The nativist responses to immigration and immigrants included the creation of the Dillingham report, passing the Chinese Exclusion Act, and mob violence toward immigrants.
Nativist responses to immigration and immigrants encompassed several actions, One significant nativist response was the creation of the Dillingham report. Published in 1911, this report aimed to assess the impact of immigration on American society. It provided arguments in favor of restricting immigration based on racial and ethnic grounds, emphasizing the negative consequences of immigrant integration and advocating for stricter immigration policies.
Another relevant nativist response was the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882. This act was the first major federal law to restrict immigration based on a specific ethnic group. It prohibited Chinese laborers from entering the United States and denied Chinese immigrants the opportunity to become naturalized citizens, thus reflecting the discriminatory sentiment prevalent during that time.
Additionally, mob violence toward immigrants was an unfortunate nativist response to their presence. Certain communities faced acts of aggression and hostility, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty or social tension. These acts of mob violence were driven by a fear of competition for jobs, cultural clashes, and xenophobia.
However, the passage of the 14th Amendment was not a nativist response to immigration. The 14th Amendment ratified in 1868, granted equal protection under the law to all individuals born or naturalized in the United States, regardless of their immigrant status. It aimed to protect the rights of all individuals, including immigrants and did not serve as a nativist response to their presence in the country.
Know more about the Chinese Exclusion Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/24795942
#SPJ8
I NEED HELP PLEASEEEEE IS JUST QUESTIONS BUT I HAVE TO GET THE QUESTIONS FROM THE READING
Using the primary documents, construct a conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American in which each evaluates the economic challenges and benefits they face.
In doing so, be sure to define and explain what Americans understood to be meant by "the middle class."
Why was it almost impossible for landless farmers to achieve middle class status?
HERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS
A conversation between a poor, landless farmer and a middle-class American in which each evaluates the economic challenges and benefits they face can be scripted as showing the farmer lamenting his woes and the American showing how his status as a middle-class makes things better for him.
How to construct the conversationThe conversation between the farmer and the middle-class American can go thus:
American: How are you today?
Farmer: Finding it hard to get through.
American: Why is that the case?
Farmer: My inability to own a piece of land has hindered the amount of success I can attain in my business.
American: I can empathize with you, although my status as a middle-class makes things a lot easier for me. I have a moderate level of income, education, and material possessions that enable me to get by smoothly.
Farmer: I wish I could say the same for myself. It is almost impossible for landless farmers like me to achieve middle-class status because of structural barriers and governmental policies.
Learn more about the middle class here:
https://brainly.com/question/26245041
#SPJ1
what was the impact of pseudoscientific of race on the Jewish nation by the nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946?
essay
Answer:
The effects of pseudoscientific theories of race used by Nazi Germany during the period of 1933-1946 had catastrophic and devastating effects on the Jewish nation. The Nazi regime promoted an ideology that created a hierarchy among people based on “Aryan” racial characteristics. They believed in racial superiority and inferiority, and deemed the Jews an inferior race. This pseudoscience, rooted in the theories of Social Darwinism and eugenics, provided justification for the discrimination and extermination of Jews in Germany.
This persecution began in April of 1933, when the Nazis approved a law that prohibited Jews from engaging in many occupations and held them responsible for any negative effects felt by the German people. Soon after, they were heavily restricted from attending school, owning property, and travelling freely. Jews were stripped of their rights as citizens. They were excluded from public ceremonies and their businesses and synagogues were destroyed. Anti-semitism was promoted and encoded in German laws, which excluded Jews from many aspects of life in German society.
The Nazi regime eventually began sending Jews to forced labour and concentration camps, where millions were subjected to torture, starvation, and death. During the Holocaust, millions of Jews were murdered and those who survived were left wounded, traumatized, and deprived of their families, homes, and dignities. This tragedy was only made possible by pseudoscientific theories of race used by the Nazi regime, serving as the basis for their persecution and extermination of Jews living in Germany during the period of 1933 to 1946.
Explanation:
Can you help me solve the paper
The attitudes being portrayed by the USA and other countries against the soviet union include suspicions and opposition. Evidence to prove this includes the issuance of the policy of containment that was meant to limit the spread of the ideology.
The attitudes toward the Soviet UnionThe Soviet Union was a union of Russia and some surrounding nations that believed in shared properties or the collective ownership of resources.
The USA was particularly averse to this idea and strongly opposed it. The attitudes that they displayed towards the advancement of this ideology included opposition and suspicion of any citizen promoting the idea.
Learn more about communism here:
https://brainly.com/question/12173354
#SPJ1
Although the era of cowboys and the open range lasted only about 20 years, it had a huge effect on American culture as a result of the romanticized version of cowboy life that became popular in the late 1800s. The descriptions of cowboys below are either myth or reality. Match each description to the correct picture.
Reality:
Cowboys were Mexican and African American, as well as White.Cowboys worked long, hard days for low wages.Myth:
Cowboys were lone adventurers.Cowboys were free to go where they pleased and do what they wanted.Explanation:
The romanticized view of cowboys doesn't reflect the fact that cowboys worked long days for low wages, and it's not widely known that many cowboys were Mexican and African American. It's a myth that cowboys were lone adventurers, and they could do what they wanted, wherever they wanted.
Hope this helped <3
Answer:
see image
Explanation:
Which countries were part of France’s expansion into southeast Asia in the 1900s? Check all that apply.
Answer: Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos.
Explanation: Cambodia, Vietnam, and Laos were part of Frances explanion into southeast Asia in the 1900s
japanese experience experts - main points
Answer:
Japanese still recall the war experience primarily in terms of their own
victimization. For them, World War II calls to mind the deaths of family and
acquaintances on distant battlefields, and, more vividly, the prolonged,
systematic bombings of their cities. If it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender, how does one justify the hasty bombing of Nagasaki only three days later, before the Japanese had time to investigate Hiroshima and
formulate a response?
Explanation:
Japanese experience experts possess deep knowledge and expertise in various aspects of Japanese culture, history, traditions, and customs.
Japanese experience experts are individuals who have dedicated their time and effort to studying and understanding the rich and diverse aspects of Japanese culture.
They possess extensive knowledge of Japan's history, traditions, arts, cuisine, language, and societal norms. These experts have often spent years immersing themselves in Japanese society, learning from local sources, and developing a deep understanding of the country's unique characteristics. They can provide valuable insights and guidance to those seeking a deeper understanding of Japan, whether it's for travel purposes, academic research, cultural exchange programs, or business ventures. Japanese experience experts may specialize in various areas such as tea ceremony, calligraphy, martial arts, traditional music, or regional cultures, enabling them to offer authentic and accurate information to enhance one's appreciation and engagement with Japanese culture.Their expertise helps promote cross-cultural understanding and facilitates meaningful interactions between Japan and the rest of the world.
For more questions on Japanese experience
https://brainly.com/question/29703034
#SPJ8
Question 20 (1 point)
As identified in the video, Megacities: The Challenges of Modern Urbanization, what
is the name of the floating settlement in Lagos?
Makoko
Ikeja
Epe
Ikorodu
Answer:
Makoko
Explanation:
The floating settlement in Lagos, as identified in the video "Megacities: The Challenges of Modern Urbanization," is called Makoko.
3
Read the following excerpt from a report about some of the possible reasons college costs are increasing.
A major concern related to higher education's business model is that colleges and universities cannot
will not control their cost increases. In for-profit industries when productivity goes up, salaries usually
up. This is different in public education.
Based on the excerpt, how is higher education different from for-profit industries?
Salaries in higher education are higher because of business costs.
Salaries in higher education are based on productivity.
O Salaries in higher education are lower because of business costs.
Salaries in higher education are based on additional factors.
Based on the excerpt, higher education is different from for-profit industries typically Salaries in higher education are based on additional factors
The excerpt states that in for-profit industries when productivity increases, salaries usually go up. However, this is different in public education, implying that higher education operates under a different system.
In higher education, salaries are influenced by factors other than just productivity. While productivity may be one consideration, other factors such as institutional budgets, government funding, market competition, and collective bargaining agreements with faculty and staff unions can also impact salary levels in higher education. These additional factors contribute to the complex and unique nature of salary determination in the education sector.
It is important to note that the excerpt does not specify whether salaries in higher education are higher or lower due to business costs. It simply highlights the difference in the relationship between productivity and salary increases in for-profit industries compared to public education.
Therefore, the most accurate interpretation is that salaries in higher education are based on additional factors beyond just productivity, making it distinct from for-profit industries.
Know more about productivity here:
https://brainly.com/question/2992817
#SPJ8
How did the framers of the Constitution use Enlightenment ideas about the natural rights of people to strengthen the Constitution?
A. They stated that the U.S. government would work to create security and protect the liberty of its people.
B. They stated the U.S. government would refuse to provide security and liberty.
C. They stated the U.S. government would tax all citizens equitably and protect their liberty with armies paid for by taxes.
D. They stated the U.S. government would make people pay to secure and protect their liberty.
The framers of the Constitution used Enlightenment ideas of natural rights to strengthen the document by committing the government to protect the security and liberty of its people. Correct option A.
Explanation:The framers of the Constitution incorporated the Enlightenment ideas of natural rights to enhance the Constitution's credibility in protecting the rights of the people.
The fundamental idea was to ensure that the U.S. government would strive to establish safety and safeguard the freedom of its citizens. This principle is primarily evident in the Constitution's preamble and the Bill of Rights. The phrase, 'secure the Blessings of Liberty,' found in the Preamble, is a clear reflection of this idea.
Additionally, the ensuing amendments, notably the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly, clearly embody the Enlightenment ideology of natural rights.
Learn more about Constitution here:https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ11
What did England give up at the end of the War of 1812?
Responses
Northwest Territory
Northwest Territory
California Territory
California Territory
Oregon Territory
Oregon Territory
Louisiana Purchase
Louisiana Purchase
At the end of the War of 1812, England did not give up any territories directly to the United States mentioned here.
The War of 1812, fought between the United States and Great Britain, concluded with the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1814. The treaty restored pre-war boundaries and did not result in any territorial changes between the two nations. England did not give up the Northwest Territory, California Territory, Oregon Territory, or the Louisiana Purchase as a result of the war.
The Northwest Territory, which included present-day states such as Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin, had been established through various treaties and agreements prior to the war.
The California Territory and Oregon Territory were both part of the Spanish Empire at the time, and they remained under Spanish control until the Mexican War and subsequent negotiations with the United States. The Louisiana Purchase, which had taken place in 1803, had already expanded the territorial holdings of the United States and was not affected by the War of 1812.
For more questions on territories
https://brainly.com/question/31845959
#SPJ8
How did President Wilson hope to change national borders following World War I? Give an example of how his plan affected a European country after the war.
President Wilson hoped to change national borders after World War I by creating self-determination in Europe. For instance, Poland regained its independence.
President Wilson hoped to change national borders following World War I by implementing the Fourteen Points. These points were presented to the Congress in January 1918. The Fourteen Points, which were Wilson's vision of world peace, were a framework for negotiating a treaty after the war.The Fourteen Points were designed to reduce international tensions and provide long-term stability. They included measures such as open diplomacy, freedom of the seas, arms reduction, and the formation of an international organization to prevent future wars, known as the League of Nations.President Wilson’s plan had a significant impact on Europe after the war. For example, in Austria-Hungary, the empire was divided into several independent states based on ethnicity and language. In addition, Poland was re-established as a sovereign nation after being partitioned for over a century. Germany lost its overseas colonies and was forced to pay war reparations. As a result, the Treaty of Versailles was created, and the League of Nations was established. Despite Wilson's best efforts, the treaty was not ratified by the United States Congress, and the US did not join the League of Nations, which ultimately led to its failure.For more such questions on President Wilson:
https://brainly.com/question/15457344
#SPJ8
Should the Philippines continue insisting its ownership over certain territories in the West Philippine sea? Why or why not?
Yes, the Philippines should continue insisting its ownership over certain territories in the West Philippine Sea to secure its sovereignty and resources.
Yes, the Philippines should continue insisting its ownership over certain territories in the West Philippine Sea. It is because these territories are part of the country's exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and extended continental shelf (ECS) as provided under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).These territories have been recognized as part of the country's EEZ and ECS by the arbitral tribunal in 2016, which invalidated China's nine-dash line claim. By asserting its sovereignty and jurisdiction over these territories, the Philippines is protecting its national interest, securing its maritime domain, and upholding its territorial integrity. Failure to do so will lead to the loss of these areas' rich marine resources, including fish, oil, gas, and minerals. It will also affect the livelihoods of millions of Filipinos who depend on fishing and other related activities. Hence, it is crucial for the Philippines to pursue a peaceful and rules-based resolution to the West Philippine Sea disputes based on international law, respect for sovereignty, and adherence to the UNCLOS.For more such questions on Philippines:
https://brainly.com/question/32061862
#SPJ8
Charles Hamilton Houston and Thurgood Marshall began an NAACP campaign to attack the concept of “separate but equal” in the 1930s.
Group of answer choices
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
i did my research
Which best describes the speaker in this poem?
O a manager who designs and carries out war plans
O an officer who teaches soldiers how to win wars
O an activist who persuades politicians to end a war
O a motivator who encourages readers to fight oppression
Answer:: D) A motivator who encourages readers to fight oppressionExplanation:hope this helps
Explanation:
The mass murder of Jewish and other groups of people by the German nazis during ww2 is known as
Answer:
Holocaust
Explanation:
The mass murder of Jewish and other groups of people by the German nazis during ww2 is known as Holocaust
Which best describes the speaker in this poem?
O a manager who designs and carries out war plans
O an officer who teaches soldiers how to win wars
O an activist who persuades politicians to end a war
O a motivator who encourages readers to fight oppression
Answer:
Based on the poem "If We Must Die" by Claude McKay, the best description of the speaker is:
--> D. a motivator who persuades readers to fight oppression.
Explanation:
The poem has a defiant and empowering tone, urging the readers to resist oppressive forces even in the face of death. The speaker advocates not with anger but with "calm and reason", appealing to the dignity and courage within the readers to stand up for justice. The powerful language is meant to encourage and inspire readers to continue the fight against oppression, discrimination and injustice.
For example, the lines "If we must die, let it not be like hogs/ Hunted and penned in an inglorious spot" call readers to fight oppression with valor and honor rather than passively accepting mistreatment. The speaker urges readers to "meet the common foe" and "Make no word our weeping" but instead "spend", "love and give" in the struggle "ere we turn and crouch" under oppression.
So overall, the motivational and inspirational tone of persuading readers to actively fight injustice positions the speaker as an activist who aims to rouse the spirit of resistance within the oppressed, rather than as an officer, manager or war planner. The focus is on activism through moral and ethical appeals rather than through military or strategic means.
Tom Stoppard's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, draws on two previous theatrical works: Shakespeare's Hamlet and Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead follows the "off-stage" exploits of two minor characters from Hamlet, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. While the two main characters in Stoppard's play occasionally make brief appearances in "Hamlet," as scripted in Shakespeare's original tragedy, the majority of the play takes place in other parts of the castle where Hamlet is set. While "off stage" in this way, the characters resemble the main characters in the absurdist Waiting for Godot. As in Beckett's play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern pass the time by impersonating other characters, engaging in word play, and remaining silent for long periods of time. These same two characters were also featured in a parody of Hamlet, the short comic play by W. S. Gilbert entitled Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. Gilbert's play makes Rosencrantz and Guildenstern into central characters and alters the storyline of Hamlet.
The author of this passage is describing
The author of this passage is describing Tom Stoppard's play, "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead." The passage highlights how Stoppard's play draws on two previous theatrical works.
Theatrical works names are William Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot.""Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead" focuses on the "off-stage" exploits of two minor characters from Shakespeare's "Hamlet," namely Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. While they occasionally make brief appearances in "Hamlet," Stoppard's play primarily takes place in other parts of the castle, exploring the perspectives and experiences of these two characters in their own story.The passage further draws a parallel between Stoppard's play and Beckett's "Waiting for Godot." Both works feature characters who pass the time through wordplay, impersonations, and prolonged periods of silence, capturing the absurdity and existential themes common in absurdist literature.The passage mentions that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were also featured in a parody of "Hamlet" by W. S. Gilbert, where they became central characters and the storyline of "Hamlet" was altered.The author provides an overview of Stoppard's play, its sources of inspiration, and its connection to both Shakespearean tragedy and the absurdist tradition of Beckett's work.For more such questions on play
https://brainly.com/question/30149581
#SPJ8
What was a result of improved relations between the Spanish and American Indians?
British settlement decreased.
The population of the Natchez District grew.
French settlers began to disrespect American Indians.
The Spanish aided the Chickasaw at the Battle of Ackia.
Answer:
A result of improved relations between the Spanish and American Indians was that British settlement decreased in areas where the Spanish had authority, such as the Natchez District. This allowed the population of the Natchez District to grow as it could no longer be held back by British expansion. Additionally, the Spanish started to have a stronger presence in the area, and as a result, the French settlers began to show less respect for the American Indians, leading to tensions which would later lead to the Battle of Ackia. The Spanish aided the Chickasaw in this battle, further cementing the improved relations between the two sides.
Explanation:
which situation describes a historian using rhetoric
Answer:
The word rhetoric means the art of persuasive speaking.
──────────────────────────────────
The situation that describes a historian using rhetoric would be C because the Historian is persuading in his essay that the World Trade Organization improved poor countries' economies.
Explanation:
Which US strategy during the Cold War was most likely behind the creation of this poster?
Answer:
The creation of what poster is not mentioned in the prompt. However, based on the search results, it appears that a poster was created during the Cold War and US propaganda strategy was most likely behind its creation.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which is a frequent source of controversy in public debates, says that "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The controversy stems from the fact that some Americans feel that the Second Amendment guarantees all citizens the absolute right to own firearms, while others believe that some restrictions on gun ownership are consistent with the Second Amendment.
Which of the following lists of words from this passage indicates the author's intention?
The author's intention is to present the controversial nature of the Second Amendment and acknowledge differing perspectives on gun ownership.
Based on the given passage, the author's intention can be inferred by examining the words used. Here are the words that indicate the author's intention:Controversy: The author acknowledges that the Second Amendment is a subject of debate and disagreement among Americans, highlighting the existence of differing opinions on the matter.Frequent: The author suggests that the controversy surrounding the Second Amendment is not an isolated event but occurs regularly, indicating ongoing discussions and disagreements.Source: By using the term "source," the author implies that the Second Amendment is the origin or cause of the controversy, emphasizing its significance in public debates.Feel: The author acknowledges the existence of different viewpoints by using the word "feel," indicating that individuals have subjective opinions about the interpretation of the Second Amendment.Absolute: The author introduces the idea that some Americans believe in an absolute right to own firearms, contrasting it with the belief that certain restrictions on gun ownership can still be consistent with the Second Amendment.Some: The author uses the word "some" to acknowledge that not all Americans share the same perspective, reinforcing the idea that there are varying opinions on the matter.These words collectively indicate that the author aims to present an objective viewpoint, acknowledging the controversy and different interpretations of the Second Amendment while highlighting the contrasting opinions held by different groups of Americans.For more questions on Second Amendment
https://brainly.com/question/1750552
#SPJ8
Consider the following statement; the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the so-called "Bill of Rights," had more to do with the construction of a political compromise related to the ratification of the Constitution than a direct concern for the rights of individual citizens and a real commitment to limit the power of the central government.
This discussion does not judge, it is asking you to analyze the history, the origin of the "Bill of Rights."
Answer:
Explanation:
The statement suggests that the primary motivation behind the creation of the Bill of Rights was the construction of a political compromise related to the ratification of the Constitution, rather than a genuine concern for the rights of individual citizens or a commitment to limiting the power of the central government. To analyze the history and origin of the Bill of Rights, let's consider the context in which it was developed.
During the process of drafting and ratifying the United States Constitution, there were debates and disagreements regarding the balance of power between the federal government and the states, as well as concerns about protecting individual rights. Some proponents of the Constitution argued that a specific enumeration of individual rights was unnecessary, as they believed that the limited powers granted to the federal government inherently protected individual liberties. This viewpoint was reflected in the original text of the Constitution, which did not include a Bill of Rights.
However, there were also Anti-Federalists who opposed the Constitution and argued for the inclusion of explicit protections for individual rights. They believed that without such protections, the new federal government might become too powerful and infringe upon the rights of citizens.
To address these concerns and secure the necessary support for ratification, the Federalists, who supported the Constitution, made a political compromise. They agreed to add a series of amendments to the Constitution that would safeguard individual rights and limit the powers of the federal government. These amendments became known as the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights, consisting of the first ten amendments to the Constitution, was ratified in 1791. It explicitly protected fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. It also established limits on the government's authority, such as prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures and protecting the right to bear arms.
While the primary purpose of the Bill of Rights was indeed to address concerns and secure support for the ratification of the Constitution, it is important to note that it has since played a significant role in safeguarding individual liberties and shaping American constitutional law. The protections outlined in the Bill of Rights have been crucial in ensuring citizens' rights and serving as a foundation for civil liberties in the United States.
In summary, while the Bill of Rights emerged as a political compromise during the ratification of the Constitution, its inclusion was driven by a real concern for the rights of individual citizens and a desire to place limitations on the power of the central government. Its subsequent impact and significance in protecting individual liberties cannot be understated.
Why was James II’s support of Catholicism and Catholic leaders an issue?
Parliament did not want religious influence in government.
Parliament did not favor one religion over another.
Most parliamentarians were not religious.
Most parliamentarians were Protestant in faith.
Why did the article of congress not last
Answer:
The articles of congress did not last because, to make any change or implement an amendment, all of the states would have to agree unanimously. This made it incredibly difficult to enact change. Difficult to enact change, and to do things like regulating trade and foreign policy and raise funds unless the states could all agree.
Do u think that president Kennedy address on Cuba helped or interfered with Americans sense of security from foreign threats
Three sentences please
While President Kennedy's address initially heightened Americans' sense of insecurity, his strong leadership, transparent communication, and successful resolution of the crisis ultimately helped restore and strengthen their sense of security from foreign threats.
Initially, the revelation of Soviet missiles in Cuba instilled a profound sense of fear and insecurity among the American population. The proximity of the threat, combined with the potential for nuclear war, created a pervasive atmosphere of anxiety. However, President Kennedy's address to the nation played a crucial role in mitigating these fears and ultimately bolstering Americans' sense of security.
In his address on October 22, 1962, Kennedy outlined the presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba, described their implications, and outlined the actions his administration would take to address the crisis. This direct and transparent communication helped to build trust and reassured the American people that their government was actively working to protect their safety.
Kennedy's address showcased his leadership and ability to navigate a highly dangerous and complex international crisis. He articulated a clear strategy that involved a naval quarantine, diplomatic negotiations, and a readiness to use military force if necessary.
know more about Kennedy's here:
https://brainly.com/question/13721861
#SPJ8
The controversy over voting in the Estates General centered on the issue of whether
Question 6 options:
A-the three Estates would meet and vote separately or would meet as one body with each deputy having one vote.
B-roll calls would be standard procedures or volce votes would suffice.
C-the Third Estate should have twice as many deputies as either of the other two.
D-absent deputies had forfeited their votes.
E-the clergy should continue to have a vote.
The controversy centered on whether the Estates General would vote separately or as one body with each deputy having one vote.
The controversy over voting in the Estates General during the French Revolution centered on the issue of whether the three Estates would meet and vote separately or whether they would meet as one body with each deputy having one vote. This issue was crucial because it determined the power dynamics and representation within the Estates General.The First and Second Estates, which consisted of the clergy and the nobility respectively, argued for separate voting by Estate. They believed that this arrangement would ensure their privileged position and protect their interests. They feared that if the Estates voted as one body, the larger Third Estate, which represented the commoners, would dominate the decision-making process.On the other hand, the Third Estate, which represented the majority of the population and held the least privileged position, demanded voting by head. They believed that each deputy should have an equal vote regardless of their Estate, as it would ensure fair representation and give a stronger voice to the common people.Ultimately, the controversy was resolved with the adoption of the "voting by head" system, where each deputy had one vote. This decision challenged the traditional order of the Estates General and marked a significant shift in power towards the Third Estate. It reflected the growing influence of democratic ideals and contributed to the social and political upheaval of the French Revolution.In conclusion, the controversy over voting in the Estates General centered on whether the three Estates would meet and vote separately or meet as one body with each deputy having one vote. The final decision was in favor of voting by head, granting equal voting rights to all deputies and significantly impacting the power dynamics during the French Revolution.For more questions on vote
https://brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ8
The ________ was designed to provide loans for war recovery
Which two statements about the Guilded Age are accurate
YOUR ANSWER
HOPE IT HELPS!!!!!!!!
MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Use the quote to answer the question:
“The natives are only too happy to share…for a copper kettle and a few toys, as beads and hatchets, they will sell you a whole Country…”
Which European power exploited Native Americans to purchase a valuable island in exchange for "a few toys"?
The British
The Dutch
The Spanish
The French
Answer: The Dutch were said to have purchased Long Island for "a few toys."
Explanation: really sad to think how exploited natives were and still are.
The palace at Versailles demonstrates which aspect of Louis XIV’s rule in France? (1point)
Answer:
Absolutism
Explanation: The palace represented his aim to centralise power and control the nobility, holding absolute authority. This is why it was built with such architectural grandeur and artistic spectacle, to showboat his opulence and royal authority.