Question 2: (15 marks)
Mike had longed to buy a new car for some years. Unfortunately, his job as a sanitation engineer did not pay very well at all, and he was unable
to afford anything more than a bicycle. However, after months of saving he had saved enough to buy a small, second-hand car. The moment he
drove out of the car yard, Mike was the proudest of all proud car owners. He was, perhaps, a little too proud. His belief in his driving skills was
misplaced.
As he came to the intersection of a major highway. Mike indicated, checked his rear-view mirror, but completely forgot to slow down. Ten metres
from the intersection he remembered, and applied his brakes with great force. The car spun out of control and collided with an electricity pole.
Jenny who was waiting for her bus near the electricity pole suffered minor injuries in the accident. Mike was slightly hurt but had been wearing
a seat belt which had prevented serious injury.
The collision with the electricity pole cut the electricity to several suburbs, with consequent inconvenience and some expense. In particular, the
Fancy Shoes factory had to shut down its operations. The shutdown lasted for two days; on the first day, the factory was without electricity. On
the second day, electricity was restored, but the manager decided to take the opportunity to carry out some urgent maintenance work.
Required: Discuss the Common law legal position of Jenny and Fancy Shoes in an action of negligence against Mike.

The idea that variables should be the focus of research is connected to Newton's Law on the linearity of mass and motion, commonly referred to as the Law of Inertia.

What does the study of object motion in relation to Newton's laws entail?

Because they represent the cornerstone of classical mechanics, one of the primary areas of physics, Newton's laws of motion are significant. The study of mechanics focuses on how objects move or remain immobile in the presence of forces.

Why is the law of inertia sometimes used to refer to Newton's first law of motion?

The law of inertia states that every material body has a characteristic that prevents it from changing its state of rest or motion in its state of motion. This property is called inertia.

To know more about variables visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ1

The main flaw of tautology, which arises when a theory utilises a concept to explain a reality but that concept is also defined by the thing being explained, is that it undermines biological hypotheses.

With a focus on the conceptual unification provided by evolutionary and developmental approaches, the journal Biological Theory is devoted to theoretical developments in the disciplines of evolution and cognition.

According to the biological positivist idea, a person's traits and actions, which make up their hereditary disposition, are what make them criminals. According to biological positivism, some people are born criminals and some people are not.

To know more about hypotheses visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30473809

#SPJ1

Neoconservatism and postmodernism are the two intertwining trends in late critical criminology that have had the biggest influence.

A contemporary theory for examining the causes, remedies, and prevention of criminal conduct is the postmodern criminal theory. According to this theory, crime is a social construct that develops as a result of complicated interactions between people who co-produce their surroundings, which in turn reproduces unique behaviours and identities like criminality.

Though he did not explicitly advocate for it, French philosopher Michel Foucault is widely regarded as one of the most influential proponents of this method.

To know more about criminology visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14916775

#SPJ1

Answer:

In the context of law, "proof" refers to the evidence presented to support a claim or assertion, and the level of certainty that the evidence establishes. The proof is used to convince a judge or jury that a particular fact or proposition is true and to satisfy the burden of proof required to establish a legal claim or defense.

Answer:

Explanation:

Proof is defined as twice the alcohol (ethanol) content by volume. For example, a whisky with 50% alcohol is 100-proof whiskey

Free will serves as the fundamental tenet or foundation of classical thought. According to traditional criminology, people are rational individuals with free will who can make decisions in their own best interests.

According to the traditional theory of criminology, committing a crime is a free-will decision. The pain-pleasure principle is used to make this decision; it states that people behave in ways that maximise pleasure and decrease pain.

In traditional criminology, the concept of free will is used to explain why criminals choose to commit crimes and why the only approach to regulate it is to dissuade criminals and make them uncomfortable .

To know more about criminology visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/10296980

#SPJ1

A trial court is similar to an appeals court as c. both are judicial bodies and form case law.

An appeals court and a district court are both legal institutions that create case law. The other choices, though, may not apply to both district judges and appeals courts. Trial courts do not always have jurors; some cases may be resolved solely by the judge. The jury system is absent from appeals courts, which only examine the judgements rendered by subordinate courts.

Trial courts typically hear questions of fact and reach preliminary conclusions based on the evidence provided, whereas appeals courts typically concentrate on legal issues and assess the rulings rendered by the lesser court. Trial courts and appeals courts both receive evidence, though the intent and reach of the testimony may vary depending on the court.

Complete Question:

A trial court is similar to an appeals court in what way?

a. both have juries.

b. both hear questions of fact.

c. both are judicial and form case law.

d. both hear testimony.

Read more about trial court on:

https://brainly.com/question/29618636

#SPJ4

Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.

Why can't the Vice President take part in Senate Debate?

The only constitutional obligation for a vice president is to preside over the Senate, except from taking over as president in the event of a president's demise or resignation. Vice presidents are not permitted to cast a vote in the Senate, with the exception of breaking a tie, or to address the Senate informally without the consent of the senators.

According to the Constitution, the vice president of the United States leads the Senate. The vice president officially preside over the receipt and tabulation of electoral votes cast in presidential elections in addition to acting as the meeting's presiding officer. He or she also has the only authority to break a deadlock in the Senate.

A vice president in the government is someone whose main duty is to take the president's position in the case of the latter's demise, resignation, or incapacity.

Learn more about Vice President :

https://brainly.com/question/18882530

#SPJ1

Answer:

Chain of custody or chain of evidence

Explanation:

The document used to establish the exact whereabouts of an item of evidence from the time it was collected until the time it goes to the courtroom is known as the "chain of custody" or "chain of evidence" document.

The chain of custody is a written record that documents the chronological history of the physical evidence, from the time it was collected at the crime scene to the time it is presented in court. It provides a detailed account of who handled the evidence, when it was collected, where it was stored, and any changes in its condition or custody over time.

The chain of custody is essential in ensuring the integrity and admissibility of evidence in court. It is used to establish the authenticity and reliability of the evidence and to prevent contamination, alteration, or tampering of the evidence by anyone who comes into contact with it.

The chain of custody document is typically maintained by the law enforcement agency responsible for the investigation, and it is usually signed and dated by each person who handles the evidence. The document may also include photographs, sketches, or other records that document the condition and location of the evidence at various stages in the chain of custody.

The document used to establish the exact whereabouts of an item of evidence from the time it was collected until the time it goes to the courtroom is known as the chain of custody.

The chain of custody is a legal term that refers to the chronological documentation and paper trail that shows the collection, transfer, handling, and storage of evidence in a criminal case. It is used to prove that the evidence was not tampered with, altered, or contaminated in any way during the period it was in the possession of law enforcement, forensic experts, or other individuals involved in the case.

The chain of custody document includes detailed information about the date and time of collection, the location, the name of the person who collected the evidence, and any subsequent transfer of the evidence. It is crucial in establishing the authenticity and reliability of the evidence presented in court, and any gaps or inconsistencies in the chain of custody can weaken the prosecution's case or lead to the exclusion of the evidence from the trial.

The chain of custody is essential for ensuring the fairness and integrity of the criminal justice system and maintaining public trust in the legal process.

To know more about item of evidence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31202446#

#SPJ11

Many states hold that a public officer who willfully delays bringing a defendant before a magistrate for arraignment is guilty of a misdemeanor or other criminal offense.

Arraignment is a critical step in the criminal justice system that takes place after an arrest. It is when the defendant is formally charged with a crime and is informed of their constitutional rights, including the right to counsel. Delays in arraignment can result in prolonged detention, which can violate a defendant's due process rights and create overcrowding in jails.

As a result, many states have laws that require public officers to promptly bring defendants before a magistrate for arraignment. When an officer willfully delays this process, they can be charged with a misdemeanor or other criminal offense. This serves as a deterrent to ensure that defendants' rights are protected and the criminal justice system operates efficiently.

To know more about defendant, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30724930#

#SPJ11

The Sixth and Seventh Amendments guarantee the right to a trial by jury in criminal and civil cases, respectively. The jury is supposed to be impartial, representative, uninfluenced, and competent to ensure a fair trial.

1. Impartial: The jury members should not have any preconceived notions or biases towards the case, ensuring a fair and unbiased trial.

2. Representative: The jury should be comprised of a diverse group of individuals that represents a cross-section of the community.

3. Uninfluenced: Jurors should not be swayed by outside influences or pressures and should make their decision solely based on the evidence and testimony presented during the trial.

4. Competent: Jurors should be capable of understanding the legal issues and evidence presented in the case, enabling them to make an informed decision.

In summary, the jury should be impartial, representative, uninfluenced, and competent to ensure a fair trial in both criminal and civil cases as guaranteed by the Sixth and Seventh Amendments.

To know more about fair trial, refer here

https://brainly.com/question/15669425#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

False- Punitive damages may be recovered in a concurrent common-law fraud action.

The given statement because punitive damages are not permitted under federal statutory law, a plaintiff suing for violation of section 11 of the 1933 act cannot file a concurrent common-law fraud action is FALSE.

Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 imposes strict liability on issuers, underwriters, and other specified parties for material misstatements or omissions in a registration statement. However, it does not preempt common-law fraud claims, which require a showing of intent or recklessness.

Although federal law does not provide for punitive damages in securities cases, some state laws do. Therefore, a plaintiff may be able to recover punitive damages in a concurrent common-law fraud action filed in state court.

In fact, courts have consistently held that Section 11 does not displace common-law fraud claims, and that a plaintiff may pursue both causes of action concurrently. The plaintiff may also elect to pursue only the common-law fraud claim and waive the Section 11 claim.

To know more about federal statutory law, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/26195686#

#SPJ11

Mark Murphy and John Kendall may be sued for the mortgage debt and the property may be foreclosed upon by First Bank and Trust Company. Ruth Thomas cannot be sued, and state law and the purchase agreements govern her options for redress against Kendall and Murphy.

In 2018, Chicago's Byline Bank formally bought Evanston, Illinois' First Bank & Trust (FB&T), a community and commercial bank. Robert Yohanan founded FB&T in the beginning in 1995.

An Indian bank called Oudh Commercial Bank, sometimes known as Awadh Commercial Bank, was founded in Faizabad in 1881 and lasted until it failed in 1958. Being limited liable, it was India's first commercial bank.

To know more about state law visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30901480

#SPJ1

Answer:Some territories of the United States were ruled by different countries, so elements of those countries laws remain in those states today.

Explanation:

I did this a week ago

Answer:

The Business, Careers, and Challenges of Security and Loss Prevention

Philip P. Purpura, in Security and Loss Prevention (Sixth Edition), 2013

Regulation of the Industry

The security vocation has its share of charlatans who tarnish the industry, and, as with many types of services offered to the public, government intervention has taken the form of licensing and registration. The Task Force Report and Hallcrest Reports recommend regulation of the security industry by all states. To protect consumers, the majority of states have varied laws that regulate, through licensing and registration, contract security officer services, private investigators, polygraph and other detection-of-deception specialists, and security alarm businesses. Security consultants are generally not regulated, but consumers should verify professional memberships and certifications. Although government regulation does not guarantee that all security practitioners will perform in a satisfactory manner, it does prevent people who have criminal records from entering the profession. In the case of applicants who have lived in multiple states, their backgrounds should be checked in each jurisdiction.

Another way the industry is regulated is through local, state, and federal agencies that contract out private security services and mandate various contract requirements (e.g., education, training, and character) to enhance professionalism and competence. Certain industries are regulated by the government and require stringent security standards. For example, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission issues rules and standards that must be followed by licensees of nuclear reactors to ensure safety and security. A variety of businesses, institutions, and other organizations also issue requirements. Notably, when a contract is awarded simply to the lowest bidder, professionalism may be sacrificed.

Attempts have been made through Congress to pass a national law to regulate the security industry. In 1995, Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA) introduced H.R. 2092, The Private Security Officers Quality Assurance Act. It languished in Congress in various forms until Rep. Matthew Martinez (D-CA) introduced a similar bill. Known as the Barr-Martinez Bill, if passed, it would have provided state regulators with expedited FBI criminal background checks of prospective and newly hired security officers. The minimal training standards were struck from the bill. These would have required eight hours of training and four hours of on-the-job training for unarmed officers and an additional 15 hours for armed officers. Critics argued that states are against such a national law and state regulations are sufficient.

Finally, Congress passed the Private Security Officer Employment Authorization Act of 2004 (included in the National Intelligence Reform Act of 2004), which enables security service businesses and proprietary security organizations in all 50 states to check whether applicants have a criminal history record with the FBI, which may emanate from one or more states. (National training requirements were not included in the legislation.) This law is significant and adds strength to criminal records checks of security officer applicants. Traditional name-based searches can result in false positives (i.e., an applicant’s name is incorrectly matched to an offender’s name or similar name) and false negatives (i.e., an applicant’s name does not result in a match because the applicant is using a different name or a database was omitted from the investigation). Because applicants may use different names and other bogus identifying information, fingerprints provide increased accuracy in background investigations. Under the act, security firm access to the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) also includes access to the Violent Gangs and Terrorism Organization File. Although not all security organizations are required to check these fingerprint databases for a match with their applicants, the effort and expense of doing so prevent litigation and the possibility that an applicant is a terrorist or other criminal. Cost is one of several factors that influence the extent of background investigations (Friedrick, 2005: 11).

Which government agency (or agencies) in your state regulates the private security industry? What are the requirements for contract security (“guard”) companies, private detectives, and security alarm installers? Are proprietary security organizations regulated in your state?

Answer:

The predominance of volunteer firefighters in the United States can be attributed to several factors. First and foremost, firefighting has a strong tradition of community service and volunteerism, with many individuals motivated by a desire to help their neighbors and protect their communities. In many rural areas and small towns, volunteer firefighters are often the only available option due to limited budgets and resources.

Additionally, volunteer firefighting departments are often deeply embedded in their communities, with members serving for years or even decades. This longevity fosters a strong sense of camaraderie and loyalty among members, and can create a tight-knit team that is highly motivated to work together to achieve their goals.

Finally, the cost of maintaining a paid firefighting force can be prohibitive for many communities, particularly in rural areas or smaller towns. Volunteer firefighters provide an important cost-effective alternative, allowing communities to provide essential firefighting services while keeping costs under control.

While paid firefighters are an important part of many larger urban areas, volunteer firefighting departments continue to play a vital role in protecting communities across the country. Their dedication, commitment, and willingness to serve provide a critical resource for ensuring public safety and protecting property.

Explanation:

Answer:

c peacemaking

Explanation:

The most likely remedy to be awarded by a court in a breach of contract case where the contract does not limit remedies is specific performance, which requires the breaching party to fulfil the terms of the contract.

When there is a breach of contract and the contract does not restrict remedies, the most likely remedy that a judge will give is specified performance. This requires the breaching party, in this instance Kirby, to fulfil the contract's conditions, which include selling the home to Marta as promised.

Specific performance is frequently given when monetary damages would not properly recompense the non-breaching party, such as when a unique or irreplaceable object, such as a home, is involved. Other possible options include monetary losses, contract rescission or reformation.

Learn more about the breach of contract:

https://brainly.com/question/28101555

#SPJ4

Athlete A's actions would likely constitute the crime of extortion or blackmail. It is also possible that Athlete A's actions could be considered obstruction of justice. Athlete A's plan would not be successful, as it would be illegal and unethical.

Extortion or blackmail involves using threats or coercion to obtain something of value from another person. In this case, Athlete A is using the threat of reporting Athlete B's past illegal activity to the police to try to gain an advantage in the competition. This would likely be considered extortion or blackmail.

Additionally, Athlete A's actions could be considered obstruction of justice, as they are attempting to interfere with the legal process by using information as leverage.

Overall, Athlete A's plan is both illegal and unethical. It goes against fair play and sportsmanship and could result in serious legal consequences.

To know more about blackmail visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30371085

#SPJ1

It is important to uphold the principles of fair play and sportsmanship, and to avoid engaging in any behaviour that could harm the reputation or freedom of movement of others.

The scenario you have described raises some important ethical and legal questions, and there are a number of criminal law implications to consider.

From a criminal law perspective, Athlete A's actions could potentially be considered defamation, which is the act of making false statements that harm a person's reputation.

Defamation can be both a civil and criminal offence, and depending on the jurisdiction, it can be punishable by fines, imprisonment, or both.

if Athlete A's false report to the police results in Athlete B being falsely arrested or imprisoned,

Athlete A could be charged with false imprisonment, which is the act of intentionally restricting someone's freedom of movement without lawful justification. False imprisonment can also result in criminal charges and significant penalties.

In terms of the rules and regulations of the relevant sporting organization, Athlete A's actions could violate the organization's code of conduct or anti-doping policies.

Many sports organizations have strict rules prohibiting the use of performance-enhancing drugs and other substances, and athletes who violate these rules can face significant penalties, including suspension or disqualification from competition.

However, if Athlete A's false report to the police is discovered, they could also face disciplinary action from the sporting organization, including suspension or disqualification from competition.

Athlete A's plan to falsely accuse Athlete B of using illegal substances and get them jailed to miss the competition is both unethical and illegal.

Therefore, It is important to uphold the principles of fair play and sportsmanship, and to avoid engaging in any behaviour that could harm the reputation or freedom of movement of others.

Learn more about law here:

https://brainly.com/question/1205493

#SPJ1

Erich Fromm's theories recently experienced a mini-revival. Fromm's emphasis on the psychological and social facets of human conduct.

Neo-Freudian psychotherapist Erich Fromm proposed a personality theory based on two fundamental needs: the need for freedom and the need for belonging. He advised people to adopt particular personality traits or coping mechanisms to deal with the anxiety brought on by loneliness.

According to Fromm, man has a unique spiritual quality that is not shared by any other creature. He considers his history and future in his own mind. He acknowledges his future and his own futility. The human race is in nature.

To know more about psychological visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/31197260

#SPJ1

Thompson's filing status for year 2 would be "Single."  Filing status is determined based on the taxpayer's situation as of the last day of the tax year (December 31st).

"Filing status" is a term used in United States tax law to determine the tax rates, deductions, and credits available to taxpayers. There are five possible filing statuses:

Single: This filing status is for unmarried individuals who are not a qualifying widow(er) or head of household.

Married Filing Jointly: This filing status is for married couples who choose to file their tax return together.

Married Filing Separately: This filing status is for married couples who choose to file their tax return separately.

Head of Household: This filing status is for unmarried individuals who provide a home for a qualifying child or dependent.

Qualifying Widow(er): This filing status is for a surviving spouse who meets certain requirements and has not remarried.

A taxpayer's filing status is determined by their marital status and living situation as of the last day of the tax year.

To know more about   filing status  here

https://brainly.com/question/29733204

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The procedure for managing legal and ethical compliance is a set of guidelines and processes that organizations follow to ensure that they comply with all relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards. The steps involved in managing legal and ethical compliance typically include:

Identify applicable laws and ethical standards: The first step in managing legal and ethical compliance is to identify all relevant laws, regulations, and ethical standards that apply to the organization and its activities. This includes federal, state, and local laws as well as industry-specific regulations and ethical guidelines.

Develop policies and procedures: Once the relevant laws and ethical standards have been identified, the organization should develop policies and procedures to ensure compliance. These policies and procedures should be documented and communicated to all employees.

Train employees: It is important to ensure that all employees are aware of the organization's legal and ethical requirements and are trained on how to comply with them. This includes training on relevant laws and regulations, as well as ethical standards and the consequences of non-compliance.

Monitor compliance: The organization should regularly monitor compliance with legal and ethical requirements, including conducting internal audits and reviews. This can help identify areas where the organization may be at risk of noncompliance and allow for corrective action to be taken.

Respond to violations: If a violation of a legal or ethical requirement is identified, the organization should take appropriate action to address the violation. This may include disciplinary action, corrective measures, or reporting the violation to relevant authorities.

Continuously improve: Finally, the organization should continuously review and improve its legal and ethical compliance program to ensure that it remains effective and up-to-date with changing laws and regulations.

By following these steps, organizations can help ensure that they comply with all relevant legal and ethical requirements, minimize the risk of noncompliance, and maintain the trust and confidence of stakeholders.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

A. i think

Explanation:

Answer:

courts martial in 1971, following his involvement in the killing of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians, including women and children, during the Vietnam War. The atrocities committed by Calley and his platoon were a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit the targeting of non-combatants in war. Similarly, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in 2004 brought to light the brutal and inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. military personnel. The photographs and videos that emerged from the prison showed detainees being subjected to physical and sexual abuse, torture, and humiliation. The actions of the soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib scandal were a clear violation of international law and human rights. In both cases, the soldiers involved were prosecuted and faced punishment for their actions. The question of whether soldiers in the military should be prosecuted for killing or torturing enemies captured

The author develops the thesis statement that "Nature returns to the cities" by providing multiple examples of how nature is finding its way back into urban areas. By discussing green spaces, urban gardening, and urban wildlife, the author argues that nature is becoming an increasingly important part of city life.

The thesis statement of the text "Nature returns to the cities" is the main argument or claim that the author is making throughout the piece. In this text, the author argues that nature is finding its way back into urban areas, and gives several examples to support this claim.

The author develops the thesis statement is by discussing how cities are incorporating green spaces into their design. For instance, the author mentions the High Line in New York City, which is a park built on an old elevated train track. The author notes that this park has become a popular destination for both tourists and locals, and is an example of how urban areas can incorporate nature into their design.

Read more about thesis statement

brainly.com/question/2094985

#SPJ1

A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n): c) Intermediate Appellate Court

An intermediate appellate court is a particular kind of court that typically doesn't handle first-instance cases but instead reviews various specific judgements rendered by lesser trial courts. A review of these judgements may be made to a superior court, like the state Supreme Court or the federal Supreme Court.

Lower courts in the same area may refer to the multiple views provided by Intermediate Appellate Courts as precedent and as a guidance when making decisions. Because they support uniformity and justice in how the law is interpreted and applied, intermediate appellate courts are hence regarded as a crucial component of the legal system.

Complete Question:

A court that does not typically hear original trials, but whose opinions are regularly reviewed by other state courts is likely to be a(n):

a) Trial Court

b) Civil Court

c) Intermediate Appellate Court

d) Court of Last Resort

Read more about Intermediate Appellate Court on:

https://brainly.com/question/8773628

#SPJ4

To make claims during a bicycle accidents firstly all road users must understand that they have a duty to  be very careful and use the road safely and to claim for compensation, they have to prove that the accident was due to the other road users negligent and you got the injuries due their negligent

A claims works when a formal request is made  by a policyholder to an insurance company for a compensation to cover for a loss or damages during an accidents

The insurance company will have to  verify the claim to check if the accident did not occur due to negligent and then issue an  approval for payment to the insured or an approved interested party on behalf of the insured.

Learn more about Insurance on  brainly.com/question/4953989

#SPJ1

Answer:

I believe the answer is D Kentucky

Explanation:

The tax percentages for each type of tax and their actual amounts would be:

The percentage of the taxes in question are shown on the left side of the picture.

The actual taxes are:

Federal :

= 7. 57% x 1, 560

= $ 118.10

FICA Medicare ;
= 1. 45% x 1, 560

= $ 22.62

FICA Social security :

= 6. 20% x 1, 560

= $ 96.72

State taxes :

= 3. 65% x 1, 560

= $ 54. 75

Find out more on taxes at https://brainly.com/question/29613785

#SPJ1

Answer:

Ballistics is the science of studying the motion, behavior, and effects of projectiles, such as bullets and missiles. It is a critical area of forensic science that plays a crucial role in criminal investigations and the justice system. Ballistic analysis can be used to determine the source of a firearm, the trajectory of a bullet, and the nature and extent of injuries caused by gunshot wounds. It can also be used to match bullets or cartridge cases recovered from crime scenes to specific firearms. The importance of ballistics in criminal investigations cannot be overstated, as it provides crucial evidence that can help establish guilt or innocence and ensure that justice is served. In summary, ballistics plays a crucial role in the investigation of firearm-related crimes, providing key evidence that can be used to solve cases and bring perpetrators to justice.

Explanation: