The following are considered external regulations regarding the use of force by the police except c) government commissions.
External regulations regarding the use of force by the police are primarily created to set expectations for proper conduct, including the use of force during arrests and similar encounters. The regulations come in various forms, ranging from policy guidelines to external entities.
External regulations are the checks and balances that oversee police activity. External regulations can be categorized into four general categories, including the following:
Courts.Civil liability. Federal review boards.Government Commissions.Government Commissions is not considered external regulations regarding the use of force by the police.
Therefore, the correct answer is c) government commissions.
Learn more about External regulations here: https://brainly.com/question/30355279
#SPJ11
Research the public safety expectation to the Miranda warning requirement. Explain how the Fourth and Fifth Amendments can become intertwined using Brewer v. Williams and Nix v. Williams as the basis of your explanation.
In Brewer v. Williams, the Supreme Court was asked to decide what constitutes a "waiver" of a person's total right to direct under the Sixth Amendment.
Facts About the Case On December 24, 1968, Pamela Powers, a 10-year-old girl, went missing from a YMCA in Des Moines, Iowa. Someone resembling the psychological clinic escapee Robert Williams was seen leaving the YMCA shortly before her disappearance, carrying a massive object covered in a cover.
A counselor contacted officials at the Des Moines police headquarters on December 26. He informed them that Williams would surrender to the police in Davenport.
Right when Williams appeared at the police base camp, he was saved and examined his Miranda alarms.
Williams tended to his attorney, Henry McKnight, by means of phone. The Des Moines police chief and an authority investigating the issue, Investigator Seaming, were accessible for the call.
Detective Leaming was reminded twice by Williams' arraignment lawyer that he shouldn't talk to Williams while driving. The attorney stressed that McKnight would be available for cross-examination when they returned to Des Moines.
Williams's attorney filed a motion to suppress the statements Williams made to authorities during the 160-mile vehicle ride while he was being investigated for first-degree murder. The delegated power opposed Williams' recommendation.
When Williams addressed analysts during the vehicle ride, the Iowa Supreme Court concluded that Williams had delayed his entitlement to direct.
A writ of Haber corpus was granted to Williams by the U.S. Region Court for the Southern District of Iowa, which concluded that he had been denied his Sixth Amendment right to guide. The District Court's decision was upheld by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment:
brainly.com/question/29791299
#SPJ4
1. What are the basic responsibilities of the
legislative branch?
2. How long is the term of office for a Representative?
For a Senator? Which do you think is better and why?
3. What is the basic resp
The basic responsibilities of the legislative branch. The legislative branch is the branch of government that has the authority to create and pass laws. It is one of the three branches of the United States government, with the other two being the executive and judicial branches.
The term of office for a representative in the House of Representatives is two years, while the term of office for a senator in the Senate is six years. Both are elected by the people of their respective states. The advantage of a two-year term is that it allows representatives to be held accountable to the people more frequently. The advantage of a six-year term is that it provides more stability and continuity in government. However, both terms have their advantages and disadvantages, and it ultimately depends on the needs of the government and the people they represent.
The executive branch is responsible for enforcing the laws created by the legislative branch. It is headed by the president of the United States, who is elected every four years. The executive branch is also responsible for carrying out foreign policy, negotiating treaties, and commanding the armed forces. It is a crucial component of the federal government, as it has the power to carry out the laws created by the legislative branch and ensure that they are being followed.
To know more about Legislative visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/23874857
#SPJ11
In the U.S., creating more jobs is not likely to substantially reduce poverty because
Question 74 options:
A. Although almost all poor people could work, most don't want to
B. Many jobs do not pay enough
C. Most poor people are disabled
D. Most poor people are retired
Mary is a young mother who works full-time, but she still has trouble paying her bills. She is also worried about her son's future because housing prices in the neighborhood are falling, local schools are not good, there aren't many good jobs in the area, and there is a lot of crime. These issues suggest that Mary's main problem is:
Question 75 options:
A. Racial discrimination
B. Gender discrimination
C. The concentration of poverty
D. The culture of poverty
Which nation has one of the highest poverty rates in the advanced world even after accounting for the effects of the social safety net?
Question 77 options:
a) Canada
b) France
c) Great Britain
d) United States
Because more jobs are unlikely to significantly reduce poverty in the United States, Many jobs do not pay enough. Option B is correct.
75. The place Mary is currently living is the main issue. The concentration of poverty can be seen in these kinds of places. Option C is correct.
77. Even after taking into account social security programs, the poverty rate in Great Britain is one of the highest in the developed world.Option C is correct.
There are two types of poverty: outright neediness and relative destitution. Money and consumption are at the center of both of these forms of poverty. Notwithstanding, neediness is in some cases connected to something other than financial aspects; It is also connected to politics and society.
Neediness seldom has a solitary reason. A scope of variables including rising living expenses, low compensation, absence of work, and lacking government backed retirement helps together mean certain individuals need more assets.
Learn more about Poverty :
brainly.com/question/30028790
#SPJ4
Match the following terms with their appropriate meaning. Terms Meaning 1. voir dire final address by the judge to the jury informing the
2. challenges for cause jury of their function and explaining the law 3. peremptory challenges failure to present a prima facie case during case in chief of the plaintiff results in this court action 4. opening statements rule prohibiting statements made out of court and
5. closing arguments offered to show the truth of matters asserted 6. direct examination questioning done by opposing counsel of the party 7. cross-examination who called the witness 8. rules of evidence each party is allowed a fixed number of these 9. leading questions (rule) challenges 10. hearsay rule when the judge overrules the jury's verdict and 11. best evidence rule enters a judgment as a matter of law 12. expert witness presentation of facts that meet burden of proof and will prevail until contradicted by other evidence 13. directed verdict 14. burden of proof primary evidence, as opposed to secondary evidence 15. prima facie case initial questioning by the attorney who calls the 16. charge to the jury witness 17. verdict challenges that are unlimited and made by the judge 18. judgment official decision of the court on respective rights and 19. judgment as a matter of law (n.o.v.) claims of the parties required degree evidence necessary to prove the contention of a party in a contested case
Matching is a technique of aligning phrases with their appropriate meanings. It involves understanding the relationships and connections among extraordinary ideas or factors. Matching enables us to make certain accurate comprehension and alertness of know-how.
The matchings are:
1. voir dire - preliminary thinking by using the legal professional who calls the witness
2. demanding situations for a cause - demanding situations that can be unlimited and made through the deciding
3. peremptory challenges - challenges that every birthday party is permitted a set range of
4. opening statements - presentation of records that meet the weight of proof and could be triumphant until contradicted via other evidence
5. ultimate arguments - final cope with by using the judge to the jury informing them of their feature and explaining the regulation
6. direct examination - wondering accomplished by opposing counsel of the celebration who referred to as the witness
7. go-exam - thinking performed by way of the opposing suggestion of the witness
8. regulations of proof - regulations prohibiting statements constituted of court docket and offered to expose the fact of subjects asserted
9. leading questions - questions that endorse the preferred solution or placed words within the witness's mouth
10. rumor rule - rule prohibiting the usage of out-of-court statements supplied for the truth of the matter asserted
11. best evidence rule - rule requiring the presentation of primary evidence, instead of secondary proof
12. expert witness - witness certified by information, ability, enjoyment, schooling, or training to offer specialized testimony
13. directed verdict - when the decide overrules the jury's verdict and enters a judgment as a depend of regulation
14. burden of proof - the required degree of proof essential to show the competition of a party in a contested case
15. prima facie case - failure to offer a prima facie case for the duration of the case in the leader of the plaintiff results in this courtroom movement
16. charge to the jury - very last address with the aid of the judge to the jury informing them of their function and explaining the law
17. verdict - the jury's legit choice on respective rights and claims of the events
18. judgment - the legitimate choice of the court docket on respective rights and claims of the parties
19. judgment as a rely on law (n.O.V.) - a judgment entered with the aid of the judge when the evidence supplied is insufficient to guide a jury verdict
To know more about law,
https://brainly.com/question/30133385
#SPJ4
Class priviege and white privillege are basically the same thing?
true or false
The correct statement is False. While both class privilege and white privilege are forms of privilege, they are not the same thing.
Class privilege refers to the advantages and benefits that individuals from higher socioeconomic classes may experience in society. This can include access to quality education, healthcare, housing, job opportunities, and other resources. Class privilege can exist across different racial and ethnic groups.
On the other hand, white privilege specifically refers to the societal advantages and privileges that white individuals may experience solely based on their race. It acknowledges that in many societies, white people tend to have certain advantages over people of other races in areas such as education, employment, criminal justice, media representation, and more. White privilege is rooted in historical and ongoing systems of racial inequality and discrimination.
To learn more about Privilege visit here:
brainly.com/question/29793573
#SPJ11
Researchers used the following data sources when evaluating discrepancies between the suspect and officer versions of the use of force for the Miami-Dade police department:
a. Suspect interviews at booking.
b. Suspect interviews one year later.
c. Official agency reports.
d. All of the Above
The following data sources were used by researchers when evaluating discrepancies between the suspect and officer versions of the use of force for the Miami-Dade police department; Suspect interviews at booking, Suspect interviews one year later, and Official agency reports (d. All of the Above)
What are interviews at booking?An interview at booking refers to a process in which suspects are interviewed to help the police gather evidence about a crime. Once a person has been arrested and taken into custody, the booking process starts, and they will be interviewed to collect as much information about them as possible. The booking interview is typically conducted by an arresting officer, and the information gathered will be used to create a comprehensive arrest report and database entry.
What are official agency reports?Official agency reports are records that are created by government agencies or other organizations that are tasked with providing official information to the public. These reports are generally considered to be reliable and are often used by journalists, researchers, and other professionals when they are conducting research or writing about a particular topic. The information contained in these reports can be wide-ranging and can include data on everything from crime statistics to economic indicators.
Therefore, the correct answer is d. All of the Above
Learn more about use of force here: https://brainly.com/question/28831464
#SPJ11
Among ethical standards, the level of the law is the
_________________ . *
a. middle
b. narrowest
c. broadest
d. biggest
Can anyone help me with any of these questions? thx
1. The view that animals should not be used by humans in any way is:
A. Animal liberation
B. Animal rights
C. Animal use
D. Animal welfare
2. True or False: There are no environmentally significant ethical concerns about genetically modified organisms (plants and animals).
True
False
3. True or False: The "deep ecology" view believes that human beings are inseparably connected to nature and do not believe in a distinction between a "human" and a "natural" world.
True
False
4. Someone who believes that dogfighting or hunting endangered species is morally permissible would hold which of the following views:
A. Animal Welfare
B. Animal liberation
C. Animal exploitation
D. Animal rights
5.The view that believes all living beings are entitled to moral treatment is:
A. Biocentrism
B. Heliocentrism
C. Polyzygotism
D. Anthropocentrism
Answer:
1. B
2. F
3. T
4. C
5. A
Smith family with a household of 6 and income $55014. 27 qualifies for how much rent
Answer:Smith's family contractor charges $16.50 per hour plus $289 in supplies . Jackson's family contractor
Explanation:
Civil Dialogue something that in the last 5 plus years has increasingly became more and more rare in our society. In your initial post describe a specific conflict you have had with someone that got out of hand to the point it affected the relationship. For instance most of us have had conflicting arguments over politics in the last 5 years or over if we should have to wear masks, whether January 6th 2021 was an attempt to overthrow the government, if we should allow immigrants into our country... Arguments and incivility have become quite common. So if our goal is to be build strong interpersonal relationships and to communicate effectively we should know that we can't be incivil to the people we want in our lives. We know once the rudeness starts - communication stops. If you can't think of a specific argument you have had with someone you can instead show and example of incivility you have seen on social media (such as Ye and Pete) or the news.
Conversational incivility is never expected. People who are truly knowledgeable and sage never behave rudely in social media conversations.
A positive and constructive discussion of a particular subject is always desired. When someone breaks the rules of civility, it looks like they don't know enough about the subject.
It is likewise found that many individuals offer mocking remarks and cruel analysis in the online entertainment. Many individuals utilize frightful words language that cross the constraint of fairness.
In any case, it should not hamper one's feeling. The discussion is also good if it is respectful and constructive. Individuals are of various perspectives and perspectives. There are people of various religions and cultures present. All individuals ought to regard one another.
In virtual entertainment we perceive the number of individuals that crossed the fairness and mutual respect. Even a lot of people said things that a gentleman would never say. Numerous people do not study and instead make insignificant remarks. It is detrimental to democracy.
The majority of nations imposed a lock down during the COVID-19 pandemic, and individuals were housed in boxes. Many individuals lost their employment and various individuals confronted extraordinary challenges.
Numerous individuals struggled greatly to earn a living. During that period many individuals upheld lock down and many individuals didn't uphold it. We observed instances of decency violations by enraged individuals on social media.
Learn more about Social Media:
brainly.com/question/31339287
#SPJ4
Please answer each question in a paragraph. (A few sentences)
1. Of all of the types of prisons, which holds the majority of prisoners in the United States (88%).
2. A Criminal Court judge is likely to "remand" a defendant before they are found guilty because… (two acceptable answers/phrases).
3. Gov. Earl Warren believed what type of sentence would be useful for rehabilitating offenders in the Correctional Model of the 1950s?
4. Name three crimes that Rudy Guiliani focused on as 'quality of life' crimes.
We can answer the four questions taking into consideration current and past information about the American judiciary system and the Broken Windows policing.
In the United States, the majority of prisoners are held in state prisons. State prisons house approximately 88% of the total incarcerated population in the country. These prisons are operated by state governments and are responsible for holding individuals convicted of state crimes, such as murder, robbery, drug offenses, and other offenses that fall under state jurisdiction.A Criminal Court judge is likely to "remand" a defendant before they are found guilty because of flight risk or concerns about public safety. "Remand" refers to the act of detaining a defendant in custody until their trial or until bail is granted. Judges may decide to remand a defendant if they believe there is a significant risk that the defendant may flee and not appear for their court proceedings. Additionally, if the judge deems the defendant to be a threat to public safety, they may choose to remand them as a precautionary measure.In the Correctional Model of the 1950s, Governor Earl Warren believed that indeterminate sentencing would be useful for rehabilitating offenders. Indeterminate sentencing allows for flexible and individualized sentences based on the needs of the offender. The idea was that through indeterminate sentencing, offenders could be rehabilitated through various correctional programs and interventions, with the possibility of early release based on their progress and demonstrated reform.Rudy Giuliani, during his tenure as Mayor of New York City in the 1990s, focused on addressing "quality of life" crimes. Three crimes that received particular attention were aggressive panhandling, public urination, and graffiti vandalism. Giuliani's administration believed that by cracking down on these minor offenses and maintaining order in public spaces, it would contribute to an overall improvement in the quality of life and safety for residents and visitors in the city. This approach was part of a broader strategy known as "Broken Windows" policing.What was the "Broken Windows" policing?"Broken Windows" policing is a theory of law enforcement that was popularized in the 1980s and 1990s, particularly associated with the work of criminologists James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling. The theory suggests that visible signs of disorder and neglect in urban environments, such as broken windows, graffiti, panhandling, and other minor offenses, create an atmosphere of social disarray and can lead to an increase in more serious crime.
According to the "Broken Windows" theory, if these signs of disorder are left unaddressed, they send a message that no one cares about maintaining order, which can attract criminal activity and perpetuate a sense of lawlessness. The theory proposes that by addressing and preventing minor offenses and maintaining order in public spaces, it is possible to prevent more serious crimes from occurring.
Learn more about the Broken Windows theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/30562380
#SPJ4
ask ai
Q2 - Select the option that is an INCORRECT response to the following statement: Why is governance of technology so important?
A: Technology is an enabler
B: Technological developments are disruptive and pose risks and opportunities
C: Technology enables the protection and accessibility of information
D: Employees through reckless behaviour cause the most technology breaches
Answer:
D: Employees through reckless behavior cause the most technology breaches.
Explanation:
This option is an incorrect response to the statement about the importance of governance of technology. While it is true that employee behavior can contribute to technology breaches, stating that employees through reckless behavior cause the most breaches is not accurate. Technology breaches can be caused by a variety of factors, including external threats, system vulnerabilities, and sophisticated cyberattacks. It is important to have governance measures in place to address these risks and ensure the secure and responsible use of technology. Therefore, this option is incorrect as it misrepresents the main reasons for the importance of governance of technology.
Read the following cases and give your legal opinion based on Nature and Effect of Obligations stipulated on Civil Code of the Philippines.
1. Case: Dr. Felipa Pablo, an associate professor in the University of the Philippines, and a research grantee of the Philippine Atomic Energy Agency was invited to take part at a meeting of the Department of Research and Isotopes of the Joint FAO-IAEA Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture of the United Nations in Ispra, Italy. To fulfill this engagement, Dr. Pablo booked passage with Alitalia, an Italian airline company. She arrived in Milan on the day before the meeting in accordance with the itinerary and time table set for her by Alitalia. She was however told by the Alitalia personnel there at Milan that her luggage was "delayed in as much as the same x x x (was) in one of the succeeding flights from Rome to Milan."
Her luggage consisted of two (2) suitcases: one contained her clothing and other personal items; the other, her scientific papers, slides and other research material. But the other flights arriving from Rome did not have her baggage on board.
Feeling desperate, she went to Rome to try to locate her bags herself. There, she inquired about her suitcases in the domestic and international airports, and filled out the forms prescribed by Alitalia for people in her predicament. However, her baggage could not be found. Completely distraught and discouraged, she returned to Manila without attending the meeting in Ispra, Italy.
As it turned out, Dr. Pablo's suitcases were, in fact, located and forwarded to Ispra, Italy, but only on the day after her scheduled appearance and participation at the U.N. meeting there. Of course, Dr. Pablo was no longer there to accept delivery; she was already on her way home to Manila. And for some reason, the suitcases were not actually restored to Prof. Pablo by Alitalia until eleven (11) months later.
Is Dr. Pablo entitled to damages for the negligence committed by Alitalia? What source of liability is being displayed in this situation?
MAXIMUM OF 2 PARAGRAPHS
Yes, Dr. Pablo is entitled to damages for the negligence committed by Alitalia. Under Article 1170 of the Civil Code of the Philippines, those who in the performance of their obligations are guilty of negligence are liable for damages.
Negligence refers to the failure to exercise reasonable care or caution that a responsible person would have taken in similar circumstances. It is a legal concept that arises when someone's careless actions or omissions result in harm or injury to another person or their property. To establish negligence, certain elements must be proven: duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages.
Duty of care means that individuals have a legal obligation to act in a manner that does not put others at an unreasonable risk of harm. Breach of duty occurs when someone fails to meet the expected standard of care, such as driving recklessly or not adequately maintaining a property. Causation requires demonstrating that the breach of duty directly caused the harm or injury suffered by the victim. Lastly, damages refer to the actual harm or losses suffered by the victim, whether physical, emotional, or financial.
To learn more about Negligence visit here:
brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer.
Which situation represents the direct benefits of taxing citizens?
A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
O B.
the price of smartphones and personal computers decreases
OC.
the number of African Americans serving on corporate boards of directors increases
O D. a Hispanic woman becomes the first woman entrepreneur in the construction industry
Answer: A.
a 70-year-old woman receives Social Security benefits
Explanation:
Innovation to Curb Dark Web Drug Sales: This one is a little bit out of the box. Place yourself in the shoes of a Federal law enforcement agent. You have been assigned to investigate policies that can aid in curbing drug trafficking on the Dark Web. Be sure to address the following:
a. What is the estimated amount of trafficked drugs / monetary value of illicit drug sales on the dark web
b. What are the current trends specific to drugs on the dark web
c. What are key weaknesses that law enforcement can exploit
d. What interventions look promising in regulating the dark web
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!!
a. The estimated value of drug sales on the dark web is in the billions of dollars annually.
b. Trends include increased availability of synthetic opioids and the use of cryptocurrencies for transactions.
c. Law enforcement can exploit weaknesses in anonymizing technologies and operational security practices.
d. Promising interventions include international collaborations, strengthening cybercrime units, and proactive monitoring of dark web activities.
What is the role of the Federal law enforcement agent.?There are many reports that say that drug sales on the dark web make billions of dollars every year. These sales are a big part of the global drug market.
The dark web is currently seeing more synthetic opioids like fentanyl, as well as new kinds of drugs called novel psychoactive substances (NPS) and designer drugs. Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoin, are still mainly used to make illegal transactions.
Read more about Federal law enforcement agent here:
https://brainly.com/question/28442014
#SPJ1
Do you think cannabis should be legalized in New Zealand? In your answer outline the common arguments for and against before reaching your position.
The legalization of cannabis has been a controversial topic in New Zealand. There have been common arguments both in favor and against the legalization of cannabis.
Below is the list of arguments for and against the legalization of cannabis:
Arguments in favor of the legalization of cannabis: Legalization of cannabis can potentially generate tax revenue. The current policies of criminalization are not working. Cannabis has medical benefits. Marijuana can replace prescription drugs like opiates and reduce the risk of overdose. Legalization can lead to safer and regulated marijuana usage. Restrictions can be set up to reduce underage consumption.
Arguments against the legalization of cannabis: Legalization of cannabis can increase the number of users, and thereby an increase in health issues associated with drug usage. Legalization can increase the demand for cannabis and also increase the production of cannabis plants.
Illegal activities can still occur due to black-market sales, especially if the price of legal cannabis is too high. Legalization can increase the number of people driving under the influence of marijuana. Legalization can lead to more addiction and mental health issues. Cannabis can be harmful to young people during the development stage of their brain.
My opinion on the legalization of cannabis in New Zealand is that it should be legalized. Cannabis has medical benefits that can help people with chronic pain, epilepsy, and multiple sclerosis. In addition, the government can generate tax revenue by legalizing cannabis.
Legalization can lead to a regulated market, and we can put in place restrictions to ensure cannabis is used in a safe and responsible way. We can also control the quality of the product and ensure the safety of those who use it. Although the legalization of cannabis has some disadvantages, the benefits outweigh the negative impacts.
To know more about cannabis refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32488101#
#SPJ11
"One reason that the criminal justice system does not do a better job deterring crime may be because it
A. relies too little on the use of punishment
B. delays punishment for too long
C. does not use reinforcing techniques
D. relies too much on highly aversive punishment"
One reason that the criminal justice system does not do a better job deterring crime may be because it relies too little on the use of punishment.
The criminal justice system is the government's framework for responding to crime. It consists of a collection of institutions, agencies, and laws that work together to uphold the law, prevent crime, and prosecute offenders. The legal system's primary aim is to deter criminal behavior and to provide retribution and rehabilitation for offenders.
The criminal justice system accomplishes this goal by imposing penalties on offenders who break the law. These penalties serve as a deterrent to others who might be considering committing the same criminal activity. The possibility of going to prison, paying fines, or receiving some other type of punishment acts as a deterrent for individuals who might otherwise be tempted to engage in criminal activity. Thus, one reason the criminal justice system does not do a better job deterring crime may be because it relies too little on the use of punishment.
To learn more about Justice system visit here:
brainly.com/question/28913925
#SPJ11
Explain how is the history of law is relevant to its purpose and goals for today? How does it impact your life and the life of your family? If you were going to start a new criminal justice system, what are a few laws you would keep from the current system and what are a few that you would take away? Include your reasoning for adding or removing these laws.
1) The history of law is relevant to its purpose and goals for today because it provides context and understanding for how laws have developed over time and how they have been shaped by various social, political, and cultural factors.
2) The responsibilities under the law, which can have a significant impact on their lives and the lives of their families. For example, knowledge of the history of civil rights laws can help people understand how these laws have evolved over time and how they can be used to protect their rights against discrimination.
3) One law that I would keep is the right to a fair trial, which is an essential component of any criminal justice system. This right ensures that individuals accused of a crime have a fair and impartial hearing, which is critical for ensuring that justice is served.
This knowledge helps policymakers and legal experts to create more effective and equitable laws that address current issues and challenges. In addition, an understanding of the history of law can help individuals better understand their own rights and responsibilities under the law, which can have a significant impact on their lives and the lives of their families.
For example, knowledge of the history of civil rights laws can help people understand how these laws have evolved over time and how they can be used to protect their rights against discrimination. Similarly, understanding the history of criminal law can help individuals understand their rights when accused of a crime and how the criminal justice system works.
One law that I would take away is mandatory minimum sentencing laws, which have been shown to be ineffective and unfair. These laws remove discretion from judges and often result in overly harsh sentences, particularly for nonviolent drug offenses. Another law that I would take away is the use of cash bail, which disproportionately impacts low-income individuals and can result in people being held in jail for months or even years before they have been convicted of a crime.
Overall, an understanding of the history of law is critical for creating effective and equitable legal systems that address current issues and challenges. By incorporating this knowledge into policymaking and legal practice, we can ensure that our laws are just, fair, and effective.
To learn more about cultural factors click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31799321#
#SPJ11
complete question
1) Explain how is the history of law is relevant to its purpose and goals for today?
2) How does it impact your life and the life of your family?
3) If you were going to start a new criminal justice system, what are a few laws you would keep from the current system and what are a few that you would take away? Include your reasoning for adding or removing these laws.
What political behaviors have you observed in (or engaged yourself in) school groups or your workplace? Were they successful? Why or why not? Please explain in depth
I listed two ethical questions that one should ask prior to engaging in politicking. Can you think of additional question(s) that we should ask in determining if political behavior is acceptable or not?
Political behavior is more likely when: goals are unclear; resources are scarce; non-routine technology and a complex environment are involved; non programmed decisions are made.
Political behavior includes informal attempts to influence others. This kind of behavior does not apply to formal attempts at influence that are a part of a person's job in the organization.
Seven Ways to Avoid Office Politics
Examine the organizational chart. Politics in the workplace frequently operate outside of the established organizational structure.The informal network should be known.Connect with people, improve your "people skills," and make use of your network.Be brave Politics that are negative must be eliminated.Learn more about Political Behaviors:
brainly.com/question/30831162
#SPJ4
Mr Cole, an alien arrived in Nigeria on a visitor's pass, but subsequently took up an appointment with L&K Ltd as a maintenance manager which was intended to last for five years, subject to renewal for another 3 years. Meanwhile, Mr Cole never obtained a work permit as required by the immigration Act. Six months after resumption of duties, Mr Cole' s appointment was terminated by L&K Ltd. Advise the parties?
Mr Cole, an alien working without a work permit in Nigeria, had his appointment terminated by L&K Ltd. The parties involved should consider the legal implications of Mr Cole's employment and immigration status.
In this scenario, Mr Cole's employment with L&K Ltd. raises legal concerns due to his lack of a work permit as required by the immigration laws of Nigeria. The termination of his appointment by L&K Ltd. may be influenced by this violation of immigration regulations.
Firstly, Mr Cole should be aware that working without a valid work permit is a violation of Nigerian immigration laws and can lead to legal consequences. He may face penalties, including fines, deportation, or restrictions on future entry into Nigeria. It is advisable for Mr Cole to seek legal advice regarding his immigration status and potential actions to rectify his situation.
On the other hand, L&K Ltd. should also consider the implications of employing an individual without a work permit. The company may face legal repercussions and penalties for employing a foreigner without the necessary documentation. L&K Ltd. should consult with legal experts to understand the potential consequences and steps to address the situation appropriately.
Overall, it is crucial for both Mr Cole and L&K Ltd. to address the immigration and employment law issues arising from Mr Cole's unauthorized employment and termination. Seeking legal guidance will help them navigate the situation and determine the best course of action based on Nigerian immigration and labor laws.
For more questions on appointment
https://brainly.com/question/32957416
#SPJ8
Opioid Epidemic Response: Place yourself in the role of the leader of substance abuse treatment for a state health agency (e.g., Louisiana Department of Health, Office of Behavioral Health). You have been tasked to design a response to the growing crisis in the state of your choice. At minimum, you must:
a. Tell me the state you are using for this response
b. Find some data to support the need for your intervention(s) you describe
i. Be able to describe your target problem population (who uses opioids in your
state)
ii. Relate your target population to national statistics
c. Evaluate programs already in operation that look promising for your target population
d. Describe your top priority intervention to begin to respond to this crisis
e. Estimate the cost of your intervention
REAL ANSWERS ONLY!!!!
NO LINKS!!!!
According to the CDC, Louisiana had the 10th highest rate of drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2020.
How to explain the informationThe target population for my intervention is individuals who are currently using opioids in Louisiana.
According to the CDC, an estimated 721,000 people in Louisiana used opioids in 2020. The opioid crisis is a national problem. In 2020, there were over 93,000 drug overdose deaths in the United States, and over 70% of those deaths involved opioids.
There are a number of existing programs in Louisiana that are designed to address the opioid crisis. These programs include:
The Louisiana State Opioid Response (LaSOR) Program, which provides funding for prevention, treatment, and recovery services for individuals with or at risk for opioid use disorder.
The Louisiana Opioid Crisis Response Fund, which provides funding for community-based organizations that are working to address the opioid crisis.
My top priority intervention is to expand access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. This includes increasing the number of treatment providers, expanding insurance coverage for treatment, and reducing the stigma associated with addiction.
The estimated cost of expanding access to MAT in Louisiana is $50 million per year. This cost would be offset by the savings in healthcare costs.
Learn more about epidemics on
https://brainly.com/question/24222732
#SPJ1
courts of _____ are empowered to reverse the judgments of lower courts and to order cases to be retried if mistakes were made .
The courts empowered to reverse judgments of lower courts and order cases to be retried if mistakes were made vary depending on the country's legal system.
In numerous common law wards, such as the Joined together States and Britain, re-appraising courts have the specialist to audit lower court choices and possibly turn around them. These re-appraising courts are regularly partitioned into distinctive levels, such as the Court of Requests or the Incomparable Court
In civil law countries, such as France or Germany, the appellate courts may have different names and structures, but they generally serve a similar function of reviewing lower court decisions and potentially overturning them if errors are found.
It's important to note that the specifics of the court system and its hierarchy can vary from one country to another, so it is necessary to refer to the legal system of a particular jurisdiction to determine the exact courts with the power to reverse judgments and order retrials.
To learn about legal system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1894269
#SPJ4
What role does education play in the path to professionalism for the private security industry? how much difference will it make? be specific about the initiatives to foster an educated security specialist.
Education plays a crucial role in the path to professionalism for the private security industry. By acquiring relevant education and training, security professionals can enhance their knowledge, skills, and competencies, thereby increasing their effectiveness in the field.
Instruction not as it were gives a solid establishment of hypothetical information but ingrains basic considering problem-solving capacities, and moral decision-making aptitudes. The effect of instruction on polished skills within the private security industry is critical.
Taught security pros are superior and prepared to get it complex security challenges, adjust to changing circumstances, make educated choices, and handle potential dangers more successfully.
They too contribute to the by and large professionalization of the industry by maintaining moral guidelines, advancing best hones, and improving the industry's notoriety. It is critical to note that whereas instruction is basic, down-to-earth encounters and on-the-job preparation are similarly critical for creating well-rounded security proficiency.
To learn about security industry visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33670429
#SPJ4
How are federal judges chosen for the job? How does this process of selection affect their incentives or strategy while serving on the court? How do federal judges decide cases? Highlight several types of factors that contribute to their rulings and what cases they decide to hear.
Federal judges are chosen through nomination and confirmation. They are influenced by legal principles, precedent, and societal impacts.
Government decided in the US are picked through a designation and affirmation process. The President names people for government judgeships, especially for seats on the High Court and bureaucratic investigative and area courts. The Senate then, at that point, surveys and affirms these assignments.
The course of choice influences judges' impetuses and methodologies on the court. Since government judges are named forever, they are for the most part protected from political tensions and can settle on choices in view of lawful standards as opposed to momentary prevalence.
This gives them the opportunity to decipher incentives and apply the law fairly, unafraid of electing outcomes.
While choosing cases, government judges think about different variables. Legitimate point of reference and protected understanding assume huge parts in their decisions.
They investigate the text, history, and expectation of regulations, as well as the more extensive strategy suggestions. Legal ways of thinking, like originalism or living constitutionalism, additionally impact their independent direction.
Furthermore, judges might think about down to earth suggestions, general assessment, and cultural effects of their decisions. They might pick cases that can possibly shape lawful point of reference, explain legitimate ambiguities, or address squeezing social issues.
In rundown, government judges are picked through a selection and affirmation process, which permits them to go with choices in light of lawful standards. Their decisions are affected by variables like legitimate point of reference, established understanding, legal way of thinking, pragmatic ramifications, and cultural effects.
To learn more about incentives, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/28274469
#SPJ4
As in other fields pertaining to mental disorder, mental health
law is ill defined and subject to controversy." Discuss why mental
health law is claimed as "ill defined" and identify the
controversies
Mental health law is considered "ill-defined" because it is not well-defined and is subject to debate. Mental health law is a subset of the larger legal field that focuses on the intersection between mental health and the law.
It covers a wide range of topics, including mental health treatment, civil commitment, and the rights of people with mental illness. As a result of its broad scope, mental health law is difficult to define and is subject to controversy. Some of the reasons why mental health law is considered "ill-defined" and subject to controversy are:1. Lack of Consensus - There is no consensus on how to define mental illness, which makes it difficult to establish clear legal standards for mental health treatment.
Changing Definitions - The definition of mental illness is constantly evolving, which makes it difficult to establish stable legal standards.3. Cultural Differences - Mental illness is viewed differently in different cultures, which can lead to differences in legal standards.4. Stigma - There is a significant stigma attached to mental illness, which can lead to discrimination against people with mental illness and can make it difficult to establish clear legal standards.
To learn more about Mental health visit here:
brainly.com/question/31708532
#SPJ11
whats the correlation between forced labor and human
trafficking?
this is a criminal justice class.
When people are coerced, deceived, or forced to do work or provide services against their will, this is known as forced labor.
This kind of crime is committed both domestically and internationally. Work in the home. Industries include mining, quarrying, construction, and brick kilns. Assembling, handling, and bundling are parts of the assembling system. Two of the most prevalent forms of sexual exploitation are prostitution and sexual exploitation.
The recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring, or reception of individuals for the purpose of profit by means of force, fraud, or deception is known as human trafficking. Men, women, and children of all ages and backgrounds can be harmed by this crime, which takes place worldwide.
The victim and the trafficker have a relationship of constant exploitation and commodification, from which the trafficker makes money. People who set out to be smuggled can become victims of trafficking while they are traveling and are exploited once they arrive at their destination. The TIP Office argues that this word should be banned because it refers to the act of detaining someone against their will in order to exploit them.
Learn more about justice class :
brainly.com/question/30695448
#SPJ4
Read the following cases and give your legal opinion based on Nature and Effect of Obligations stipulated on Civil Code of the Philippines.
Case: This is an action for damages for alleged breach of contract. Nicolas L. Cuenca, then Commissioner for Public Highways of the Republic of the Philippines filed a case against Northwest Airlines, Inc. The facts reveal that Mr. Cuenca boarded Northwest Airlines in Manila with a first-class ticket to Tokyo. Upon arrival at Okinawa, Mr. Cuenca was transferred to the tourist class compartment. Although he revealed that he was traveling in his official capacity as official delegate of the Republic to a conference in Tokyo, an agent of Northwest Airlines rudely compelled him, in the presence of other passengers, to move, over his objection, to the tourist class, under threat of otherwise leaving him in Okinawa. In order to reach the conference on time, respondent had no choice but to obey. Is Mr. Cuenca entitled to damages for culpa contractual? Justify your opinion.
MAXIMUM OF 2 PARAGRAPHS
Yes, Mr. Cuenca is entitled to damages for culpa contractual. Obligations stipulated in the Civil Code of the Philippines indicate that when there is a breach of contract, the aggrieved party shall have the right to demand fulfillment of the obligation, or damages resulting from non-performance.
Northwest Airlines breached its contract with Mr. Cuenca when it transferred him to the tourist class compartment without his consent, and when he objected, he was compelled rudely to move under threat of being left in Okinawa.
As a result, Mr. Cuenca was forced to move to the tourist class compartment, causing damage to his reputation, given that he was a high-ranking official of the Philippine government, and was traveling on official business.
To know more about Obligations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28192164
#SPJ11
The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey found that there was a surplus of practicing physicians in the U. S. In the 1960’s. True or False
Question 2
According to the principal-agent problem;
A) Patients chose to be rationally ignorant
B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor
C) Both 1 and 2
D) Health maintenance organizations do not insure people for their pre-existing conditions
Question 3
The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is;
A) GDP per capita
B) Population size
C) Medical Insurance System
D) Availability of physicians
1. True. 2. B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. 3. The strongest predictor in the variation in health care demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System.
1. In the 1960s, there was indeed a surplus of practicing physicians in the United States. The Health Planners’ Evaluation of the Physicians Supply survey conducted during that time period found evidence of an oversupply of physicians relative to the demand for their services. This surplus was attributed to various factors, including the rapid growth of medical schools, changes in healthcare financing, and increased government support for medical education. As a result, the number of physicians entering the workforce exceeded the demand, leading to a surplus.
2. The principal-agent problem refers to a situation in which an agent (in this case, the doctor) is entrusted by a principal (the patient) to make decisions on their behalf. The correct statement regarding the principal-agent problem is B) The patient delegates the decision to the doctor. In this context, patients often rely on doctors' expertise and knowledge to make informed decisions about their healthcare. However, this delegation of decision-making can sometimes lead to issues of information asymmetry, where the doctor may prioritize their own interests or have different goals than the patient. The principal-agent problem recognizes this potential conflict of interest and the need for mechanisms to align the doctor's actions with the patient's best interests.
3. Among the given options, the strongest predictor of the variation in healthcare demand among countries is C) Medical Insurance System. The type and structure of a country's healthcare insurance system can significantly influence healthcare demand. Countries with comprehensive and accessible healthcare insurance systems tend to have higher demand for healthcare services due to increased affordability and availability of care. On the other hand, countries with limited or fragmented insurance systems may experience lower demand for healthcare services. While factors such as GDP per capita, population size, and availability of physicians can also contribute to healthcare demand variation, the medical insurance system has been found to be a key determinant.
It is important to note that these answers are based on general knowledge and may not encompass all possible perspectives or nuances related to the topics.
To learn more about delegates click here: brainly.com/question/30112239
#SPJ11
Should we force defendant's to take medication for the sole purpose of holding a criminal trial or should we continue to hospitalize them until they regain competence? What about death row inmates who are incompetent awaiting trial? Should we force them to take medication to regain competency? Why or why not?
The decision of whether or not to force a defendant to take medication for the sole purpose of holding a criminal trial or continue hospitalizing them until they regain competence depends on a variety of factors, including the specific circumstances of the case, the nature of the medication, and the patient's preferences.
In general, if a defendant is found to be incompetent to stand trial, the court must determine whether it is more appropriate to hospitalize the individual until they regain competence or to force them to take medication to regain competence. This decision should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the individual's mental health, the nature of the medication, and the potential risks and benefits of each approach.There is no simple answer to this question, as the decision will depend on a variety of factors. In general, if a death row inmate is found to be incompetent, it may be more appropriate to hospitalize them until they regain competence rather than force them to take medication. However, this decision will depend on the individual circumstances of the case.
To know more about hospitalizing visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29574454
#SPJ11
question 3/10
Which statement is true? (select one).
Gaining ethical approval means that ethical issues will not arise in your research.
Research ethics is about ensuring that research is carried out in an ethical way, rather than preventing research from being done.
Gaining ethical approval means that all risks in your research will be eliminated.
Ethical approval is not needed if your research does not involve human participants.
Option B: Research ethics is about ensuring that research is carried out in an ethical way, rather than preventing research from being done is true.
Research ethics are a set of moral values that govern how researchers conduct themselves while conducting research. Ethical principles provide researchers with guidelines for conducting research that is trustworthy, and socially responsible. Researchers must apply for ethical approval, which is granted by ethics committees, before conducting a research study to ensure that their study complies with ethical principles. These committees have the authority to approve, deny, or recommend changes to research proposals.
Researchers must address ethical concerns that arise during the study, and they must also obtain informed consent from research participants. Ethics in research are critical because they ensure that researchers conduct themselves in a manner that is ethically sound and socially responsible. Researchers must take care to ensure that they do not harm participants physically or emotionally during the study and that they do not breach their confidentiality.
Research ethics is concerned with how research is carried out in an ethical manner, and not with preventing research from being conducted. Research studies have the potential to improve people's lives and contribute to society's knowledge base. It is critical, however, that researchers conduct their studies in an ethical manner to ensure that they are trustworthy and socially responsible. Therefore, the correct option is B.
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
question 3/10
Which statement is true? (select one).
A. Gaining ethical approval means that ethical issues will not arise in your research.
B. Research ethics is about ensuring that research is carried out in an ethical way, rather than preventing research from being done.
C. Gaining ethical approval means that all risks in your research will be eliminated.
D. Ethical approval is not needed if your research does not involve human participants.
Know more about Research ethics here:
https://brainly.com/question/32146475
#SPJ8