John Peter Zenger's court case in 1735 won freedom of the press by establishing the precedent that truth should be a defense against charges of libel, option E is correct.
The court case that won freedom of the press is attributed to John Peter Zenger. In 1735, Zenger, a New York newspaper publisher, was put on trial for criticizing the colonial governor. His defense lawyer argued that truth should be a defense against charges of libel. The jury, defying the wishes of the judge, acquitted Zenger, establishing an important precedent for freedom of the press in the American colonies.
Zenger's case highlighted the importance of the principle that the press should be able to criticize the government without fear of retribution. This landmark trial laid the groundwork for the protection of free speech and press rights, influencing later legal developments such as the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, option E is correct.
To learn more about court follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/29766399
#SPJ4
The correct question is:
Use the Terms & Names list to identify each sentence online or on your own paper.
A. John Locke
B. Battle of Quebec
C. French and Indian War
D. George Whitefield
E. John Peter Zenger
F. Jonathan Edwards
G. English Bill of Rights
H. Benjamin Franklin
I. Albany Plan of Union
J. Pontiac’s Rebellion
K. Edmund Andros
L. Proclamation of 1763
Whose court case won freedom of the press?
Describe what nations did to protect world peace.
Following the horrors of the First and Second World Wars, nations took several measures to protect world peace. There were several organizations established to promote peacekeeping activities, such as the United Nations, League of Nations, and International Criminal Court.
Furthermore, nations have also been cooperating in military exercises and sharing intelligence to prevent the spread of terrorism. Military alliances such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are also created to establish strong military partnerships. Additionally, countries have signed numerous treaties and agreements to prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, which has been a significant threat to world peace.
In conclusion, nations have taken several measures to protect world peace, such as establishing international organizations, military alliances, humanitarian interventions, and arms control treaties. Countries continue to work together and develop new ways to protect world peace and promote international cooperation.
To know more about World Wars visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
Please write 1 paragraph with a thesis on the following 2 texts and use the outline I created below to help discuss the 2 texts.
WEB DuBois’s "Close Ranks" Article in Crisis (1918)
and
Soviet Union, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (1938)
Introductory paragraph
Thesis and brief layout
WEB DuBois's article "Close Ranks" was published in The Crisis in 1918, and The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was published in 1938. Both of these texts are historically significant and reveal how their authors approached the issue of race and revolution in different ways.
DuBois saw the fight for civil rights as a way to gain respect and dignity for Black Americans in the United States, whereas the Soviet Union's Communist Party believed that the abolition of class society and the creation of a proletarian society would ultimately lead to the end of racial inequality. While these texts present distinct and opposing viewpoints, they also share common themes about social change and the importance of collective action. DuBois's "Close Ranks" article was written during a time of war, and it expressed a call for unity among Black Americans in the face of adversity. DuBois believed that African Americans needed to support the war effort in order to prove their loyalty and worthiness as citizens. He argued that Black Americans needed to "close ranks" and show that they were just as capable and patriotic as white Americans. This sentiment was not universally accepted within the Black community, as some saw the war effort as an extension of white supremacy. However, DuBois's article served as a rallying cry for many Black Americans, who saw the fight for civil rights as a way to gain respect and dignity in a society that had long oppressed them.
On the other hand, The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union presented a different perspective on the role of race in revolutionary struggle. The Communist Party believed that the struggle for socialism was inextricably linked to the abolition of class society and the creation of a society in which all people were equal. The Soviet Union's approach to race was not to address it directly but to work towards the abolition of all forms of oppression through a proletarian revolution. This belief system had a significant impact on the international communist movement and inspired many to view the struggle for socialism as the ultimate solution to all forms of oppression. In conclusion, WEB DuBois's "Close Ranks" and The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union present different approaches to race and revolution. DuBois believed that the fight for civil rights was essential to gain respect and dignity for Black Americans, while the Soviet Union's Communist Party believed that the abolition of class society was the key to ending all forms of oppression. Despite their different perspectives, both texts highlight the importance of collective action and social change.
To know more about Communist Party visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/32383363
#SPJ11
Place How were the political divisions of the East carried into the West?
The political divisions of the East were carried into the West through the migration of settlers, territorial disputes, the extension of slavery, and the influence of political parties.
The political divisions of the East were carried into the West through various mechanisms. The migration of settlers brought with them their political affiliations and ideologies, contributing to the formation of new political factions in the Western territories.
Additionally, territorial disputes, such as the competition between free and slave states, intensified the political divisions as settlers brought their differing views on slavery and other issues to the West. The influence of political parties, like the Democrats and Whigs, further propagated East-West political divisions.
Learn more about the political divisions at
https://brainly.com/question/28093244
#SPJ4
The question is -
How were the political divisions of the East carried into the West?
Draw Conclusions Why would Puritans have felt threatened by the beliefs and practices of the Quakers?
Puritans would have felt threatened by the beliefs and practices of the Quakers due to their differences in religious beliefs, practices, and customs.
Puritans were Protestants who believed in the strict interpretation of the Bible and followed a strict moral code. They believed in predestination and that only a select few were chosen by God for salvation. On the other hand, Quakers believed in the presence of God in all individuals and the possibility of direct communication with God without the need for intermediaries such as priests or ministers. They also rejected the traditional sacraments such as baptism and the Eucharist and instead believed in the inward light of God.
These differences in beliefs and practices were seen as a threat to Puritan religious and social order. Puritans were also concerned about the Quaker's rejection of social hierarchies and their practice of allowing women to participate in religious activities and even preach. The Quaker's pacifist beliefs and refusal to participate in war or swear oaths of loyalty to the government were also seen as a threat to Puritan society. As a result, Puritans actively persecuted Quakers, including imprisonment, fines, and even the death penalty.
Know more about felt threatened, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30418557
#SPJ11
Connect Today to What American political traditions can be traced back to the Constitutional Convention?
the American political traditions that can be traced back to the Constitutional Convention include a republic system of governance, the rule of law, separation of powers, and federalism.
The American political traditions that can be traced back to the Constitutional Convention are:The concept of a republic, which is a system of governance in which citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, was established at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787.
The United States of America is one of the most well-known examples of a republic. This was a big departure from the old-style democracy in which each citizen was given a voice in every decision. The idea of the rule of law, which means that everyone, including those in government, must follow the law, is another tradition that emerged from the Constitutional Convention.
To know more about Convention visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20973924
#SPJ11
Which details give explicit examples of starvation during elizabethan times?
Starvation during Elizabethan times was a significant problem in England. The poor were more likely to starve because they had less access to food, and the price of food was very high, as compared to today’s world.
People died in large numbers, and the government struggled to manage the crisis. Starvation affected both the poor and the rich, and it was a widespread issue throughout the country. The problem was so severe that the government issued proclamations calling on people to give money and food to the poor.
They also believed that the poor were lazy, which is why they were starving. One of the explicit examples of starvation during Elizabethan times is the story of Mary Queen of Scots. She was imprisoned by Elizabeth I, and she died from starvation after being held captive for several years.
To know more about imprisoned visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28731950
#SPJ11
Why did the Quakers protest against the Puritans?
The Quakers protested against the Puritans due to differences in religious beliefs, practices, and their emphasis on individual spiritual experiences and equality.
The Quakers and Puritans held differing religious beliefs and practices, which led to conflicts and protests between the two groups.
The Quakers, also known as the Religious Society of Friends, emerged as a dissenting religious movement in the 17th century. They emphasized individual spiritual experiences, inner light, and equality among believers. Quakers rejected formal religious hierarchies, sacraments, and clergy, instead advocating for direct communion with God.
On the other hand, the Puritans were a group of English Protestants who sought to purify the Church of England from what they perceived as remnants of Roman Catholic practices. Puritans emphasized strict religious discipline, adherence to biblical law, and a structured religious hierarchy.
Learn more about the Quakers' protest at
https://brainly.com/question/984414
#SPJ4
What was the impact of the great war for empire on britich policy makers and the colonies?
The Great War for Empire, or the Seven Years' War as it is also known, was a major conflict fought between 1756 and 1763 that had a significant impact on British policy makers and the colonies.
This conflict arose due to the competing territorial ambitions of the European powers in North America and India, and it was ultimately won by the British Empire, although at a considerable cost. The impact of this war on British policy makers was twofold: first, it led to a significant expansion of British territory, particularly in North America and India, which in turn made the Empire a more powerful force on the world stage.
Second, it created a massive debt that the British government had to repay, which led to significant changes in economic policy and taxation. As for the colonies, the Great War for Empire had a similarly significant impact. In North America, the war was fought largely between the British and the French, with the native peoples caught in the middle.
To know more about War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
Making Inferences Why do you think the Mercator projection is used for all types of navigation?
The Mercator projection is used for all types of navigation because it provides a consistent and accurate representation of a straight line of travel.
The Mercator projection is a cylindrical map projection that shows a true direction between any two points on Earth, keeping the same shape for small areas. It has a constant scale along the equator and shows all the meridians and parallels as straight lines that meet at right angles, which helps navigators plot a course that minimizes distance and avoids distortion.
Aside from its consistency and accuracy, the Mercator projection is commonly used because it can be easily reproduced, it is simple to use, and it offers a great way to measure distances accurately. The Mercator projection is widely used in navigation charts and maps because it presents the true angle between two points, allowing sailors to plot a straight course, and it is highly useful in aviation navigation and other fields that require precise measurements.
To know more about Mercator projection :
https://brainly.com/question/30060339
#SPJ11
Name a theory that explains the importance of culturally
relevant text in student achievement?
A. Culturally Relevant Pedagogy or cultural relevance theory is a theoretical model.
B. theoretical model.
C. cultural relevance theory
The theory that explains the importance of culturally relevant text in student achievement is the Culturally Relevant Pedagogy or Cultural Relevance Theory.
Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) is a theoretical model of teaching and learning that has been developed and implemented to support the academic achievement and cultural empowerment of students from underrepresented groups.
Culturally relevant pedagogy is focused on the cultural context of learning, with the goal of creating a learning environment that is responsive to the cultural backgrounds and experiences of students from diverse backgrounds
Cultural Relevance Theory is a theory that explains the importance of culturally relevant text in student achievement. It is a theoretical model that focuses on the importance of creating a learning environment that is responsive to the cultural backgrounds and experiences of students from diverse backgrounds.
Cultural Relevance Theory emphasizes the importance of including cultural context in the curriculum, using culturally relevant teaching materials, and providing opportunities for students to learn about their own culture and the cultures of others. By doing so, students are more likely to feel engaged, connected, and empowered in the learning process.
To know more about Culturally Relevant Pedagogy, visit:-
brainly.com/question/33225463
#SPJ11
This forum focuses on the changing social and economic climate prior to the Civil War, with a focus on the northern states. What were the important changes that were taking place in the North? How were communities affected by them? Let's consider economic, demographic and cultural changes. Can you compare those changes with what was taking place in the South?
Recreation was the nation's endeavor to bring the North and the South back together so they could run as one nation liberated from subjection.
The war wiped out the Southern economy, which was built on slavery in the first place, and the entire economic system had to be rebuilt. Millions of newly freed slaves had to be reintegrated into society as well.
During Reconstruction, the South experienced severe social unrest as well as a brief period of military rule. But as we'll see, there was also a lot of change in the North after the Civil War.
Post-war lifestyles were altered by economic growth during the war, and the abolition of slavery sparked the Civil Rights Movement, which would take off a century later.
More modest farmsteads as opposed to rambling estates that necessary subjection to run them were more profitable in the North because of the land and environment. Immigrants from Europe provided labor, which helped the manufacturing and industrial sectors flourish. Iron and copper were two of the more abundant natural resources in the North than in the South.
Huge scope homesteads could develop crops like cotton and tobacco due to the South's warm environment and rich soil. Because agriculture was so successful, few Southerners felt the need for industrial expansion. Eighty percent of the workforce worked on farms or plantations.
Learn more about Civil War:
brainly.com/question/1737514
#SPJ4
How did Rhode Island most closely compare to Pennsylvania at the
time of its founding in the late 17th century? Why?
Rhode Island, the smallest state in the United States, was founded in 1636 by Roger Williams, who was expelled from Massachusetts Bay Colony for his opposition to religious tolerance and the confiscation of Native American land.
In the late 17th century, Rhode Island most closely compared to Pennsylvania in terms of its religious tolerance and government policies. William Penn, a Quaker, founded Pennsylvania as a haven for people of different faiths and beliefs, and he worked to establish a government that was equitable and fair to all citizens. Rhode Island was also established as a haven for religious freedom. Rhode Island's government was based on the principles of the separation of church and state, and the state's constitution protected the rights of individuals to practice their own religions without fear of persecution.
Both state's founders believed in the principles of democracy, individual liberty, and religious freedom. They worked hard to establish governments that protected these rights and fostered the growth of a diverse and prosperous society. In conclusion, at the time of its founding in the late 17th century, Rhode Island most closely compared to Pennsylvania in terms of its emphasis on religious tolerance, government policies, and principles of democracy, individual liberty, and religious freedom.
To know more about confiscation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4588173
#SPJ11
What is the last effect in this cause and effect chain from the romans to the kings?
The last effect in this cause and effect chain from the Romans to the kings is that it led to the establishment of powerful and wealthy monarchies.
The Roman Empire was one of the most powerful empires in the world, and it lasted for over 500 years. The empire was known for its military might, innovative engineering, and political savvy. The fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century AD marked the end of an era and the beginning of a new one.
The fall of the Roman Empire left a power vacuum that was quickly filled by various groups of people. In Europe, the period following the fall of the Roman Empire was marked by the rise of powerful monarchies. These monarchies were usually based on hereditary rule, and they were often characterized by an extensive system of feudalism. The kings and queens of Europe were powerful figures, and they often controlled vast amounts of land and resources.
To know more about Romans visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19035601?
#SPJ11
What did prehistoric hunter gather groups have in common
A. Rulers who made strict laws
B. Varied roles for men and women
C. Metal weapons and tools
D. Permanent homes and farms
what where some key changes to latin america following the great depression and WW||?
Answer:The Great Depression in the U.S. also affected the countries of Latin America. Before the Great Depression, many Latin American countries established democratic governments. However, the Great Depression caused the rise of fascist governments and military dictatorship, accompanied by a desire for nationalism.The Great Depression in Latin America caused massive unemployment, difficulties with product export caused by a sharp decline in prices, so people were forced to sell goods at extremely low prices or burn it.World War II caused significant economic, military and political changes in Latin America. The war caused a lot of economic damage because, before the War, the U.S. and Europe were investing in Latin America. However, when the War started, those investments ended and left Latin America broke.
Explanation:
Plantation owners were making good money planting sugar in Barbados. Why would they want to move to Carolina - a whole 2,000 miles away?
Plantation owners in Barbados were motivated to move to Carolina, located 2,000 miles away, due to several reasons, including the search for new land and opportunities for expansion, desire for economic diversification, and concerns over the limited availability of fertile land and labor in Barbados.
Plantation owners in Barbados, despite making good money from sugar production, had various reasons to consider moving to Carolina. Firstly, they sought new land for expansion. Barbados, being a small island, had limited available land for cultivation. As the sugar industry flourished and demand increased, plantation owners looked to acquire larger plantations and expand their operations. Carolina, with its vast, undeveloped lands, offered the opportunity for significant expansion and the establishment of new plantations.
Additionally, plantation owners wanted to diversify their economic interests. Relying solely on sugar production made them vulnerable to fluctuations in market prices, pests, diseases, and natural disasters. Moving to Carolina allowed them to explore other crops and industries, reducing their dependence on a single commodity.
Another factor that motivated the move was the limited availability of fertile land and labor in Barbados. Over time, the soil in Barbados became depleted due to intensive sugar cultivation, making it less productive. This, combined with the increasing demand for labor, resulted in higher wages and a scarcity of workers. By moving to Carolina, plantation owners could access fresh, fertile land and a larger labor pool, enabling them to maintain profitability and expand their operations.
Overall, the decision to move from Barbados to Carolina was driven by the pursuit of new opportunities for expansion, economic diversification, and the challenges posed by limited land and labor availability in Barbados. The move allowed plantation owners to secure their economic interests, mitigate risks, and capitalize on the untapped potential of Carolina's resources.
Learn more about Plantation owners here:
brainly.com/question/28943048
#SPJ11
Democratic institutions may not ensure stable, civilian government unless what common practices are present to make democracy work?
Abstract
Political scientists have conventionally assumed that achieving democracy is a one-way ratchet. Only very recently has the question of “democratic backsliding” attracted any research attention. We argue that democratic instability is best understood with tools from complexity science. The explanatory power of complexity science arises from several features of complex systems. Their relevance in the context of democracy is discussed. Several policy recommendations are offered to help (re)stabilize current systems of representative democracy.
Introduction
The Economist recently identified 80 countries whose democracy score declined during the last decade, including the USA and some consolidated European democracies (The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2017). While the question of how democracies arise and how such rise can be facilitated has received much research attention, little is known as yet about how democracies destabilize.Footnote1 The conventional assumption amongst political scientists was that achieving democracy is a one-way ratchet. Only very recently has the question of “democratic backsliding” attracted any research attention (Waldner and Lust, 2018). We argue that insights from complexity science can facilitate the study of democratic processes and institutions and the design of stabilizing policies. The cross-disciplinary approach to political science that we advocate here rests on mathematical models of human societies, built with tools from statistical physics, dynamical systems, complex networks, and game theory (Wiesner et al., 2018). These tools allow scientists to focus on the salient features of the complex system at hand.
how do historians define the modern era
Historians define the modern era as a period that began in the late 18th century and is marked by significant changes in society, economics, and technology. This period saw the rise of industrialization, urbanization, and the growth of capitalism.
The modern era is also characterized by the emergence of nation-states, the spread of democracy, and the rise of colonialism. One of the key defining features of the modern era is the growth of capitalism, which saw the expansion of trade and commerce on a global scale. This was facilitated by new technologies such as the steam engine and the telegraph, which made it easier to transport goods and communicate across great distances. The rise of capitalism also saw the emergence of new forms of labor, such as wage labor, and the growth of urbanization as people moved to the cities to work in factories.
The modern era also saw the emergence of nation-states, which were defined by a shared language, culture, and history. This led to the growth of nationalism and the idea that each nation had a right to self-determination. The spread of democracy was another defining feature of the modern era, as more people gained the right to vote and participate in political life.
Finally, the modern era was marked by the rise of colonialism, as European powers sought to expand their empires around the world. This led to the exploitation of people and resources in colonized countries and had a profound impact on the world as a whole. Overall, the modern era is characterized by significant changes in society, economics, and technology, which continue to shape our world today.
Know more about urbanization here:
https://brainly.com/question/12007420
#SPJ8
Which statement best completes the table?
Structure of the Federal Government
There are three branches of government.
All branches of government have equal power.
?
Power is separated between three branches of government.
ARBET
W
A. Congress has total control over every branch of government.
OB. All branches of government can create new laws.
OC. Only the legislative branch is described in the U.S. Constitution.
OD. Each branch of government can check the power of the other two.
Option D. Each branch of government can check the power of the other two.
The statement that best completes the table is "Power is separated between three branches of government."This statement is the most accurate and complete one that accurately describes the structure of the Federal Government. According to the Constitution of the United States, the federal government is composed of three separate branches, which are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The reason for the separation of power between these branches is to avoid any one branch from having too much power over the others and to ensure that each branch of government can check and balance the others.
In the legislative branch, Congress has the power to make laws and to manage the budget of the federal government. The executive branch is responsible for enforcing and implementing the laws created by Congress, and the judicial branch interprets the laws and decides if they are constitutional. The principle of separation of powers is one of the most important features of the United States government. This principle ensures that no one person or group can have too much power, and it provides a system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch of government from becoming too powerful .
The separation of power between the three branches of government ensures that there is no centralization of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups. Instead, power is spread across different branches of government, which means that no one branch can have too much control over the others. This is important in a democracy, where the people must have the power to hold their government accountable. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about Constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ8
To repeat a ceremony, often without thought, reduces the ceremony to a ritual.
True
False
To repeat a ceremony, often without thought, reduces the ceremony to a ritual is True.
Repeating a ceremony without thought or understanding can indeed reduce it to a mere ritual. Ceremonies are typically imbued with meaning, symbolism, and intention. They often serve as important cultural, religious, or social practices that carry significance for the individuals or communities involved.
However, if a ceremony is performed mechanically or repetitively without genuine engagement or understanding, the deeper meaning and significance behind the ceremony may be lost, and it may be reduced to a mere ritual—a routine or tradition carried out without thought or meaningful connection.
Rituals, while they may still hold cultural or social value, can lack the depth and intentionality that ceremonies possess. They may become empty routines or habits performed for the sake of tradition or appearance, rather than as meaningful acts of reverence, celebration, or remembrance.
To fully appreciate the power and significance of a ceremony, it is important to approach it with mindfulness, understanding, and active participation. By engaging with the ceremony's symbolism, reflecting on its purpose, and recognizing its relevance to one's own life or community.
for similar questions on ceremony.
https://brainly.com/question/32252693
#SPJ8
Explain the significance of each of the following.
Treaty of Greenville.
The Treaty of Greenville played a crucial role in shaping the relationship between Native American tribes and the United States. It expanded American territory, established peace, and set the stage for future land transactions.
The Treaty of Greenville was a significant event in American history that took place in 1795. It marked the end of the Northwest Indian War and established peace between the United States and several Native American tribes, including the Shawnee, Delaware, Miami, and Wyandot.
Here's why the Treaty of Greenville is significant:
1. Territory: The treaty defined the boundaries of Native American lands and ceded a large portion of present-day Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin to the United States. This land became available for American settlement and expansion.
2. Peace and Stability: The treaty brought an end to hostilities between the Native American tribes and the United States, leading to a period of peace and stability in the Northwest Territory. This allowed for the development and growth of settlements in the region.
3. Land Purchases: The treaty established a precedent for the United States to negotiate land purchases with Native American tribes. It set the stage for future treaties and land transactions, shaping the expansion of the United States westward.
4. Native American Sovereignty: While the treaty resulted in the cession of land, it also recognized the sovereignty of the Native American tribes involved. They retained the rights to hunt and fish on the land they still occupied and were granted annuity payments as compensation for the land ceded.
To know more about history visit:
https://brainly.com/question/17092502
#SPJ11
How did African Americans resist their enslavement?
African Americans resisted enslavement through escape, rebellions, day-to-day resistance, formation of maroon communities, cultural expression, legal challenges, and activism.
African Americans employed various forms of resistance to challenge and resist their enslavement throughout the period of American slavery. Some key forms of resistance included:
Escape and Underground Railroad: Enslaved individuals sought freedom by escaping from plantations and seeking refuge in free states or Canada. Revolts and Rebellions: Enslaved individuals occasionally organized revolts and rebellions against their oppressors. Day-to-Day Resistance: Enslaved individuals engaged in various acts of everyday resistance, such as slowing down work, feigning illness, breaking tools, or engaging in acts of sabotage. Formation of Maroon Communities: Some escaped slaves formed independent communities known as maroon communities in remote areas, where they lived in relative freedom, away from the control of slaveholders.Cultural Preservation and Expression: African Americans maintained their cultural heritage by preserving traditions, practicing African religions in secret, and creating new forms of cultural expression such as music, dance, and storytelling. Legal Challenges and Activism: Some African Americans pursued legal avenues to challenge their enslavement, often seeking freedom through the courts.Learn more about enslavement at
https://brainly.com/question/31936688
#SPJ4
How did white people react to civil rights protests?
During the civil rights protests, white people reacted with a mixed response. The white community was not a single group with a uniform opinion.
Some supported the civil rights movement, while others opposed it. There was also a significant number of individuals who were indifferent to the issue and did not take a stand. The various reactions of white people to the civil rights protests can be summarized as follows.
Large section of white society actively opposed the civil rights movement. They believed that it was against their interests and that it would lead to the loss of their privileges. Some used violence and intimidation to suppress the protests.
To know more about protests visit:
https://brainly.com/question/21873719
#SPJ11
What’s the famous charge
against Union forces that the commander of the largest Confederate unit did?
The most famous charge against Union forces that the commander of the largest Confederate unit did was Pickett's Charge.
What was Pickett's Charge ?Pickett's Charge was a frontal assault by 12,000 Confederate troops against the Union center on Cemetery Ridge. The attack was a costly failure, and it is considered to be one of the turning points of the Civil War.
The commander of the largest Confederate unit at Gettysburg was Lieutenant General James Longstreet. Longstreet was a brilliant strategist and tactician, but he was also a cautious commander. He believed that Pickett's Charge was a reckless gamble, and he tried to dissuade General Robert E. Lee from ordering it. However, Lee was determined to attack, and he overruled Longstreet's objections.
Find out more on Pickett's Charge at https://brainly.com/question/4457966
#SPJ1
Analyze Which changes happened as a result of civilian participation in the war effort?
During World War I and World War II, civilian participation in the war effort played a significant role. During both wars, many changes took place as a result of civilian participation in the war effort. This can be demonstrated by the following:
1. Changes in the economy: In order to aid the war effort, governments all over the world had to restructure their economies. The majority of the countries' economies were focused on military spending, which resulted in an increase in industrial activity.
2. Changes in the role of women: The war effort allowed women to play an important role in society. Women worked as nurses, ambulance drivers, and factory workers, among other things.
3. Changes in society: The war also led to changes in society. It brought people together, and it created a sense of national unity. The war allowed people to see that they were all in this together, and they needed to work together to win the war.
4. Advances in technology: Finally, the war led to significant advances in technology. For example, the invention of the airplane, radio communication, and the use of tanks all resulted from the war effort.
To know more about World War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
What is nationalism? Question 1 options: a) An economic system where businesses produce goods and services in order to make money. b) A strong sense of attachment or belonging to one's own country. c) A strong sense of attachment or belonging to one's own continent. d) The action by which one country controls another country.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
b) A strong sense of attachment or belonging to one's own country.
Explanation:
Nationalism refers to a strong sentiment of loyalty, pride, and attachment to one's own nation or country. It emphasizes the interests and well-being of the nation and its people, often promoting unity and collective identity. Nationalism can manifest in various forms, including cultural, political, and social aspects, and can influence policies, attitudes, and behaviors within a country.
Quotations of Gulliver’s Travels
What is the food do the Yahoos eat?
How does Gulliver finally find food for him? What are those kinds of food?
The horses see that Gulliver truly loathes the Yahoos, and that he also can't eat the raw meat they eat. Gulliver sees a cow passing and indicates that he will milk her, which is how he finally feeds himself. Around noon, an elderly horse appears in a carriage drawn by 4 Yahoos.
In Jonathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels, there are a few important quotations that can be examined to understand the story and its themes better. Here's what the book says about the food eaten by the Yahoos and how Gulliver finally finds food for himself.
The Yahoos are described as human-like creatures in the novel, and their diet is savage. They eat "raw flesh, and bones, and vegetables, and the excrement of their own and other animals." Swift's depiction of the Yahoos as animalistic and barbaric people is a comment on humanity's worst tendencies.
The horses, on the other hand, are portrayed as highly intelligent, civilized beings. Gulliver is horrified by the Yahoos and disgusted by their food. He tries to find alternatives for himself, and eventually sees a cow being milked. He realizes that he can drink the milk and is overjoyed at the discovery of this new source of food.
Later on, he finds some fruits and nuts that he can eat as well.Gulliver eventually discovers that he has more in common with the horses than he does with either the Yahoos or the humans from his home country. The horses are peaceful, reasonable, and respectful, while the other creatures are violent, selfish, and brutal.
Thus, This is a significant revelation for Gulliver and one that he must deal with as he continues on his journey.
To know more about Gulliver's Travels, visit:-
brainly.com/question/28190365
#SPJ11
which of these statements best describes one of the union's advantages over the confederacy during the civil war?
One of the union's advantages over the Confederacy during the Civil War was that the Union had more resources, including more significant industrial production, better transportation, and a larger population, which gave them a more significant number of soldiers and better equipment.
The Union's superior resources were critical during the Civil War. They enabled the Union to equip their soldiers better, transport them, and provide food, clothing, and weapons for them. Union armies could advance into Confederate territory more effectively because they had better logistics. Additionally, the Union had a more extensive industrial base, allowing them to produce more war materials such as arms, ammunition, clothing, and shoes. With a more significant population, the Union could mobilize more men into their armies. The Union had access to more extensive networks of railways and canals, making it easier for them to transport troops and supplies.
These advantages enabled the Union to maintain a robust blockade of Confederate ports, choking off the Confederacy's ability to trade with foreign countries.
To know more about Confederacy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29766761
#SPJ11
The Union also had an established government and a recognized leader in President Abraham Lincoln, whereas the Confederacy struggled with unity and leadership. These advantages ultimately played a significant role in the Union's victory in the Civil War.
Confederacy during the Civil War was their larger population and industrial cap One of the Union's advantages over the acity. This advantage allowed the Union to mobilize a larger army and produce more weapons, ammunition, and supplies.
The Union also had a more developed transportation system, including railroads, which helped them move troops and supplies more efficiently.
Additionally, the Union had control of the major waterways, such as the Mississippi River, which allowed them to cut off Confederate supply lines and divide their forces.
To know more about government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ11
Select and investigate three of the following World Heritage sites: Site Name Associated City or Kingdom Approximate Dates Aksum Axum 1st–13th century BCE Archaeological Sites of the Island of Meroe 8th century BCE–4th century CE Great Zimbabwe National Monument Great Zimbabwe 1100–1450 CE Lamu Old Town Swahili 13th–19th century CE Rock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela Ethiopia 13th century CE Tombs of Buganda Kings Buganda (Bunyoro-Kitara) 19th century CE Create your public service announcement. For each of the three World Heritage sites you chose, be sure to include: a paragraph description of the site, including how it relates to the associated African city or kingdom an image that you feel best represents the site a paragraph explanation of why the site is worth preserving
Answer:D i'm pretty sure
Explanation:
how
the conflict start between Diljit Dosanjh and kangana. What is the
conflict. what power did diljit or kangana used? and how did it
stop?
word limit 1500-1700
The conflict between Diljit Dosanjh and Kangana Ranaut began on social media in September 2020.
It primarily revolved around the controversial Farm Bills passed by the Indian government, which led to widespread protests by farmers across the country.
Diljit Dosanjh, a popular Punjabi actor and singer, expressed his support for the farmers and their demands. He criticized the government's handling of the situation and engaged in discussions with various individuals, including Kangana Ranaut, a prominent Bollywood actress known for her outspoken nature and right-wing views.
So, it began in 2020 when Diljit became irate about a tweet from Kangan. When the Farmers' Protest took place, she had posted about an old Sikh woman who had been there.
The old woman, who the actress identified as being the same Dadi who played Shaheen Bagh, had written that she had taken part in the demonstration for Rs. 100.
Learn more about social media Here.
https://brainly.com/question/30194441
#SPJ11