Which type of election requires the United States to choose a presiden

Gloria Steinem was a key advocate of feminist policies in the 1970s.

She was a feminist activist and journalist who co-founded Ms. Magazine in 1972. She was one of the most visible faces of the women's liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s.

Steinam was a prominent feminist leader who founded the National Women's Political Caucus, served as president of the feminist organization Voters for Choice, and established the Ms. Foundation for Women, which provides grants to women's groups throughout the country.

Therefore the key advocate of feminist policies is "gloria steinem."

To know more about Gloria Steinem click here:

https://brainly.com/question/16578908

#SPJ11

Between 1800 and 1850, America underwent change as the industrial economies of the North and South became reliant on Southern cotton.

The 31st state, California, joins the Union (see History of California and An Act for the Admission of the State of California). Territory of Utah is created. The U.S. Congress passed a resolution creating New Mexico Territory.

When more white males gained the right to vote and political parties became more organized between the 1820s and 1850, the nature of American democracy changed. It changed, turning more political and loud, which encouraged ambivalence and even dissatisfaction with politics and the major parties.

To know more about America  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/17745650

#SPJ1

Answer:

Your answer would be : William Lloyd Garrison

Explanation:

A man of moral authority, Douglass developed into a charismatic public speaker. Prominent abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison recognized his oratory skill and hired him as a speaker for the Massachusetts Anti-Slavery Society.

Source From : www.nps.gov!

I have also done this quiz and found that it was correct! Wishing you the best of luck!

Answer:

Latin

Explanation:

Latin was one of the most important gifts from Rome.

The Roman Empire spread its influence throughout much of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, and as a result, Latin became a dominant language across much of the known world. Latin was the language of the Roman government, military, and legal system, and it was widely used in trade and commerce.

Latin was an important gift from Rome because it provided a common language for people across different regions and cultures to communicate with one another. Latin allowed for the spread of ideas and knowledge across the Roman Empire and beyond, and it helped to shape the course of Western civilization.

Oswaldo Escobar Velado was a renowned Guatemalan writer, journalist, and teacher who made significant contributions to Central American literature. In his works, Velado depicts the complexities of Guatemalan society.

Its political issues, and the struggles of its people, often with a critical and sometimes satirical tone. His literature is characterized by a focus on social and political issues, a deep concern for human rights, and an unwavering commitment to advocating for justice.

Velado was part of the Generation of '44, a group of writers who emerged in Guatemala in the 1940s and made significant contributions to Central American literature. Other notable representatives of this generation include Miguel Angel Asturias, who won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1967 for his works such as "El Señor Presidente" and "Men of Maize," and Luis Cardoza y Aragón, a poet and diplomat who wrote "Cuentos de Guatemaltecos" and "Génesis del Presagio." These writers, along with Velado, shared a commitment to social justice and used their literature to expose the injustices and inequalities present in Guatemalan society.

Learn more about Oswaldo

https://brainly.com/question/18354269

#SPJ4

Translated Question;

Activity 6Write a commentary on Oswaldo Escobar Velado's text, commenting on the characteristics of his literature and giving textual examples. Name different representatives of the generation of '44 and their respective works

The Philippines has asserted its maritime rights over the West Philippine Sea based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and has recently filed several diplomatic protests against Chinese activities in the area.

The Philippines has a valid legal claim to the maritime areas within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and to certain maritime entitlements beyond that, such as a continental shelf. The Philippines has also taken a number of initiatives to defend its sovereign rights, including filing a case against China in the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea and conducting military exercises and drills in the area.

For such more question on United Nations:

https://brainly.com/question/909525

#SPJ11

During the years of 1229 and 1231, King James I of Aragon led the Christian nations in the conquest of Mallorca.

Who captured Majorca in 1229?

The Almoravid (1018–1203) and Almohad (1203–1229) empires each had a valis, or administrative governor, who oversaw Mallorca between the foundation of the Taifa of Mallorca in 1031 until Jaume of Aragon's invasion in 1229. As the islands were successively administered by Carthaginians, Romans, Vandals, Moors, and Spanish, each of whom left their imprint, historical evidence suggests that they have been inhabited for at least 2,600 years.

The Vandals and the Byzantines both captured the Balearic Islands in 526 and 534, respectively. After three years of resistance by the Moorish army hiding out in the Serra de Tramuntana, the violent end of Majorca's Muslim dominion resulted in the island's absolute liberation.

Learn more about Majorca:

https://brainly.com/question/29557377

#SPJ1

Answer: True

Explanation: President George Washington nominated Jay the first Chief Justice of the United States on September 24, 1789. serving as Chief Justice for five years, Jay resigned from the Supreme Court on June 29, 1795, and became Governor of New York.

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new political system had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the Republican Party is Multi-party system, the correct option is (a).

The election saw the emergence of two major political parties: the Democratic Party, which supported Andrew Jackson, and the National Republican Party, which backed John Quincy Adams. This was a significant departure from the previous political landscape, which had been dominated by a single political party, the Democratic-Republican Party.

The emergence of multiple political parties marked the beginning of a multi-party system in the United States, which has since become a defining feature of American politics. The two-party system that emerged in 1828 has persisted to this day, with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party dominating American politics, the correct option is (a).

To learn more about Republican Party follow the link:

brainly.com/question/1204107

#SPJ4

The complete question is:

By the time of the 1828 presidential election, a new had begun to emerge out of the divisions within the republican party. Multiple choice questions.

a. Multi-party system

b. System of regional alliances

c. Variable-party system

Out of the given options, the French and Dutch people had the best relations with the native peoples. This can be seen through their trading practices and alliances with the indigenous communities.

The native peoples of America had a rich history and diverse cultures that existed long before the arrival of Europeans. As Europeans began to explore and colonize the continent, they encountered a wide variety of indigenous communities. While some of these interactions were peaceful and cooperative, others were marked by conflict, violence, and exploitation.

French and Dutch people were more interested in trade and commerce than colonization and conquest. They established strong relationships with the native communities through their trading practices and alliances. Both the French and Dutch traders were known to respect the customs and traditions of the native peoples, which helped to build trust and cooperation. They traded goods such as guns, furs, and textiles with the natives in exchange for goods such as beaver pelts, foodstuffs, and wampum.

Unlike the Spanish and English, who sought to conquer and subjugate Native Peoples, the French sought to establish economic and cultural partnerships with them. The French were often willing to learn from Native Peoples and adopt their customs and practices, such as the fur trade and intermarriage with Native women. This approach helped to establish more positive and enduring relationships with many Native Peoples, particularly in areas such as Canada and the Great Lakes region.

Learn more about native peoples:

https://brainly.com/question/21030450

#SPJ11

Option C. Oars were not a technological advancement for helping sailors improve their sailing techniques.

Oars have been used for centuries as a means of propulsion for boats, but they do not improve sailing techniques.

On the other hand, the compass, astrolabe, and rudders are all technological advancements that have helped sailors improve their sailing techniques.

The compass helps sailors navigate and maintain their course, the astrolabe helps determine latitude, and the rudder helps with steering and maneuvering the boat.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. It could then be concluded that option C oars were not a technological advancement for helping sailor improve their sailing techniques.

learn more about sailing techniques: https://brainly.com/question/19351991

#SPJ1

Answer: Submarine aircraft carriers were developed by the Imperial Japanese Navy to a greater extent than any other navy, before and during World War II. In total, 42 were built. (Other sources say 47 were built but actually 42 were.)

Answer:

The last kings of Judah were Zedekiah, Jehoiakim, Jehoahaz, and Josiah. These kings ruled during the time period from around 640 BCE to 586 BCE. Their rule was marked by political instability and conflict, as Judah was caught between the competing empires of Babylon and Egypt.

One notable aspect of the rule of the last kings of Judah was their failure to follow God's commands. The prophet Jeremiah, who lived during this time period, spoke out against the kings and the people of Judah for their disobedience. In Jeremiah 2:8, God says, "The priests did not say, 'Where is the Lord?' Those who handle the law did not know me; the shepherds transgressed against me; the prophets prophesied by Baal and went after things that do not profit."

The kings of Judah also struggled to maintain their independence from foreign powers. For example, in 609 BCE, King Josiah attempted to stop the advance of the Egyptian army, but was killed in battle. After Josiah's death, his son Jehoahaz ruled for just three months before being deposed by the Egyptian pharaoh, who installed his own puppet king, Jehoiakim, on the throne. Jehoiakim was later overthrown by the Babylonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, who took many of the people of Judah into exile in Babylon.

Despite their failures, the last kings of Judah did have some things in common. For example, they all struggled to balance their allegiance to God with the political realities of their time. They also faced the challenge of ruling a small kingdom in the midst of larger, more powerful empires.

The lives of the last kings of Judah had a significant impact on the people of Judah. Their disobedience to God's commands led to a time of great turmoil and suffering, as the people were taken into exile and their homeland was destroyed. However, their stories also serve as a reminder of the consequences of disobedience and the importance of following God's commands.

In conclusion, the rule of the last kings of Judah was marked by political instability, conflict, and disobedience to God's commands. While they all faced unique challenges, they shared the struggle to balance their allegiance to God with the political realities of their time. Their lives as rulers had a significant impact on the people of Judah, leading to a time of great turmoil and suffering. However, their stories also serve as a reminder of the consequences of disobedience and the importance of following God's commands.

Explanation:

BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!

Answer:

(no plagiarism)

Explanation:

Josiah, Zedekiah, Jehoiakim, and Jehoahaz served as Judah's final kings. These monarchs held power between roughly 640 and 586 BCE. Political unrest and conflict characterized their rule because Judah was sandwiched between the rival empires of Babylon and Egypt.

The failure of the final Judahi monarchs to obey God's precepts was one significant characteristic of their governance. During this time, the prophet Jeremiah condemned the kings and the people of Judah for their disobedience. God declares in Jeremiah 2:8, "The priests did not ask, 'Where is the Lord?'" The shepherds violated me, and those in charge of the law were unaware of me. The rulers of Judah similarly struggled to keep their nation free from outside influences. For instance, King Josiah sought to halt the Egyptian army's march in 609 BCE but was killed in combat. After Josiah's passing, his son Jehoahaz held the kingdom for about three months before being overthrown by the Egyptian pharaoh, who replaced him with Jehoiakim, his puppet king. Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, overthrew Jehoiakim later on and exiled numerous Judahite citizens to Babylon. The final Judah kings shared some traits despite their failings. They all strove, for instance, to strike a balance between their adherence to God and the political circumstances of their time. They also had to deal with the difficulties of governing a little kingdom amid much bigger and more formidable empires.

The final Judahi monarchs' lives had a profound effect on the people of Judah. The people were exiled and their nation was destroyed as a result of their disobedience to God's laws, which caused a period of intense instability and misery. Their experiences also serve as a warning about the repercussions of disobedience and the significance of keeping God's instructions.

In conclusion, political unrest, war, and disobedience to God's commands characterized the reign of Judah's last kings. They all encountered different difficulties, but they all struggled to strike a balance between their adherence to God and the political realities of their time. The people of Judah experienced a period of enormous upheaval and suffering as a result of their actions as kings. Their experiences also serve as a warning about the repercussions of disobedience and the significance of keeping God's instructions.

The photograph (Source 4) depicts a family of four tending to a "victory garden".

The family is posed in a very traditional way, with the mother and father in the center, a daughter on the left, and a son on the right. This suggests that the victory garden program was seen as a family activity, with all members of the family taking part in the effort.

This implies that the victory garden program was seen as a communal activity, where all members of society worked together to contribute to the war effort. It also suggests that the war efforts on the homefront were seen as a communal responsibility, where all members of society had a role to play.

She is posed with her hands on her hips, wearing a hat and apron, and smiling confidently. Her pose suggests that she is proud of the garden that she has planted and is confident in the success of the Victory Garden program.

The Victory Garden program was a response to food shortages during World War II and allowed citizens to grow their own fruits and vegetables in their backyards. This photo suggests the success of the program and the effort that citizens put into supporting the war effort on the home front. It also serves as a reminder of the commitment and patriotism of the citizens of the United States during the war effort.

To know more about World War II, click here;

https://brainly.com/question/1449762

#SPJ4

In my opinion it is fair that every state gets two senate seats because the system of providing every state with two Senate seats was established as part of the United States Constitution so that smaller states have an equal say in government.

The idea behind it was to ensure that smaller states have an equal say in the legislative process, rather than being dominated by larger, more populous states.

This system is often debated and criticized by some who argue that it can result in disproportionate representation, with some smaller states having more influence than their population would suggest. On the other hand, others believe that it's important to protect the interests of less populated states and to maintain the federalist structure of the US government.

Learn more about senate at:

https://brainly.com/question/747425

#SPJ1

Answer:

Stories about some mysterious markings on animal bones hinted that the Shang might have been the first Chinese to use a system of writing

Explanation:

For hundreds of years, the Shang dynasty was considered a legend by Western scholars. Stories about some mysterious markings on animal bones hinted that the Shang might have been the first Chinese to use a system of writing. But still, archaeologists had no solid evidence that the ancient culture had ever existed.

Shays's Rebellion, an uprising in massachusetts And connecticut from August 1786 to February 1787 against oppressive economic conditions and exorbitant taxes.

Shays' Rebellion sped up calls for Articles reform, which ultimately led to the Convention In philadelphia of 1787. Washington was chosen as the Convention's president, and the result was the United States Constitution. In order to stop the execution of debt collection and foreclosure procedures, armed groups forced the closure of various courts. Revolt strives to topple and eliminate the oppressive power as well as the rules that go along with it, unlike rebellion, which typically aims to dodge and/or win concessions from it. Revolts aim for a revolution, whilst rebellions aim for resistance.

To know more about Shays' Rebellion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19692099

#SPJ1

The women's rights movement and the anti-slavery movement were closely related. The two movements shared many similarities in terms of their goals and tactics. The movements sought to end discrimination against oppressed groups and establish equality for all.

Here are three key points from the documents that support this argument.Document A highlights that Sojourner Truth was a woman and a former slave. Truth was an important figure in both movements and advocated for the rights of both women and African Americans. This connection shows that the two movements were not mutually exclusive and could work together towards a common goal.Document B, on the other hand, shows how some people in the anti-slavery movement did not support women's participation in their cause. Reverend Harvey argued that women should not participate in the World Anti-Slavery Convention.

However, this does not discredit the broader connection between the two movements. In fact, it highlights the tensions between the two groups and suggests that the women's rights movement was fighting for a broader social change that would benefit all oppressed groups.

Finally, both documents speak to the shared goals of the two movements. Document A shows that Truth was advocating for women's suffrage and the abolition of slavery, two goals that were also central to the anti-slavery movement. Document B highlights that the anti-slavery movement was fighting against the oppressive system of slavery, a system that was founded on the exploitation of African Americans and women.

The fact that both movements were fighting for equality and justice shows that they were closely related.In conclusion, the women's rights movement and the anti-slavery movement were related. Both movements shared similar goals and tactics in the fight for equality and social justice. While there were tensions between the two groups, they were ultimately working towards a common goal.

For more questions on The women's rights movement

https://brainly.com/question/3245147

#SPJ8

Answer: a sharp rise in inflation-adjusted wages

In 30 BCE, the Roman Empire conquered Egypt, ending its 3,000-year-old stability.

Egypt was conquered by the Ptolemies, a Greek family that had been chosen by Alexander the Great to rule his empire's new province. The Ptolemies established a powerful dynasty that ruled Egypt for nearly 300 years, from 305 to 30 BCE.

They are well-known for creating a cosmopolitan society, a library in Alexandria, and the writing of the Septuagint. The Septuagint was an early Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, which is still in use today.

In 30 BCE, Egypt was conquered by the Roman Empire, ending the Ptolemaic dynasty's reign. This was the end of Egypt's 3,000-year-old stability. The Roman Empire remained in control of Egypt until the 7th century CE, when it was conquered by the Islamic Caliphate.

To know more about Roman Empire here:
https://brainly.com/question/11415671#

#SPJ11

Answer: Mainly newspapers from the 20th century will have a bold headline/ title on the front page. and would kind of add dramatic affect onto the title like:

Coca Cola Got Rid of The Cocaine in The Drink What Will Happen To The Franchise NOW?

then have the story behind it.

Explanation: I used to read old magazines with my great grandmother before she passed and kind of memorized how they got the attention of readers also it really was the peoples only way of knowing what is going on in the world before they had tv and even then, people would read the newspaper.

If this helps your welcome and if not, I'm sorry if you got it wrong.

Thank you.

During World War II, George Marshall oversaw the Army of the United States as its chief of staff. His wartime experiences impacted creation of the Marshall Plan, which utilised American resources to rebuild Europe and foster stability and economic progress.

On September 1, 1939, the day that Germany invaded Poland to start World War II, Marshall took the oath of office as chief of staff of the United States Army.

For his work on the Marshall Plan and other contributions to world peace and understanding, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in December 1953. On October 16, 1959, General Marshall passed away at Reed Army Hospital in Washington.

To know more about World War II visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/7745710

#SPJ9

Answer:  No.

Explanation:

Hope It Helps

The British and French had different goals in Africa. The British were mainly interested in trade and maintaining their existing colonies. The French, on the other hand, were looking to expand their imperial possessions. The Fashoda Crisis was an episode in 1898 in which French and British forces confronted each other in the Sudan.

This episode demonstrated the opposing goals of the two countries in Africa and highlighted the potential for conflict between them.

The Fashoda Crisis was an example of the conflicting goals of the British and French in Africa. The British were more interested in trade and the preservation of their existing colonies, while the French were looking to expand their influence and power.

The conflict between the two forces in the Sudan showed the potential for disagreement and conflict between the two countries in Africa.

To know more about Fashoda Crisis refer to-

brainly.com/question/14677586#
#SPJ11

The Holodomor was a classicide committed against successful peasants and the Soviet Union during the 1920s and 1930s that resulted in the death of more than 6 million Soviets due to execution, prison camps, and the ensuing famine.

The Holodomor was a form of ethnic cleansing and genocidal famine conducted by the Soviet Union to suppress resistance and subjugate those who did not comply with Stalin’s orders.

Peasants were stripped of their land and possessions and prohibited from leaving their villages, leading to a devastating famine.

Millions of peasants were sent to labor camps or executed for resisting. Millions more died from malnutrition and starvation. This tragedy left a lasting legacy of suffering and death in the Soviet Union.

To know more about Soviet Union click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/15776884#

#SPJ11

After France fell to the Germans, a new French government largely controlled by the German occupiers was established in Vichy, France. Vichy was a town in the southern part of France and became the seat of the collaborationist government. This government was known as the Vichy Regime.

1. France fell to the Germans during WWII

2. A new French government largely controlled by the German occupiers was established

3. This government was based in Vichy, France

4. This government was known as the Vichy Regime

The Vichy Regime was a collaborationist government established in Vichy, France after France fell to the German occupiers during WWII. This government was largely controlled by the Germans, and had its own legislature, police force, and legal system.

It also signed armistices with Germany that allowed the Germans to control much of the country.

To know more about Vichy Regime refer to-

brainly.com/question/23868266#
#SPJ11

Although it was incredibly difficult to survive the Rwandan genocide, some victims were able to flee or hide from the assailants.

Many moderate Hutus and Tutsis fled to refugee camps in nearby nations including Burundi, Tanzania, and Uganda. Others sought safety from the violence in temples, mosques, or educational institutions. Some were protected by strangers, acquaintances, or family members who put their own lives in danger to keep them hidden. Individuals who managed to survive the genocide frequently struggled to rebuild their lives after the bloodshed stopped due to the unfavorable living circumstances in refugee camps. Many survivors are still dealing with the effects of the genocide's trauma today.

Learn more about Rwandan genocide here:

brainly.com/question/20996958

#SPJ9