The magnetic energy in the RL circuit when t=3.5s is 2.49 J. Which Provide a response in J in the hundredth place.
To find the magnetic energy in the RL circuit when t=3.5s, we need to calculate the current flowing through the circuit at that time and then use it to determine the energy stored in the inductor.
Given:
Emf of the battery (E) = 22V
Current at t=1.25s (I) = 0.2A
Resistance (R) = 40Ω
First, we need to find the inductance (L) of the circuit. Since the circuit contains only an inductor, the voltage across the inductor is equal to the emf of the battery. Therefore, we have:
E = L(dI/dt)
Rearranging the equation, we get:
L = E/(dI/dt)
The change in current with respect to time can be calculated as follows:
dI/dt = (I - I₀) / (t - t₀)
Where:
I₀ is the initial current at t₀ = 1.25s
Substituting the given values into the equation, we have:
dI/dt = (0.2A - I₀) / (3.5s - 1.25s)
Now, we can calculate the inductance (L):
L = 22V / [(0.2A - I₀) / (3.5s - 1.25s)]
Next, we need to calculate the energy stored in the inductor. The magnetic energy (W) is given by the equation:
W = (1/2) * L * I²
Substituting the known values, we have:
W = (1/2) * L * I²
Finally, substitute the values of L and I at t = 3.5s into the equation to find the magnetic energy at that time.
To learn more about circuit -
brainly.com/question/31329650
#SPJ11
Dock The object in the figure is a depth d= 0.750 m below the surface of clear water. The index of refraction n of water is 1.33. d Water (n=1.33) Object D What minimum distance D from the end of the dock must the object be for it not to be seen from any point on the end of the dock? D = m Assume that the dock is 2.00 m long and the object is at a depth of 0.750 m. If you changed the value for index of refraction of the water to be then you can see the object at any distance beneath the dock. Dock The object in the figure is a depth d = 0.750 m below the surface of clear water. The index of refraction n of water is 1.33. d Water (n=1.33) Object D What minimum distance D from the end of the dock must the object be for it not to be seen from any point on the end of the dock? D= m m Assume that the dock is 2.00 m long and the object is at a depth of 0.750 m. If you changed the value for index of refraction of the water to be then you less than a maximum of beneath the dock. greater than a minimum of Dock The object in the figure is a depth d = 0.750 m below the surface of clear water. The index of refraction n of water is 1.33. d Water (n=1.33) Object D What minimum distance D from the end of the dock must the object be for it not to be seen from any point on the end of the dock? D = m Assume that the dock is 2.00 m long and the object is at a depth of 0.750 m. If you changed the value for index of refraction of the water to be then you can see the object at any distance b 1.07, lock 1.33, 1.00,
The image provided shows a dock with a length of 2.00 m, with an object placed at a depth d of 0.750 m below the surface of clear water having a refractive index of 1.33. We need to determine the minimum distance D from the end of the dock, such that the object is not visible from any point on the end of the dock.
The rays of light coming from the object move towards the surface of the water at an angle to the normal, gets refracted at the surface and continues its path towards the viewer's eye. The minimum distance D can be calculated from the critical angle condition. When the angle of incidence in water is such that the angle of refraction is 90° with the normal, then the angle of incidence in air is the critical angle. The angle of incidence in air corresponding to the critical angle in water is given by: sin θc = 1/n, where n is the refractive index of the medium with higher refractive index. In this case, the angle of incidence in air corresponding to the critical angle in water is:
[tex]sin θc = 1/1.33 ⇒ θc = sin-1(1/1.33) = 49.3°[/tex]As shown in the image below, the minimum distance D from the end of the dock can be calculated as :Distance[tex]x tan θc = (2.00 - D) x tan (90 - θc)D tan θc = 2.00 tan (90 - θc) - D tan (90 - θc)D tan θc + D tan (90 - θc) = 2.00 tan (90 - θc)D = 2.00 tan (90 - θc) / (tan θc + tan (90 - θc))D = 2.00 tan 40.7° / (tan 49.3° + tan 40.7°)D = 0.90 m[/tex]Therefore, the minimum distance D from the end of the dock, such that the object is not visible from any point on the end of the dock is 0.90 m .If the refractive index of the water is changed to be less than a maximum of 1.07, then we can see the object at any distance beneath the dock. This is because the critical angle will be greater than 90° in this case, meaning that all rays of light coming from the object will be totally reflected at the surface of the water and will not enter the air above the water.
To know more about minimum distance visit:
brainly.com/question/1416206
#SPJ11
2. A hollow metal sphere with a positive charge a and radius ris concentric with a larger hollow metal Sphere of radius R, A charge of R=-α is placed on the outer sphere. Using Gauss' Law, find an expression for the electfic field at radius ². measured from the center when (a)r'
Gauss’ Law is one of the four Maxwell equations that define the behavior of electric fields. The law states that the electric flux via any closed surface is directly proportional to the charge enclosed within that surface.
Which is a scalar quantity, divided by the electric constant (ε_0).Gauss’s law in electrostatics states that the electric flux via a closed surface is equal to the net charge contained inside that surface divided by the electric constant (ε_0). The statement of Gauss's.
Law can be written as ∫EdA = Qenc/ε0 where Qenc is the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface and E is the electric field at every point of the surface. Gauss's law helps to solve various electrostatic problems by finding the electric field strength and the charge enclosed within a closed surface.
To know more about Gauss’ Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13434428
#SPJ11
A capacitor with a capacitance of C = 6.00x10-5 F
is charged by connecting it to a 11.5 - V battery. The capacitor is then disconnected from the batten
and connecteo across an inauctor wit an
inductance of L = 1.55 H.
What is the angular frequency w of the electrical oscillations?
The angular frequency (w) of the electrical oscillations can be calculated using the formula w = 1 / sqrt(LC).
The angular frequency (w) of the electrical oscillations can be calculated using the formula w = 1 / sqrt(LC), where L is the inductance and C is the capacitance. In this case, the capacitance (C) is given as 6.00x10^(-5) F and the inductance (L) is given as 1.55 H.
Plugging in these values into the formula, we have w = 1 / sqrt(1.55 * 6.00x10^(-5)). Simplifying further, w = 1 / sqrt(9.3x10^(-5)). Taking the square root, we get w = 1 / (9.64x10^(-3)). Evaluating this expression, we find w ≈ 103.91 rad/s. Therefore, the angular frequency of the electrical oscillations is approximately 103.91 rad/s.
To learn more about angular frequency
Click here brainly.com/question/32670038
#SPJ11
When there is a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms, a
battery of 9.00 V and the direct current begins to flow, when
reaching equilibrium the current is:
The current in a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms when a battery of 9.00 V and direct current begin to flow is 0.9 A (amperes) acc to Ohm's Law.
Ohm's Law is a fundamental principle in electrical engineering and is used to analyze and design electrical circuits, determine voltage drops, and current flows, and calculate the required resistance or current for a given circuit. Ohm's Law provides a mathematical relationship between the voltage applied to a conductor (V) and the current (I) that flows through it if the resistance (R) remains constant. The formula is as follows:
I = V/R
Here, we are given the values of V (9.00 V) and R (10.0 ohms). To find the value of I, we will apply Ohm's Law.
I = V/R= 9.00 V/10.0
ohms= 0.9 A (amperes)
Therefore, the current in a copper wire whose resistance is 10.0 ohms when a battery of 9.00 V and direct current begins to flow is 0.9 A (amperes).
To know more about Ohm's Law visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1247379
#SPJ11
A 1530-kg automobile has a wheelbase (the distance between the axdes) of 3.30 m. The automobile's center of mass is on the centerline at a point 1.10 m behind the front axle. Find the force exerted by each front wheel KN each rear wheel
Front wheel exerts a force of approximately 5018 N, and each Rear wheel exerts a force of approximately 2509 N .
To find the force exerted by each front and rear wheel of the automobile, we can use the principle of moments and the concept of weight distribution.
Let's assume that the weight of the automobile is evenly distributed between the front and rear wheels. Since the center of mass is located 1.10 m behind the front axle, the weight of the automobile can be considered as acting at the center of mass.
The total weight of the automobile can be calculated using the formula:
Weight = mass * acceleration due to gravity
Weight = 1530 kg * 9.8 m/s^2
Weight ≈ 15054 N
Now, we can calculate the weight distribution between the front and rear wheels. Since the wheelbase is 3.30 m, the weight distribution can be determined using the principle of moments:
Weight_front * distance_front = Weight_rear * distance_rear
Weight_front * (3.30 m) = Weight_rear * (3.30 m - 1.10 m)
Weight_front * 3.30 = Weight_rear * 2.20
Weight_front/Weight_rear = 2.20/3.30
Weight_front/Weight_rear = 2/3
Since the weight distribution is proportional to the ratio of distances, we can calculate the weight on each wheel:
Weight_front = (2/3) * Total Weight
Weight_rear = (1/3) * Total Weight
Weight_front = (2/3) * 15054 N ≈ 10036 N
Weight_rear = (1/3) * 15054 N ≈ 5018 N
Finally, to calculate the force exerted by each front and rear wheel, we divide the weight by the number of wheels:
Force_front = Weight_front / 2
Force_rear = Weight_rear / 2
Force_front = 10036 N / 2 ≈ 5018 N
Force_rear = 5018 N / 2 ≈ 2509 N
Therefore, each front wheel exerts a force of approximately 5018 N (5.018 kN), and each rear wheel exerts a force of approximately 2509 N (2.509 kN).
Learn more about force from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/12970081
#SPJ11
The heating coil in an electric bea pot is made of nichrome wire with a radius of 0.400 mm. If the coil draws a current or 5.60 A when there is a 120 V potential oference across ta ende, find the following. (Take the resistivity of nicome to be 1.50 X 100m) (a) resistance of the col (in) (1) length or wire used to win the col tinm) m
The resistance of the coil is approximately 21.43 Ω, and the length of wire used to wind the coil is approximately 0.071 m.
To find the resistance of the coil, we can use the formula:
Resistance (R) = Resistivity (ρ) * Length (L) / Cross-sectional area (A)
Given the resistivity of nichrome wire as 1.50 × 10^−6 Ω·m and the radius of the wire as 0.400 mm, we can calculate the cross-sectional area (A) using the formula:
[tex]A = π * r^2[/tex]
where r is the radius of the wire.
Let's calculate the cross-sectional area first:
[tex]A = π * (0.400 mm)^2[/tex]
[tex]= π * (0.400 × 10^−3 m)^2[/tex]
[tex]≈ 5.03 × 10^−7 m^2[/tex]
Now, we can calculate the resistance (R) of the coil using the given formula:
[tex]R = ρ * L / A[/tex]
To find the length of the wire used in the coil (L), we rearrange the formula:
[tex]L = R * A / ρ[/tex]
Given that the current drawn by the coil is 5.60 A and the potential difference across the coil is 120 V, we can use Ohm's Law to find the resistance:
[tex]R = V / I[/tex]
Now, we can substitute the values into the formula for the length (L):
[tex]L = (21.43 Ω) * (5.03 × 10^−7 m^2) / (1.50 × 10^−6 Ω·m)[/tex]
Simplifying:
L ≈ 0.071 m
Therefore, the resistance of the coil is approximately 21.43 Ω, and the length of wire used to wind the coil is approximately 0.071 m.
Learn more about resistance from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/17563681
#SPJ11
12. (6 pts) In the picture below, rank particles A,B and C, which are moving in the directions shown by the arrows through a magnetic field pointing out of the page, in the order of increasing speed. Which particles are positive? Which are negative?
The particles moving in the direction opposite to the arrows (against the increasing speed) are positive, while the particles moving in the direction of the arrows (with the increasing speed) are negative.
In order to determine the polarity of the charged particles, we need to consider the interaction between the magnetic field and the motion of the particles. According to the right-hand rule for charged particles, when a charged particle moves in a magnetic field, the direction of the force experienced by the particle is perpendicular to both the velocity of the particle and the magnetic field direction.
Given that the magnetic field is pointing out of the page, we can apply the right-hand rule. When the velocity vector is in the direction of the arrow and the force is out of the page, the charge on the particles must be negative. Conversely, when the velocity vector is in the opposite direction to the arrow and the force is into the page, the charge on the particles must be positive.
Therefore, the particles moving in the direction opposite to the arrows (against the increasing speed) are positive, while the particles moving in the direction of the arrows (with the increasing speed) are negative.
To know more about right-hand rule, here
brainly.com/question/30641867
#SPJ4
--The complete Question is, A beam of charged particles is moving in the directions shown by the arrows through a magnetic field pointing out of the page, in the order of increasing speed. Which particles are positive? Which are negative? --
A 45μF air-filled capacitor is charged to a potential difference of 3304 V. What is the energy stored in it?
Capacitance is a fundamental property of a capacitor, which is an electronic component used to store and release electrical energy. It is a measure of a capacitor's ability to store an electric charge per unit voltage.Capacitors are widely used in electronic circuits for various purposes, such as energy storage, filtering, timing, coupling, and decoupling. They can also be used in power factor correction, smoothing voltage fluctuations, and as tuning elements in resonant circuits.
Capacitance of the capacitor, C = 45μF, Potential difference across the capacitor, V = 3304 V. Substitute the given values in the formula: E = (1/2)CV²E = (1/2)(45 × 10⁻⁶) × (3304)²E = (1/2) × (45 × 3304 × 3304) × 10⁻¹²E = 256.86 J.
Therefore, the energy stored in the given capacitor is 256.86 J.
Let's learn more about capacitor:
https://brainly.com/question/14883923
#SPJ11
A well-known (but probably apocryphal) Einstein quote is 'Sit on a hot stove for five minutes, and it feels like an hour. Talk to a pretty girl for an hour, and it feels like five minutes. That's relativity. (a) Einstein (at rest, frame S) sits on pins and needles for five minutes. Could there be a moving frame S' in which this same period lasts an hour? If so, determine the velocity of that frame with respect to S, if not, explain why not. (b) Einstein talks with Marilyn Monroe for an hour. (According to another well-known anecdote, during this conversation Marilyn Monroe would have said to Einstein 'If we were to have children, and they'd have your brains and my looks, wouldn't that be fantastic?", to which Einstein replied 'Yes, but what if they'd have your brains and my looks?"). Both Einstein and Monroe are at rest in frame S. Could there be a moving frame S' in which this same period lasts five minutes? If so, determine the velocity of that frame with respect to S, if not, explain why not.
The velocity of this frame with respect to S would be v = c * sqrt(1 - (T'/T)^2). Yes, there could be a moving frame S' in which the five minutes that Einstein sits on pins and needles last an hour.
a) Yes, there could be a moving frame S' in which the five minutes that Einstein sits on pins and needles last an hour. The velocity of this frame with respect to S would be:
v = c * sqrt(1 - (T'/T)^2)
where:
v is the velocity of S' with respect to S
c is the speed of light
T' is the time interval in frame S'
T is the time interval in frame S
In this case, T' is 60 minutes and T is 5 minutes. Substituting these values into the equation for v, we get:
v = c * sqrt(1 - (60/5)^2) = 0.994 c
This means that the frame S' is moving at 99.4% of the speed of light with respect to frame S.
b) No, there could not be a moving frame S' in which the hour that Einstein talked with Marilyn Monroe lasted five minutes. This is because the time interval is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion. The only way that the hour could last five minutes in frame S' is if the time dilation factor, gamma, were greater than one. However, gamma can never be greater than one. The maximum value of gamma is one, which occurs when the velocity of the observer is equal to the speed of light.
In conclusion, the quote by Einstein is not entirely accurate. The passage of time is not relative to the observer's motion. The time interval is the same for all observers, regardless of their motion. The only way that the passage of time can appear to be different for different observers is if the observers are moving at a significant fraction of the speed of light.
To learn more about velocity click here
https://brainly.com/question/30265720
#SPJ11
A wire of 52 turns has a surface area vector A = (5i + 3j - 4k) cm2 and carries a current of 1.2 amps. The mass of the whole wire is 187 grams. There is a Magnetic field in the region equal to B = -3i + 7j – 3k mTeslas. a) Calculate the magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire. b) What is the Torque on this wire due to the Magnetic field? c) What is the potential energy of this wire due to the Magnetic field? d) What is the potential energy of this wire when it is lined up with the B field? e) What is the velocity of the wire by the time it is lined up with the B field?
a) The magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire is 263.4 μA m2. b) The torque on the wire due to the magnetic field is 1245.6 μN-m. c) The potential energy of the wire due to the magnetic field is -3229.7 μJ. d) The potential energy of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is -3229.7 μJ. e) The velocity of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t
a) The magnetic dipole moment of the wire is given by;
μ = NIA
Where N is the number of turns, I is the current flowing,
and A is the surface area of the loopμ = 52*1.2*(5i + 3j - 4k) μA m2μ
= 187.2i + 112.32j - 149.76kμ
= 216.5 μA m2
Therefore, the magnitude of the Magnetic Dipole Moment of this wire is given by;
|μ| = √(187.2² + 112.32² + (-149.76)²)
|μ| = 263.4 μA m2
b) The torque τ on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by the cross product of the magnetic dipole moment of the wire and the magnetic field as follows;
τ = μ x BB
= -3i + 7j - 3k,
μ = 187.2i + 112.32j - 149.76k
τ = [112.32*(-3) - (-149.76)*7]i + [(-149.76)*(-3) - 187.2*(-3)]j + [187.2*7 - 112.32*(-3)]k
τ = -1226.4i - 65.88j + 1066.8k
Therefore, the torque on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
|τ| = √((-1226.4)² + (-65.88)² + 1066.8²)
|τ| = 1245.6 μN-m
c) The potential energy of the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
U = -μ.B
U = -|μ||B| cosθ
U = -263.4 * √(3² + 7² + (-3)²)
U = -263.4 * √67
U = -3229.7 μJ
d) When the wire is lined up with the B field, the angle between the magnetic dipole moment and the magnetic field is θ = 0°
Therefore, the potential energy of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is given by;
U = -μ.B
U = -|μ||B| cos0°
U = -263.4 * √(3² + 7² + (-3)²)
U = -263.4 * √67
U = -3229.7 μJ
e) The force on the wire due to the magnetic field is given by;
F = I L x B
= (IA) x B
= (52*1.2 * (5i + 3j - 4k)) x (-3i + 7j - 3k)
F = [-122.4i + 73.44j - 97.92k] x [-3i + 7j - 3k]
F = [486.72i + 239.04j + 44.16k] Nm-2
The force is constant, and we know the mass of the wire. Therefore, we can find the acceleration of the wire as follows;
F = ma,
a = F/m
= [486.72i + 239.04j + 44.16k] / 0.187
a = 2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k m/s2
The velocity of the wire at any time t is given by;
v = at
v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t
When the wire is lined up with the B field, the direction of the force acting on it is perpendicular to the direction of the velocity, and there is no force acting on it. Therefore, the velocity of the wire will remain constant when it is lined up with the B field.
The velocity of the wire when it is lined up with the B field is;
v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k)t,
when t = ∞v = (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k) * ∞v
= (2597.3i + 1278.8j + 236.1k) m/s
Learn more About magnitude from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/30337362
#SPJ11
1.15-k22 resistor and a 570-nH inductor are connected in series to a 1500-Hx generator with an rms voltage of 12.1 V What is the rms current in the circuit? What capacitance must be inserted in series with the resistor and inductor to reduce the rms current to half the value found in part A?
The rms current in the circuit is approximately 2.3 A.
To find the rms current in the circuit, we can use Ohm's law and the impedance of the series combination of the resistor and inductor.
The impedance (Z) of an inductor is given by Z = jωL, where j is the imaginary unit, ω is the angular frequency (2πf), and L is the inductance.
In this case, the impedance of the inductor is Z = j(2πf)L = j(2π)(1500 Hz)(570 nH).
The impedance of the resistor is simply the resistance itself, R = 0.15 kΩ.
The total impedance of the series combination is Z_total = R + Z.
The rms current (I) can be calculated using Ohm's law, V_rms = I_rms * Z_total, where V_rms is the rms voltage.
Plugging in the given values, we have:
12.1 V = I_rms * (0.15 kΩ + j(2π)(1500 Hz)(570 nH))
Solving for I_rms, we find that the rms current in the circuit is approximately 2.3 A.
(b) Brief solution:
To reduce the rms current to half the value found in part A, a capacitance must be inserted in series with the resistor and inductor. The value of the capacitance can be calculated using the formula C = 1 / (ωZ), where ω is the angular frequency and Z is the impedance of the series combination of the resistor and inductor.
To reduce the rms current to half, we need to introduce a reactive component that cancels out a portion of the inductive reactance. This can be achieved by adding a capacitor in series with the resistor and inductor.
The value of the capacitance (C) can be calculated using the formula C = 1 / (ωZ), where ω is the angular frequency (2πf) and Z is the impedance of the series combination.
In this case, the angular frequency is ω = 2π(1500 Hz), and the impedance Z is the sum of the resistance and inductive reactance.
Once the capacitance value is calculated, it can be inserted in series with the resistor and inductor to achieve the desired reduction in rms current.
To learn more about capacitance
brainly.com/question/31871398
#SPJ11
A lamp located 3 m directly above a point P on the floor of a
room produces at P an illuminance of 100 lm/m2. (a) What is the
luminous intensity of the lamp? (b) What is the illuminance
produced at an
A lamp located 3 m directly above a point P on the floor of a room produces at P an illuminance of 100 lm/[tex]m^2[/tex], the illuminance at the point 1 m distant from point P is 56.25 lm/[tex]m^2[/tex].
We can utilise the inverse square law for illuminance to address this problem, which states that the illuminance at a point is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the light source.
(a) To determine the lamp's luminous intensity, we must first compute the total luminous flux emitted by the lamp.
Lumens (lm) are used to measure luminous flux. Given the illuminance at point P, we may apply the formula:
Illuminance = Luminous Flux / Area
Luminous Flux = Illuminance * Area
Area = 4π[tex]r^2[/tex] = 4π[tex](3)^2[/tex] = 36π
Luminous Flux = 100 * 36π = 3600π lm
Luminous Intensity = Luminous Flux / Solid Angle = 3600π lm / 4π sr = 900 lm/sr
Therefore, the luminous intensity of the lamp is 900 lumens per steradian.
b. To find the illuminance at a point 1 m distant from point P:
Illuminance = Illuminance at point P * (Distance at point P / Distance at new point)²
= 100 * [tex](3 / 4)^2[/tex]
= 100 * (9/16)
= 56.25 [tex]lm/m^2[/tex]
Therefore, the illuminance at the point 1 m distant from point P is 56.25 [tex]lm/m^2[/tex]
For more details regarding illuminance, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29156148
#SPJ4
Your question seems incomplete, the probable complete question is:
A lamp located 3 m directly above a point P on the floor of a room produces at Pan illuminance of 100 lm/m2. (a) What is the luminous intensity of the lamp? (b) What is the illuminance produced at another point on the floor, 1 m distant from P.
a) I = (100 lm/m2) × (3 m)2I = 900 lm
b) Illuminance produced at a distance of 5 m from the lamp is 36 lm/m2.
(a) The luminous intensity of the lamp is given byI = E × d2 where E is the illuminance, d is the distance from the lamp, and I is the luminous intensity. Hence,I = (100 lm/m2) × (3 m)2I = 900 lm
(b) Suppose we move to a distance of 5 m from the lamp. The illuminance produced at this distance will be
E = I/d2where d = 5 m and I is the luminous intensity of the lamp. Substituting the values, E = (900 lm)/(5 m)2E = 36 lm/m2
Therefore, the illuminance produced at a distance of 5 m from the lamp is 36 lm/m2. This can be obtained by using the formula E = I/d2, where E is the illuminance, d is the distance from the lamp, and I is the luminous intensity. Luminous intensity of the lamp is 900 lm.
Learn more about luminous intensity
brainly.com/question/32005476
#SPJ11
Pole thrown upward from initial velocity it takes 16s to hit the ground. a. what is the initial velocity of pole? b. What is max height? C. What is velocity when it hits the ground
Pole thrown upward from initial velocity it takes 16s to hit the ground. (a)The initial velocity of the pole is 78.4 m/s.(b) The maximum height reached by the pole is approximately 629.8 meters.(c)The velocity when the pole hits the ground is approximately -78.4 m/s.
To solve this problem, we can use the equations of motion for objects in free fall.
Given:
Time taken for the pole to hit the ground (t) = 16 s
a) To find the initial velocity of the pole, we can use the equation:
h = ut + (1/2)gt^2
where h is the height, u is the initial velocity, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time.
At the maximum height, the velocity of the pole is zero. Therefore, we can write:
v = u + gt
Since the final velocity (v) is zero at the maximum height, we can use this equation to find the time it takes for the pole to reach the maximum height.
Using these equations, we can solve the problem step by step:
Step 1: Find the time taken to reach the maximum height.
At the maximum height, the velocity is zero. Using the equation v = u + gt, we have:
0 = u + (-9.8 m/s^2) × t_max
Solving for t_max, we get:
t_max = u / 9.8
Step 2: Find the height reached at the maximum height.
Using the equation h = ut + (1/2)gt^2, and substituting t = t_max/2, we have:
h_max = u(t_max/2) + (1/2)(-9.8 m/s^2)(t_max/2)^2
Simplifying the equation, we get:
h_max = (u^2) / (4 × 9.8)
Step 3: Find the initial velocity of the pole.
Since it takes 16 seconds for the pole to hit the ground, the total time of flight is 2 × t_max. Thus, we have:
16 s = 2 × t_max
Solving for t_max, we get:
t_max = 8 s
Substituting this value into the equation t_max = u / 9.8, we can solve for u:
8 s = u / 9.8
u = 9.8 m/s × 8 s
u = 78.4 m/s
Therefore, the initial velocity of the pole is 78.4 m/s.
b) To find the maximum height, we use the equation derived in Step 2:
h_max = (u^2) / (4 × 9.8)
= (78.4 m/s)^2 / (4 × 9.8 m/s^2)
≈ 629.8 m
Therefore, the maximum height reached by the pole is approximately 629.8 meters.
c) To find the velocity when the pole hits the ground, we know that the initial velocity (u) is 78.4 m/s, and the time taken (t) is 16 s. Using the equation v = u + gt, we have:
v = u + gt
= 78.4 m/s + (-9.8 m/s^2) × 16 s
= 78.4 m/s - 156.8 m/s
≈ -78.4 m/s
The negative sign indicates that the velocity is in the opposite direction of the initial upward motion. Therefore, the velocity when the pole hits the ground is approximately -78.4 m/s.
To learn more about velocity visit: https://brainly.com/question/80295
#SPJ11
Which of the following statemtents is inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics? a. The entropy of the universe tends to increase. b. Perpetual motion machines are impossible. c. The arrow of time moves in the forward direction. d. A refrigerator cycle is a spontaneous process. e. Heat spontaneously flows from high temperature to low temperature regions.
The statement that is inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics is “A refrigerator cycle is a spontaneous process.”Why is it inconsistent with the second law of thermodynamics?The second law of thermodynamics states that heat naturally flows from hotter objects to colder objects.
The other statements listed are consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. For example, the entropy of the universe always tends to increase. Entropy is a measure of disorder or randomness. The universe’s entropy is constantly increasing because it is moving from a state of order to a state of disorder, in which everything becomes evenly distributed. Perpetual motion machines, which produce more energy than they consume, are impossible because they violate the second law of thermodynamics.
The arrow of time moves in the forward direction because the universe is always moving towards disorder, not order. Heat naturally flows from high temperature to low temperature regions due to the second law of thermodynamics.
To know more about spontaneous visit:
https://brainly.com/question/5372689
#SPJ11
A 13-width rectangular loop with 15 turns of wire and a 17 cm length has a current of 1.9 A flowing through it. Two sides of the loop are oriented parallel to a 0.058 uniform magnetic field, and the other two sides are perpendicular to the magnetic field. (a) What is the magnitude of the magnetic moment of the loop? (b) What torque does the magnetic field exert on the loop?
The magnitude of the magnetic moment of the loop is 45.81 Am². The torque exerted on the loop by the magnetic field is 2.66 Nm.
Rectangular loop width, w = 13 cm
Total number of turns of wire, N = 15
Current flowing through the loop, I = 1.9 A
Length of the loop, L = 17 cm
Strength of uniform magnetic field, B = 0.058 T
The magnetic moment of the loop is defined as the product of current, area of the loop and the number of turns of wire.
Therefore, the formula for magnetic moment can be given as;
Magnetic moment = (current × area × number of turns)
We can also represent the area of the rectangular loop as length × width (L × w).
Hence, the formula for magnetic moment can be written as:
Magnetic moment = (I × L × w × N)
The torque (τ) on a magnetic dipole in a uniform magnetic field can be given as:
Torque = magnetic moment × strength of magnetic field sinθ
where θ is the angle between the magnetic moment and the magnetic field.So, the formula for torque can be given as:
T = MB sinθ
(a) The magnetic moment of the loop can be calculated as follows:
Magnetic moment = (I × L × w × N)
= 1.9 × 17 × 13 × 15 × 10^-2Am^2
= 45.81 Am^2
The magnitude of the magnetic moment of the loop is 45.81 Am².
(b)The angle between the magnetic moment and the magnetic field is θ = 90° (as two sides of the loop are perpendicular to the magnetic field)
So sin θ = sin 90° = 1
Torque = M B sinθ
= 45.81 × 0.058 × 1
= 2.66 Nm
Therefore, the torque exerted on the loop by the magnetic field is 2.66 Nm.
Learn more about magnetic field :
brainly.com/question/26257705
#SPJ11
Problem# 12 (Please Show Work 20 points) (a) What is the angle between a wire carrying an 9.00-A current and the 1.20-T field it is in if 50.0 cm of the wire experiences a magnetic force of 3.40 N? (b) What is the force on the wire if it is rotated to make an angle of with the field?
a) Angle: 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees. b) Force: I * L * B * sin().
a) To find the angle between the wire carrying a current and the magnetic field, we can use the formula for the magnetic force on a current-carrying wire:
F = I * L * B * sin(theta)
Where:
- F is the magnetic force on the wire,
- I is the current in the wire,
- L is the length of the wire segment experiencing the force,
- B is the magnetic field strength,
- theta is the angle between the wire and the magnetic field.
Given:
- Current (I) = 9.00 A
- Length (L) = 50.0 cm = 0.50 m
- Magnetic force (F) = 3.40 N
- Magnetic field strength (B) = 1.20 T
Rearranging the formula, we can solve for the angle theta:
theta = arcsin(F / (I * L * B))
Substituting the given values into the equation, we find:
theta = arcsin(3.40 N / (9.00 A * 0.50 m * 1.20 T))
Calculating this expression, we get:
theta ≈ 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees
Therefore, the angle between the wire carrying the current and the magnetic field is approximately 0.377 radians or 21.63 degrees.
b) To find the force on the wire when it is rotated to make an angle with the magnetic field, we can use the same formula as in part (a), but with the new angle:
F' = I * L * B * sin()
Given:
- Angle (theta) = (angle with the field)
Substituting these values into the formula, we can calculate the force on the wire when it is rotated:
F' = 9.00 A * 0.50 m * 1.20 T * sin()
(b) To determine the force on the wire when it is rotated to make an angle (θ) with the magnetic field, we can use the same formula for the magnetic force:
F = BILsinθ
Given that the magnetic field strength (B) is 1.20 T, the current (I) is 9.00 A, and the angle (θ) is provided, we can substitute these values into the formula:
F = (1.20 T) * (9.00 A) * L * sinθ
The force on the wire depends on the length of the wire (L), which is not provided in the given information. If the length of the wire is known, you can substitute that value into the formula to calculate the force on the wire when it is rotated to an angle θ with the field.
To know more about Force, click here:
brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
The rms speed of the molecules of a gas at 143 °C is 217 m/s. Calculate the mass m of a single molecule in the gas.
The mass of a single molecule in the gas is approximately 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg.
The root mean square (rms) speed of gas molecules can be related to the temperature and the molar mass of the gas using the following equation:
v(rms) = √(3kT / m)
Where v(rms) is the rms speed, k is the Boltzmann constant (1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K), T is the temperature in Kelvin, and m is the molar mass of the gas in kilograms.
To solve for the mass of a single molecule, we need to convert the temperature from Celsius to Kelvin:
T(K) = 143°C + 273.15
Substituting the given values into the equation, we can solve for m:
217 m/s = √(3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / m)
Squaring both sides of the equation:
(217 m/s)^2 = 3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / m
Simplifying and rearranging the equation to solve for m:
m = 3 * 1.38 x 10^(-23) J/K * (143 + 273.15) K / (217 m/s)^2
Calculating the right-hand side of the equation:
m ≈ 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg
Therefore, the mass of a single molecule in the gas is approximately 4.54 x 10^(-26) kg.
learn more about root mean square (rms) speed here:
https://brainly.com/question/31830043
#SPJ11
You place an object 17.6 cm in front of a diverging lens which has a focal length with a magnitude of 11.8 cm. Determine how far in front of the lens the object should be placed in order to produce an image that is reduced by a factor of 2.85. cm
We need to use the thin lens formula which relates the distance between the lens and the object (p), the distance between the lens and the image (q), and the focal length of the lens (f).
The formula is:1/f = 1/p + 1/q
We are given that: f = -11.8 cm (negative because the lens is a diverging lens) p = 17.6 cm q = ?
We need to determine the value of q for which the image is reduced by a factor of 2.85. This means that:
q/p = 1/2.85q = (1/2.85)pq = (1/2.85) * 17.6 cmq ≈ 6.168 cm
Now that we know the value of q, we can use the thin lens formula to determine the value of p that corresponds to this image:
p = q/(1/q - 1/f)
p = (6.168 cm)/[1/(6.168 cm) + 1/(11.8 cm)]
p ≈ 50.28 cm
Therefore, the object should be placed approximately 50.28 cm in front of the lens to produce an image that is reduced by a factor of 2.85.
Learn more about thin lens here: https://brainly.com/question/32233960
#SPJ11
Three identical point charges of magnitude 6nC are placed at the three corners of a square 40mm on a side. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner.
The magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner can be calculated using Coulomb's law. Coulomb's law states that the force between two charges is directly proportional to the product of their magnitudes and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.The electric field at the vacant corner is the vector sum of the electric fields due to the other three charges.
The magnitude of the electric field due to each of the three charges is given by;E = kq / r²where k is the Coulomb constant, q is the charge, and r is the distance between the charges.The distance between each of the charges and the vacant corner can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem since they are placed at the three corners of a square 40mm on a side.
Thus, the distance between each charge and the vacant corner is:√(40² + 40²) = 56.6 mmThe magnitude of the electric field due to each of the charges is:
E = (9 x 10⁹) x (6 x 10⁻⁹) / (0.0566)²E
= 45.4 N/C
The direction of the electric field due to the two charges on the horizontal side of the square will be at an angle of 45° to the x-axis, and the direction of the electric field due to the charge on the vertical side of the square will be at an angle of -45° to the y-axis.
Therefore, the resultant electric field at the vacant corner will be:E = √(45.4² + 45.4²) = 64.3 N/CThe angle made by the resultant electric field with the positive x-axis is given by:θ = tan⁻¹(45.4 / 45.4) = 45°Therefore, the magnitude and direction of the electric field due to the three charges at the vacant corner are 64.3 N/C and 45° with the positive x-axis, respectively.
To know more about electric field visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
13. At each instant, the ratio of the magnitude of the electric field to the magnetic field in an electromagnetic wave in a vacuum is equal to the speed of light. a. Real b. False
b. False.The statement is false. In an electromagnetic-wave in a vacuum, the ratio of the magnitude of the electric field to the magnitude of the magnetic field is not equal to the speed of light.
Instead, the ratio is determined by the impedance of free space, which is a fundamental constant in electromagnetism. The impedance of free space, denoted by the symbol "Z₀," is approximately equal to 377 ohms and represents the ratio of the electric field amplitude to the magnetic-field amplitude in an electromagnetic wave. It is not equal to the speed of light, which is approximately 3 x 10^8 meters per second in a vacuum. Therefore, the correct answer is false.
To learn more about electromagnetic-wave , click here : https://brainly.com/question/29774932
#SPJ11
ONS statistics show that 63% of UK households are homeowners. The Bank of England claims that, due to the
very low interest rates in recent years, the actual proportion of home owners is actually higher. Investigate
this hypothesis by completing the following tasks:
a. Construct a confidence interval that has a high probability of including the true population proportion of
UK homeowners. Comment on your findings.
b. Use hypothesis testing to test the Bank of England claim. Comment on your findings.
c. The Bank of England also believes that UK North and South divides means that the combined proportion
of homeowners in the South East and South West is higher than the combined proportion of
homeowners in the North and North West. Test this hypothesis by:
1) Constructing and plotting two confidence intervals for the population proportions of combined
homeowners in the South East and South West and North and North West. Comment on your
findings.
2) Carrying out a hypothesis testing for two population proportions. Comment on your results.
a) Claim of a higher proportion of homeowners is statistically significant. b) will indicate the precision of our estimate and whether it supports the Bank of England's claim of a higher proportion of homeowners. c) The results of the hypothesis test will indicate whether the regional differences in homeownership proportions are statistically significant.
We aim to explore the hypothesis put forward by the Bank of England regarding the proportion of UK homeowners. We will construct a confidence interval to estimate the true population proportion of homeowners and perform hypothesis testing to assess the validity of the Bank of England's claim.
(a) To construct a confidence interval for the true population proportion of UK homeowners, we can use the sample proportion of 63% as an estimate. By applying appropriate statistical methods, such as the normal approximation method or the Wilson score interval, we can calculate a confidence interval with a desired level of confidence, e.g., 95%. This interval will provide an estimated range within which the true population proportion is likely to lie. The findings of the confidence interval will indicate the precision of our estimate and whether it supports the Bank of England's claim of a higher proportion of homeowners.
(b) Hypothesis testing can be employed to assess the Bank of England's claim. We would set up a null hypothesis stating that the proportion of homeowners is equal to the reported 63%, and an alternative hypothesis suggesting that it is higher. By conducting a statistical test, such as a z-test or a chi-square test, using an appropriate significance level (e.g., 5%), we can determine whether the evidence supports rejecting the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. The findings of the hypothesis test will provide insights into whether the claim of a higher proportion of homeowners is statistically significant.
(c) For investigating regional differences, we can construct and plot confidence intervals for the population proportions of combined homeowners in the South East/South West and the North/North West. By using appropriate statistical methods and confidence levels, we can estimate the ranges within which the true proportions lie. Comparing the two intervals will provide insights into whether there is a significant difference between the regions in terms of homeownership. Additionally, hypothesis testing for two population proportions can be conducted using appropriate tests, such as the z-test for independent proportions or the chi-square test for independence. The results of the hypothesis test will indicate whether the regional differences in homeownership proportions are statistically significant.
Learn more about hypothesis here: https://brainly.com/question/31362172
#SPJ11
An object falls from height h from rest and travels 0.68h in the last 1.00 s. (a) Find the time of its fall. S (b) Find the height of its fall. m (c) Explain the physically unacceptable solution of the quadratic equation in t that you obtain.
The time of the fall is 2.30 seconds when the. The height of its fall is 7.21m. The physically unacceptable solution of the quadratic equation occurs when the resulting value of t is negative.
To find the time of the object's fall, we can use the equation of motion for vertical free fall: h = (1/2) * g * t^2, where h is the height, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and t is the time. Since the object travels 0.68h in the last 1.00 second of its fall, we can set up the equation 0.68h = (1/2) * g * (t - 1)^2. Solving this equation for t will give us the time of the object's fall.
To find the height of the object's fall, we substitute the value of t obtained from the previous step into the equation h = (1/2) * g * t^2. This will give us the height h.
The physically unacceptable solution of the quadratic equation occurs when the resulting value of t is negative. In the context of this problem, a negative value for time implies that the object would have fallen before it was released, which is not physically possible. Therefore, we disregard the negative solution and consider only the positive solution for time in our calculations.
Learn more about gravity here:
brainly.com/question/31321801
#SPJ11
A rock is dropped at time t=0 from a bridge. 1 second later a second rock is dropped from the same height. The height h of the bridge is 50-m. How long is the rock in the air before it hits the water surface? 3.8 s 4.9 s 3.25 2.2 s
The time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be 4.19 seconds.
The height of the bridge is 50 m, and two rocks are dropped from it. The time when the second rock was dropped is 1 second after the first rock was dropped. We need to determine the time the first rock takes to hit the water surface.What is the formula for the height of a rock at any given time after it has been dropped?
In this case, we may use the formula for the height of an object dropped from a certain height and falling under the force of gravity: h = (1/2)gt² + v₀t + h₀,where: h₀ = initial height,v₀ = initial velocity (zero in this case),
g = acceleration due to gravityt = time taken,Therefore, the formula becomes h = (1/2)gt² + h₀Plug in the given values:g = 9.8 m/s² (the acceleration due to gravity)h₀ = 50 m (the height of the bridge).
The formula becomes:h = (1/2)gt² + h₀h .
(1/2)gt² + h₀h = 4.9t² + 50.
We need to find the time taken by the rock to hit the water surface. To do so, we must first determine the time taken by the second rock to hit the water surface. When the second rock is dropped from the same height, it starts with zero velocity.
As a result, the formula simplifies to:h = (1/2)gt² + h₀h.
(1/2)gt² + h₀h = 4.9t² + 50.
The height of the second rock is zero. As a result, we get:0 = 4.9t² + 50.
Solve for t:4.9t² = -50t² = -10.204t = ± √(-10.204)Since time cannot be negative, t = √(10.204) .
√(10.204) = 3.19 seconds.
The second rock takes 3.19 seconds to hit the water surface. The first rock is dropped one second before the second rock.
As a result, the time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be:Time taken = 3.19 + 1.
3.19 + 1 = 4.19seconds .
Therefore, the answer is option B, 4.9 seconds. It's because the rock is in the air for a total of 4.19 seconds, which is about 4.9 seconds rounded to the nearest tenth of a second.
The height of the bridge is 50 m, and two rocks are dropped from it. The time when the second rock was dropped is 1 second after the first rock was dropped. We need to determine the time the first rock takes to hit the water surface. The first rock is dropped one second before the second rock. As a result, the time taken for the first rock to hit the water surface will be 4.19 seconds.
To know more about acceleration due to gravity visit:
brainly.com/question/13860566
#SPJ11
A raft is made of 20 logs lashed together. Each is 45 cm in Part A diameter and has a length of 5.9 m. How many people can the raft hold before they start getting their feet wet, assuming the average person has a mass of 68 kg ? Do not neglect the weight of the logs. Assume the specific gravity of wood is 0.55. Express your answer using two significant figures.
The raft made of 20 logs lashed together can hold a maximum of 16 people before they start getting their feet wet.
This calculation takes into consideration the weight of the logs and the specific gravity of wood, along with the average mass of a person.
To calculate the maximum capacity of the raft, we first need to determine its total weight. Each log has a volume of
[tex](π/4)(0.45m)^2(5.9m) = 0.378 m^3[/tex]
and a mass of
.
[tex] (0.378 m^3)(0.55)(1000 kg/m^3) = 207.9 kg. [/tex]
So, the total weight of the logs is
20(207.9 kg) = 4158 kg.
Next, we need to consider the weight of the people that the raft can hold. Assuming an average mass of 68 kg per person, the total weight of the people the raft can hold is 16(68 kg) = 1088 kg.
Finally, we can calculate the maximum capacity of the raft by finding the difference between its total weight and the weight of the people it can hold:
(4158 kg - 1088 kg) / 68 kg/person = 14.8 people.
However, we must round down to 16 people, since fractions of people are not practical. Therefore, the maximum capacity of the raft is 16 people, after which they will start getting their feet wet.
To learn more about specific gravity click brainly.com/question/13258933
#SPJ11
A car drives at a constant speed of 21 m/s around a circle of radius 100m. What is the centripetal acceleration of the car
The centripetal acceleration of the car driving at a constant speed of 21 m/s around a circle with a radius of 100 m is calculated to be 4.41[tex]m/s^2.[/tex]
To find the centripetal acceleration of the car, we can use the formula:
a = [tex]v^2[/tex] / r
where "a" represents the centripetal acceleration, "v" is the velocity of the car, and "r" is the radius of the circular path.
Given that the car drives at a constant speed of 21 m/s and the radius of the circle is 100 m, we can substitute these values into the formula to calculate the centripetal acceleration.
a = (21[tex]m/s)^2[/tex]/ 100 m
a = 441 [tex]m^2/s^2[/tex]/ 100 m
a = 4.41 [tex]m/s^2[/tex]
Therefore, the centripetal acceleration of the car is 4.41[tex]m/s^2.[/tex] This centripetal acceleration represents the inward acceleration that keeps the car moving in a circular path, and its magnitude is determined by the square of the velocity divided by the radius of the circle.
For more such information on: centripetal acceleration
https://brainly.com/question/22103069
#SPJ8
A car with mass 1.8 × 103 kg starts from rest at the top of a 5.0 m long driveway that is inclined at 16.0° with respect to the horizontal. An average friction force of 3.6 × 103 N impedes the motion of the car
a. Determine the starting height of the car.
b. Find the work done by friction as the car rolls down the driveway.
c. Find the final speed of the car at the bottom of the driveway.
Please show work for each
Substituting the calculated values for h and the work done by friction, and solving for v: (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°) = (1/2) * (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * v^2 + Work
To solve this problem, we'll break it down into three parts: finding the starting height of the car, calculating the work done by friction, and determining the final speed of the car at the bottom of the driveway.
(a) Starting Height of the Car:
The potential energy of the car at the top of the driveway is equal to its gravitational potential energy, given by:
PE = m * g * h
where m is the mass of the car, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the starting height.
Given:
m = 1.8 × 10^3 kg
g = 9.8 m/s^2 (approximate value)
To find the starting height, we'll use trigonometry. The vertical component of the gravitational force is mg, and it can be related to the starting height by:
mg * sin(theta) = m * g * h
where theta is the angle of inclination of the driveway.
Substituting the given values:
theta = 16.0°
m * g * h = m * g * sin(theta)
Simplifying:
h = sin(theta) = sin(16.0°)
Now we can calculate the starting height:
h = (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°)
(b) Work Done by Friction:
The work done by friction can be calculated using the formula:
Work = Force * Distance
In this case, the force of friction is given as 3.6 × 10^3 N, and the distance is the length of the driveway.
Given:
Force of friction = 3.6 × 10^3 N
Distance = 5.0 m
Work = (3.6 × 10^3 N) * (5.0 m)
(c) Final Speed of the Car at the Bottom of the Driveway:
To find the final speed of the car, we'll use the principle of conservation of mechanical energy. The initial mechanical energy (potential energy at the top of the driveway) is converted into the final mechanical energy (kinetic energy at the bottom of the driveway) and the work done by friction.
The initial mechanical energy is equal to the potential energy at the top of the driveway:
Initial mechanical energy = m * g * h
The final mechanical energy is equal to the kinetic energy at the bottom of the driveway:
Final mechanical energy = (1/2) * m * v^2
where v is the final speed of the car.
Since mechanical energy is conserved, we have:
Initial mechanical energy = Final mechanical energy + Work done by friction
m * g * h = (1/2) * m * v^2 + Work
Substituting the calculated values for h and the work done by friction, and solving for v:
(1.8 × 10^3 kg) * (9.8 m/s^2) * sin(16.0°) = (1/2) * (1.8 × 10^3 kg) * v^2 + Work
Finally, we can solve for v.
Please note that I've provided the general steps to solve the problem, but the exact numerical calculations are omitted. To obtain the numerical values and perform the calculations, please substitute the given values and solve using a calculator or software.
Visit here to learn more about friction brainly.com/question/28356847
#SPJ11
QUESTION 1 0.25 points A student measures the diameter (D) of a cylindrical wire using micrometer of accuracy (0.01mm) as shown in the figure. What is the reading of the measured diameter? a. 5.53 b.3
The reading of the measured diameter is 2.0151 mm which is closest to option b. 3.
Given,Accuracy = 0.01mmDiameter of a cylindrical wire = DWe know that,Error = (Accuracy / 2)So, error in the measurement of diameter = (0.01 / 2) = 0.005 mmAs per the given diagram, the reading on the micrometer scale is 3.51 mm.The main scale reading is 2 mm.
So,Total reading on micrometer = main scale reading + circular scale reading= 2 + 1.51= 3.51 mmThe final reading of the diameter D is obtained by adding the main scale reading to the product of the circular scale reading and the least count of the instrument.
Least Count = 0.01 mmSo, D = Main scale reading + (Circular scale reading x Least count)= 2 + (1.51 × 0.01)= 2 + 0.0151= 2.0151 mm
Therefore, the reading of the measured diameter is 2.0151 mm which is closest to option b. 3.
To know more about diameter visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30460318
#SPJ11
If 2.4 C of charge passes a point in a wire in 0.6 s, what is
the electric current?
The electric current passing through the wire is 4 A (amperes).
Electric current is defined as the rate of flow of electric charge. It is measured in amperes (A), where 1 ampere is equivalent to 1 coulomb of charge passing through a point in 1 second.
In this case, 2.4 C (coulombs) of charge passes a point in the wire in 0.6 s. To calculate the electric current, we use the formula:
Electric Current = Charge / Time
Plugging in the given values, we have:
Electric Current = 2.4 C / 0.6 s = 4 A
Therefore, the electric current passing through the wire is 4 A. This means that 4 coulombs of charge flow through the wire every second.
It's important to note that electric current is a scalar quantity, representing the magnitude of the flow of charge. The direction of the current is determined by the direction of the flow of positive charges (conventional current) or negative charges (electron flow).
To know more about electric current click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1922668
#SPJ11
There are two kids on a seasaw and one child has a mass of M and the second has a mass of 2M. Is there a way to make it so the seasaw is balanced?
the possible multiple choice answers are
A: If both children sit on the opposite ends of the seasaw
B: If the 2M child sits half way between the end and the center while child M sits on the opposite end of the seasaw
C:If the 2M child sits at one end while the M child sits on the other side half way between the end and the center
D: There is no way it can be done
If the 2M child sits halfway between the end and the center while the child with mass M sits on the opposite end of the seesaw, the seasaw is balanced. The correct answer is option b.
To understand why, we need to consider the concept of torque, which is the rotational force applied to an object. Torque is calculated by multiplying the force applied to an object by the distance from the pivot point (fulcrum in this case). For the seesaw to be balanced, the torques on both sides must be equal.
In this scenario, if the child with mass M sits on one end, the torque on that side will be M multiplied by the distance from the fulcrum. To balance the seesaw, the 2M child needs to sit at a position that generates the same torque on the other side.
Since the mass of the second child is 2M, it means that to generate the same torque as the child with mass M, the 2M child needs to sit at a position that is half the distance from the fulcrum compared to the position of the child with mass M. This is because torque is directly proportional to both force and distance.
The correct answer is option b.
To know more about torque refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/30338175
#SPJ11
A 1.7 t car is accelerated at 1.7 m/s² for 11 s on a horizontal surface. If the initial velocity was 33 km/h and the force due to friction on the road surface was 0.5 N/kg, determine force applied in the same direction as motion.
The force applied in the same direction as motion, if the initial velocity was 33 km/h and the force due to friction on the road surface was 0.5 N/kg is 2040 N.
To determine the force applied in the same direction as motion, we need to consider the net force acting on the car. The net force can be calculated using Newton's second law of motion:
Net force = mass * acceleration
It is given that, Mass of the car = 1.7 t = 1700 kg and Acceleration = 1.7 m/s²
Using the equation, we can calculate the net force:
Net force = 1700 kg * 1.7 m/s²
Net force = 2890 N
However, we need to take into account the force due to friction on the road surface. This force acts in the opposite direction to the motion and is given as 0.5 N/kg. To determine the force applied in the same direction as motion, we need to subtract the force due to friction from the net force:
Force applied = Net force - Force due to friction
Force applied = 2890 N - (0.5 N/kg * 1700 kg)
Force applied = 2890 N - 850 N
Force applied = 2040 N
Therefore, the force applied in the same direction as motion is 2040 N.
To learn more about friction: https://brainly.com/question/15122221
#SPJ11