The conclusion Mendel reached was that plant traits are inherited independently, and no single trait influences other traits or traits.
Mendel proposed three laws of inheritance.
Law of Dominance - This law states that in the heterozygous state, the allele whose trait is transmitted through the other allele is known as the dominant allele, and the trait of the dominant allele is known as the dominant trait.
A character is a character that appears in the F1 generation.
Law of Segregation – This law states that when two traits are combined in a hybrid pair, the two characters do not mix and are independent of each other.
This means that during gametogenesis the two genes segregate completely independently of each other and the other trait segregates.
Law of Independent Sorting - The law of independent sorting states that different traits and traits have different genes, which influence each other and classify independently of other genes.
To know more about ‘Mendel laws’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29785146
#SPJ4
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to which of the following
The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] has opened up law enforcement jobs to Some people with disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a state civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in everyday life.
The ADA prohibits discrimination based on disability, just as other civil rights laws prohibit discrimination based on race, color, sex, national origin, age, or religion.
The ADA ensures that people with disabilities have equal opportunities with all others to pursue employment opportunities, purchase goods and services, and participate in state and local government programs.
To prevent discrimination against people with disabilities, the ADA has requirements that apply to many everyday situations.
To know more about ‘The Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA]’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28202627
#SPJ4
Click this link to view O*NET Skills section for Lawyers. Note that common skills are listed toward the top and less common skills are listed toward the bottom. According to O*NET, what are some common skills needed by Lawyers
The lawyer should posses the quality of independence as well as good communication skills.
A Lawyer is someone who stands by the person and speaks for any person in the court. He is the one to present the case on behalf of the client and he represents the client in the court. A lawyer should posses certain skills in order to win the case. These qualities include the quality of having a good communication skill both written and verbal. It is necessary as the lawyer has to persuade the jury with his/her views. Some other qualities that a lawyer should posses include the quality of being aware with the current affairs going on in the world, the quality of working under pressure, the quality of research, quality of understanding people and so on.
Learn more about Lawyer at:
brainly.com/question/29731616
#SPJ4
The amount is credited to the account of the taxpayer and reduces the amount of tax otherwise due to the government on the due date of the return.
The withholding amount is credited to the account of the taxpayer and reduces the amount of tax otherwise due to the government on the due date of the return.
For employees, withholding is the amount of federal income tax that is deducted from your salary. The amount of payroll tax that your employer withholds from your regular salary depends on two factors:
Amount earned.
Information you provide to your employer on Form W–4.
To calculate withholding tax, you can use the Tax Withholding Estimator. You can estimate your 2020 income tax using the withholding estimator tool.
The Withholding Estimate Tool compares this estimate with your current withholding and helps you determine if you need to change your withholding with your employer.
To learn more about ‘tax withholdings’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2178436
#SPJ4
How important is it to lead by example as a supervisor?
Leading by example as a supervisor helps to develop a better relationship among team members as well as help in creating trust.
What is a supervisor?A supervisor is referred to as an individual who monitors or keeps check on the kind of work being performed by subordinates and helps them by guiding them effectively to improve their performance.
When a supervisor monitors or guides by giving examples it helps in engaging the group of poeple effectively. The words and actions of the supervisor are sincerely observed by the team.
It helps to develop trust among them and encourages them to meet the challenges they are facing together.
Learn more about supervisors, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16888664
#SPJ1
What is Mendel's first law ?
Based on the Upfront article and the excerpts from McDonald’s statement, why do you think the movement to lower the voting age had bipartisan support? *
From the McDonald’s statement we learn about a blind child in the story "A View From the Bridge." He approaches a man on a bridge and requests his assistance in capturing a fish. The youngster is blind, but the dad does not instantly understand this.
The title "A View from the Bridge" was most likely chosen to suggest that the guy serves as a link between the youngster and the outside world. The man is first reluctant to talk since it is not immediately clear what is going on. The father starts to view the world, nonetheless, from the viewpoint of a kid once it becomes clear. This brings attention to the essay's main idea. the "bridge's vista"
The unique perspective the man gains after experiencing the world through the eyes of a youngster is known as the "view from the bridge."
For such more question on McDonald’s statement.
https://brainly.com/question/15401924
#SPJ4
A farmer purchased a tract of farmland adjacent to a factory. For months, the factory had emitted a foul-smelling chemical cloud that hovered approximately one foot over the farmland. The farmer invited the factory foreman to his farmland to show him the damage the chemical cloud was doing to his land. The foreman informed the farmer that there was nothing he could do, and that the previous landowner had not complained about the cloud. The farmer brought suit against the factory for trespass to his land.Will the farmer’s trespass suit against the factory be successful?
A.No, because nothing is physically touching the farmer’s property.
B.No, because the factory was in operation and producing the cloud before the farmer purchased the land.
C.Yes, because the chemical cloud constitutes a physical invasion of the property.
D.Yes, because the factory’s agent, the foreman, physically entered the farmer's property.
The farmer brought the suit against the factory for trespass to his land. So, yes the farmer’s trespass suit against the factory will be successful because the chemical cloud tends to constitute a physical invasion of the property.
The trespass to the land tends to occur when a defendant's intentional conduct is said to have caused a physical invasion of the land of the another. So, the defendant here need not personally enter onto the plaintiff's land.
However, a trespass may be committed on, or above, or below the surface which is of the plaintiff's land. Thus, here the chemical cloud produced by the factory tends to constitute a physical invasion of the land.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about the trespass here:
https://brainly.com/question/29869713
#SPJ4
What are state laws called?
Answer:
State laws are called state statuses
Why would a lawyer allow a paralegal to assist defending a client in a criminal trial? (Select all that apply.) To prepare drafts of documents for the lawyer to review. To deal with the client so the lawyer can focus on issues of law. To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial.
Answer:
I think it's "To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial."
Explanation:
Alison, a data analyst and software engineer, worked for Dellis, Inc. When she joined Dellis, she signed an employment contract. In that employment contract, among other provisions, was an arbitration clause, which read:
"any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association."
During her work for Dellis, Alison created a software program that would better track Dellis’ clients. Alison attempted to register for a patent to the program, claiming personal ownership in the rights to the software. Dellis learns Alison is applying for patent protection and claims the program was created as a result of Alison's work for the company and therefore it belongs to the company.
Alison files a lawsuit in Court. She is requesting that the Court enter a Declaratory Judgment--essentially an order that she is the rightful owner of the patent associated with the program.
Dellis immediately files a motion to dismiss Alison’s lawsuit. Should the court hear Alison’s lawsuit. Why or why not?
Any disputes arising out of this contract of employment are subject to arbitration in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Was an arbitration clause.
What is employment?In most cases, employment refers to the status of having a paid job—of being employed. Employing someone is paying them to work. Employees are employed by an employer. Employment can also refer to the act of hiring individuals, as in We're trying to hire more women.
The term employment contract may include an employment arbitration clause, which means you agreed not to pursue any legal action against your employer in court. Instead, any disputes that you have with your employer must be settled through a process known as arbitration
Therefore, Thus option (A) is correct.
Learn more about employment here:
https://brainly.com/question/1361941
#SPJ1
What is common law and how is it created ?
Common law is decided upon by judges based on how statute law is interpreted. An inferior court in the same jurisdiction must abide by the court's ruling.
A corpus of unwritten laws known as common law is founded on judicially established legal precedents. In unique situations where the conclusion cannot be predicted based on existing statutes or written principles of law, common law influences the decision-making process.
The British custom that was introduced to North America during the colonial eras of the 17th and 18th centuries gave rise to the American common-law system. Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, India, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom are other countries that use common law.
To learn more about common law, visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ4
What are Mendel's 4 hypothesis?
The first of Mendel's four postulates and laws of inheritance is the principle of paired factors. The second is the principle of dominance. The third is the law of segregation or the law of purity of gametes, while the fourth is the law of independent assortment
Principles of Paired Factors: Postulate I
A character in an organism (diploid) is represented by at least two components. The two components are located at the same locus on the two homologous chromosomes. They might be a different or same representation of the same character. Alleles or allelomorphs are factors that indicate the same or alternate version of a character.
Postulate II. Dominance Principle:
The traits that occur in the hybrids of the F1 generation are always the dominant characters, and those that do not present in F1 progeny are always the recessive characters when two homozygous individuals with one or more sets of opposing characters are crossed.
Postulate III. Mendel's First Law of Inheritance, often known as the Law of Segregation or Law of Purity of Gametes:
When gametogenesis (the formation of gametes) or sporogenesis (the formation of spores), the two factors (alleles) of a trait that remain together in an individual, are randomly distributed to different gametes and then paired again in different offspring according to the probability principle, they maintain their identity and remain distinct. The law of segregation is sometimes referred to as the "law of purity of gametes" because two alleles remain together in their original, unaltered state without interacting, influencing, or combining.
Law of Independent Assortment (also known as Mendel's Second Law of Inheritance) Postulate IV:
Mendel considered two pairs of opposing characteristics and examined their inheritance after being pleased with monohybrid crossings (i.e., di-hybrid cross).
This law states that "the two components (genes) of each opposing character (trait) at the moment of gamete development assort or separate independently of the factors of other characters and become arbitrarily rearranged in the offspring."
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true of right-to-work laws?
a. They promote closed shops in organizations.
b. They restrict compulsory union membership.
c. They require that all union members have legal work permits.
d. They prohibit union meetings during work hours.
They limit compulsory union membership. THe correct answer is
option (b).
Which of the following acts is referred to as right to work?India has ratified both the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Articles 23 and 6, respectively, recognise the duty of the state to defend this right as well as the right to work in a profession of one's choosing.
The Taft-Hartley Act essentially gave rise to the nation's right-to-work legislation, which enable states to forbid requiring union membership as a condition of employment in both the private and public sectors. Every person has the right to decent working conditions. Every employee has the right to establish and join a union.
To know more about Human Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Privatized prisons may be more likely to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and/or jailbreaks because _____.
they are not accredited in the same way that government-run facilities are
prison guards in these settings may not have been properly trained
inadequate spending to increase profits may mean conditions in the facility are sub-standard
the private guards employed in these facilities have no arrest or detention authority
Prison overcrowding can be reduced by privatization, increasing the safety of the facilities for both convicts and staff.
The advantages of private prisons include lower working fees, managing the population of convicts, and the emergence of jobs in the network. As a result, privatized prisons may be more prone to experience assaults between prisoners and guards and/or jail breaks. The drawbacks of private prisons include a decrease in value for money, a decrease in safety and protection, unpleasant circumstances, and the potential for corruption. Prison overcrowding can be reduced by privatization, increasing the safety of the facilities for both convicts and staff. Private prisons can fix the inefficient government-run prison system. Private prisons offer cutting-edge programs to reduce the expense of re-incarceration.
Learn more about Prison here:
https://brainly.com/question/28554225
#SPJ4
The case: Sixteen-year-old Terry was in a bedroom at his family's home with his younger brother when he pulled a handgun from underneath the mattress. Terry was allegedly pointing the gun at his brother when it fired. The bullet struck his brother, killing him. Terry had gotten the .380-caliber semi-automatic handgun by trading a 9mm Glock he had stolen from his father. The police say they believe the shooting was not intentional.
Answer: Involuntary Manslaughter
Explanation:
It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).
Elements of crime committed:
Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.
Who makes the laws at the local state and federal level?
Answer:
The legislature makes the law
More than half of the contact that police officers engage in
with civilians is spent?
a. Catching Criminals
b. handling traffic related matters
c. Ferreting out drug deals
d. Investigating crime
More than half of the contact that police officers engage in handling traffic related matters with civilians is spent. The correct option is b.
Managing traffic related issues, such as enforcing traffic laws, responding to accidents and directing traffic, takes up more than half of police officers interactions with civilians. Calls for service are made after that and they include responding to a range of incidents like domestic disputes, break-ins and noise complaints.
Although catching criminals looking into crimes and sniffing out drug deals are important aspects of a police officer's job, these are not the interactions that officers have with citizens on a regular basis. The correct option is b.
Learn more about police officers at:
brainly.com/question/28588505
#SPJ1
an individual who has been the subject of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal
True, a person who has been the victim of a crime can prosecute the alleged criminal.
Alleged: stated to be true but not yet proven to be true; the crime may be referred to as the "alleged crime" until the trial is completed.To allege is to assert or claim something as true; to make an allegation. [Last updated by the Wex Definitions Team in June 2021] criminal justice. Prosecute means to initiate criminal proceedings against someone in criminal law. The prosecuting attorney, for example, a local District Attorney, state Attorney General, or federal United States Attorney, initiates such actions. Alleged can also be used as the past tense of the verb allege, which means to claim before or without proof.
Learn more about prosecute here:
https://brainly.com/question/29415296
#SPJ4
Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. What is this seminar probably trying to do
If Estelle hears a radio ad telling her that she can attend a free seminar to learn how to “flip” houses to make tons of money quickly, all while being her own boss. This seminar probably trying to do: A. the Bureau of Economics.
What is the Bureau of Economics?The Bureau of Economics can be defined as an agency whose roles is to provide the necessary information or data that will help to promote an economy and this data provided are often useful and accurate.
Based on the scenario the seminar is probably trying to do the Bureau of Economics so as to enables Estelle acquire knowledge that will help to become her own boss.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about Bureau of Economics here:https://brainly.com/question/1391135
#SPJ1
The complete question is:
Eileen works for the federal government and would like to find a report about the effectiveness of a recent FTC-created consumer education program designed to help families better meet their monthly rent payments. Which branch of the FTC should she contact first about finding such a report?
the Bureau of Economics
the Bureau of Competition
the Bureau of Consumer Protection
the Bureau of Housing and Development
On the question of whether american laws applied to the overseas territory acquired in the spanish-american war, the supreme court ruled in the insular cases that?
The supreme court ruled in the insula cases that the American Constitution and laws did not apply to US colonies on the issue of whether American laws applied to the foreign territory won in the Spanish-American War.
The United States Constitution established the country's national government, established its core laws, and provided its citizens with a number of essential rights. Delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and Baltimore agreed on September 17, 1787, that the Bill of Rights solely applied to the federal government and not to any state governments. The Supreme Court continued to hold in United States v. Cruikshank (1876) that the First and Second Amendments did not extend to state governments even after the Fourteenth Amendment had been ratified.
Read more about supreme court at
https://brainly.com/question/8856072
#SPJ4
What does Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience?
Thoreau compare government to in civil disobedience to a machine.
Thoreau makes a comparison between the government to a machine to explain how governments is devoid of any humane or moral values. It dehumanizes individuals.
He further elaborates his point by stating that Thoreau claims that the machines are the 'mass of men'. On the other hand "with their bodies"; they "put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones."
By using this words that correspond to parts of different machines, he explains how the government exploits the people to fulfill his means is that by serving the state.
In this way, the government no longer fulfills its functions of a welfare state and does little for the betterment.
To know more about Civil disobedience, click here
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
Identify a crime news story and discuss ways in which the news media coverage impacted the public perception of the crime. Also discuss whether the media coverage had a positive impact on the case, or if the coverage had a negative impact on the case and how and why?
Answer:
sadly, i don't know
Explanation:
Answer:
Media reporting often highlights random and unexpected crimes. As a result, individuals can imagine themselves as potential victims of such events. Sensationalist media reporting contributes to moral panic (or outrage directed at certain groups such as youth or particular ethnic groups). i think this the answer.
What law states that two alleles for a heritable character separate during gamete formation and end up in different gametes?
Mendel’s second law states that two alleles for a heritable character separate during gamete formation and end up in different gametes.
By the law of segregation, parents with two copies of each gene can inherit any allele. Both alleles are equally likely to end up in a fertilized egg.
By the law of segregation, each allele is its own entity, always equally likely to be passed on to the next generation.
This means that alleles are inherited in the same way and with the same frequency regardless of whether they are dominant or recessive in relation to other alleles.
To learn more about ‘Law of segregation’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8881583
#SPJ4
If a new joint tenants with right of survivorship account is opened, all of the following statements are true except
If a new joint tenants with right of survivorship account is opened, checks cannot be drawn in the name of either party.
The right of survivorship is a right that bestows each tenant an undivided interest in the whole estate.
The tenant’s interest disappears when one tenant dies. Also, the tenants’ shares increases proportionally and obtain the rights to the entire estate.
Tenancies that posses the right of survivorship can be divided into two types- joint tenancy and tenancy by the entirety.
In a joint tenancy, the right of survivorship may be severed, converting the estate to a tenancy in common, by means of partition. This can either be voluntary or involuntary.
On the other hand, where there is a right of survivorship in a tenancy by the entirety, it may be may be severed by divorce, mutual agreement, or even by execution by a joint creditor.
However, the right of survivorship cannot be terminated by an involuntary partition in a tenancy by the entirety,
To know more about right of survivorship click here:
https://brainly.com/question/15542054
#SPJ4
The question is incomplete. the complete question is:
If a new joint tenants with rights of survivorship account is opened, all of the following statements are true EXCEPT:
A) orders may be given by either party.
B) in the event of death, the decedent's interest in the account goes to the other party.
C) checks may be drawn in the name of either party.
D) mail may be sent to either party (with the permission of each party).
How does the relationship between the federal government and state
governments differ from the relationship between state and local
governments?
A. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments can produce conflict between the two sides.
B. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments gives one type of government more power than the
other.
C. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments involves sharing some responsibilities.
D. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
The relationship between the federal government and state governments differ from the relationship between state and local governments as D. The relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
What is government?It should be noted that government means the group of people who have been given the power to look after the affairs of a state.
In this case, the relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
Learn more about government on:
brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
What is state Mendel's law?
Mendel proposed three laws of inheritance- Law of Dominance, Law of Separation, Law of Independent Assortment.
Mendel's law of dominance states that "if a homozygous organism is crossed for the contrasting traits of the pair, only one trait of the pair will appear in the first generation."
The law of segregation states that all organisms contain two alleles for each trait, and these alleles separate (segregate) during meiosis, so that each gamete contains only one allele. increase.
Law of Independent Sorting - The law of independent sorting states that different traits and traits have different genes, which influence each other and classify independently of other genes.
To learn more about 'Mendels law', here:
https://brainly.com/question/2707222?
#SPJ4
All of the following are true of the federal tax advantages of a qualified plan EXCEPT: O At distribution, all amounts received by the employee are free of taxes. O Individually owned non-qualified annuities are generally taxed as follows: O Premiums are not deductible; interest credited to the cash value is taxed deferred.
Answer:
O At distribution, all amounts received by the employee are free of taxes.
You are a doctor in a small CityTwo weeks ago, the City was a legal marijuanamunicipality (For Medicinal Use only) but later decided not to participate in the legalized trade What is the legal ramification of your decision
An example of a recent bankruptcy is the bankruptcy case of rapper 50 Cent, which was filed in July 2015.
What is bankruptcy?
Bankruptcy is a legal process where an individual or a business struggling with financial difficulties can obtain relief from debt. It is a legal court process in which a debtor can be released from their financial obligations, such as outstanding loans and unpaid bills. Bankruptcy can also provide a fresh start for individuals and businesses, where they can begin rebuilding their financial life and establishing a better financial future.
According to court documents, 50 Cent had a networth of over $100 million at one point, but ended up filing for bankruptcy due to a combination of factors, including a series of costly lawsuits, bad investments, and a lavish lifestyle.
Had 50 Cent paid better attention to his finances, he may have been able to avoid bankruptcy. He could have been more selective in the investments he made and been more cautious with the lawsuits he was involved in. He also could have reigned in his spending and lived a simpler lifestyle.
To know more about that discussed this bankruptcy case can be found here:
https://brainly.com/question/27220195
#SPJ1
Hi how do I create a answer on this thing i want achievments
Answer: You just click the answer button
within how many days of the last instance of harassment or discrimination must charges be filed with the eeoc?
Employees must file a complaint with the United States within 180 calendar days from the date the discrimination occurred. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reports discrimination.
The EEOC enforces laws that discriminate against people in the workplace based on race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity and sexual orientation), religion, disability, age (over 40), or genetic information.
Harassment is prohibited.
Laws enforced by the EEOC also protect you from workplace harassment and penalties for filing a harassment complaint by you or someone you have a close relationship with (such as a relative or close friend).
This is called the right to protection from retaliation.
To learn more about ‘EEOC’, here;
https://brainly.com/question/17245692
#SPJ4