Which equation represents an exponential function that passes through the point (2, 36)?

A. f(x) = 4(3)x
B. f(x) = 4(x)3
C. f(x) = 6(3)x
D. f(x) = 6(x)3

The compound that will start precipitating first is AgIThe concentration of Ag+ ions present when Cul begins to precipitate is 7.53 × 10-8 M

When solid Nal is added to the solution containing 0.0071 M Cu+ and 0.0075 M Ag+, the first compound to precipitate is AgI. CuI would not precipitate because its solubility product is far greater than that of AgI.

Thus, we will compute the molar solubility of AgI first, which will help us calculate the concentration of Ag+ when Cul begins to precipitate.

AgI(s) ⇌ Ag+(aq) + I−(aq) Ksp = [Ag+][I−] = 8.3 × 10-17  

1.52 × 10-16 = [Ag+] × [I−] 1.52 × 10-16

= [Ag+]2 [Ag+]

= sqrt(1.52 × 10-16) [Ag+]

= 1.23 × 10-8M

At this point, Cul begins to precipitate when [Ag+] = 1.23 × 10-8M.

The solubility product expression for Cul(s) is: Cul(s) ⇌ Cu+(aq) + I-(aq) Ksp

= [Cu+][I-] 1.17 × 10-12

= [0.0071 - x][1.23 × 10-8 + x]

Simplifying and solving for x, we get x = 7.53 × 10-8M. Therefore, [Ag+] when Cul begins to precipitate is 7.53 × 10-8 M. In the given problem, we have calculated the first compound that will precipitate and the concentration of Ag+ ions present when Cul begins to precipitate.

The AgI compound will begin to precipitate first, while the concentration of Ag+ ions present when Cul begins to precipitate is 7.53 × 10-8 M.

To know more about solubility visit :

brainly.com/question/31493083

#SPJ11

The calculated value of the length of the segment ST is 13.5

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The trapezoids

The length of the segment ST is then calculated as

XY/XW = ST/SR

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

9/12 = ST/18

So, we have

ST = 18 * 9/12

Evaluate

ST = 13.5

Hence, the length of the segment ST is 13.5

Read more about similar shapes at

https://brainly.com/question/32122930

#SPJ1

Answer: to find it:

to find the mean: add up all of the numbers and divide by the number of numbers listed. ex: 2, 4, 9

2+4+9=15/3= mean = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Collect the data for the two variables you want to determine the correlation for. The data should be continuous and normally distributed.

Step 2: Calculate the mean of both variables.

Step 3: Calculate the standard deviation of both variables.

Step 4: Calculate the covariance of the two variables using the formula below: `Cov(X, Y) = Σ [(Xi - Xmean) * (Yi - Ymean)] / (n-1)

Step 5: Calculate the correlation coefficient using the formula below: `r = Cov(X, Y) / (SD(X) * SD(Y))` where r is the correlation coefficient, Cov is the covariance, SD is the standard deviation, X is the first variable, Y is the second variable, Xi and Yi are the individual values of X and Y, X mean and Y mean are the means of X and Y, and n is the number of observations. The resulting value of r ranges from -1 to +1. A value of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, a value of 0 indicates no correlation and a value of +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation

The graph the corresponds to the function f(x)=√(x - 1) is plotted and attached

A radical graph, also known as a square root graph, represents the graph of a square root function. A square root function is a mathematical function that calculates the square root of the input value.

key features of a radical graph is the shape: The shape of a square root graph is a concave upward curve. The steepness or flatness of the curve depends on the value of the constant a. A larger value of a results in a steeper curve, while a smaller value of a results in a flatter curve.

Learn more about square root function at

https://brainly.com/question/29111434

#SPJ1

The Ksp of compound A2B can be calculated using the given solubility expression: A2B (s) <==> 2 A+ (aq) + B-2 (aq). The solubility of A2B is given as 0.131 mol/L. Since there are 2 A+ ions and 1 B-2 ion produced for every A2B molecule that dissolves, the concentration of A+ ions and B-2 ions will both be twice the solubility of A2B. Therefore, the concentration of A+ ions and B-2 ions will be 2 * 0.131 = 0.262 mol/L. The Ksp of A2B can be calculated by multiplying the concentrations of the ions raised to their stoichiometric coefficients: Ksp = [A+]^2 * [B-2] = (0.262)^2 * 0.262 = 0.018 mol^3/L^3.

The solubility product constant (Ksp) of compound A2B is calculated by multiplying the concentrations of the ions raised to their stoichiometric coefficients. In this case, since there are 2 A+ ions and 1 B-2 ion produced for every A2B molecule that dissolves, the concentration of A+ ions and B-2 ions will both be twice the solubility of A2B. Therefore, the concentration of A+ ions and B-2 ions will be 0.262 mol/L. By plugging in these values into the Ksp expression, we can calculate the Ksp of A2B: Ksp = (0.262)^2 * 0.262 = 0.018 mol^3/L^3.

In this case, the main answer is the calculation of the Ksp of compound A2B, which is 0.018 mol^3/L^3. The supporting explanation provides the step-by-step process of how to calculate the Ksp using the given solubility expression and the stoichiometry of the compound.

Know more about ions here:

https://brainly.com/question/30663970

#SPJ11

a) The amount of water in the peanut is 0.62 g.

b) The percentage of water in the peanut is 2.18%.

c) The amount of loss from the crushing process is 0.47 g.

d) The percentage of loss from the crushing process is 1.66%.

e) The amount of oil extracted from the peanut is 9.12 g.

f) The percentage of oil recovery from the peanut before drying is 32.09%.

g) The percentage of solvent recovery from the distillation process is 88%.

h) The total solvent recovered from the distillation and evaporation processes is 215 ml.

i) The amount of solvent makeup is 35 ml.

j) The percentage of solvent makeup related to the total solvent in the process is 14.63%.

To calculate the values, we'll use the given data and perform the necessary calculations:

a) The amount of water can be obtained by subtracting the mass of the peanut after drying from the mass of the peanut before drying:

28.42 g - 27.8 g = 0.62 g.

b) The percentage of water can be calculated by dividing the amount of water by the mass of the peanut before drying and multiplying by 100: [tex]\[\left(\frac{0.62 \, \text{g}}{28.42 \, \text{g}}\right) \times 100 = 2.18\%.\][/tex]

c) The amount of loss from the crushing process can be calculated by subtracting the mass of the crushed peanut from the mass of the peanut before drying:

28.42 g - 27.35 g = 0.47 g.

d) The percentage of loss from the crushing process can be calculated by dividing the amount of loss from the crushing process by the mass of the peanut before drying and multiplying by 100:

[tex]\[\left(\frac{0.47 \, \text{g}}{28.42 \, \text{g}}\right) \times 100 = 1.66\%.\][/tex]

e) The amount of oil extracted can be calculated by subtracting the mass of the dry spent peanut from the mass of the wet spent peanut:

34.675 g - 18.3 g = 9.375 g.

f) The percentage of oil recovery from the peanut before drying can be calculated by dividing the amount of oil extracted by the mass of the peanut before drying and multiplying by 100:

[tex]\[ \left(\frac{9.375 \, \text{g}}{28.42 \, \text{g}}\right) \times 100 = 32.09\% \][/tex]

g) The percentage of solvent recovery from the distillation process can be calculated by dividing the volume of recovered hexane from distillation by the volume of hexane used and multiplying by 100:

[tex]\[ \left(\frac{220 \, \text{ml}}{250 \, \text{ml}}\right) \times 100 = 88\% \][/tex]

h) The total solvent recovered from the distillation and evaporation processes is given as 220 ml.

i) The amount of solvent makeup is given as 35 ml.

j) The percentage of solvent makeup related to the total solvent in the process can be calculated by dividing the amount of solvent makeup by the total solvent recovered and multiplying by 100:

[tex]\[ \left(\frac{35 \, \text{ml}}{215 \, \text{ml}}\right) \times 100 = 16.28\% \][/tex]

The calculations above provide the values for each parameter as requested in the question.

To know more about Calculate visit-

brainly.com/question/31718487

#SPJ11

The grouped frequency table is

Temperature     Frequency

2 < z < 4                3

4 < z < 6                5

6 < z < 10              4

The estimate for the mean temperature is 5.5

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The histogram

The values of x, y and z are the frequencies of the temperatures

Working out the values that should replace x, y and z, we have

Temperature     Frequency

2 < z < 4                3

4 < z < 6                5

6 < z < 10              4

Start by calculating the midpoint of the temperatures

Temperature     Frequency

3                           3

5                           5

8                           4

So, we have

Mean = (3 * 3 + 5 * 5 + 8 * 4)/(3 + 5 + 4)

Evaluate

Mean = 5.5

Hence, the estimate for the mean temperature is 5.5

Read more about histogram at

https://brainly.com/question/25983327

#SPJ1

On the other hand, waste disposal emissions are typically classified as Scope 3, which encompasses indirect emissions occurring in the value chain, including waste disposal activities outside the reporting organization's direct control.

Under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) framework, emissions are categorized into three scopes based on the source and control of emissions.

Scope 1 includes direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by the reporting organization, such as on-site fuel combustion for a bus company and methane produced from anaerobic digestion processes.

Wastewater treatment emissions can also fall under Scope 1 if the treatment facility has on-site fuel combustion or anaerobic digestion processes.

Learn more about encompasses indirect

brainly.com/question/13753880

#SPJ11

The model for the motion of the spring given by x(t) = 20sin(t) - 20cos(t) is unrealistic because it neglects damping effects, external forces, nonlinearities, and Hooke's Law.

a. To graph the function x(t) = 20sin(t) - 20cos(t), we can first analyze its components. The term 20sin(t) represents the vertical displacement of the mass due to the oscillation of the spring, and the term -20cos(t) represents the horizontal displacement. The graph of this function will show the position of the mass relative to its equilibrium position over time.

The equilibrium position is located at x = 0. When t = 0, the mass is released 20 inches below the equilibrium position. As time progresses, the sinusoidal term (20sin(t)) causes the mass to oscillate up and down, while the cosinusoidal term (-20cos(t)) produces a side-to-side motion.

The graph will exhibit periodic behavior with both vertical and horizontal components. The amplitude of the oscillation is 20 inches, and the period of the function is 2π since both sine and cosine have a period of 2π.

b. To find dx/dt, we need to differentiate the function x(t) with respect to t.

x(t) = 20sin(t) - 20cos(t)

Taking the derivative:

dx/dt = 20cos(t) + 20sin(t)

The derivative dx/dt represents the velocity of the mass at any given time. It provides the rate of change of the position with respect to time. In this case, it gives the instantaneous velocity of the mass as it oscillates up and down and moves side to side.

c. To find the times when the velocity of the mass is zero, we need to set dx/dt = 0 and solve for t:

20cos(t) + 20sin(t) = 0

Dividing by 20:

cos(t) + sin(t) = 0

Rearranging the equation:

sin(t) = -cos(t)

This equation is satisfied when t = -π/4 and t = 3π/4. These are the times when the velocity of the mass is zero.

d. The given model for the motion of a spring, x(t) = 20sin(t) - 20cos(t), has some unrealistic aspects.

1. Damping: The model does not consider any damping effects, such as air resistance or friction. In reality, damping would cause the amplitude of the oscillation to decrease over time until the mass eventually comes to a stop.

2. External forces: The model does not account for any external forces acting on the mass-spring system, such as gravity. In real-world scenarios, gravity would influence the behavior of the spring and the motion of the mass.

3. Nonlinearities: The model assumes a perfectly linear relationship between the displacement and time, neglecting any nonlinearities that might be present in the spring or the mass. Real springs can exhibit nonlinear behavior, especially when stretched to their limits.

4. Hooke's Law: The model does not incorporate Hooke's Law, which states that the force exerted by a spring is directly proportional to its displacement from equilibrium. This law is fundamental to spring behavior and is not explicitly represented in the given model.

To know more about motion, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/33317467

#SPJ4

The equations for the chemical equilibrium of methane steam reforming using the law of mass action and reactions stoichiometry.

The methane steam reforming reaction can be represented as follows:

CH4 + H2O ⇌ CO + 3H2

The equilibrium constant expression for this reaction is given by the law of mass action as:

Kp = (P_CO * P_H2^3) / (P_CH4 * P_H2O)

Where Kp is the equilibrium constant at constant pressure, and P represents the partial pressure of the respective species involved.

The equilibrium constant of a reaction is temperature-dependent and changes with temperature. In general, the equilibrium constant (K) for a reaction is related to the standard Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) for the reaction through the equation:

ΔG° = -RT ln(K)

Where R is the gas constant and T is the temperature in Kelvin. As the temperature changes, the value of the equilibrium constant will also change.

Regarding the characteristics of using the law of mass action and reactions stoichiometry to solve chemical equilibrium compared to non-stoichiometric methods like the Lagrange Multiplier method, some key points are:

Stoichiometric methods: These methods are based on the stoichiometry of the chemical reactions and the law of mass action. They use equilibrium constant expressions and solve systems of algebraic equations to determine the equilibrium concentrations or pressures of the species involved.

Conservation of mass: Stoichiometric methods explicitly consider the conservation of mass and the stoichiometric relationships between reactants and products. They are useful for determining the equilibrium composition in terms of species concentrations or pressures.

Simplicity: Stoichiometric methods are relatively straightforward and do not involve complex mathematical techniques like optimization or nonlinear programming used in non-stoichiometric methods.

On the other hand, non-stoichiometric methods like the Lagrange Multiplier method or minimization of Gibbs free energy can handle more complex equilibrium problems involving non-ideal behavior, multiple constraints, and phase equilibrium.

Overall, stoichiometric methods based on the law of mass action and reactions stoichiometry are simpler and effective for many chemical equilibrium problems, but non-stoichiometric methods are more versatile and can handle more complex scenarios.

To more about equilibrium, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/517289

#SPJ11

The maximum flexural stress of the rectangular beam can be determined by analyzing the shear and moment diagram and finding the maximum shear and moment values.

Analyze the Shear and Moment Diagram

To find the maximum shear and moment values, we need to analyze the shear and moment diagram for the rectangular beam. The shear diagram represents the variation of shear forces along the length of the beam, while the moment diagram represents the variation of bending moments. By examining these diagrams, we can identify the maximum values.

Identify Maximum Shear and Moment Values

In the shear diagram, the maximum shear value occurs at the point where the shear force is highest. Similarly, in the moment diagram, the maximum moment value occurs at the point where the bending moment is highest. By locating these points on the diagrams, we can determine the maximum shear and moment values.

Calculate Maximum Flexural Stress

Once we have obtained the maximum shear and moment values, we can calculate the maximum flexural stress using the formula:

Flexural Stress = (Maximum Moment) * (Distance from Neutral Axis) / (Moment of Inertia)

The distance from the neutral axis can be determined based on the dimensions of the rectangular beam (width and depth). The moment of inertia depends on the cross-sectional shape of the beam and can be calculated using standard formulas.

By substituting the values into the formula, we can find the maximum flexural stress of the beam.

Learn more about moment values

brainly.com/question/32354951

#SPJ11

The solution to the given initial value problem (y'' + 5y' = 0), with (y(0) = 3) and (y'(0) = -25), is: (y(t) = -2 + 5e^{-5t}).

An initial value problem (IVP) is a type of mathematical problem that involves finding a solution to a differential equation or a difference equation along with an initial condition.

To solve the given initial value problem (y'' + 5y' = 0), with the initial conditions (y(0) = 3) and (y'(0) = -25), we can use the method of solving linear second-order homogeneous differential equations.

Step 1: Find the characteristic equation by assuming (y(t) = e^{rt}), where (r) is a constant.

The characteristic equation is (r^2 + 5r = 0).

Step 2: Solve the characteristic equation to find the values of (r).

Factoring out (r), we get (r(r + 5) = 0).

So, the values of (r) are (r = 0) and (r = -5).

Step 3: Write down the general solution.

Since we have two distinct real roots, the general solution is given by:

[y(t) = c_1e^{0t} + c_2e^{-5t}], where (c_1) and (c_2) are arbitrary constants.

Simplifying this expression, we get:

[y(t) = c_1 + c_2e^{-5t}].

Step 4: Use the initial conditions to find the values of the constants (c_1) and (c_2).

Given (y(0) = 3), we substitute (t = 0) into the general solution:

[3 = c_1 + c_2e^{0} = c_1 + c_2].

Given (y'(0) = -25), we take the derivative of the general solution and substitute (t = 0):

[y'(t) = -5c_2e^{-5t}].

[-25 = -5c_2e^{0} = -5c_2].

Simplifying these equations, we find (c_1 = 3 - c_2) and (c_2 = 5).

Step 5: Substitute the values of (c_1) and (c_2) into the general solution.

Using (c_1 = 3 - c_2 = 3 - 5 = -2), we have:

[y(t) = -2 + 5e^{-5t}].

Therefore, the solution to the given initial value problem (y'' + 5y' = 0), with (y(0) = 3) and (y'(0) = -25), is: (y(t) = -2 + 5e^{-5t}).

Learn more about initial value problem:

https://brainly.com/question/31041139

#SPJ11

In a replication of Milgram's famous study on obedience with 100 individuals, it is likely that the majority would administer 450 volts as instructed.

Milgram's study on obedience involved participants administering electric shocks to a learner in a simulated learning task. The study found that a significant majority of participants obeyed the experimenter's instructions and administered the maximum 450 volts, despite the potential harm to the learner. This suggests that under certain circumstances, individuals are willing to obey authority figures, even if it goes against their own moral beliefs.

The study demonstrated the power of situational factors in influencing human behavior and highlighted the importance of ethical considerations in research. While not all individuals may necessarily obey in a replication of the study, it is likely that a majority would still comply with the instructions given.

Know more about moral beliefs here:

https://brainly.com/question/33776125

#SPJ11

The inlet pressure into the reducing bend is 1.8 x [tex]10^6[/tex] Pa, the total force in the X and Y directions are 2.638 x [tex]10^5[/tex] N and 294.3 N, respectively, the pressure force in the X and Y directions are 4243.4 N and 9.81 N, respectively, and the anchoring force needed to hold the elbow in place is 4249.5 N.

First, let's determine the velocity of the water at the inlet and exit of the elbow

At the inlet:

Q = Av, where Q is the volumetric flow rate, A is the cross-sectional area, and v is the velocity of the water.

150 cm² = 0.015 m²

Q = 30 kg/s

30 kg/s = 0.015 m² x v

v = 2000 m/s

At the exit:

25 cm² = 0.0025 m²

Q = 30 kg/s

30 kg/s = 0.0025 m² x v

v = 12000 m/s

inlet pressure can be determined using Bernoulli's equation

[tex]P_1 + (1/2) \rho v_1^2 + \rho gh_1 = P_2 + (1/2) \rho v_2^2 + \rho gh_2[/tex]

where P is the pressure, ρ is the density of water, v is the velocity, and h is the elevation difference.

Assuming that the pressure at the exit is atmospheric pressure (101325 Pa)

[tex]P_1 + (1/2)\rho v_1^2 + \rho gh_1 = 101325 Pa + (1/2)\rho v_2^2 + \rho gh_2[/tex]

Substitute the values

[tex]P_1 + (1/2)(1000 kg/m^3)(2000 m/s)^2 + (1000 kg/m^3)(9.81 m/s^2)(0.4 m) = 101325 Pa + (1/2)(1000 kg/m^3)(12000 m/s)^2 + (1000 kg/m^3)(9.81 m/s^2)(0 m)[/tex]

Solving for P₁, we get:

P₁ = 1.8 x [tex]10^6[/tex] Pa

To determine the total force in the X and Y directions

The total force in the X direction is equal to the change in momentum of the water as it flows through the elbow:

F_x = ρQv₂ cos(45°) - ρQv₁

Substitute the values

F_x = (1000 kg/m³)(30 kg/s)(12000 m/s)(1/√2) - (1000 kg/m³)(30 kg/s)(2000 m/s)

F_x = 2.638 x [tex]10^5[/tex] N

The total force in the Y direction is equal to the weight of the water

F_y = mg

F_y = (30 kg/s)(9.81 m/s²)

F_y = 294.3 N

To determine the pressure force in the X and Y directions:

The pressure force in the X direction is equal to the difference in pressure at the inlet and outlet of the elbow multiplied by the area of the elbow

F_px = (P₁ - P₂)A₂

F_px = (1.8 x [tex]10^6[/tex] Pa - 101325 Pa)(0.0025 m²)

F_px = 4243.4 N

The pressure force in the Y direction is equal to the weight of the water in the elbow:

F_py = ρVg

V = Ah

V = (0.0025 m²)(0.4 m)

V = 0.001 m³

F_py = (1000 kg/m³)(0.001 m³)(9.81 m/s²)

F_py = 9.81 N

To determine the anchoring force needed to hold the elbow in place

The anchoring force is equal to the vector sum of the pressure force and the weight of the elbow:

F_anchor = √(F_p[tex]x^2[/tex] + (F_y - F_py[tex])^2)[/tex]

F_anchor = √((4243.4 N[tex])^2[/tex] + (294.3 N - 9.81 [tex]N)^2)[/tex]

F_anchor = 4249.5 N

Therefore, the inlet pressure into the reducing bend is 1.8 x [tex]10^6[/tex] Pa, the total force in the X and Y directions are 2.638 x [tex]10^5[/tex] N and 294.3 N, respectively, the pressure force in the X and Y directions are 4243.4 N and 9.81 N, respectively, and the anchoring force needed to hold the elbow in place is 4249.5 N.

Learn more on pressure on https://brainly.com/question/24719118

#SPJ4

We cannot definitively conclude the spontaneity of the reaction. The correct answer is E: It is impossible to determine the reaction spontaneity without additional information.

The spontaneity of a reaction can be determined by considering the sign of the change in enthalpy (ΔHrxn) and the change in entropy (ΔSrxn). In this case, the given reaction has a negative ΔHrxn (-1267 kJ), indicating that it is exothermic and releases energy.
To determine the spontaneity, we need to consider the relationship between ΔHrxn and ΔSrxn using the Gibbs free energy equation: ΔGrxn = ΔHrxn - TΔSrxn

where ΔGrxn is the change in Gibbs free energy, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and ΔSrxn is the change in entropy.

Since the question does not provide any information about the change in entropy, we cannot directly calculate ΔGrxn. However, we can use the sign of ΔHrxn to make an inference.
If a reaction has a negative ΔHrxn and ΔSrxn is positive, the reaction will be spontaneous at all temperatures because the negative term (-TΔSrxn) will eventually overcome the negative ΔHrxn term, resulting in a negative ΔGrxn. This means that the reaction is thermodynamically favorable.
On the other hand, if ΔHrxn is negative and ΔSrxn is negative, the reaction will only be spontaneous at low temperatures, as the negative term (-TΔSrxn) will become more dominant at higher temperatures, making the reaction non-spontaneous.

Since we do not have information about ΔSrxn, we cannot determine its sign. Therefore, we cannot definitively conclude the spontaneity of the reaction. The correct answer is E: It is impossible to determine the reaction spontaneity without additional information.

Learn more about spontaneity:

https://brainly.com/question/30127476

#SPJ11

Answer:

6 < x < 26

Step-by-step explanation:

given 2 sides of a triangle then the third side x is in the range

difference of 2 sides < x < sum of 2 sides , then

16 - 10 < x < 16 + 10 , that is

6 < x < 26

2.1 Determination of effective stress at a depth of 6.0m below the ground surface Effective stress can be calculated as follows:Effective stress = (Total stress – Pore pressure)Where,Pore pressure = ϒw * Depth of the water table

Therefore, the effective stress at the same depth as in 2.1 when water table is lowered by 300mm (0.3m) is 144.3441 kN/m².

Total stress = (ϒsand * Depth of the dry sand) + (ϒclay * Depth of the clay)

ϒw = unit weight of water

ϒsand = unit weight of sand

ϒclay = unit weight of clay Given, Depth of the dry sand (zs) = 3.0m

Water table depth (zw) = 2.0m

Depth of interest (z) = 6.0m

Unit weight of water (ϒw) = 9.81 kN/m³ (given)

Unit weight of sand (ϒsand) = 2.65 * 9.81 = 25.9815 kN/m³ (given)

Unit weight of clay (ϒclay) = 2.82 * 9.81 = 27.6922 kN/m³ (given)

Effective stress = (Total stress – Pore pressure)

Pore pressure = ϒw *

Depth of the water table = 9.81 * 2.0 = 19.62 kN/m²

Total stress = (ϒsand * Depth of the dry sand) + (ϒclay * Depth of the clay)

= (25.9815 * 3.0) + (27.6922 * (6.0 - 3.0))

= 77.9445 + 83.0766 = 161.0211 kN/m²

Effective stress at a depth of 6.0m = (161.0211 – 19.62) = 141.4011 kN/m²

Therefore, the effective stress at a depth of 6.0m below the ground surface is 141.4011 kN/m².2.2 Determination of effective stress at the same depth as in 2.1 when water table is lowered by 300 mm (0.3 m)When the water table is lowered by 300mm (0.3m), the new depth of the water table becomes (2.0 – 0.3) = 1.7m.New pore pressure = ϒw * Depth of the new water table = 9.81 * 1.7 = 16.677 kN/m²New effective stress = (Total stress – New pore pressure)Total stress = (ϒsand * Depth of the dry sand) + (ϒclay * Depth of the clay)= (25.9815 * 3.0) + (27.6922 * (6.0 - 3.0))= 77.9445 + 83.0766= 161.0211 kN/m²New effective stress = (161.0211 – 16.677) = 144.3441 kN/m²

To know more about stress visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31366817

#SPJ11

The effective stress at a depth of 6.0m below the ground surface can be calculated using the formula:

Effective stress = (total stress - pore water pressure)

First, we need to determine the total stress at this depth. The total stress is the weight of the soil above the point of interest.

For the dry sand layer:
Total stress = unit weight of dry sand × thickness of sand
Total stress = (2.65 × 9.81) × 3.0
Total stress = 78.2275 kPa

For the saturated clay layer:
Total stress = unit weight of saturated clay × thickness of clay
Total stress = (2.82 × 9.81) × (6.0 - 2.0)
Total stress = 108.7044 kPa

Next, we need to determine the pore water pressure at this depth. The pore water pressure is the pressure exerted by the water in the soil.

Pore water pressure = unit weight of water × drawdown
Pore water pressure = (9.81 × 0.3)
Pore water pressure = 2.943 kPa

Now, we can calculate the effective stress:

Effective stress = total stress - pore water pressure
Effective stress = (78.2275 + 108.7044) - 2.943
Effective stress = 183.9889 - 2.943
Effective stress = 181.0459 kPa

For the second part of the question, if the water table is lowered by 300mm, the new pore water pressure would be:

Pore water pressure = (9.81 × 0.0)
Pore water pressure = 0.0 kPa

Therefore, the effective stress at the same depth (6.0m) with a 300mm drawdown would be equal to the total stress:

Effective stress = total stress
Effective stress = (78.2275 + 108.7044)
Effective stress = 186.9319 kPa

I hope this explanation helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.

To know more about EFFECTIVE STRESS click here-https://brainly.com/app/ask?q=effective+stress

#SPJ11

To calculate the density of the rectangular blocks, we would need the mass of each block in addition to the dimensions provided in the table view.

The given table provides the dimensions (width, length, and height) of three rectangular blocks, but it does not include the mass of each block. To calculate the density of a rectangular block, we need to know its mass and volume. The formula for density is:

Density = Mass / Volume

Without the mass values, it is not possible to calculate the density for each block. The mass of each block needs to be provided in order to perform the calculations.

The given information in the table view does not include the mass of the rectangular blocks. Therefore, we cannot calculate the density of the blocks based on the provided data. To determine the density, the mass of each block needs to be known.

To know more about density visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ11

The optimal objective values obtained by solving the original LO problem and its dual using the simplex method are the same, providing confirmation of the duality theorem.

To solve the given Linear Optimization (LO) problem using the simplex method, we'll follow these steps:

Step 1: Formulate the problem
The given LO problem is:
Minimize: 2x1 + 3x2 + 3x3
Subject to:
x1 + 2x2 - 8 ≤ 0
2x2 + x3 ≥ 15
2x1x2 + x3 ≤ 25
T1, T2, T3 ≥ 0

Step 2: Convert inequalities to equations
To convert the inequalities to equations, we introduce slack variables:
x1 + 2x2 - 8 + T1 = 0
2x2 + x3 - T2 = 15
2x1x2 + x3 + T3 = 25

Step 3: Write the initial tableau
The initial tableau is formed by writing the coefficients of the decision variables, slack variables, and constants in matrix form.

[ C | x1 | x2 | x3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | RHS ]
------------------------------------------------
   Z | 1 | -2 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0
------------------------------------------------
  T1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8
------------------------------------------------
 T2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0 | -15
------------------------------------------------
 T3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25

Step 4: Perform the simplex method
To perform the simplex method, we'll choose the most negative coefficient in the Z-row as the pivot column. In this case, the most negative coefficient is -3, corresponding to x3.

Next, we'll choose the pivot row by calculating the ratios of the RHS to the positive values in the pivot column. The smallest positive ratio corresponds to T2, which will be the pivot row.

The pivot element is the value in the intersection of the pivot row and pivot column. In this case, the pivot element is 2.

To update the tableau, we'll perform row operations to make the pivot element 1 and other elements in the pivot column 0.

After performing the row operations, the updated tableau is:

[ C | x1 | x2 | x3 | T1 | T2 | T3 | RHS ]
------------------------------------------------
  Z | 1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 22.5
------------------------------------------------
T1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | -1 | 0 | 9
------------------------------------------------
x3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | -0.5 | 0 | 0 | 7.5
------------------------------------------------
T3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25

Since all the coefficients in the Z-row are non-negative, we have reached the optimal solution. The optimal objective value is 22.5, which corresponds to the minimum value of the objective function.

Step 5: Write down the dual problem
To write down the dual problem, we'll transpose the original tableau and use the transposed coefficients as the coefficients in the dual problem.

The dual problem is:
Maximize: 22.5y1 + 9y2 + 7.5y3
Subject to:
y1 + y2 + 2y3 ≤ -2
0.5y1 - 0.5y2 ≥ -2
1.5y1 - y2 ≤ -3
y1, y2, y3 ≥ 0

Step 6: Solve the dual problem using the simplex method
By following similar steps as in the original problem, we can solve the dual problem using the simplex method. After performing the necessary row operations, we obtain the optimal objective value of -22.5.

Step 7: Verify the optimal objective values are the same
By comparing the optimal objective values of the original problem (-22.5) and the dual problem (-22.5), we can see that they are the same. This verifies that the optimal objective values are indeed the same.

In conclusion, the optimal objective values obtained by solving the original LO problem and its dual using the simplex method are the same, providing confirmation of the duality theorem.

Learn more about duality theorem from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/32275931

#SPJ11

The measure of the larger congruent angles in the rhombus is approximately 134.3 degrees.

In a rhombus, all four sides are equal in length, and the diagonals bisect each other at right angles. To determine the measure of the larger congruent angles, we can use the properties of a rhombus and apply the trigonometric concept of the Law of Cosines.

Let's denote the measure of the larger congruent angle as θ. In a rhombus, the diagonals are perpendicular bisectors of each other, forming four congruent right triangles. The sides of each right triangle are half the length of the diagonals.

Using the Law of Cosines, we can relate the side lengths and diagonal lengths:

[tex]c^{2} = a^{2} + b^{2} - 2ab * cos(θ)[/tex]

Given that the side length (a) is 30 inches and the longest diagonal (c) is 45 inches, we can substitute these values into the equation:

[tex]45^{2} = 30^{2} + 30^{2} - 2(30)(30) * cos(θ)[/tex]

2025 = 900 + 900 - 1800 * cos(θ)

225 = -1800 * cos(θ)

cos(θ) = -225/1800

θ = [tex]cos^{(-1)(-225/1800)}[/tex]

Using a calculator, we find θ ≈ 134.3 degrees (rounded to the nearest tenth of a degree).

Know more about Law of cosines here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766161

#SPJ8

The number of moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C is 1.751 mol. The % yield of the reaction is 86.60%. The final mass of D formed by reacting 72 g of reactant A is 33.0 g.

For the given chemical reaction 3A ⟶ B + 2C, 72.2% yield is given.

We need to find out the number of moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C.

Yield = 72.2% = 0.722

Moles of C formed = 1.167 mol

The balanced chemical reaction is,3A ⟶ B + 2C

Total moles of product formed = moles of B + moles of C

= (1/1)mol + (2/1) mol

= 3 mol

Moles of A required to form 1 mol of C = 3/2 mol

Moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C = (3/2) × 1.167 mol

= 1.7505 mol

≈ 1.751 mol

Therefore, the number of moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C is 1.751 mol.

Reported answer = 1.751 (to three decimal places).

For the given reaction X(s) ⟶ Y(g) + Z(s), theoretical yield of Z = 47.3 g

Molar mass of Z = 82 g/mol

Moles of Z present after the reaction is complete = 0.5 mol

Let the actual yield be y.

The balanced chemical reaction is,X(s) ⟶ Y(g) + Z(s)

The number of moles of Z produced per mole of X reacted  = 1

Therefore, moles of Z produced when moles of X reacted = 0.5 mol

Molar mass of Z = 82 g/mol

Mass of Z produced when moles of X reacted = 0.5 × 82 g

= 41 g

% Yield = (Actual yield ÷ Theoretical yield) × 100

%Actual yield, y = 41 g

% Yield = (41 ÷ 47.3) × 100%

= 86.59%

≈ 86.60%

Therefore, the % yield of the reaction is 86.60%.

Given the reaction:2A ⟶5B

(Step 1)B ⟶2C

(Step 2)3C ⟶D

(Step 3)Molar mass of A = 147.1 g/mol

Molar mass of D = 135 g/mol

Mass of A = 72 g

Number of moles of A = (72 g) ÷ (147.1 g/mol)

= 0.489 mol

According to the chemical reaction,2 mol of A produces 1 mol of D

∴ 1 mol of A produces 1/2 mol of D

Therefore, 0.489 mol of A produces = (1/2) × 0.489 mol of D

= 0.2445 mol of D

Molar mass of D = 135 g/mol

Mass of D produced = 0.2445 mol × 135 g/mol

= 33.023 g

≈ 33.0 g

Therefore, the final mass of D that is created when 72 g of reactant A is reacted is 33.0 g (reported with one decimal place).

In the first part, we have to determine the number of moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C. This can be calculated by determining the number of moles of B and C formed and then using the stoichiometry of the reaction to determine the number of moles of A used. In the second part, we have to determine the % yield of the reaction using the actual and theoretical yield of the reaction. In the third part, we have to determine the final mass of D formed by reacting 72 g of reactant A using the stoichiometry of the reaction. The three given problems are solved with the help of balanced chemical reactions, stoichiometry, and percentage yield of the reaction.

The number of moles of A required to form 1.167 mol of C is 1.751 mol. The % yield of the reaction is 86.60%. The final mass of D formed by reacting 72 g of reactant A is 33.0 g.

To know more about number visit:

brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

The two steel I beams in the construction site have different characteristics.

Beam A has a 3" long stringer in the middle of the beam, specifically in the center of the shear web.

On the other hand, beam B has multiple edge cracking measuring 0.1".

The stringer in beam A provides additional support and stiffness to the beam. It helps distribute the load evenly across the beam, preventing it from sagging or bending excessively.

The stringer is placed in the center of the shear web, which is responsible for transferring the shear forces in the beam. By reinforcing the shear web with a stringer, beam A becomes stronger and more resistant to deformation under shear loads.

On the other hand, beam B with multiple edge cracking is experiencing a structural issue.

Cracks on the edges can weaken the beam and compromise its integrity. These cracks can propagate and lead to further damage if not addressed.

It is important to assess the extent and severity of the cracking and take appropriate measures to repair or replace the beam if necessary.

Know more about stringer

https://brainly.com/question/33568794

#SPJ11

The Option B) ln γ₁ = -1 + 2x₁ - x₁² ; ln γ₂ = x₁² obeys the Gibbs-Duhem equation for a thermodynamically consistent system.

To determine which relation between activity coefficient (γi) and mole fraction (xi) obeys the Gibbs-Duhem equation for a thermodynamically consistent system, we need to consider the Gibbs-Duhem equation itself.

The Gibbs-Duhem equation is given by:

∑(xi d(ln γi)) = 0

This equation states that the sum of the products of mole fraction (xi) and the differential of the natural logarithm of the activity coefficient (d(ln γi)) for all components in a system must be equal to zero for a thermodynamically consistent system.

Let's analyze the given options:

Option A) ln γ₁ = -1 + 2x₁ - x₁² ; ln γ₂ = -x₁²

Taking the differential of ln γ₁ with respect to x₁:

d(ln γ₁) = (dγ₁/γ₁) - (2x₁ - x₁²)dx₁

Taking the differential of ln γ₂ with respect to x₁:

d(ln γ₂) = (dγ₂/γ₂) - 2x₁dx₁

Now let's substitute these expressions into the Gibbs-Duhem equation and simplify:

∑(xi d(ln γi)) = x₁(dγ₁/γ₁) - x₁²(dx₁) + x₂(dγ₂/γ₂) - x₁(dx₁) - x₂(dx₁)

= (dγ₁/γ₁) - 2x₁(dx₁) + (dγ₂/γ₂) - (x₁ + x₂)(dx₁)

= (dγ₁/γ₁) + (dγ₂/γ₂) - (3x₁ + x₂)(dx₁)

We can see that the term on the right side of the equation, (3x₁ + x₂)(dx₁), does not cancel out, indicating that the Gibbs-Duhem equation is not satisfied. Therefore, Option A does not obey the Gibbs-Duhem equation.

Option B) ln γ₁ = -1 + 2x₁ - x₁²; ln γ₂ = x₁²

Following the same steps as before, we substitute the expressions into the Gibbs-Duhem equation:

∑(xi d(ln γi)) = (dγ₁/γ₁) - 2x₁(dx₁) + (dγ₂/γ₂) - (x₁ + x₂)(dx₁)

= (dγ₁/γ₁) - 2x₁(dx₁) + (dγ₂/γ₂) - (x₁ + x₂)(dx₁)

= (dγ₁/γ₁) + (dγ₂/γ₂) - (3x₁ + x₂)(dx₁)

Here, we can see that the term on the right side of the equation, (3x₁ + x₂)(dx₁), cancels out, indicating that the Gibbs-Duhem equation is satisfied. Therefore, Option B obeys the Gibbs-Duhem equation for a thermodynamically consistent system.

To learn more about mole fraction here

brainly.com/question/28165730

#SPJ4

The question is:

For a binary mixture at constant temperature and pressure, which of the

following relation between activity coefficient (γi) and mole fraction (xi)

obeys the Gibbs - Duhem equation for a thermodynamically consistent

system? Justify your answer

A) ln γ1 = -1+2x1-x1

2

; ln γ2 = - x1

2

B) ln γ1 = -1+2x1-x1

2

; ln γ2 = x1

2

The inverse of the matrix A

To verify if the matrix A is invertible, we need to check if its determinant is nonzero.

The determinant of a 3x3 matrix can be calculated using the following formula:

det(A) = a(ei - fh) - b(di - fg) + c(dh - eg)

Given the matrix A:

A = [[1, 2, 3], [0, 1, -1], [2, 2, 2]]

We can calculate the determinant using the formula:

det(A) = 1((12) - (2(-1))) - 2((02) - (2(-1))) + 3((02) - (12))

det(A) = 1(2 + 2) - 2(0 + 2) + 3(0 - 2)

det(A) = 1(4) - 2(2) + 3(-2)

det(A) = 4 - 4 - 6

det(A) = -6

Since the determinant of A is -6, which is nonzero, we can conclude that the matrix A is invertible.

To find the inverse of matrix A using Gaussian elimination, we can augment the matrix A with the identity matrix of the same size (3x3) and perform row operations until the left side becomes the identity matrix. The right side of the augmented matrix will then be the inverse of A.

Let's set up the augmented matrix:

[1 2 3 | 1 0 0]

[0 1 -1 | 0 1 0]

[2 2 2 | 0 0 1]

Performing row operations to obtain the identity matrix on the left side:

R2 = R2 - 2R1

R3 = R3 - 2R1

[1 2 3 | 1 0 0]

[0 -3 -7 |-2 1 0]

[0 -2 -4 |-2 0 1]

R3 = R3 - (2/3)*R2

[1 2 3 | 1 0 0]

[0 -3 -7 |-2 1 0]

[0 0 0 |-2 2 1]

R2 = R2 - (7/3)*R3

[1 2 3 | 1 0 0]

[0 -3 0 |12 -3 -7]

[0 0 0 |-2 2 1]

R1 = R1 - (3/2)*R2

[1 0 3 | -5 3 10]

[0 -3 0 |12 -3 -7]

[0 0 0 |-2 2 1]

R2 = -R2/3

[1 0 3 | -5 3 10]

[0 1 0 |-4 1 7]

[0 0 0 |-2 2 1]

R1 = R1 - 3*R2

[1 0 0 | 7 0 -11]

[0 1 0 |-4 1 7]

[0 0 0 |-2 2 1]

Therefore, the inverse of the matrix A

Learn more about  matrix  from

https://brainly.com/question/27929071

#SPJ11

Therefore, the pH and concentrations of all species present in 0.11 M H2SO3 are:

pH = 1.22

[H2SO3] = 0.050 M

[HSO3-] = 0.060 M

[SO3^2-] = 0.060 M

To calculate the pH and the concentrations of all species present in 0.11 M H2SO3, we can set up the following equations:

H2SO3 <=> H+ + HSO3-

HSO3- <=> H+ + SO3^2-

The ionization constants (Ka values) for these equations are given as:

Ka1 = 1.5 x 10^-2

Ka2 = 6.3 x 10^-8

Given: Concentration of H2SO3 = 0.11 M

First ionization equation:

Ka1 = [H+][HSO3-] / [H2SO3]

Let the concentration of [H+] be 'x'. Therefore, the concentration of [HSO3-] is equal to (0.11 - x).

Using the above equation and Ka1 value, we get:

1.5 x 10^-2 = (x * (0.11 - x)) / 0.11

Solving the quadratic equation, we find x = 0.060 M.

Hence, the pH of H2SO3 is:

pH = -log[H+]

  = -log(0.060)

  = 1.22

Now, to find the concentrations of all species, we use an equilibrium table:

Equilibrium Table:

Species         H2SO3       HSO3-       SO3^2-

Initial Conc.   0.11 M       0 M          0 M

Change          (-x)        (+x)        (+x)

Equilibrium Conc.0.11-x       x           x

We have found the value of x to be 0.060 M.

So, the equilibrium concentration of HSO3- and SO3^2- will be 0.060 M and 0.060 M, respectively.

The equilibrium concentration of H2SO3 will be (0.11 - x), which is 0.11 - 0.060 = 0.050 M.

Learn more about pH from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/12609985

#SPJ11

The volume of the mixture in the tank will increase at a rate of 2 L/min because the inflow rate is 5 L/min and the outflow rate is 3 L/min. The tank's capacity is 150 L, and it currently contains 100 L of water.

When the tank is completely filled, the amount of salt in the tank can be calculated. Since 0.1 kg of salt is present in 1 L of the solution,

0.1 kg/L × 5 L/min × 60 min/hour = 30 kg/hour of salt is added to the tank.

When 3 L/min of the mixture is drained, the concentration of salt decreases.

30 kg/hour ÷ (5 L/min - 3 L/min)

= 15 kg/L

When the tank is completely filled, the amount of salt in the mixture is 15 kg/L.

Answer:

Concentration of mixture when the tank fills to maximum capacity is 15 kg/L.

To know more about increase visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33491846

#SPJ11

The hydraulic conductivity of the given fine sand sample is 0.514 cm^3/min .

The hydraulic conductivity is an essential parameter in hydrogeology that quantifies the ability of water to flow through a porous medium under the influence of a hydraulic gradient.

It is the ratio of the discharge of water through the porous medium to the cross-sectional area and hydraulic gradient that generates the discharge. The hydraulic conductivity is expressed in units of cm^3/min.  

To find the hydraulic conductivity, the equation is given as:

Hydraulic conductivity = (Weight of water collected × L)/(t × A × h)

Where:L = Length of the sample = 60 mm = 6 cm.

A = Cross-sectional area of the sample = (π × d^2) / 4 = (π × 80^2) / 4 = 5026.55 mm^2.

t = Time of collection of water = 10 mins.

h = Constant head difference = 40 cm.

Weight of water collected = 430 kg = 430 × 10^3 g.

The given values are substituted in the above equation,

Hydraulic conductivity = (Weight of water collected × L)/(t × A × h)

Hydraulic conductivity = (430 × 10^3 g × 6 cm)/(10 mins × 5026.55 mm^2 × 40 cm)

Hydraulic conductivity = 0.514 cm^3/min

Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity of the given fine sand sample is 0.514 cm^3/min.

Learn more about hydraulic conductivity

https://brainly.com/question/31920573

#SPJ11

The hydraulic conductivity of the fine sand sample is approximately 0.085 cm^3/min.

To calculate the hydraulic conductivity of the fine sand sample, we can use the formula:

K = (Q * L) / (A * H * t)

where:
K is the hydraulic conductivity,
Q is the weight of water collected (430 kg),
L is the length of the sample (60 mm or 6 cm),
A is the cross-sectional area of the sample (π * (d/2)^2, where d is the diameter of the sample),
H is the constant head difference (40 cm),
and t is the time of collection of water (10 mins or 10/60 hours).

First, let's calculate the cross-sectional area:
A = π * (80/2)^2 = π * 40^2 = 1600π cm^2.

Next, let's convert the time to hours:
t = 10/60 = 1/6 hour.

Now, we can substitute the values into the formula and calculate the hydraulic conductivity:
K = (430 * 6) / (1600π * 40 * (1/6))
 = (2580) / (9600π)
 ≈ 0.085 cm^3/min (rounded to 3 decimal places).

Therefore, the hydraulic conductivity of the fine sand sample is approximately 0.085 cm^3/min.

Learn more about hydraulic conductivity

https://brainly.com/question/31920573

#SPJ11

The power output of the cylinder is given by the expression:  Power = (mep × A × L) × N

The power output of a cylinder can be calculated using the formula:

Power = (Force × Distance) ÷ Time

In this case, the force exerted by the cylinder is the mean effective pressure (mep) multiplied by the cross-sectional area of the cylinder. The distance is the length of stroke, and the time is the time taken for N power strokes per minute.

Given:

Cross-sectional area of the cylinder (A) = A square inches

Length of stroke (L) = L inches

Mean effective pressure (mep) = p_m psi

Number of power strokes per minute (N) = N

The force exerted by the cylinder is:

Force = mep × A

The distance covered by the piston in one stroke is L inches.

The time taken for N power strokes per minute is:

Time = 1 minute / N

Substituting these values into the power formula, we get:

Power = (mep × A × L) ÷ (1 minute / N)

Simplifying further, we have:

Power = (mep × A × L) × N

Therefore, the power output of the cylinder is given by the expression:

Power = (mep × A × L) × N

To know more about power output visit :

https://brainly.com/question/21208683

#SPJ11

While increasing the mix water content can improve the consistency of concrete, excessive water can lead to problems such as segregation and bleeding, which can weaken the concrete's structure.

When the mix water content of concrete increases, it leads to a higher consistency. However, excessive amounts of water can cause problems in fresh concrete. Two common problems caused by excessive water content are segregation and bleeding.

1. Segregation: Excessive water causes the solid particles in the concrete mix to settle, resulting in the separation of the mix components. This can lead to non-uniform distribution of aggregates and cement paste, affecting the strength and durability of the concrete.

2. Bleeding: Excess water in the concrete mix tends to rise to the surface, pushing air bubbles and excess water out. This process is called bleeding. It forms a layer of water on the concrete surface, which can weaken the top layer and reduce the concrete's strength.

Both segregation and bleeding can compromise the structural integrity and overall quality of the concrete. It's important to maintain the appropriate water-to-cement ratio to achieve the desired consistency without compromising the performance of the concrete.

In summary, While adding more water to the mix might make concrete more consistent, too much water can cause issues like segregation and bleeding that can impair the concrete's structure.

learn more about consistency from given link

https://brainly.com/question/19129356

#SPJ11

Form the tangent If m = 80° and m = 30°, then the  value of m3 is -2.14.

To find the value of m3, we need to use the following formula:(tangent of A + tangent of B) / (1 - tangent of A × tangent of B) = tangent of (A + B)

By substituting the given values, we get:(tangent of 80° + tangent of 30°) / (1 - tangent of 80° × tangent of 30°) = tangent of (80° + 30°)

Now, we know that the value of tangent of 80° and tangent of 30° can be obtained from the tangent table.

The value of tangent of 80° is 5.67 (approx).

The value of tangent of 30° is 0.58 (approx).

Substituting the values, we get:(5.67 + 0.58) / (1 - 5.67 × 0.58) = tangent of 110°

Now, we know that the value of tangent of 110° can also be obtained from the tangent table.

The value of tangent of 110° is -2.14 (approx).

Therefore, m3 = -2.14

Hence, the value of m3 is -2.14.

For more questions on tangent

https://brainly.com/question/4470346

#SPJ8