what were women's political and economic contributions to
seventeenth century(1600s) colonial life? provide examples from two
different groups of women.

THIS MIGHT NOT BE WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR! READ FIRST!

Humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. Some of the most notable effects include:

Deforestation: The clearing of forests for agriculture, timber, and other purposes has been a major problem in both South America and Africa. In South America, deforestation has been particularly severe in the Amazon rainforest, which is home to a vast diversity of plant and animal life. In Africa, deforestation has been a major factor in the loss of savannas and other important ecosystems.

Pollution: Air, water, and soil pollution are all major problems in both South America and Africa. In South America, industrial pollution is a major problem, particularly in the Amazon region. In Africa, agricultural pollution is a major problem, particularly in areas where fertilizers and pesticides are used heavily.

Overpopulation: Both South America and Africa are experiencing rapid population growth, which is putting a strain on natural resources and leading to environmental degradation. In South America, the population is expected to double by 2050. In Africa, the population is expected to triple by 2050.

Climate change: Both South America and Africa are vulnerable to the effects of climate change, such as rising sea levels, more extreme weather events, and changes in precipitation patterns. Climate change is already having a significant impact on both continents, and the effects are expected to become more severe in the future.

In addition to these general effects, there are also some specific ways in which humans have impacted South America and Africa differently. For example, the introduction of non-native species has been a major problem in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa. Similarly, the mining industry has had a major impact on the environment in South America, but it has not been as significant a problem in Africa.

Overall, humans have had a significant impact on both the South American and African continents. This impact has been both positive and negative, and it is likely to continue to grow in the future. It is important to understand the effects of human activity on these continents so that we can take steps to mitigate the negative effects and preserve the natural resources that they contain.

Byzantine conventions of representation in art differ from Jewish and early Christian traditions, particularly in the portrayal of human figures. Byzantine art often emphasized spiritual symbolism, hierarchy, and a sense of otherworldliness. These characteristics reflected the Byzantine faith and practice.

In Byzantine art, human figures were portrayed in a highly stylized and symbolic manner. The emphasis was not on realistic representation, but rather on conveying the spiritual significance of the figures.

Byzantine icons, for example, depicted saints, angels, and other holy figures with elongated proportions, solemn expressions, and a lack of naturalistic details. This departure from realistic representation reflected the Byzantine belief in the spiritual realm and the divine nature of the depicted figures.

Another characteristic of Byzantine representation was the emphasis on hierarchy and the portrayal of authority. Byzantine emperors and religious leaders were often depicted in larger scale and more prominently than other figures in the composition. This conveyed their elevated status and reinforced the Byzantine social and political structure, where the emperor was seen as the representative of God on earth.

Furthermore, Byzantine art often employed a sense of otherworldliness and transcendence. The use of gold backgrounds, rich colors, and intricate patterns created a sense of divine light and heavenly realms. This reflected the Byzantine belief in the divine presence and the idea that the physical world was a mere reflection of the spiritual realm.

Overall, Byzantine conventions of representation in art differed significantly from Jewish and early Christian traditions. The stylized and symbolic portrayal of human figures, the emphasis on hierarchy and authority, and the creation of an otherworldly atmosphere all reflected the Byzantine faith and practice, which focused on the spiritual realm and the divine nature of the depicted figures.

Learn more about Byzantine belief here:

https://brainly.com/question/2496491

#SPJ11

Henry David Thoreau believed that when individuals believe a law is unjust or unfair, they have a moral duty to resist and disobey it. He advocated for civil disobedience as a means of expressing dissent and challenging oppressive laws or policies. Thoreau's views on civil disobedience are best exemplified in his essay "Civil Disobedience," where he presents his arguments and justifications for individual resistance.

Thoreau argued that individuals should follow their conscience and prioritize their own sense of right and wrong over blind obedience to the law. He believed that individuals have a responsibility to act in accordance with their own moral principles, even if it means breaking unjust laws. Thoreau famously stated, "It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law so much as for the right."

According to Thoreau, civil disobedience was a means of raising awareness and provoking discussion about social issues. By openly defying unjust laws, individuals could draw attention to the flaws in the legal system and inspire others to question and challenge oppressive practices. Thoreau believed in the power of individual conscience and the potential for peaceful noncompliance to effect change.

However, Thoreau also emphasized the importance of nonviolent resistance. He advocated for peaceful acts of civil disobedience that did not cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Thoreau himself famously refused to pay taxes to protest the institution of slavery and the Mexican-American War, but he willingly accepted the consequences of his actions and spent a night in jail.

In summary, Thoreau believed that individuals should resist and disobey unfair laws as a means of asserting their moral convictions and promoting social change. He saw civil disobedience as a powerful tool for challenging unjust authority and stimulating public discourse on important issues.

for more questions on Civil Disobedience

https://brainly.com/question/17749455

#SPJ8

The "bland" Democratic president who oversaw the Panic of 1857 and John Brown's raid was James Buchanan. Buchanan was elected to the presidency in 1856 and served from 1857 to 1861. His presidency was marked by significant challenges and controversies, including the economic crisis of the Panic of 1857 and the escalation of tensions over slavery.

The Panic of 1857 was a severe economic downturn that began with the collapse of the Ohio Life Insurance and Trust Company. It quickly spread throughout the United States, leading to bank failures, unemployment, and a decline in trade and industrial production. Buchanan's administration struggled to effectively address the economic crisis, exacerbating the hardships faced by many Americans during that time.

In addition to the economic challenges, Buchanan also had to deal with the growing sectional tensions over slavery. One of the most significant events during his presidency was John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry in 1859. John Brown, an abolitionist, led a failed attempt to seize a federal arsenal in an effort to spark a slave rebellion. Buchanan's handling of the crisis was criticized, as he struggled to find a balanced response that would appease both the pro-slavery South and the anti-slavery North.

Regarding the Dred Scott Decision of 1857, those who would have strongly supported Chief Justice Roger Taney's ruling were pro-slavery Southerners. The Dred Scott case involved a slave named Dred Scott who had lived in free territories and states. The Supreme Court, under Taney's leadership, declared that Scott was not entitled to his freedom and that the Missouri Compromise, which restricted slavery in certain territories, was unconstitutional.

Overall, James Buchanan's presidency was marked by a series of challenges and controversies, including economic crises and escalating tensions over slavery, which further divided the nation in the years leading up to the American Civil War.

for more questions on Democratic

https://brainly.com/question/29798216

#SPJ8

The "Big Three" Allied powers (Britain, the Soviet Union, and the United States) made significant sacrifices and contributions to win the war.

Below are the significant contribution that each of the Big Three powers made to victory:

1. Britain: One of the significant contributions of Great Britain to victory was their leadership. They had capable leaders such as Winston Churchill, who rallied the British people to keep fighting against the Germans. The British also made significant technological advances in areas such as radar, which allowed them to detect German planes earlier, helping them gain air superiority.

2. Soviet Union: The Soviet Union's greatest contribution to victory was their military power. They sustained the highest number of casualties and loss of lives, with over 20 million people. The Soviet army was the largest and most diverse in the world, with over 11 million men. They were able to push back the Germans at the Battle of Stalingrad, which was a significant turning point in the war.

3. United States: The United States' greatest contribution to victory was their economic power. They were able to produce massive amounts of war supplies, including ships, planes, tanks, and ammunition. The United States also had the atomic bomb, which they used against Japan, forcing them to surrender.

The US also had excellent leaders such as Franklin D. Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower, who helped lead the war effort.

Learn more about Franklin D. Roosevelt Here.

https://brainly.com/question/6746454

#SPJ11

In the mid-1800s, the West was mainly occupied by Native Americans.

In the mid-1800s, the West was mainly occupied by Native Americans, and later, by Mexicans. At that time, the West was seen as a vast, unsettled region. However, it was actually home to several Native American tribes, including the Cheyenne, Sioux, and Apache. In fact, the West was one of the most culturally diverse regions of the United States. Then, in 1862, the Homestead Act was passed, which allowed any citizen to claim up to 160 acres of land if they lived on it for at least five years.

This led to a rapid expansion of settlers into the West, and by the end of the century, much of the region had been settled. Today, the West is home to many of the country's fastest-growing cities and is a major center of industry and commerce.

For the past seven months, the junk market has been unstable. Every day, a lot of people get up feeling uneasy and disoriented. To be honest, I'm a little uneasy tonight. All unresolved issues were currently being resolved.

Know more about unsettled region, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17447398

#SPJ11

The modern civil rights movement has had a significant impact on the lives of African Americans, bringing about important advancements in civil rights, equality, and social justice. However, while progress has been made, there are still areas where further work is needed to achieve full equality.

The civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s played a pivotal role in dismantling legal segregation and securing key legislation to protect the rights of African Americans. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark achievements that helped end racial discrimination in public spaces, employment, and voting.

Furthermore, the civil rights movement sparked a cultural and social shift, challenging racist attitudes and promoting racial equality. It raised awareness about systemic racism and led to broader conversations on social justice, diversity, and inclusion. African Americans gained greater representation in various fields, including politics, entertainment, sports, and academia, breaking barriers and inspiring future generations.

However, despite these advancements, significant challenges remain. African Americans continue to face systemic inequalities, including disparities in education, employment, criminal justice, and healthcare. Racial discrimination and systemic racism persist in various forms, affecting individuals and communities. Police violence against Black individuals, voter suppression efforts, and socioeconomic disparities are among the pressing issues that require continued attention and action.

To make further progress, it is essential to address these systemic issues, promote economic and educational opportunities, reform the criminal justice system, and dismantle institutional racism. Ongoing efforts to eliminate racial disparities, promote inclusive policies, and foster dialogue and understanding are crucial for achieving true equality for African Americans.

for more questions on civil rights

https://brainly.com/question/30092721

#SPJ8

Knowing that they will answer to God in the afterlife, they will carry out their daily obligations and religious duties. Everyone is in charge of their own work and is accountable for it.

Morality is a matter of reason and conscience, not religious faith; right and wrong are not to be defined in terms of God's will; and in any event, religious considerations do not offer definitive solutions to the particular moral difficulties that we face. In a nutshell, morality and religion are different. Religion largely focuses on the interaction between people and a transcendent reality, whereas morality is supposed to relate to how human affairs are conducted and interpersonal relationships. In actuality, this morality versus religion dichotomy is a rather recent one.

Read more about religious duties at

https://brainly.com/question/31151059

#SPJ4

Settlers chose to live in the West for reasons such as economic opportunities, land ownership, Manifest Destiny, escape from crowded urban areas, adventure and exploration, religious and cultural freedom, and government incentives and support.

Settlers were motivated to live in the West for various reasons. Economic opportunities, including fertile land for farming, ranching, and mining, attracted those seeking prosperity. The Homestead Act provided a chance for land ownership, encouraging migration.

The belief in Manifest Destiny fueled a sense of national mission and expansion. Others sought refuge from crowded cities, yearning for open spaces and new beginnings. The spirit of adventure and exploration drew pioneers eager to discover unknown territories.

Some sought religious and cultural freedom, establishing communities aligned with their beliefs. Government incentives, like the Pacific Railroad Act, further facilitated Western settlement. These factors collectively drove settlers to embrace the challenges and opportunities of the West.

Learn more about the Settlers at

https://brainly.com/question/2907329

#SPJ4

Answer:

why don't u do the work urself. You are asking for too much dude

Relative location refers to the position of a place relative to landmarks, features, or other geographic coordinates.

The relative location of a place refers to its position among other landmarks, regions, or features. It describes the location of a place by referring to its proximity to other known locations. For example, relative location can be expressed by indicating that a city is located near a particular river, mountain range, or a neighbouring city.

It provides a general idea of ​​the location without exact coordinates. Relative location helps provide context and understanding by indicating a place's position relative to its surroundings or other notable reference points. 

Learn more about landmarks:

https://brainly.com/question/27780625

#SPJ4

The correct question will be: What is the relative location of a place?

Answer:

There have been many events in history that have been compared to the French Revolution, but the most similar one is perhaps the Russian Revolution of 1917, which marked the end of the Romanov dynasty and the beginning of the Soviet Union.

Like the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution was a period of political and social upheaval, marked by popular uprisings and the overthrow of a longstanding monarchy. The Russian Revolution, like the French Revolution, also had a profound impact on the rest of the world, shaping global politics and ideology for years to come. Both revolutions also saw the rise of radical political movements and the use of violence as a means of achieving political change.

It is important to note, however, that while there are similarities between these events, there are also significant differences, both in terms of the political and social context of each revolution and in their respective outcomes.

President Nixon's desire for peace with honor was so strong due to several reasons. One of the reasons was that he wanted to withdraw American troops from Vietnam, a war that had been going on for several years and had caused much loss of life, resources, and money.

However, he did not want to do so in a way that would make it seem as though the United States was defeated or had lost the war. He wanted to be able to negotiate a peace settlement that would allow the U.S. to withdraw its troops with dignity, and with the feeling that the war had been worthwhile and that the U.S. had achieved its goals.

Another reason why Nixon wanted peace with honor was that he felt that the U.S. was losing support at home and abroad for the war. There were widespread protests in the U.S. against the war, and many people felt that the U.S. should not be involved in a conflict that did not directly affect its national security interests.

Internationally, the U.S. was losing support from its allies, who were becoming increasingly critical of the war and of the U.S. policy in Vietnam. By negotiating a peace settlement, Nixon hoped to restore some of the U.S. credibility and prestige that had been lost as a result of the war.

To know more about resources visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18448459

#SPJ11

In 1877, Robert Koch thought preparing permanently stained slides would be valuable because it allowed him to examine and identify microorganisms more closely and accurately. He used staining techniques to visualize microorganisms, making them more visible under the microscope.

Koch's work paved the way for the development of microbiology as a field of study. Staining made it possible to differentiate between different types of bacteria, enabling scientists to identify and classify them. It also made it easier to study the structure and function of cells and the ways in which they interact with each other. Koch's work was groundbreaking and opened up new avenues for scientific inquiry.

Koch believed that preparing permanently stained slides would be valuable to the field of microbiology because it enabled scientists to better visualize and study microorganisms, leading to new discoveries and advances in medical research.

To know more about microorganisms visit:

https://brainly.com/question/9004624

#SPJ11

Answer: Option C is the correct interpretation of the author's statement.

Explanation:

When the author says historian Michael Parrish "draws a straight line between the events at Pearl Harbor and the momentous struggle for civil rights," it means that Parrish has identified a direct and significant connection between the events at Pearl Harbor (such as the attack on Pearl Harbor during World War II) and the subsequent civil rights movement.

This statement implies that Parrish has identified historical links and influences between the impact of Pearl Harbor, the war effort, and subsequent social and political changes related to civil rights. It suggests that the events at Pearl Harbor and the actions that followed, along with other historical factors, had an impact on the struggle for civil rights in a significant and consequential way.

The Emancipation Proclamation was meant to weaken the Confederacy by freeing enslaved individuals and undermining the Confederate economy.

The Emancipation Proclamation was issued by President Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War in 1863. It declared that all enslaved individuals in Confederate territory were to be freed. The proclamation was intended to have several impacts on the Confederacy. Firstly, it aimed to weaken the Confederate economy by freeing the labor force that the Confederacy relied on for their agriculture. Secondly, it aimed to undermine the Confederate cause by depriving them of a valuable source of labor and morale support.

Lastly, it aimed to gain international support for the Union by demonstrating that the war was now also being fought for the abolition of slavery. However, it is important to note that the Emancipation Proclamation did not actually free all enslaved individuals as it only applied to Confederate territory and not border states or Union states where slavery was still legal.

Know more about Confederate economy, here:

https://brainly.com/question/6274810

#SPJ11

Answer:

Solid geometry

Explanation:

You would simply use the volume of a sphere to calculate the volume of a basketball.

Knossos and Mycenae were two important cities in the ancient Greek world. Each had its own architectural complex that differed in several ways.

This article will look at the differences between these two complexes and how they helped archaeologists in speculating about ancient Greece's past. The architectural complex at Knossos was built around 2000 BCE. The palace of Knossos was the center of this complex. The palace was a grand structure that housed the king, queen, and other members of the royal family.

The palace also had many rooms, courtyards, and gardens. These structures were built using a unique style of architecture that was prevalent during the Minoan civilization. The palace's arrangement was such that it was protected from enemies and had a clear view of the surrounding area.

To know more about important visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24051924

#SPJ11

The life of the wealthy during the Tudor period in England was characterized by opulence, luxury, and a distinct social hierarchy. The wealthy individuals, including nobles and landowners, enjoyed a lavish lifestyle filled with grand mansions, fine clothing, sumptuous feasts, and a range of leisure activities.

Tudor mansions differed from medieval castles in several ways. Firstly, Tudor mansions were designed more for comfort and aesthetics rather than defense.

While medieval castles featured massive walls, towers, and moats, Tudor mansions had symmetrical layouts with large windows, intricate woodwork, and ornate gardens.

Secondly, Tudor mansions were built with an emphasis on spaciousness and grandeur. They often had multiple stories, expansive halls, and numerous rooms for different purposes, such as dining, entertaining guests, and housing servants.

In contrast, medieval castles were primarily designed for protection, and living spaces were often more cramped and functional.

Thirdly, Tudor mansions showcased the wealth and status of their owners through extravagant furnishings and decorations. These mansions featured elaborate tapestries, ornate furniture, and richly decorated ceilings and walls.

Medieval castles, on the other hand, prioritized functionality and defensive features, with less emphasis on luxurious interiors.

Lastly, Tudor mansions typically had well-manicured gardens and outdoor spaces, serving as extensions of the grandeur inside. These gardens were meticulously designed and maintained, often incorporating elements such as fountains, topiaries, and intricate patterns.

Medieval castles, however, had more utilitarian outdoor spaces, such as courtyards and fortifications.

Overall, Tudor mansions represented a shift from the defensive and austere nature of medieval castles to a more luxurious and aesthetically pleasing architectural style that catered to the comfort and status of the wealthy.

For more such questions Tudor,click on

https://brainly.com/question/246757

#SPJ8

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, farmers experienced a number of difficulties. In order to deal with these challenges, they took a number of steps. First, they attempted to form a political party that would promote their interests.

Another strategy used by farmers was to organize cooperatives, which were designed to help them purchase goods at a lower cost and sell their crops at a higher price. The most successful of these cooperatives was the National Grange, which was founded in 1867. The organization provided farmers with a forum to discuss their problems and to develop solutions.

It also established a number of cooperative ventures, including a purchasing system and a marketing system. By working together, farmers were able to secure better prices for their crops and to reduce their expenses.

Finally, farmers turned to scientific farming methods in order to improve the productivity of their land. They began to use new technologies, such as the mechanical reaper, the steam engine, and the combine harvester.

They also experimented with new crops and new farming techniques, such as crop rotation and soil conservation. By doing so, they were able to increase their yields and improve the quality of their crops. All of these strategies helped farmers to deal with the challenges that they faced during this time period.

To know more about goods visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29426090

#SPJ11

Regionalism refers to the tendency to cling to one's area or region, regardless of the larger nation or entity that one is a part of. It is evident that regionalisms developed in the colonies due to the fact that the colonies were quite diverse in terms of geography, climate, and economy.
Each of the colonies had its own unique features and resources, which influenced the lifestyles, beliefs, and attitudes of the colonists. For instance, the New England colonies were rocky and cold, which led to the development of small farms and a focus on fishing, lumbering, and shipbuilding.
The Southern colonies, on the other hand, had fertile soil and a warm climate, which made it ideal for cash crop agriculture, such as tobacco and rice. These differences in geography and economy contributed to the emergence of distinct cultural, social, and political identities in each of the colonies.

To know more about Regionalism visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13162113

#SPJ11

Antonio López de Santa Anna was a significant figure in Mexican history due to his involvement in the Mexican independence movement, his role in shaping Mexico's political ideologies, his actions during the Texas Revolution and the Mexican-American War, and his authoritarian leadership.

Antonio López de Santa Anna was a significant figure in Mexican history, and his actions had a lasting impact on the country. Here is an explanation of his significance:

1. Mexican Independence: Santa Anna played a crucial role in Mexico's fight for independence from Spain. He joined the movement led by Agustín de Iturbide and supported the Plan of Iguala, which called for a constitutional monarchy in Mexico. This plan eventually led to Mexico gaining independence in 1821.

2. Centralist vs. Federalist: Santa Anna's political ideology shifted throughout his career. However, he later switched to supporting federalism, which advocated for power to be decentralized among the states. This shift had a profound impact on the political landscape of Mexico.

3. Texas Revolution: Santa Anna's involvement in the Texas Revolution greatly impacted the history of both Mexico and the United States. As the Mexican president, he led the Mexican army in an attempt to suppress the rebellion in Texas. The Battle of the Alamo and the Battle of San Jacinto were significant events during this conflict.

4. Mexican-American War: Santa Anna's leadership during the Mexican-American War was both significant and controversial. Santa Anna's actions during this war, such as his defeat at the Battle of Buena Vista, further shaped Mexico's relationship with its northern neighbor.

5. Dictatorship: Santa Anna's multiple terms as the president of Mexico often leaned towards authoritarian rule. He dissolved congress, amended the constitution to increase his power, and even declared himself dictator at times. This contributed to political instability and a lack of institutional development in Mexico.
To know more about history visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3583505

#SPJ11

During 300 C.E, it is believed that the distant regions of the world were well interconnected due to some of the early stages of global trade.

Some of the notable factors that made this possible include the spread of the Silk Road, the invention of sea routes, and the establishment of global market economies.To begin with, the Silk Road was a major trade route that connected Asia to Europe and Africa.

This network of roads extended up to a distance of 6000 miles and allowed for the trade of various goods, including spices, silk, and jewelry. Traders used the Silk Road as a means of transporting goods from one location to the other, which led to the growth of various trading centers along the road.

To know more about interconnected visit:

https://brainly.com/question/4405104

#SPJ11

In 300 C.E., distant regions of the world were interconnected to some extent via entities like the Roman Empire, the Gupta Empire, and Han Dynasty, primarily through trade routes such as the Silk Road. Cultural exchange occurred, but it didn't lead to complete homogenization of societies.

In 300 C.E., the interconnectedness between the distant regions of the world varied. Fundamental entities of the time included the Roman Empire, the Gupta Empire in India, and the Han Dynasty in China. Ways of interaction consisted of trade routes such as the Silk Road and incipient maritime technology, allowing for the exchange of goods, ideas, and cultures. However, it's important to note that this did not mean all societies were homogenized in culture or politics. An illustration of this is the spread of Buddhism from India to China around this era.

https://brainly.com/question/34908876

#SPJ12

The origins of World War I can be traced back to a complex web of political, economic, and social factors that existed in Europe during the early 20th century. The immediate trigger for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary in Sarajevo on June 28, 1914, by a Serbian nationalist.

Contemporaries of the war tried to explain its origin through various perspectives. Some blamed Germany for its aggressive expansionist policies and militaristic ambitions, while others blamed the complex system of alliances that existed in Europe, particularly the alliance system between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy known as the Triple Alliance, and the alliance between France, Russia, and Britain known as the Triple Entente.

Later scholars have offered different interpretations and analysis of the origins of World War I. The debates have centered on several key theories, including the "Fischer thesis" which argues that Germany was primarily responsible for the war, and the "primacy of domestic politics" thesis which suggests that internal political and social factors within each country played a significant role.

Scholars have extensively studied and analyzed primary sources, diplomatic correspondence, and historical records to support or refute these accounts. They have examined the role of individual leaders, the impact of alliance systems, the influence of public opinion, economic factors, and the complex interplay of multiple causes.

Overall, the origins of World War I continue to be a subject of debate and interpretation among historians, with ongoing research shedding new light on the complex causes and dynamics that led to one of the deadliest conflicts in human history.

for more questions on World War I

https://brainly.com/question/446364

#SPJ8

Answer:

I tried to get it but it's also blurred for me too

But I'm pretty sure you can search all of these and it shouldn't take more than 10 minutes to complete

Explanation:

quoting a source.4.06 Worlds Collide AssessmentName:Ariann SlaterDate:10-12-2022Step 1:Complete the chart below. For each effect, identify and explain it in 2-3 complete sentences.Old World (Europe, Africa, and/or Asia)PoliticalShort-Term EffectImperialism disrupted traditional African ways of life, political organization,and social norms.PoliticalLong-Term EffectAfrican political systems and institutions were traditionally based on kinshipand lineage, sanctioned by a founding myth.EconomicShort-Term EffectThe Bubonic Plague reduced the size of the labor force, which meant that theremaining laborers had to work harder.EconomicLong-Term EffectColonization brought disarticulation of the African economy, education, trade,market, transport, and currency institution.New World (The Americas and Caribbean)PoliticalShort-Term EffectIncreased participation in politics and governance, the legal institutionalism ofreligious toleration, and the growth and diffusion of the population.PoliticalLong-Term EffectEach colony had its own type of government, they ranged from being ruled bya governor, to a democratic type government, or for the Spanish colonies theyused the Encomienda system.EconomicShort-Term EffectEnvironmental degradation, the spread of disease, economic instability, ethnicrivalries, and human rights violations.EconomicLong-Term EffectPopulation growth in Europe by bringing new crops from the Americas andstarted Europe’s economic shift towards capitalism

Answer: Common stocks

Explanation: Common stocks because total realized returns have earned stock investments such as dividend yield and capital gains yield.

John Calvin's core beliefs include predestination, salvation by faith alone, and biblical authority. He agreed with Luther on his rejection of papal authority but disagreed on the nature of the Eucharist.

John Calvin, a key figure in the Protestant Reformation, had core beliefs that revolved around the concept of predestination, biblical authority, and the idea of ​​salvation by faith alone. Calvin and Luther agreed on important theological aspects such as the rejection of papal authority, emphasis on Scripture as the supreme authority, and belief in salvation by faith.

However, they disagree on the nature of the Eucharist, especially the concept of Christ's presence. Calvin advocates symbolic presence, while Luther believes in a more literal presence known as oneness. 

Learn more about predestination:

https://brainly.com/question/18460867

#SPJ4