Rights specifically granted to Congress by the federal Constitution is what

Answer: Hope this helps.

Explanation:

State Authority Occupational Crime refers to illegal activities committed by individuals in positions of authority in government or state organizations, using their power for personal gain or to benefit the organization they work for. An example of a State Authority Occupational Crime would be an elected official embezzling public funds for personal use, a police officer accepting bribes to overlook criminal activities, or a public official awarding contracts to companies in exchange for personal favors or kickbacks. Another example would be a public official using their influence to influence government policies or regulations to benefit a particular business or industry in which they have a financial interest.

Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational crime.

State authority occupational crimes are crimes that happen when someone uses the power that has been legitimately granted to them by someone with the ability to execute the law or to order others to commit the crime. These crimes are often referred to as white-collar crimes.

Money laundering is the practice of fraudulently disguising the source of funds earned via unlawful activities such as the sale of illegal drugs, corruption, embezzlement, or gambling by rerouting them through a legitimate source.

Hence, Money laundering is an example of State Authority Occupational Crime.

To learn more about Occupational crimes, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/3187325

#SPJ4

Answer:

injuction

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The conduct on the part of the plaintiff which falls below the standard to which he should conform for his own protection and which cooperates with the negligence of the defendant in bringing about the plaintiff's harm is called "contributory negligence."

Contributory negligence is a defense in tort law, which allows a defendant to avoid liability for a plaintiff's injury or damages if the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the harm. In other words, if the plaintiff's own actions or failure to act were a significant factor in causing or contributing to their own injury, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff was partly to blame and therefore not entitled to recover damages from the defendant.

Not all states recognize contributory negligence as a complete bar to recovery, and some states have modified the doctrine to allow for comparative negligence or comparative fault. Under comparative negligence, the plaintiff's recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault, while under pure comparative negligence, the plaintiff can recover even if they are found to be more than 50% at fault for their own injury.

Conduct on the part of the plaintiff which falls below the standard to which he should conform for his own protection and which cooperates with the negligence of the defendant in bringing about the plaintiff's harm is called contributory negligence.

Contributory negligence is when the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their own harm, and cooperated with the defendant's negligence to cause the harm.

In other words, the plaintiff's conduct fell below the standard that should have been conformed for their own protection.

Contributory negligence is often a defense used by defendants to avoid being found liable for the plaintiff's harm. To be successful, the defendant must show that the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care for their own safety, and that this failure to exercise reasonable care resulted in the plaintiff's harm.

If contributory negligence is found to be a factor, then the plaintiff's damages may be reduced or barred altogether. Thus, it is important for the plaintiff to exercise reasonable care for their own safety in order to avoid being found contributorily negligent.

To know more about Contributory negligence click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14925661#

#SPJ11

The Model Penal Code comes from the American Law Institute, an independent group of scholars, judges, and lawyers, and a widespread desire to reform the historical common law.

It is not directly related to international legal bodies surrounding criminal law reform or a string of key U.S. Supreme Court cases in the 1960s.

The Model Penal Code (or MPC) is just a model code developed by the American Legal Institute and published in 1962. Having followed the promulgation of the MPC, many states' criminal codes having undergone significant reforms, and many states' criminal codes were always based on the MPC.

To know more about Model Penal Code

https://brainly.com/question/28483426

#SPJ4

The person who is accusing another person or group of wrongdoing and bringing a lawsuit to court is called the plaintiff.

The plaintiff is the person who initiates a legal action by filing a complaint or petition in a court of law against another person or entity. The plaintiff is the party who is seeking legal remedies or relief for some harm or injury that they have suffered, and they must prove their case through evidence and arguments presented in court.

The plaintiff is responsible for bearing the burden of proof in a civil lawsuit, and their ultimate goal is to obtain a favorable judgment or settlement that compensates them for their losses or addresses their legal grievances.

Learn more about The plaintiff

https://brainly.com/question/29213730

#SPJ4

Negative spectator may impact the game by being rude and violent towards players.

The different types of spectator aggression include verbal abuse, gesturing, physical violence, property damage, littering, and "warming up" or rushing the field. Public intoxication, student gatherings, ticket touting, and other factors can all contribute to spectator violence. At sporting events, spectators can also have a negative impact because they can be rude and abusive to athletes, which demotivates them or causes them to lose focus, which affects their performance.

The four consequences of bad behavior spectator are disorientation with regard to values. Inefficiency. high homicide rate. Slow development and low investment.

Learn more about Negative spectator at:

brainly.com/question/30816169

#SPJ4

The correct answer is (b): the bill of rights does not apply to the states. After Engel v. Vitale (1962), the bill of rights applies to the states.

Prior to Engel v. Vitale, the bill of rights did not apply to the states. The Fourteenth Amendment, which was passed in 1868, prohibits the states from violating the rights of individuals; however, the Supreme Court had not applied the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states until 1962.

Engel v. Vitale (1962) was a landmark Supreme Court case that held that state-mandated prayer violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. This case established the doctrine of selective incorporation, which applies the Bill of Rights to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment.  

The decision in Engel v. Vitale (1962) had a huge impact on the rights of individuals in the United States. By incorporating the Bill of Rights into state law, the Supreme Court was able to protect individuals from having their rights violated by state governments. This is an important protection for citizens of the United States, as state governments.

Know more about Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29371683

#SPJ11

Criminal law is the branch of law that regulates the behavior of individuals or groups and punishes those who violate the law. It is designed to protect society from criminal acts and punish those who commit them. Criminal law consists of a body of rules and regulations that define criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders.Criminal law serves several purposes. One of the most important is to deter individuals from engaging in criminal behavior.

Criminal law punishes those who break the law by imposing fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions. This helps to prevent crime and protect society. Criminal law also serves to protect individual rights by ensuring that individuals are treated fairly and justly when accused of a crime. This includes the right to a fair trial, the right to legal counsel, and the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Criminal law is based on the principle of individual responsibility. This means that individuals are held accountable for their actions, regardless of whether they intended to commit a crime. Criminal law also distinguishes between different types of crimes.

Know more about criminal offenses here:

https://brainly.com/question/11112199

#SPJ11

A Day Reporting Center is a type of nonresidential, outpatient program based on a three-phase levels system where offenders report for a variety of treatment programs and random drug testing.

Day Reporting Centers are facilities where offenders report for a variety of treatment programs and random drug testing. It is a form of a non-residential, outpatient program that is structured and disciplined, similar to a boot camp, but less punitive.

In the United States, Day Reporting Centers (DRCs) have been used in recent years as an alternative to imprisonment for non-violent offenders, including drug addicts and alcoholics, as well as those convicted of property and other non-violent crimes.

The facilities are structured in a way that helps offenders develop personal responsibility and other important life skills, such as education, job readiness, and communication.  These centers have been considered an effective tool for the reduction of recidivism.

For more such questions on offenders, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/28143259

#SPJ11

The potential defenses that Rob could use to respond to Sue's claim based on the assumption that Sue has filed a claim against Rob under a theory of negligence. Rob's best argument for protecting himself from Sue's claim is the defense of comparative negligence.

Rob's Best Argument in Defense of Sue's Claim- Rob might use a defense of contributory negligence, but this is less probable because it is rarely utilized in any jurisdiction. Because the contributory negligence defense is more commonly seen in fewer jurisdictions, comparative negligence is a better defense for Rob to use to safeguard himself from Sue's claim.

In comparative negligence, the court determines the degree of negligence of each party involved and proportionally distributes the responsibility for the incident. This defense places some of the blame on Sue, lowering the amount she could receive in compensation if she is found to be partly liable for the incident.

To know more about theory of negligence, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30652890#

#SPJ11

The excuses found in the Texas Penal Code that require the defendant to prove their excuse by the preponderance of the evidence are known as affirmative defenses.

This means that the accused must prove their defense is true in order to gain an acquittal at trial. To meet this burden of proof, the accused must present evidence that supports their claim that they acted in accordance with the statutory excuse.

This evidence could include expert testimony, documentary evidence, or witness testimony. By presenting this evidence, the accused is attempting to show that it is more likely than not that the statutory excuse is true.

To know more about  affirmative defenses click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/28554010#

#SPJ11

Under the Uniform Securities Act, a sole proprietor who provides advice for compensation about fixed income annuity contracts must register as an investment adviser. The correct option is B) must register as an investment adviser.

The Uniform Securities Act is a model legislation that aims to regulate the sale of securities and protect investors from fraud. It has been adopted in some form by many U.S. states to regulate the securities industry. In this act, an investment adviser is defined as a person who, for compensation, provides advice on the value of securities, the advisability of investing in securities, or the purchase or sale of securities.

A fixed income annuity contract is a financial product that provides a series of payments at regular intervals, typically for retirement purposes. Advising clients on these contracts would fall under the realm of an investment adviser, as it involves providing advice on the value and advisability of investing in securities.

A sole proprietor providing such advice must register as an investment adviser to comply with the requirements of the Uniform Securities Act. This registration process involves submitting an application and providing required documentation to the appropriate regulatory authority. Additionally, investment advisers are typically subject to examinations and must follow compliance and record-keeping rules to ensure the protection of their clients' interests.

In contrast, agents, broker-dealers, and those who need not register under the act have different roles and requirements. Agents represent broker-dealers or issuers in the sale of securities, broker-dealers are firms that engage in securities transactions for clients or their own account, and those who need not register usually don't offer services related to securities for compensation. Therefore The correct option is B) must register as an investment adviser.

To learn more about Uniform Securities Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/29814284#

#SPJ11

Judges serving longer terms are more likely than judges serving shorter terms to have a greater sense of security in their jobs, so they may be less swayed by public opinion.

What do we understand by the term “judges serving longer terms”?

Long-term judges are those who serve longer terms in their offices. Such judges are more likely to be impartial and deliver justice according to their consciences rather than public sentiment.

What do you mean by “judges serving shorter terms”?

Short-term judges, on the other hand, are more likely to be swayed by public opinion, as they are still struggling to establish themselves in their roles and may feel insecure about their future prospects as judges.

What are the differences between short-term and long-term judges?

Thus, judges serving longer terms are more likely to be impartial in their decision-making, as they have a better understanding of the law, more experience, and a greater sense of job security.

For more such question on public opinion

https://brainly.com/question/29641370

#SPJ11

There are three possible explanations for the substantial growth of democracy in the 20th century is 1) Expansion of social services, 2) Rise of globalization, 3) Response to crises.

1. Expansion of social services: As democracies matured, citizens increasingly demanded improved social services such as healthcare, education, and welfare. Governments expanded their roles in these areas to address inequalities and ensure a higher standard of living for their citizens. This growth in social services led to a larger government presence and higher public spending.

2. Rise of globalization: The 20th century saw a significant increase in globalization, with countries becoming more interconnected economically, politically, and culturally. As a result, governments had to adapt to new challenges such as international trade, diplomacy, and coordination with other nations. This required expanding the role of the government to effectively deal with these new responsibilities.

3. Response to crises: Throughout the 20th century, democracies faced numerous crises, including the Great Depression, World War II, and the Cold War. To tackle these crises, governments expanded their roles, implementing new policies and programs to mitigate the impact of these events on their citizens. The crisis-driven growth of government became a lasting feature in many democracies, even after the crises subsided.

In conclusion, the substantial growth in democratic governments in the 20th century can be attributed to citizens' demands for expanded social services, the rise of globalization, and the need to respond to various crises. Each of these factors contributed to a larger government presence, with more responsibilities and greater public spending.

To learn more about democracy here:

https://brainly.com/question/3710021#

#SPJ11

In a governmental election, campaign officials may want to know what percentage of the population voted in the previous election.

To obtain the percentage of the population that voted in the previous governmental election, the following formula is utilized: Percentage of the population that voted = (Number of votes cast / Total population) * 100The number of votes cast refers to the number of votes that were cast in the previous election, whereas the total population refers to the total number of individuals residing in the constituency where the election was held. The percentage of the population that voted in the previous election can be used by campaign officials to determine the number of votes they must earn to win the election.

In addition, this information can be utilized to determine the participation rate in the previous election and to evaluate the success of any efforts to raise voter turnout.

Read more about governmental election here:https://brainly.com/question/25815264

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

To ensure a smooth transfer, the outgoing Incident Command should provide a "transfer of command briefing" to the new Incident Command. This briefing should include all relevant information about the incident, including the current status, objectives, and action plans, as well as any important documentation or records. The briefing should also cover any issues or concerns that the outgoing Incident Command faced during their tenure and provide recommendations for the incoming Incident Command. This transfer of command briefing is critical to ensure that the new Incident Command has a complete understanding of the incident and can effectively take over command responsibilities without any interruption to the response effort.

Answer:

Explanation:

The Texas graffiti statute is directed largely toward property damage caused by the use of "paint, an indelible marker, or an etching or engraving device." This statute specifically prohibits individuals from intentionally or knowingly making markings, inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings on someone else's property without their consent.

The Texas criminal mischief statute, on the other hand, covers a broader range of conduct that could damage or destroy someone else's property, including actions such as vandalism, destruction, tampering, or defacement. While the elements of the criminal mischief statute and the graffiti statute may overlap somewhat, the graffiti statute specifically targets the act of making marks or inscriptions on someone else's property using certain specific tools, such as paint, markers, or etching devices.

The graffiti statute is largely directed toward property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements.

Such implements are usually used to deface public and private property with writing, drawings, marks, etchings, or paintings. The graffiti statute provides additional penalties for graffiti offenses and allows for additional recovery of costs from the person who committed the offense.

Graffiti is a form of vandalism, and the Texas Graffiti Statute provides additional penalties for individuals convicted of this type of criminal mischief. The Statute also allows victims of graffiti to recover their costs for the removal of graffiti from property.

The Statute applies to property damage caused by aerosol spray paint, markers, etching tools, or similar implements and provides enhanced penalties for those who commit graffiti offenses.

The Statute also requires that the graffiti be visible from a public area in order for the enhanced penalties to apply.

To know more about private property click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29613081#

#SPJ11

The most likely outcome of Taylor's case is that she would be awarded damages for her injury due to the Giants' negligence.

In order for her to prevail in her case, she must be able to show that the Giants had a duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent her from being harmed, that they failed to do so, and that her injury was caused by that failure.

She must also show that her injury was the proximate result of their negligence, and that the damages that she incurred were a direct result of the negligence.

To prove negligence in this case, Taylor must show that the Giants had a duty of care to provide a safe environment for their fans and to prevent foreseeable harm. She must also prove that the Giants failed to act as a reasonably prudent person would have and that they breached their duty of care to her.

Finally, she must show that her injury was caused by the breach of their duty of care, that her damages are a direct result of their negligence, and that the damages she incurred were foreseeable by the Giants.

To know more about prudent click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/22082788#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Read Below:

Explanation:

Based on the scenario provided, it is not clear whether the officers are justified in using deadly force against the suspect as the suspect has not displayed any weapon. In general, the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers is only justifiable when the officer reasonably believes that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to the officer or others.

In this case, while Lonny Smith is a known criminal who has previously fired his weapon during an arrest, he has not displayed any weapon or made any threatening gestures towards the officers. Therefore, the use of deadly force would be difficult to justify, and the officers should exhaust all other options before resorting to lethal force.

The officers should attempt to apprehend the suspect using less-lethal force, such as verbal commands, physical force, or non-lethal weapons like pepper spray or a Taser. If the suspect resists arrest or attempts to flee, the officers may pursue and attempt to apprehend him, but they should not use deadly force unless they reasonably believe that the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm to them or others.

It is important for law enforcement officers to use good judgment and follow established protocols when dealing with potentially dangerous situations to ensure that they uphold the law and protect both the public and themselves.

Judge Johnson is likely to favor leniency when sentencing the defendant in this case. Given his view that drug abuse is a sickness and a public health issue, he would likely opt for a more lenient sentencing, such as probation or community service, instead of harsher penalties such as incarceration. This could allow the defendant to get the help they need and potentially prevent future criminal activity.

Judge Johnson is also known for his extreme conservative views on crimes of violence. While this case does not involve violence, his past decisions demonstrate his preference for punishments that focus on rehabilitation rather than retribution.  The judge could also take into account the defendant’s circumstances, such as any underlying mental health issues, and attempt to craft a sentence that is tailored to the individual.

He is likely to favor a sentence for the defendant that focuses on helping them find a path away from crime.

Know more about incarceration here:

https://brainly.com/question/14300869

#SPJ11

Answer:

D) a more informed society is considered one long-term result of the constitutional protection of free speech. The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to free speech, which has helped promote the exchange of ideas and opinions, and has allowed individuals to express their views and challenge the status quo without fear of retribution. This has led to a more diverse and informed society, where a wide range of viewpoints and opinions are expressed and debated, contributing to a more robust democracy.

The "pains of confinement" have long been a topic of interest in prison sociology. This article revisits the subject, arguing that contemporary criminal procedures have produced certain brand-new burdens and annoyances.

What is punishment strategy and mass incarceration?

It states that there are three categories into which the pains of imprisonment can be conceptually and somewhat historically subdivided: those resulting from the inherent characteristics of incarceration, those brought on by willful misconduct and duty neglect, and those brought on by systemic policies and institutional practices.

After thoroughly describing the latter, with an emphasis on the difficulties of indeterminacy, psychiatric evaluation, and self-government, the paper illustrates how the concepts of "tightness," "depth," and "weight" apply to the modern jail experience. That is a shortened way of saying that the United States imprisons more people than any other country in the world, including China. Also, the U.S. leads the world in terms of the number of prisoners. That are distinct from earlier pains in terms of their origins, characteristics, and outcomes.

Learn more about punishment strategy:

https://brainly.com/question/8801970

#SPJ1

Answer:

Answer choice (B)

Explanation:

The discussion about explosives in relation to an armed robbery case can be considered as irrelevant unless there is evidence or suspicion that the perpetrator(s) used explosives in the commission of the crime. Otherwise, the discussion about explosives would not have any direct connection or relevance to the armed robbery case.

The Vice President of the United States serves as the president of the Senate and is responsible for presiding over its sessions. The correct answer to the question is C.

The duties of the Vice President of the United States are defined in the U.S. Constitution and are primarily related to the Vice President's role as the second-highest ranking official in the executive branch. However, the Vice President also has a specific role in the legislative branch, as outlined in the Constitution.

The correct answer to the question is C. The Vice President of the United States serves as the president of the Senate and is responsible for presiding over its sessions. In this role, the Vice President has the power to cast tie-breaking votes when the Senate is evenly divided on a particular issue.

This is an important responsibility that gives the Vice President a significant amount of influence in the legislative process. In addition to these duties, the Vice President may also take on other responsibilities at the direction of the President.

For example, Vice President Kamala Harris has been tasked with leading the administration's efforts to address issues related to immigration and voting rights. Overall, the Vice President of the United States plays an important role in both the executive and legislative branches of government.

While the specific responsibilities of the Vice President may vary depending on the needs of the administration and the priorities of the President, the role of the Vice President as the president of the Senate and tie-breaking vote-caster remains a key part of the job.

For more such question on Vice President

https://brainly.com/question/29797686

#SPJ11

Note: The question would be as

Which of the following best describes the duties of the U.S. vice president?

A. Making committee assignments in the Senate

B.Serving as president of the Senate

C. Serving as president of the Senate and casting tiebreaking votes in the Senate

D. Serving as president of the Senate and making committee assignments in the Senate

E. Casting tiebreaking votes in the Senate

Although the Posse Comitatus Act limits the federal government's authority to use the military to enforce domestic policies, there are exceptions that can be made to the rule.

Learn more about Posse Comitatus Act: https://brainly.com/question/27885404

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

It is not possible to answer this question without more specific information about the case in question.

Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to exercise power over a particular individual or entity, such as the defendant in a lawsuit. It is based on a variety of factors, such as the defendant's presence or contacts within the jurisdiction, and is distinct from jurisdiction over property.

Jurisdiction over property, also known as in rem jurisdiction, refers to a court's authority to adjudicate disputes over specific property, regardless of who owns or possesses that property. In rem jurisdiction can be based on a variety of factors, such as the location of the property or the source of a particular claim.

Whether or not the court in the case in question had jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries would depend on the specific facts of the case and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. Without further information, it is impossible to say whether the court had jurisdiction over property as well as over the individuals involved in the case.

American Express looks at historical transactions to predict consumer behaviors. By watching how current and past customers have used their credit, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. This statement is True.

American Express is a financial services corporation. It is a global corporation that provides various financial products and services, including credit cards, travel-related services, and other services. American Express uses customer data to make strategic decisions and tailor its products and services to the customer's needs.

American Express uses transaction data to predict consumer behaviors. By analyzing transaction data, American Express can predict churn and customer loyalty. It also enables American Express to provide personalized recommendations and offers to its customers.

Historical transaction data analysis helps American Express to optimize its business operations. It helps the company to identify and address issues related to credit and customer service. American Express also uses transaction data analysis to identify high-risk customers and mitigate fraud.

American Express's transaction data analysis helps to understand customer behaviors and preferences. By analyzing customer behaviors, American Express can develop new products and services that meet customer needs.

American Express also uses transaction data analysis to provide personalized customer service and targeted marketing campaigns.

Learn more about American Express at

https://brainly.com/question/29680015

#SPJ11

The correct option is: The Federal Housing Administration's qualifying standards for a mortgage loan are less strict than those of traditional lenders.

Learn more about mortgage: https://brainly.com/question/1318711

#SPJ11