Unit 1 is m feet, unit 2 is n feet unit 3 is k dollars per square feet, write an expression that could result in a final unit measure of dollars

The roots of the given quadratic equation are x= 4, [tex]\frac{-3}{2}[/tex]

The definition of a quadratic as a second-degree polynomial equation demands that at least one squared term must be included. It also goes by the name quadratic equations. The quadratic equation has the following generic form:

ax² + bx + c = 0The roots of a quadratic equation are found using the quadratic formula. In place of the factorization method, this formula aids in evaluating the quadratic equations' solutions. The quadratic formula aids in identifying the problem's fictitious roots when a quadratic equation lacks actual roots. Shreedhara Acharya's formula is another name for the quadratic formula.

2x² - 5x​ -12 = 0

The Shridharacharya formula or quadratic formula -

[tex]x=\frac{-b\ +-\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}[/tex]

we have a=2, b=-5 and c=-12

[tex]x=\frac{5+-\sqrt{5^2-4*2*12}}{2*2}\\\\x=\frac{5+-\sqrt{25+96}}{4}\\\\x=\frac{5+\sqrt{121}}{4}\\\\x=\frac{5+-11}{4}\\now, \\x=\frac{5+11}{4}=\frac{16}{4}\\x=4\\x=\frac{5-11}{4}\\x=-6/4\\x=-3/2[/tex]

The mistake in your solution is we have the value of b=-5 so , when we put the value of b in a formula then -5 will be 5.

learn more about  quadratic formula ,

https://brainly.com/question/9300679

#SPJ1

the amount of sand in the top cone when the height of the sand is only 1 inch is (h-1)/h times the amount of sand in the top cone originally.

the cones are similar, their volumes are proportional to the cube of their heights. Let's denote the height of the top cone as h, and the radius of the top and bottom bases as r. Then, the volume of the top cone can be expressed as:

V₁ = (1/3)π[tex]r^2[/tex]h

If the height of the sand in the top cone is reduced to 1 inch, then the height of the remaining sand in the top cone is (h-1) inches. The volume of the remaining sand in the top cone can be expressed as:

V₂ = (1/3)π[tex]r^2[/tex](h-1)

To compare the amount of sand in the top cone in these two scenarios, we can take the ratio of their volumes:

V₂/V₁ = [(1/3)π[tex]r^2[/tex](h-1)] / [(1/3)π[tex]r^2[/tex]h] = (h-1)/h

Learn more about proportional here:

https://brainly.com/question/28979975

#SPJ1

Answer:

The first one...............

Answer:

10km/hr

Step-by-step explanation:

The speed of the wind is approximately 6.93 km/hr.

We have,

Let's call the speed of the wind "w" (in km/hr).

When the airship is flying with the wind, its speed relative to the ground is the sum of its speed in calm weather (50 km/hr) and the speed of the wind (w km/hr). So the airship's speed with the wind is 50 + w km/hr.

When the airship is flying against the wind, its speed relative to the ground is the difference between its speed in calm weather (50 km/hr) and the speed of the wind (w km/hr).

So the airship's speed against the wind is 50 - w km/hr.

The distance flown by airship in each direction is the same (150 km).

Let's use the formula for distance, rate, and time:

distance = rate x time

For the first leg of the trip (flying with the wind), we have:

distance = (50 + w) x time

distance = (50 + w) x t(1)

where t(1) is the time taken for the first leg of the trip.

For the second leg of the trip (flying against the wind), we have:

distance = (50 - w) x time

distance = (50 - w) x t(2)

where t(2) is the time taken for the second leg of the trip.

The total time for the round trip is given as 6 hours and 15 minutes, or 6.25 hours.

So we have:

t(1) + t(2) = 6.25

We also know that the distance flown in each direction is 150 km. So we have:

(50 + w) x t(10 = 150

(50 - w) x t(2) = 150

Now we can solve this system of equations for w:

t(1) = 150 / (50 + w)

t(2) = 150 / (50 - w)

t(1) + t(2) = 6.25

Substituting the first two equations into the third equation, we get:

150 / (50 + w) + 150 / (50 - w) = 6.25

Multiplying both sides by (50 + w)(50 - w), we get:

150(50 - w) + 150(50 + w) = 6.25(50 + w)(50 - w)

Expanding and simplifying, we get:

7500 - 150w + 7500 + 150w = 15625 - 312.5w²

Simplifying further, we get:

15000 = 312.5w²

Dividing both sides by 312.5, we get:

w² = 48

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

w = ±√(48)

Since the speed of the wind cannot be negative, we take the positive square root:

w = √(48) ≈ 6.93 km/hr

Therefore,

The speed of the wind is approximately 6.93 km/hr.

Learn more about speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/7359669

#SPJ2

Total of 3 hours are needed to complete the job.

The required equation that can be used to answer this question is: 31x = 568 − 475, where x is the number of hours of labor that was needed to complete the job.

Here's how you can solve it:Samantha recently hired a mechanic to do some necessary work. On the final bill, Samantha was charged a total of $568. $475 was listed for parts and the rest for labor.

If the hourly rate for labor was $31, how many hours of labor were needed to complete the job?Solution:Let x be the number of hours of labor needed to complete the job.

Labor cost = $31/hourTotal labor cost = 31x dollars. Total cost of the job = $568.

Cost of parts = $475.

Labor cost = Total cost − Cost of parts.

31x = 568 − 47531x = 93x = 3

Therefore, 3 hours of labor was needed to complete the job.

To know more about hourly rate click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29335545#

#SPJ11

the relationship between test scores and the student-teacher ratio can be modeled as a linear function: The right choice is D) lessen test scores by 4.56 for each school locale.

In view of the data in the inquiry, the relationship between test scores and the understudy educator proportion can be numerically composed as follows:

x = 698.9 - 2.28y .................... (1)

Where,

x = test scores

y = understudy educator proportion

The slant of (- 2.28) shows the sum by which x will change at whatever point there is an adjustment of y.

Hence, when there is a reduction in the understudy educator proportion by 2 (for example y = 2), we will have:

Change in x = - 2.28 * 2 = - 4.56

The negative sign thusly shows that the test scores will decrease by 4.56 for each school area. Accordingly, the right choice is D) lessen test scores by 4.56 for each school locale.

to know more about linear functions click here:

https://brainly.com/question/2248255

#SPJ4

the complete question is:

Assume that the relationship between test scores and the student-teacher ratio can be modeled as a linear function with an intercept of 698.9 and a slope of (-2.28). A decrease in the student teacher ratio by 2 will: A) reduce test scores by 2.28 on average) result in a test score of 698.9C) reduce test scores by 2.56 on average) reduce test scores by 4.56 for every school district.

Answer:

B. y = (x+1)(x-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Bbecause when y intersect the x axis, y = 0

so (x+1)(x-3) = 0, which we get x = -1 and x = 3

As shown in the graph this is true, because the function does indeed also intersect with the x axis at x = -1 and x = 3 as well.

Answer:

Proofs attached to answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Proofs attached to answer

Answer:

x = 10, -4

Step-by-step explanation:

(x – 3)² = 49

x - 3 = √49

x - 3 = ± 7

x = 10, -4

Looking at options,  10 and -4 is the answer.

To test if more than 80% of her students enjoyed taking her class, the statistics professor should use a hypotheses test.

The null hypotheses (H0) would be that the proportion of students who enjoyed taking her class is equal to or less than 80%, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) would be that the proportion is greater than 80%.

H0: p <= 0.80

Ha: p > 0.80

Where p: proportion of students who enjoyed taking the class.

To test this hypothesis, the professor would need to collect a random sample of students from her class and ask them if they enjoyed taking the class. She could then use a test statistic, such as the z-score, to determine the probability of obtaining the observed proportion of students who enjoyed the class, assuming the null hypothesis is true.

If the probability of obtaining the observed proportion is very low (typically, less than 0.05), then the professor would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis that more than 80% of her students enjoyed taking her class.

Learn more about hypotheses here:

https://brainly.com/question/30670688

#SPJ4

Rounding to three decimal places, the probability that exactly 7 Americans out of a sample of 15 own an answering machine is approximately 0.170.

To find the probability that exactly 7 of the 15 Americans selected at random own an answering machine, we can use the binomial distribution formula:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) * p^k * (1 - p)^(n - k)

where P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k successes, n is the sample size, p is the probability of success, and (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient which represents the number of ways to choose k successes out of n trials.

In this case, n = 15, p = 0.69 (the proportion of Americans who own an answering machine), and k = 7. Thus, the probability of getting exactly 7 Americans who own an answering machine out of a sample of 15 is:

P(X = 7) = (15 choose 7) * 0.69^7 * (1 - 0.69)^(15 - 7)

Using a calculator or statistical software, we can evaluate this expression to find:

P(X = 7) ≈ 0.170

This means that if we were to repeat this survey many times with samples of size 15, we would expect approximately 17% of the samples to have exactly 7 Americans who own an answering machine.

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/17153222

#SPJ4

Answer:

8.17

Step-by-step explanation:

43x19/100 equals 8.17

it would take 6 men 20 minutes to dig a hole that is 4 x 4 x 3 meters

To solve this problem, we can use the formula that relates the time taken to do a job to the number of workers available, assuming that all workers have the same productivity. This formula is given by the equation:Work Done = Productivity x Time Taken x Number of Workers available. If we let the work done be W, the productivity be P, and the time taken be T, then the equation becomes:W = P x T x N. We are given that 3 men can dig a hole that is 3 x 2 x 4 meters in 20 minutes. We can find the volume of this hole by multiplying its dimensions:V = 3 x 2 x 4 = 24 cubic metersThis means that 3 men can dig a volume of 24 cubic meters in 20 minutes.

To find their productivity, we can use the formula: Productivity = Work Done / (Time Taken x Number of Workers)P = W / (T x N) = 24 / (20 x 3) = 0.4 cubic meters per minute per worker. Now we can use this productivity to find the time taken for 6 men to dig a hole that is 4 x 4 x 3 meters. We can find the volume of this hole by multiplying its dimensions:V = 4 x 4 x 3 = 48 cubic meters.

To dig this hole, the amount of work done would be 48 cubic meters. The productivity per worker is still 0.4 cubic meters per minute, but the number of workers is now 6. Therefore, the time taken would be:T = W / (P x N) = 48 / (0.4 x 6) = 20 minutes.Therefore, it would take 6 men 20 minutes to dig a hole that is 4 x 4 x 3 meters, given that 3 men can dig a hole that is 3 x 2 x 4 meters in 20 minutes.

To know more about time and work, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3854047

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the length of the shorter leg of the isosceles trapezoid "a" and the length of the longer leg "b".

From the problem, we know that:

a = 0.1x - 0.5 (length of one leg is 0.1.x - 0.5 meters)

b = 0.3x - 2.1 (length of the other leg is 0.3.x-2.1 meters)

Since we know that the trapezoid is isosceles, we know that a = b. So we can set the two expressions equal to each other:

0.1x - 0.5 = 0.3x - 2.1

Now we can solve for x:

0.2x = 1.6

x = 8

Now that we know x, we can substitute it back into the expressions for a and b to find their lengths:

a = 0.1(8) - 0.5 = 0.3 meters

b = 0.3(8) - 2.1 = 0.3 meters

Therefore, each of the legs of the solar panel are 0.3 meters long.

The distance from point A to the boat is approximately 23.3 meters, and the distance from point B to the boat is approximately 26.7 meters, rounded to the nearest foot.

Distance can be calculated using a variety of methods, depending on the context. For example, the distance between two points in a straight line can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem in two dimensions or the distance formula in three dimensions. In more complex situations, such as when the two points are not in a straight line, distance may be calculated using other mathematical methods or by estimating the distance based on contextual information.

Distance is often used in everyday life to describe how far apart objects or locations are from each other, such as the distance between two cities, the distance from home to work, or the distance between two landmarks. It is also used in many scientific fields to describe the separation between celestial objects, the distances traveled by particles in a chemical reaction, or the distances between neurons in the brain.

We can solve this problem using the Law of Sines, which states that for any triangle with sides a, b, and c and opposite angles A, B, and C:

a/sin A = b/sin B = c/sin C

Let's label the distance from point A to the boat as a, the distance from point B to the boat as b, and the distance from point C to the opposite bank as c. We are given that AB = 50 meters, angle ABC = 68 degrees, and angle BCA = 73 degrees. We want to find a and b.

First, we can find the measure of angle ACB by using the fact that the sum of angles in a triangle is 180 degrees:

angle ACB = 180 - angle ABC - angle BCA

angle ACB = 180 - 68 - 73

angle ACB = 39 degrees

Next, we can use the Law of Sines to find a and b:

a/sin 68 = c/sin 39

b/sin 73 = c/sin 39

Solving for c in both equations gives:

c = a sin 39 / sin 68

c = b sin 39 / sin 73

We can set these two equations equal to each other and solve for b:

a sin 39 / sin 68 = b sin 39 / sin 73

b = a (sin 39 / sin 73) * (sin 68 / sin 39)

b = a (sin 68 / sin 73)

We know that a + b = 50, so we can substitute the expression for b into this equation:

a + a (sin 68 / sin 73) = 50

Solving for a gives:

a = 50 / (1 + sin 68 / sin 73)

a ≈ 23.3 meters

Substituting this value of a into the expression for b gives:

b ≈ 26.7 meters

So the distance from point A to the boat is approximately 23.3 meters, and the distance from point B to the boat is approximately 26.7 meters, rounded to the nearest foot.

To know more about expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17248750

#SPJ1

The complete question is

Two landing points, A and B, lie on the straight bank of a river and are separated by 50 meters. Find the distance from each landing point to a boat pulled ashore on the opposite bank at a point C if angle ABC=68 degree and angle BCA=73 degree. Round to the nearest foot.

If the system has infinite solutions, it means that the two equations are not independent, but rather one equation is a multiple of the other. In other words, the second equation must be a multiple of y = 7x + 8.

One possible equation that completes the system is:

14y = 98x + 112

To check that this equation works, we can substitute y = 7x + 8 into the equation:

14(7x + 8) = 98x + 112

98x + 112 = 98x + 112

As we can see, the equation is true for any value of x, which means that it is satisfied for any value of y that corresponds to y = 7x + 8.

Therefore, the system of equations that has y = 7x + 8 as one of its equations and has infinite solutions is:

y = 7x + 8

14y = 98x + 112

True, conditional formulas can be used to exclude data from analysis if certain conditions are met. These formulas, often found in spreadsheet software and programming languages, allow you to set specific criteria that must be met in order for the data to be included or excluded from your analysis.

This can be useful in situations where you need to focus on specific subsets of data, or to remove outliers or irrelevant information from your dataset.

By incorporating conditional logic in your formulas, you can ensure that only relevant and useful data is included in your analysis, making it more accurate and efficient. Overall, the use of conditional formulas can greatly enhance your data analysis by providing a flexible and powerful tool to filter and process your data based on specific requirements.

for such more questions on data from analysis

https://brainly.com/question/14724376

#SPJ11

Each number occupies 7.7 inches² of  the dartboard.

In geοmetry, area is the amοunt οf space a flat shape, like a pοlygοn, circle οr ellipse, takes up οn a plane. The area οf a shape is always measured in square units. Tο find the area οf simple shapes like a square οr the area οf a rectangle, yοu οnly need its width, w, and length, l (οr base, b). The area is length times width:

First we need the area of the dartboard

Area = πr²

here r = d/2 = 14/2 = 7

Area of dartboard = πr²

[tex]$ \rm = \frac{22}{7 } \times 7 \times 7[/tex]

= 22 × 7

= 154 inches²

Now, its is said that each number occupies 1/20 of the board,

Then area of each number =  154 ×  1/20

                                             = 7.7 inches²

Thus, Each number occupies 7.7 inches² of  the dartboard.

learn more about area

https://brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ1

The value of x in the right triangle when calculated is approximately 13.8 units

Given the right-angled triangle

The side length x can be calculated using the following sine ratio

So, we have

sin(39) = x/22

To find x, we can use the fact that sin(39 degrees) = x/22 and solve for x.

First, we can use a calculator to find the value of sin(39 degrees), which is approximately 0.6293.

Then, we can set up the equation:

0.6293 = x/22

To solve for x, we can multiply both sides by 22:

0.6293 * 22 = x

13.8446 = x

Rewrite as

x = 13.8446

Approximate the value of x

x = 13.8

Therefore, x is approximately 13.8 in the triangle

Read about right triangle at

https://brainly.com/question/2437195

#SPJ1

Answer:

To solve the inequality x^2-5x-36>0, we need to find the values of x for which the expression is greater than zero.

One way to do this is by factoring the quadratic expression:

x^2-5x-36 = (x-9)(x+4)

The expression is positive when either both factors are positive or both factors are negative.

When both factors are positive: x-9 > 0 and x+4 > 0

Solving for x, we get x > 9 and x > -4. Therefore, x > 9.

When both factors are negative: x-9 < 0 and x+4 < 0

Solving for x, we get x < 9 and x < -4. Therefore, x < -4.

Now, we have two intervals: x < -4 and x > 9. To check whether the expression is positive within these intervals, we can pick a value within each interval and plug it into the expression.

Let's choose x = -5 (within x < -4) and x = 10 (within x > 9).

For x = -5:

x^2-5x-36 = (-5)^2-5(-5)-36

= 25+25-36

= 14

Since 14 is greater than zero, the expression is positive when x = -5.

For x = 10:

x^2-5x-36 = 10^2-5(10)-36

= 100-50-36

= 14

Since 14 is greater than zero, the expression is also positive when x = 10.

Therefore, the solution to the inequality x^2-5x-36>0 is x < -4 or x > 9, which can be written in interval notation as (-∞,-4) ∪ (9,∞).

The probability that a dessert chosen at random contains nuts given that it contains chocolate is 34.9%.

The likelihood of any event A happening when another event B related to A has already happened is known as conditional probability. This implies that the likelihood of event A relies on event B.

The conditional probability symbol is P(A|B). Conditional probability P(A|B) is crucial for any exam that is part of a competition. The concept of conditional probability P(A|B), formula, and examples with solutions are all covered in this article. The Bayes theorem predicts the likelihood that an event connected to any condition would occur. For the situation of conditional probability, this theorem is taken into account.

Let A : a certain cafe contains chocolates

B: a dessert contains Nuts

P(A) = 86% = 0.86

P(AB) = 30% = 0.3

[tex]P(B|A) =\frac{P(AB)}{P(A)}[/tex]

= 0.3/0.86

= 34.9 %

So the answer is 34.9%

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/2364330

#SPJ4

The correlation between the ages of men and women in this situation would be +1. This means that for every one-year increase in the age of the man, the age of the woman would increase by one year as well. The correlation coefficient of +1 signifies a perfect positive linear correlation between the two variables.

In other words, if a man is 40 years old, the woman he is married to would be 37. If the man was 50, then the woman would be 47, and so on. This would remain true for any age, regardless of the difference in their ages. Therefore, the correlation between their ages would always remain +1.

It is important to note that this correlation coefficient is not necessarily reflective of  traditional or even natural social or biological behavior. Rather, it is simply a mathematical relationship that would exist in this specific situation. In reality, the age gap between married couples can vary widely depending on various social and cultural factors.

To summarize, the correlation between the ages of men and women in this scenario would be +1, signifying a perfect positive linear correlation. This means that for any given age of the man, the age of the woman would be exactly three years younger.

Know more about linear correlation  here:

https://brainly.com/question/24881420

#SPJ11      

Jennifer needs to sample at least 151 vets to achieve a standard error of the mean of 3.42 years or less.

The variability or uncertainty of a sample statistic, like the mean or proportion, is measured by standard error. It represents the sample distribution's standard deviation for that statistic. In other words, it calculates the amount by which chance is likely to cause the sample statistic to deviate from the actual population parameter.

The calculation of the standard error is based on the particular statistic being produced as well as the characteristics of the sampled population. For instance, the population's standard deviation is divided by the square root of the sample size to determine the standard error of the mean. If p is the estimated proportion based on the sample, then the standard error of a proportion is determined as (p * (1 - p)) divided by the square root of the sample size.

A population parameter estimate that has a lower standard error is more accurate. Inferential statistics frequently employ the standard error to compute confidence intervals and test population parameter-related hypotheses.

The formula for the standard error of the mean can be used to get the approximate number of veterans Jennifer needs to sample:

[tex]SE = / \sqrt{n}[/tex]

where n: sample size, delta: age standard deviation, and SE: standard error of the mean.

In this instance, we are aware that = 22 years and SE = 3.42 years. As we solve for n, we obtain:

[tex]n = (delta / SE)^2 n = (22 / 3.42)^2 \sn = 150.39[/tex]

Learn more about standard error here:

https://brainly.com/question/13179711

#SPJ4

Answer:

China's top ten famous flowers are: the queen of flowers - plum blossom, the king of flowers - peony, frost blooming - chrysanthemum, gentleman's flower - orchid, the queen of flowers - rose, blooming flowers - Rhododendron, delicate flowers - camellia, water hibiscus - lotus, ten miles of fragrance - osmanthus, Lingbo fairy - daffodil 10 kinds of precious and beautiful local flowers.

Plum blossom is known as the "top ten famous flowers in China". These ten kinds of flowers respectively contain different levels of Chinese spiritual and cultural deposits, with profound and strong historical connotation. They are unique in the flower industry, marking the extraordinary significance of Chinese traditional culture. However, among China's top 10 traditional famous flowers, only the plum blossom, osmanthus and lotus have international registration rights.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Replacing it

The numerical value of x in the expression (x+5) and 2(x-4) is 61.

The sum of angles on a straight line equals 180 degrees.

From the figure in the image:

We know that the sum of angles on a straight line equals 180 degrees.

Since angle GDC and its supplement are on a straight line.

Hence;

Angle GDC + Supplemetary angle to GDC = 180

Plug in the given values and solve for x.

( x + 5 ) + 2( x - 4 ) = 180

Apply distributive property.

x + 5 + 2x - 8 = 180

Collect like terms

x + 2x - 8 + 5 = 180

3x - 3 = 180

3x = 180 + 3

3x = 183

x = 183/3

x = 61

Therefore, the value of x is 61.

Learn more about supplementary angles here: https://brainly.com/question/18164299

#SPJ1

The fact that the overall frequency of an event can be determined by multiplying together the frequencies of the independently occurring factors related to that event is called a frequency multiplier. Also called as multiplication rule.

             The multiplication rule states that the overall probability of a sequence of events happening jointly is the product of the probabilities of the individual events.

                  In probability, the multiplication rule is used to calculate the joint probability of two independent events that occur together.

              In probability scenarios, the factors are the set of conditions that influence the probability of a certain occurrence, event, or outcome.

These factors are used to calculate the probability of an event. The likelihood of the occurrence of an event is based on these factors.

             The multiplication rule can be used to calculate the overall frequency of an event by multiplying the frequency of each factor independently related to the event.

Learn more about the overall frequency of an event at: https://brainly.com/question/15171176

#SPJ11

To solve an equation with multiple unknowns, you need to have as many equations as there are unknowns.the solution to the system of equations is  [tex]x = 13/11 and z = 37/11.[/tex]

For the equation you provided, [tex]-x - 4z = -15[/tex]  , there are two unknowns: x and z. To solve for both, you need another equation that involves x and z.

If you have another equation that involves x and z, you can use a method like substitution or elimination to solve for both variables simultaneously.

For example, let's say you have the equation  [tex]2x + 3z = 7.[/tex] You can use substitution to solve for one variable in terms of the other and substitute the result into the other equation.

To solve for x, rearrange the first equation to get x in terms of z:

[tex]-x - 4z = -15[/tex]

[tex]x = -15 + 4z[/tex]

Substitute the expression for x into the second equation:

[tex]2x + 3z = 7[/tex]

[tex]2(-15 + 4z) + 3z = 7[/tex]

Distribute the 2:

[tex]-30 + 8z + 3z = 7[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]11z = 37[/tex]

Solve for z:

[tex]z = 37/11[/tex]

Substitute the value of z back into the equation for x:

[tex]x = -15 + 4z[/tex]

[tex]x = -15 + 4(37/11)[/tex]

[tex]x = -15 + 148/11[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]x = 13/11[/tex]

Therefore, the solution to the system of equations is x = 13/11 and z = 37/11.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ9

a force of 560J can raise a block weighing 8 N to a height of 70 meters. It's important to note that this calculation assumes no energy is lost due to friction or other factors, so in reality, the block may not reach exactly 70 meters.

How to calculate work?

To calculate the height to which a block weighing 8 N can be raised by a force of 560J, we need to use the formula for work done:

Work (W) = force (F) x distance (d) x cos(theta)

where theta is the angle between the force and the displacement. In this case, the force is the weight of the block (8 N), the distance is the height the block is raised (h), and theta is 0 degrees because the force is acting vertically upward and the displacement is in the same direction.

So, we can rearrange the formula to solve for the height (h):

h = W / (F x cos(theta))

Substituting the values we have, we get:

h = 560 J / (8 N x cos(0 degrees))

Since the cosine of 0 degrees is 1, we can simplify to:

h = 560 J / 8 N

h = 70 meters

Therefore, a force of 560J can raise a block weighing 8 N to a height of 70 meters. It's important to note that this calculation assumes no energy is lost due to friction or other factors, so in reality, the block may not reach exactly 70 meters.

To know more about forces visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/12785175

#SPJ1

Answer:

first box (pies): 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 33

-> increments of 3

2nd box [cost ($)]: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 121

-> increment of 11

Step-by-step explanation:

$44 ÷ 12 pies = $3.67 per 1 pie

3 × $3.67 = $11.01

same process: (number of pies) × $3.67 ≈ COST

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

So start off with 66 x 33. That will equal 2,178. Divide 2,178 by 18, like this: 2,178/18. That will equal 121. that will mean that 33 = 121. So 9 = 33 because 9 x 44 = 396 so you will divide that by 12 meaning that 9 equals 33. So now you will multiply 9 and 22 and then divide that answer by 33 making 6 = 22. now divide 22 by 6. That will equal 3.67. So 3.67 is the cost of one pie.

For the boxes above 12 and 44 it will be 16 = 59.

I hope it helped