[tex]log_\frac{1}{2} w^4 + (log_\frac{1}{2} \frac{u^2}{v^3} )[/tex]

and [tex]log_\frac{1}{2} \frac{w^{4}u^{2} }{v^{3} }[/tex]

Hence the equation is [tex]log_\frac{1}{2} \frac{w^{4}u^{2} }{v^{3} }[/tex].

Learn more about logarithmic;

https://brainly.com/question/30085872

#SPJ5

Answer:

A $270 I'm guessing sorry I hope I'm right

Answer:

uhh i think the 2nd and the very last one

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry if its wrong

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

100/10=10

Hi ;-)

100 cupcakes in 10 boxes = 10 cupcakes per box

100 : 10 = 10

Answer:

x, y, z = 0

Explanation:

Quiz on K12

Answer:

hola que nesecitas yo no se ese deber

Hi ;-)

54 passengers on 2 buses = 27 passengers per bus

54 : 2 = 27

Answer:

the answer is 27 passengers per bus

Step-by-step explanation:

54÷2=27

Answer:

well this is according to my calculator

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is 506

Answer:

Its the third one.

Step-by-step explanation:

I dont know what to write for the explanation but the other answers dont match up with the ratio. Hope this helps!

[tex]( \frac{1}{4} gh) ^{3} = \frac{ {g}^{3} {h}^{3} }{64} [/tex]

I hope I helped you^_^

Answer:

((1/4g)(h))^3

=1/64  g^3 h^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Circle question of the rug

That you needed answer for is ;

3/4 pi^2  

Step-by-step explanation:

Proof  1/4 pi r^2

We can state the radius of small rug is 3ft

to show Area pi 3^2 = pi 9

If the large rug is 3x this size  

then  pi 9^2 = pi81

So the ratio here is 1 : 9 when 3 cm or 1 : 3 radius

Ratio is 1 : 9 when 1cm or 1 : 3 radius  

When 1 : 9 cm when 5cm or 1 : 3 radius  

So if we are considering an expression of the larger rug  

that shows 3: 1 more radius to that of the small.

1/4 pi^2 becomes 3/4 pi^2 of the smaller rug

As this is 3 x 1/4 pi^2 we show 3/4pi r^2

Answer:

2 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

Praveen collected 20 pounds and the center only took 18.

20-18=2

Answer:

Aunts = 6/24 => 3/12 => 1/4

Sisters = 2/24 => 1/12

hope that helps uh..☺

Answer:

1/2  is the answer

Answer:

3.2

Step-by-step explanation:

3.8 + (-0.6)

=> 3.8 - 0.6       [Since, Positive x Negative = Negative]

=> 3.2

So Plot 3.2 on the number line.             (First segment after 3)

Answer:

The integers are -58, -57, -56.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference between two consecutive integers is 1.

If you let the smallest of the three consecutive integers equal x, then the next greater one is x + 1, and the greatest of the three is x + 2.

Integers: x, x + 1, x + 2

The sum of the first and third is: x + x + 2

3 times the sum of the first and third is: 3(x + x + 2)

That product equals -342.

3(x + x + 2) = -342

3(2x + 2) = -342

Divide both sides by 3.

2x + 2 = -114

Subtract 2 from both sides.

2x = -116

Divide both sides by 2.

x = -58

x + 1 = -57

x + 2 = -56

The integers are -58, -57, -56.

not my answer...found it from somewhere else... but hope this helps

Diameter = 2 x radius

Area of circle formula: πr²

0.82/2 gives us the radius.

The radius is 0.41 so let's square that.

0.41²= 0.1681

Your answer is 0.1681π OR approximately 0.527834*

(*since 0.1681 times 3.14 is approximately 0.527834)

Answer:

0.527834

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter = 2 x radius

Area of circle formula: πr²

0.82/2 gives us the radius.

The radius is 0.41 so let's square that.

0.41²= 0.1681

0.527834

Answer:

(-2,1) (-2,3) (-4,1) (-4,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Simply select each of the points, Count how many squares away that point is away from the line of reflection (the y-axis) and Put that point the same distance/amount of squares away on the other side of the y-axis. Join up the points and then you get your answer!

  35x + 0.15y

=3500x + 15y

= 700x + 3y

2. x + (x+2) + (x+2+2)  ----> x+x+2+x+4 ----->3x+6

3. 1/5*(r+7) - 9s -----> (r+7)/5 - 9s

4. x=cows and y= sheep+goats

Answer/x= (y+140)/2

Answer:

a. y=(-9)^2+3=81+3=84

y=square root of -9-2=3i-2

b. He cannot with the first but he can with with second. For the first, we have 0=x^2+3. Then subtract 4 from each side and get -3=x^2. This isn't possible in a theoretical term. For the second, you have 0=square root of x -2 or 2=square root of x. That means x is 4.